ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06294574Updated Sep 25, 2026

Improved Successful Retrieval Rate of HydroMARK Plus Breast Biopsy Site Marker in Comparison to HydroMARK as Well as Improved Surgeon Satisfaction

An interventional study of HydroMARK Plus Clip in Breast Neoplasm, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 46 studies in Breast Neoplasms by University of Alabama at Birmingham — 7 open to participants now, 11 under way, none of them phase 3. Breast Neoplasms · University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Planned enrollment
4th of 42
150 · median 35
Started
2025
with 3 others
No phase
22 of 46
4 open now
Primary completion
2027-12
later than 5 of 10 live
Registered
43rd of 46
by date

Among the 46 studies in Breast Neoplasms by University of Alabama at Birmingham, this one is the 4th largest by planned enrollment of the 42 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2025, is one of 22 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 5 of the 10 other live ones, and was the 43rd registered.

Breast Neoplasms

14,829 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,318 are open to participants now.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 46 studies in Breast Neoplasms by University of Alabama at Birmingham are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 7 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 2,398 Breast Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 1,569 (65%) set no upper age limit and 592 (25%) stop at 75 or younger; 103 take children under 18; 215 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 90 Years · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 46 studies in Breast Neoplasms by University of Alabama at Birmingham, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to test how successful the retrieval rate of the new HydroMARK Plus Breast Biopsy Site Marker in comparison to HydroMARK.

Read the detailed description

Study objectives

Primary objective

Assess the successful retrieval rates of the HydroMARK Plus clip

Secondary objective

Determine the level of satisfaction of the surgeon with the retrieval of the HydroMARK Plus clip

03

Conditions studied

  • Breast Neoplasm

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with clips scheduled for surgery with SCOUT localization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who didn't have surgery, patients younger than 18 years old
  • Patients older than 90 years old
  • Inmates
  • Non-English speakers
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hydromark plus clip placement

    Patients with a previously placed HydroMARK T3 coil clip or a clip made by another manufacturer and will have a HydroMARK Plus clip placed during the scout localization procedure for this study. Breast surgeons will perform retrieval and then complete a satisfaction survey to compare the two clips.

    Device: HydroMARK Plus Clip

Interventions

  • DeviceHydroMARK Plus Clip

    Each patient will undergo a breast localization procedure, and a HydroMARK plus clip will be placed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Retrieval rate of the HydroMARK Plus clip.

    The primary endpoint of HydroMARK Plus retrieval rate will be estimated with % and two-sided 95% CI using normal approximation. A paired McNemar Test will be used to compare HydroMARK Plus retrieval rate and HydroMARK retrieval rate, and the 95% CI for the difference of retrieve rate will be estimated using the Newcombe's Score method.

    Time frame: Date of HydroMARK Plus Clip placement to 1 week plus or minus 5 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Level of satisfaction of the surgeon with the retrieval of the HydroMARK Plus clip.

    Surgeon satisfaction will be evaluated using a Likert scale survey.

    Time frame: Date of retrieval surgery to 1 week.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 28 months after the start.

Of 2,662 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 28 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,772 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 28, 2024
First posted
Mar 5, 2024
StartActual
Aug 5, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: identifiers, verification date, oversight details and data sharing statement
1 update, last Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 4 other changes: identifiers, verification date, oversight details and data sharing statement

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06294574
Collaborators
Mammotome
Responsible party
Ceren Yalniz (Assistant Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2024
Start date
Aug 5, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Quenteeria Mooney
Contact
qmooney@uabmc.edu
205-996-1082
Ceren Yalniz, MD
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion