ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03331874RCM-1Updated Oct 8, 2020

RCM to Diagnose BCC - Reflectance Confocal Microscopy to Diagnose Basal Cell Carcinoma

An observational study in Basal Cell Carcinoma, sponsored by Julie Dawson. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-08.

Sponsored by Julie Dawson · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
352
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the commonest non melanoma skin cancer in the UK and its incidence is rising. The Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Foundation Trust (NNUHFT) see and excise approximately 3,000 new cases of BCC each year. Many of these patients have a biopsy to confirm their diagnosis before being listed for surgical excision. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) involves using a machine which can examine the upper layers of the skin non invasively.

In clinically suspicious lesions, the Investigators will use RCM prior to biopsy with the aim of demonstrating that RCM can accurately diagnose BCC. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and utility of using RCM for the diagnosis of BCC in the NHS setting, thereby shortening the patient pathway and effectively using limited public resources. If the Investigators' study shows that RCM can accurately diagnose BCC in these patients then this would prevent the need for biopsy as a routine in these patients.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be recruited from the outpatient clinics of the Departments of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Foundation Trust. These will be patients who have been assessed in clinic by a consultant dermatologist or consultant plastic surgeon. They will be suspected of having a BCC on the head and neck region. Clinical and dermoscopic (a dermatoscope is a hand held microscope) images will be taken by the Medical Illustration at NNUHFT as part of their routine standard of care. Patients will be invited to participate in the trial and provided with a patient information leaflet. They will be given sufficient time to review the information sheet and ask questions. Patients will be consented to having reflectance confocal microscopy performed of the target lesion before undergoing biopsy for histology. These patients would be having photographs, including dermoscopic images, and a biopsy as part of their standard of care prior to their final treatment being determined - the only additional intervention is examination with the confocal microscope.

The images taken of the tumour by the reflectance confocal microscope will be anonymised. These images will then be examined by a different in house dermatologist who has undergone training in examining confocal images. The images will also be sent to a dermatologist in Modena, Italy who is experienced in interpreting confocal microscopic images - both of these dermatologists will be blinded as to the patient's history and the results of the punch biopsy.

The biopsies will undergo routine processing in our histopathology laboratory as normal and will be analysed by a pathologist who will be unaware of the findings on confocal microscopy.

The patients will undergo one additional intervention over-and-above their standard investigation and treatment pathway. The treatment pathway for the patients will not be lengthened or shortened by their participation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Basal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

  • confocal
  • basal
  • carcinoma
03

In context

Carcinoma, Basal Cell

389 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Basal Cell; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 352 is above the median of 142 across 95 observational studies indexed under Carcinoma, Basal Cell.

Browse Carcinoma, Basal Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Julie Dawson is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

See Above

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Patients 18 years or older with a suspected diagnosis of BCC of the head and neck region.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
352 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Basal Cell Carcinoma

    Diagnosis of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Reflectance confocal microscopy

    Diagnostic Test: Reflectance Confocal Microscopy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testReflectance Confocal Microscopy

    In-vivo microscope

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Specificity & Sensitivity of RCM in diagnosing BCC compared to standard histology

    Specificity \& Sensitivity of RCM in diagnosing BCC compared to standard histology

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inter- & intra-observer agreement in assessing RCM images

    Inter- \& intra-observer agreement in assessing RCM images

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Levell NJ, Igali L, Wright KA, Greenberg DC. Basal cell carcinoma epidemiology in the UK: the elephant in the room. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2013 Jun;38(4):367-9. doi: 10.1111/ced.12016. Epub 2013 Mar 18. PubMed 23496262 ↗
  • Sauermann K, Gambichler T, Wilmert M, Rotterdam S, Stucker M, Altmeyer P, Hoffmann K. Investigation of basal cell carcinoma [correction of carcionoma] by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo. Skin Res Technol. 2002 Aug;8(3):141-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2002.20345.x. PubMed 12236882 ↗
  • Gonzalez S, Tannous Z. Real-time, in vivo confocal reflectance microscopy of basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Dec;47(6):869-74. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.124690. PubMed 12451371 ↗
  • Goldgeier M, Fox CA, Zavislan JM, Harris D, Gonzalez S. Noninvasive imaging, treatment, and microscopic confirmation of clearance of basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Mar;29(3):205-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29050.x. PubMed 12614409 ↗
  • Marra DE, Torres A, Schanbacher CF, Gonzalez S. Detection of residual basal cell carcinoma by in vivo confocal microscopy. Dermatol Surg. 2005 May;31(5):538-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31157. PubMed 15962737 ↗
  • Nori S, Rius-Diaz F, Cuevas J, Goldgeier M, Jaen P, Torres A, Gonzalez S. Sensitivity and specificity of reflectance-mode confocal microscopy for in vivo diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma: a multicenter study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Dec;51(6):923-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.06.028. PubMed 15583584 ↗
  • Longo C, Farnetani F, Ciardo S, Cesinaro AM, Moscarella E, Ponti G, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Pellacani G. Is confocal microscopy a valuable tool in diagnosing nodular lesions? A study of 140 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jul;169(1):58-67. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12259. PubMed 23374159 ↗
  • Gerger A, Koller S, Weger W, Richtig E, Kerl H, Samonigg H, Krippl P, Smolle J. Sensitivity and specificity of confocal laser-scanning microscopy for in vivo diagnosis of malignant skin tumors. Cancer. 2006 Jul 1;107(1):193-200. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21910. PubMed 16615102 ↗
  • Eichert S, Mohrle M, Breuninger H, Rocken M, Garbe C, Bauer J. Diagnosis of cutaneous tumors with in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010 Jun;8(6):400-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2010.07333.x. Epub 2010 Feb 5. English, German. PubMed 20141551 ↗
  • Guitera P, Menzies SW, Longo C, Cesinaro AM, Scolyer RA, Pellacani G. In vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosis of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma using a two-step method: analysis of 710 consecutive clinically equivocal cases. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Oct;132(10):2386-2394. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.172. Epub 2012 Jun 21. PubMed 22718115 ↗
  • Peppelman M, Wolberink EA, Blokx WA, van de Kerkhof PC, van Erp PE, Gerritsen MJ. In vivo diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma subtype by reflectance confocal microscopy. Dermatology. 2013;227(3):255-62. doi: 10.1159/000354762. Epub 2013 Oct 18. PubMed 24158236 ↗
  • Castro RP, Stephens A, Fraga-Braghiroli NA, Oliviero MC, Rezze GG, Rabinovitz H, Scope A. Accuracy of in vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma: a comparative study between handheld and wide-probe confocal imaging. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun;29(6):1164-9. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12780. Epub 2014 Oct 22. PubMed 25338750 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03331874
Lead sponsor
Julie Dawson
Responsible party
Julie Dawson (Research Services Manager, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2017
Start date
Mar 3, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 27, 2019
Completion
Dec 31, 2019
Last update
Oct 8, 2020

Study contacts

Jennifer Garioch, Dr
principal investigator · Consultant Oncologist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion