ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07715279VERIFICATIONUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Vericiguat for the Inhibition of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis Progression

A Phase 2 interventional study of Vericiguat (BAY1021189) and Placebo in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease, AORTIC VALVE DISEASES and Aortic Valve Stenosis, sponsored by West China Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Primary conditionAortic Valve StenosisRegistry: Aortic Valve DiseaseReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Aortic Valve Disease — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Aortic Valve Stenosis, a narrower term within Aortic Valve Disease.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by West China Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Sep 25, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
238
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is a condition in which the aortic valve progressively narrows and stiffens due to calcium deposition, eventually impairing blood flow from the heart to the body. No drug therapy has been proven to slow CAVS progression. Individuals with mild-to-moderate CAVS are managed with periodic monitoring until the stenosis becomes severe, at which point surgical or transcatheter valve replacement is the only treatment option. The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether vericiguat, an oral soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator, can slow the progression of mild-to-moderate CAVS.

The primary questions this study aims to answer are:

Does vericiguat slow the progression of aortic valve calcium accumulation, as measured by the change in aortic valve calcium score from baseline to 24 months, compared to placebo?

The study will compare vericiguat against a placebo (an inactive pill that is identical in appearance but contains no active drug). Both participants and the research team will not know which treatment each participant is receiving throughout the study.

Participants will:

Take vericiguat or placebo orally once daily for 24 months; Begin treatment at 2.5 mg/day and undergo a stepwise dose increase every two weeks to a target dose of 10 mg/day, provided the drug is tolerated; Attend approximately 8 scheduled study visits over two years, during which they will undergo cardiac imaging examinations (transthoracic echocardiography and non-contrast cardiac CT), blood sample collection, physical assessment, and completion of standardized questionnaires on quality of life and heart failure symptoms; Undergo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the beginning and end of the study, if there are no contraindications.

Approximately 238 participants will be enrolled across roughly 19 hospitals in China.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND AND UNMET NEED Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is the most common valvular heart disease worldwide and a leading cause of heart failure, valve replacement, and cardiovascular death in older adults. In Western populations, the prevalence of CAVS reaches 1-2% among individuals aged ≥65 years and approximately 12% in those aged ≥75 years. In China, prevalence is rising sharply as the population ages. Once the aortic valve peak velocity exceeds 2.5 m/s, the disease typically progresses to severe stenosis within a decade. Among patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who do not undergo intervention, two-year mortality approaches 50%.

Aortic valve replacement-either surgical (SAVR) or transcatheter (TAVI)-is currently the only effective treatment for severe CAVS. However, valve replacement carries substantial procedural risks (stroke, conduction block, paravalvular leak, bleeding, infection) and imposes a heavy economic burden. There is therefore an urgent clinical need for a pharmacological intervention that can slow CAVS progression at the mild-to-moderate stage and thereby reduce the proportion of patients who progress to severe stenosis requiring valve replacement.

Over the past two decades, numerous randomized controlled trials have tested pharmacological strategies for slowing CAVS progression, including intensive statin therapy (SALTIRE, TASS, ASTRONOMER), anti-osteoporotic agents (SALTIRE-2: denosumab and alendronate), vitamin K2 plus vitamin D supplementation, and DPP-4 inhibitors (evogliptin). All have yielded negative results. Recent evidence has reframed CAVS as an active fibro-calcific disease driven by valvular interstitial cell (VIC) osteogenic differentiation, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammatory signaling, rather than a passive degenerative process. The consistent failure of prior trials highlights the need for mechanistically novel therapeutic targets.

RATIONALE FOR TARGETING THE NO-sGC-cGMP PATHWAY Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) is a critical second messenger in cardiovascular homeostasis, synthesized from GTP by guanylate cyclases. Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)-the principal receptor for nitric oxide (NO)-is widely expressed in valvular endothelial cells and VICs. cGMP activates protein kinase G (PKG), which exerts multiple protective effects including suppression of VIC osteogenic differentiation, preservation of mitochondrial function, and attenuation of oxidative stress.

In calcified aortic valve tissue, the NO-sGC-cGMP signaling axis is markedly impaired despite compensatory upregulation of sGC subunits. The key mechanism involves localized oxidative stress that converts sGC from its active (reduced, heme-containing) form to an oxidized or heme-free form that is insensitive to endogenous NO, thereby limiting cGMP production. Our group has further demonstrated that serum cGMP concentrations are significantly reduced in patients with CAVS and correlate inversely with CT-derived aortic valve calcium (AVC) scores and echocardiographic mean pressure gradients, supporting cGMP-PKG pathway downregulation as a hallmark of CAVS progression.

sGC stimulators are a novel drug class that can restore this pathway through a dual mechanism: (1) direct, NO-independent stimulation of sGC to generate cGMP, and (2) enhancement of sGC sensitivity to residual endogenous NO. This property allows sGC stimulators to function effectively in the oxidative valvular microenvironment, overcoming the limitation of conventional NO donors.

PRECLINICAL EVIDENCE FOR VERICIGUAT IN CAVS

Vericiguat is a novel oral sGC stimulator with a long half-life (\~22 hours) enabling once-daily dosing and favorable pharmacokinetics. Our research group has systematically characterized its anti-calcification effects across three experimental levels:

  1. Cellular level: In human VICs cultured under calcifying conditions, vericiguat (500 nM and 1 μM) significantly reduced osteogenic markers, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and RUNX2 protein expression (P\<0.01). Among multiple cGMP agonists tested (BNP, sildenafil, vericiguat), vericiguat exhibited the most potent anti-calcification effect.
  2. Tissue level: In ex vivo human aortic valve tissue cultured under pro-calcific conditions, vericiguat (1 μM) intervention for 21 days markedly reduced calcium deposition as assessed by Alizarin Red and von Kossa staining.
  3. Animal level: In two established mouse models of CAVD-LDLR-/- mice fed a high-fat diet and a wire-injury aortic valve model-vericiguat (3-10 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced leaflet calcification and thickening and improved hemodynamic parameters (peak transvalvular velocity, aortic valve area). The high-dose group (10 mg/kg/day) showed the greatest efficacy. Mechanistically, integrated transcriptomic, proteomic, and phosphoproteomic analyses revealed that PKGI phosphorylates ULK1 at Ser556, enhancing autophagic flux, preserving mitochondrial function, and reducing oxidative stress, thereby suppressing VIC osteogenic differentiation. Prkg1+/- heterozygous knockout mouse studies confirmed PKGI as the critical mediator of vericiguat's anti-calcification effect.

CLINICAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTING sGC STIMULATION IN CAVS Clinical validation of sGC pathway targeting in CAVS comes from an independent study of ataciguat, another sGC activator. In human ex vivo valve tissue, ataciguat enhanced sGC signaling and reduced BMP2 signaling. In a murine CAVS model, ataciguat significantly reduced aortic valve calcification. In its phase II randomized controlled trial, ataciguat slowed AVC score progression by approximately 70% over 6 months (P=0.051), providing the first human evidence that sGC pathway activation may exert disease-modifying effects in CAVS.

In the VICTORIA trial (N=5,050), vericiguat significantly reduced the composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.90, P=0.019) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction without increasing symptomatic hypotension or syncope. This safety profile is critical for CAVS patients, in whom hypotension could exacerbate transvalvular gradients and impair coronary perfusion.

STUDY DESIGN This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling approximately 238 participants with mild-to-moderate CAVS across roughly 19 hospitals in China. Participants are randomized 1:1 to vericiguat or matching placebo, stratified by baseline AVC score (200-600 AU vs. ≥600 AU), and followed for 24 months. Both arms receive guideline-directed background therapy for comorbidities throughout the study. The double-dummy design-in which placebo tablets match the three dose strengths of vericiguat (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg) in size, shape, color, and texture-ensures that participants, treating investigators, imaging personnel, and outcome assessors remain blinded throughout.

The primary endpoint is the change in log-transformed aortic valve calcium (AVC) score from baseline to 24 months. AVC progression was selected as the primary efficacy measure for three reasons. First, aortic valve calcification is the core pathological driver of CAVS, and calcium accumulation closely parallels hemodynamic deterioration across the disease spectrum; quantifying calcification progression therefore assesses the most upstream and potentially reversible driver of disease. Second, CT-based AVC measurement demonstrates markedly superior reproducibility compared with echocardiographic parameters. A hierarchical composite endpoint-comprising all-cause death, aortic valve-related clinical events, and AVC change, analyzed using the Win Ratio method-serves as a secondary endpoint to capture integrated clinical benefit.

POPULATION The study targets patients aged 35-80 years with mild-to-moderate CAVS. This disease stage represents the optimal window for pharmacological intervention: valve leaflets retain structural plasticity and have not yet undergone irreversible fibro-calcific remodeling, whereas patients with severe stenosis are likely to require valve replacement within a short timeframe and would not benefit from a 24-month drug trial. Key safety-driven exclusions-significant left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF \<50%), advanced heart failure symptoms (NYHA class III-IV), and baseline systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg-mitigate confounding from concomitant cardiac disease and minimize the risk of drug-related hypotension in a population with pre-existing afterload limitation. Full eligibility criteria are provided in the Eligibility section.

DOSE SELECTION RATIONALE

The dosing regimen mirrors the established titration schedule from the VICTORIA trial: vericiguat 2.5 mg once daily, doubled every 2 weeks to a target maintenance dose of 10 mg once daily. The rationale is as follows:

Phase I data: Across six phase I studies (265 participants), vericiguat was well tolerated at doses up to 10 mg once daily, with plasma cGMP concentrations rising in a dose-dependent manner. At 15 mg, dose-limiting pharmacodynamic effects (orthostatic reactions and syncope) were observed, establishing 10 mg as the safe upper limit. The half-life of approximately 22 hours supports once-daily dosing.

Phase II data: In the SOCRATES-REDUCED trial, vericiguat dose-dependently reduced NT-proBNP with the 10 mg target dose showing the most favorable efficacy signal while maintaining acceptable tolerability.

Phase III data: The VICTORIA trial confirmed that the 2.5→5→10 mg titration schedule achieved both efficacy and safety in a large heart failure population, importantly without excess symptomatic hypotension or syncope.

Preclinical dose-response: In LDLR-/- mice fed a high-fat diet, vericiguat at 10 mg/kg/day reduced peak transvalvular velocity by approximately 40% (P=0.0002), leaflet calcification area by approximately 50% (P\<0.0001), leaflet thickness from approximately 150 μm to 80 μm (P=0.0088), and RUNX2 expression by approximately 65% (P\<0.0001), with the 10 mg/kg/day dose consistently outperforming 3 mg/kg/day.

SAFETY MONITORING AND RISK MITIGATION The primary anticipated risk of vericiguat in the CAVS population is hypotension, given its vasodilatory mechanism. Risk mitigation includes exclusion of participants with baseline SBP \<120 mmHg or history of symptomatic hypotension; a conservative stepwise dose-titration schedule (2.5 mg starting dose, doubled every 2 weeks) with protocol-defined dose-reduction rules when SBP falls below 90 mmHg; investigator discretion to reduce concomitant non-evidence-based vasodilatory medications before reducing study drug; and continuous blood pressure monitoring at all scheduled and unscheduled visits. An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) conducts periodic reviews of unblinded safety data. Participants who permanently discontinue study drug are followed for the full 24-month study duration to permit intention-to-treat analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
  • AORTIC VALVE DISEASES
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Vericiguat
  • BAY1021189
  • Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase
  • sGC stimulator
  • sGC activator
  • Cyclic GMP
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis Reclassified

1,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 293 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 238 is above the median of 126 across 554 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

West China Hospital is the lead sponsor of 501 studies on the registry; 246 are open to participants now.

Compared within Aortic Valve Stenosis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Aortic Valve Disease. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The participant agrees to enter this clinical trial and consents to long-term follow-up;
  2. 35 ≤ age \< 80 years;
  3. Echocardiographically confirmed mild-to-moderate (peak aortic jet velocity ≥ 2.5 m/s and \< 4.0 m/s, aortic valve area > 1.0 cm², and mean aortic valve pressure gradient \< 40 mmHg) non-rheumatic aortic valve stenosis;
  4. Baseline aortic valve calcium score (Agatston score) ≥ 200 AU as measured by cardiac CT;
  5. Male participants, or female participants who are not of , or female participants who commit to avoiding pregnancy through 4 weeks after the end of the trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe aortic stenosis (AS peak velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s, or mean transvalvular aortic pressure gradient ≥ 40 mmHg, or aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm², or indexed effective aortic valve area \< 0.6 cm²/m²), or very mild stenosis (AS peak velocity \< 2.5 m/s), or a planned aortic valvuloplasty/replacement procedure;
  2. Concomitant severe mitral or tricuspid valve disease (moderate or greater mitral or tricuspid regurgitation, or prior mitral or tricuspid valve repair/valvuloplasty/replacement);
  3. Concomitant moderate or greater aortic regurgitation;
  4. Use, within 1 month prior to the screening visit, of medications affecting the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway (e.g., sildenafil, nitrates, etc.), or known to vericiguat or its components;
  5. (LVEF) \< 50%, or class III-IV (see Appendix 4 for NYHA classification criteria);
  6. Presence of a (except those with an expected cure) or other serious non-cardiac disease with a of less than 3 years;
  7. Rheumatic valvular heart disease;
  8. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 120 mmHg, or a history of symptomatic hypotension, or a history of hemodynamic instability or hypovolemia within the 4 weeks prior to screening;
  9. Presence of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (outflow tract obstruction defined as a peak left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient ≥ 30 mmHg at rest or after provocative testing);
  10. Infective endocarditis or complex congenital heart disease;
  11. Estimated \< 15 mL/min/1.73 m², or on dialysis;
  12. Severe pulmonary disease requiring continuous home oxygen therapy;
  13. Interstitial lung disease;
  14. Concomitant disorder of calcium-phosphate metabolism;
  15. Current use of warfarin;
  16. and AST ≥ 3 times the , or severe hepatic insufficiency (e.g., cirrhosis, chronic active liver disease);
  17. Inability to undergo contrast-enhanced CT, or contrast media allergy;
  18. Concomitant acute myocarditis, cardiac amyloidosis, cardiac sarcoidosis, or stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy;
  19. Presence of acute coronary syndrome (including unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) within 60 days prior to randomization, or an indication for coronary revascularization (percutaneous intervention/bypass surgery); or a need for coronary revascularization identified at the time of randomization;
  20. History of cerebrovascular accident (including or stroke) within 60 days prior to randomization;
  21. Psychiatric disorder or legal incapacity precluding the ability to provide ;
  22. Any medical condition, circumstance, or history that, in the investigator's judgment, would compromise the participant's ability to participate in or complete the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
238 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Vericiguat

    Vericiguat orally once daily.

    Drug: Vericiguat (BAY1021189)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Matching placebo tablets orally once daily

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Vericiguat 2.5 mg orally once daily, titrated every 2 weeks (2.5 mg → 5 mg → 10 mg) to a target maintenance dose of 10 mg once daily. Total treatment duration: 24 months

    Also known as: MK-1242, BAY 1021189

  • DrugPlacebo

    Matching placebo tablets orally once daily, with a dose-titration schedule synchronized to the vericiguat arm to maintain blinding. Placebo tablets are identical to vericiguat tablets (2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg dose strengths) in size, shape, color, and texture. The same SBP-based dose-adjustment rules are applied. Total treatment duration: 24 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Aortic Valve Calcium (AVC) Score at 24 months

    Change in log-transformed aortic valve calcium score from baseline, measured by non-contrast electrocardiographic-gated cardiac CT (Agatston method). Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: At 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hierarchical Composite Endpoint including Time to all-cause death, Time to aortic valve-related clinical events and Change in aortic valve calcification (AVC) score from baseline at 24 months (log-transformed).

    A three-tier hierarchical composite endpoint, compared using the Win Ratio method, ranked by clinical importance: Tier 1: Time to all-cause death. Tier 2: Time to aortic valve-related clinical events (aortic valve replacement \[TAVR or SAVR\] or first hospitalization for aortic stenosis). Tier 3: Change in aortic valve calcification (AVC) score from baseline at 24 months (log-transformed). A smaller increase (slower calcification progression) is favored.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  2. Change in Aortic Valve Calcium (AVC) Score at 12 Months

    Change in log-transformed aortic valve calcium score from baseline, measured by non-contrast electrocardiographic-gated cardiac CT (Agatston method). Higher scores mean worse outcome

    Time frame: At 12 months

  3. Change from baseline in aortic valve calcium volume

    The change in aortic valve calcium volume (in cubic millimeters) from baseline to 12 and 24 months, measured by non-contrast cardiac CT. Higher scores mean worse outcome

    Time frame: At 12 and 24 months

  4. Change in Aortic Valve Peak Velocity

    Change in transthoracic echocardiography-measured aortic valve peak velocity from baseline.

