ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03292796CMOUpdated Oct 8, 2020

RCT to Investigate if Prostaglandin Analogue Drops Increase the Risk of Cystoid Macular Oedema After Cataract Surgery.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Prostaglandins in Open Angle Glaucoma and Cataract, sponsored by Julie Dawson. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-08.

Sponsored by Julie Dawson · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2016, registered Sep 2017).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Post-operative cystoid macular oedema (CMO) is a common complication causing visual loss following routine cataract surgery. This complication is more prevalent in eyes with excessive inflammation as they heal from surgery.

Prostaglandin analogues (PGA) are the commonest first line drugs used in the long-term treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG)- where they reduce the pathologically high pressure in the eye. Prostaglandins are inflammatory mediators.

In the post-operative care of glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery, there is a clinical dilemma whether to stop or continue the use of prostaglandin eye drops. Clinical practice is completely dichotomized between continuing and stopping PGA treatment in the postoperative period. There is conflicting scientific literature on the effect of PGA on the incidence of CMO; and only a single randomized control trial (Miyake K, Arch Ophthalmol 1999, 117:34-40), where the post operative regime is not applicable to present practice, compared the incidence of CMO following routine cataract surgery in POAG on PGA.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to answer the common clinical question of whether or not to stop PGA after routine cataract surgery. Cataract surgery is the commonest operation performed on the NHS and the prevalence of glaucoma is 5% in the population over 80 years old. Thus the clinical dilemma is a common one.

A current literature search reveals that a divided opinion over whether PGAs do increase the incidence of CMO. No study has yet established a causal relationship between the use of PGAs and the development of CMO. Anecdotal reports and small case series have associated peri-operative PGA use with the occurrence of CMO (Henderson BA et al, 2007 J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1550-1558; Moroi SE et al, 1999, Ophthalmology 106:1024-1029). Whilst, in direct contrast, other authors argue CMO as a rare phenomenon and the causative relationship is debated (Schumer RA et al 2000, Curr Opin Ophthalmol 11:94-100; Miyake K et al 2003 J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1800-1810)

The most similar previous study to the one proposed, was by Miyake K et al. (Arch Ophthalmol 1999, 117:34-40). The key difference, though, is in the postoperative drop regime of fluorometholone and diclofenac in that paper and current UK clinical practice of using dexamethasone. In terms of study design, this paper used an invasive method of investigating CMO by fundus fluorescein angiography compared to OCT proposed here.

A recent case report by Agange N \& Mosaed S (Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010) concludes with 'conclusions about causal relationships cannot be made without well-designed, prospective clinical trials addressing this issue'.

This study will therefore use drops that are routinely used in current UK clinical practice and add to the body of evidence that helps answer the question should PGAs be continued after cataract surgery so as to prevent the progression of glaucoma in patients.

  • Aim

    • This study investigates if the occurrence of CMO after cataract surgery is affected by the use of PGA drops by patients with glaucoma
    • The null hypothesis states there is no increase in the incidence of CMO on OCT scanning in the 4 weeks following cataract surgery whether PGA eye drops continue or are stopped.
  • Design

    • Randomised control study with parallel group design
    • Single masking of outcome assessors
02

Conditions studied

  • Open Angle Glaucoma and Cataract

Keywords

  • Open Angle Glaucoma
  • Cataract
  • Phacoemulsification,
  • Cystoid Macular Oedema,
  • Prostaglandin Analogues
03

In context

Glaucoma, Open-Angle

924 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma, Open-Angle; 117 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 80 across 692 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma, Open-Angle.

Browse Glaucoma, Open-Angle studies →

Lead sponsor

Julie Dawson is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertensive subjects undergoing cataract surgery (routine phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) AND on current topical glaucoma treatment with a prostaglandin analogue eye drop for at least 2 months prior to cataract surgery.
  • Subjects capable of giving

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with additional risk factors for macula oedema (eg. diabetic retinopathy, previous macula oedema, uveitis)
  • Subjects with advanced glaucoma

    • Advanced visual field loss (Humphrey Mean Deviation >-12dB)
    • Advanced glaucomatous disc changes (vertical cup-to-disc ratio >0.9)
  • Subjects with non-controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) (pre-operative IOP >22 mmHg)
  • Any to the use of topical prostaglandin drops
  • Any contra-indication to the use of routine post-operative dexamethasone 0.1% eye drops
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients unable to give
  • Intra-operative complication during cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Stop prostaglandin eye drops post op

    Stop prostaglandin eye drops post operatively. Prostaglandins either stopped or continued after cataract surgery. Latanoprost Travaprost Bimatoprost Tafluprost

    Drug: Prostaglandins

  • Other
    Continue prostaglandin eye drops post op

    Continue prostaglandin eye drops post operatively Prostaglandins either stopped or continued after cataract surgery. Latanoprost Travaprost Bimatoprost Tafluprost

    Drug: Prostaglandins

Interventions

  • Also known as: Latanoprost Travaprost Bimatoprost Tafluprost

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of cystoid macula oedema (CMO) at 4 weeks post operatively

    Occurrence of cystoid macula oedema (CMO) at 4 weeks post operatively.Cystoid macular oedema will be defined as an increase in the central macula thickness on the OCT with characteristic intraretinal changes in the 4 weeks following surgery.

    Time frame: 4 weeks post operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) at 4 weeks post-operatively.

    Intraocular pressure (IOP) at 4 weeks post-operatively. Intraocular pressure will be measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry, the standard method used in clinical practice to monitor glaucoma. This forms part of the standard post-operative examination following surgery.

    Time frame: 4 weeks post operatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Agange N, Mosaed S. Prostaglandin-induced cystoid macular edema following routine cataract extraction. J Ophthalmol. 2010;2010:690707. doi: 10.1155/2010/690707. Epub 2010 Nov 7. PubMed 21076526 ↗
  • Henderson BA, Kim JY, Ament CS, Ferrufino-Ponce ZK, Grabowska A, Cremers SL. Clinical pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Risk factors for development and duration after treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1550-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.013. PubMed 17720069 ↗
  • Miyake K, Ota I, Maekubo K, Ichihashi S, Miyake S. Latanoprost accelerates disruption of the blood-aqueous barrier and the incidence of angiographic cystoid macular edema in early postoperative pseudophakias. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;117(1):34-40. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.1.34. PubMed 9930158 ↗
  • Miyake K, Ibaraki N, Goto Y, Oogiya S, Ishigaki J, Ota I, Miyake S. ESCRS Binkhorst lecture 2002: Pseudophakic preservative maculopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Sep;29(9):1800-10. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00560-1. PubMed 14522305 ↗
  • Moroi SE, Gottfredsdottir MS, Schteingart MT, Elner SG, Lee CM, Schertzer RM, Abrams GW, Johnson MW. Cystoid macular edema associated with latanoprost therapy in a case series of patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology. 1999 May;106(5):1024-9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00528-X. PubMed 10328408 ↗
  • Schumer RA, Camras CB, Mandahl AK. Latanoprost and cystoid macular edema: is there a causal relation? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000 Apr;11(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200004000-00005. PubMed 10848227 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2016 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 34 months.

Of 41 phase 2 interventional studies under Glaucoma, Open-Angle, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 18. This study's 34 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 21, 2017
First posted
Sep 26, 2017
StartActual
Dec 7, 2016
Primary completionActual
Oct 21, 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 25, 2020
Last update
Oct 8, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03292796
Lead sponsor
Julie Dawson
Responsible party
Julie Dawson (Research Services Manager, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 26, 2017
Start date
Dec 7, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2019
Completion
Jul 25, 2020
Last update
Oct 8, 2020

Study contacts

Nuwan Niyadurupola, Consultant
principal investigator · Consultant Ophthalmologist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Prostaglandins

Start the discussion