    Time frame: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  5. Change in Aortic Valve Mean Pressure Gradient

    Change in mean transaortic pressure gradient from baseline, measured by transthoracic echocardiography.

    Time frame: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  6. Change in Aortic Valve Area

    Change in aortic valve area from baseline, calculated by the continuity equation using transthoracic echocardiography measurements.

    Time frame: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  7. Time to First Aortic Valve-Related Clinical Event

    Time to the first occurrence of an aortic valve-related clinical event, defined as aortic valve replacement (transcatheter \[TAVR\] or surgical \[SAVR\]) or first hospitalization for aortic stenosis, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  8. Time to Aortic Valve Replacement

    Time to aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) follow-up period.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  9. Time to all-cause death and cumulative all-cause mortality

    Time to all-cause death and cumulative all-cause mortality during the 24-month follow-up period.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  10. Time to First Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event

    Time to the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), defined as a composite of: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, and aortic valve-related clinical events.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  11. Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score

    Change in KCCQ Overall Summary Score from baseline. The KCCQ score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Time frame: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  12. Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification

    Change in NYHA functional classification from baseline. The minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 4, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  13. Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Number and percentage of participants experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). AEs are coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities . Severity is graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events .

    Time frame: Baseline through 24 months

  14. Incidence of Events of Clinical Interest: Liver Function Abnormalities

    Number and percentage of participants with liver function test abnormalities meeting the following criteria: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥3× upper limit of normal (ULN), AND total bilirubin ≥2× ULN, AND alkaline phosphatase \<2× ULN.

    Time frame: Baseline through 24 months

  15. Incidence of Events of Clinical Interest: Symptomatic Hypotension

    Number and percentage of participants with symptomatic hypotension

    Time frame: Baseline through 24 months

  16. Incidence of Events of Clinical Interest: Syncope

    Number and percentage of participants experiencing syncope

    Time frame: Baseline through 24 months

  17. Incidence of Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events

    Number and percentage of participants who permanently discontinue study drug due to treatment-emergent adverse events. All non-serious adverse events occurring from the first dose of study drug through 14 days after treatment discontinuation are recorded in the adverse event case report form.

    Time frame: Baseline through 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Coronary Artery Calcium Score at 12 and 24 Months

    Change in coronary artery calcium score from baseline, measured by non-contrast cardiac CT (Agatston method). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: At 12 and 24 months

  2. Change in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parameters at 24 Months

    Change in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-measured parameters from baseline, including left ventricular mass index, extracellular volume fraction, and myocardial fibrosis burden (late gadolinium enhancement).

    Time frame: At 24 months

  3. Change in Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass Index

    Change in left ventricular mass index from baseline, measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Left ventricular mass is calculated as: LVM (g) = {0.8 × 1.04 × \[(IVSd + LVIDd + PWd)³ - LVIDd³\] + 0.6} / body surface area (g/m²).

    Time frame: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • West China Hospital, Sichuan Unversity
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610013, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang Y, Xu F, Song C, Wang X, Zhou H, Qu T, Li H, Luo Q, Lei W, Yin Y, Huang F, Chen M. Cyclic guanosine monophosphate-protein kinase G signaling attenuates aortic valve calcification through ULK1-mediated autophagy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2026 Mar 12;11(1):90. doi: 10.1038/s41392-026-02624-5. PubMed 41820291 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2029, 37 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 14, 2026
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
StartActual
Sep 24, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2029
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Sep 25, 2026→Sep 24, 2026 (actual)
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Start date Sep 25, 2026→Sep 24, 2026 (now actual)

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07715279
Collaborators
Bayer
Responsible party
Mao Chen (Director of Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
Start date
Sep 24, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Fangyang Huang, MD
Contact
fyhuang1989@wchscu.cn
+86-18980607283
Yan Wang, MD
Contact
gloriawang_98@163.com
+86-15319969201

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Vericiguat

Start the discussion