ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03661762CAVAUpdated Dec 10, 2020Results posted

Production of a Device to Obtain Continuous Ambulatory Vestibular Assessment (CAVA) - Healthy Volunteer Trial

An observational study in Optokinetic Nystagmus, sponsored by Julie Dawson. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-10.

Sponsored by Julie Dawson · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
18
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Clinical investigation of a medical device (CAVA) for recording eye movements. Healthy volunteers will wear the device for 23 hours a day, for 30 days. On 8 separate days of the trial they will induce optokinetic nystagmus (a normal reflex in response to full-field motion) by watching a short video of less than 1 minute in duration. The data will be analysed offline by a scientist, who will attempt to identify the dates that the nystagmus was induced.

Read the detailed description

Dizziness is a common condition that is responsible for a significant degree of material morbidity and burden on the National Health Service. There are multiple causes of dizziness, and these originate from pathologies affecting a large variety of different organ systems. Dizziness is usually episodic and short-lived, so when a patient presents to their health care provider, examination is often normal. As such, diagnosis is challenging and patients often experience significant delay in receiving a diagnosis. The investigators have developed a prototype device for monitoring dizziness and have tested it in a small group of volunteers. The results showed that their device is capable of accurately, precisely and reliably identifying periods of dizziness over a short period of time. Independent market research has confirmed that their device could meet the required clinical need, would be desired by clinicians, and that there is no equivalent solution currently available. The investigators have received an award from the Medical Research Council to trial their device in a large cohort of healthy volunteers. Once completed, they will be positioned well to test their device in a cohort of patients with a defined dizziness syndrome, before further testing their device in a more diverse patient population. Once validated, developed and brought to market, the device would provide early diagnosis and accurate treatment for a significant proportion of the patient population. This would save the National Health Service money by reducing multiple visits to General Practitioner clinics, reducing referrals to multiple specialist clinics, and reducing treatment required from falls and other conditions associated with dizziness.

The overall aim of this trial is to test a fully evolved device for the continuous recording of eye movements over a prolonged period of time. For the purpose of this study, the monitoring period is 23 hours a day, for 30 days. The device is composed of two components: a bespoke single-use sensor array that adheres to the participant's face, and a small reusable module that contains a battery, microcomputer, data storage facility, battery and connection port.

The investigators intend to confirm that the device will be able to capture any occurrence, of a minimum period of thirty seconds, of artificially induced nystagmus, within a 24-hour period of time. Each participant will be provided with the device and enough single-use electrode arrays to allow the array to be changed every 24 hours, for thirty days. Participants will be allowed to remove the sensor array for up to 60 minutes each day to allow them to wash and/or shower. On eight of the thirty days for which they wear the array, each participant will be required to induce physiological nystagmus by viewing optokinetic video footage. The footage will be viewed on a portable screen (of a deactivated mobile phone) inside a Virtual Reality headset. These will be issued to the participants at the beginning of the trial. Participants will undertake the procedure whilst stationary for the first four days, and whilst walking gently on the spot for the remaining four days. The identity of these days will not be revealed to the blinded investigator who will later analyse the data. At the end of the thirty-day trial, the sensitivity and specificity of the device will be determined by assessing whether the data can be used to correctly identify the dates that participants induced nystagmus.

02

Conditions studied

  • Optokinetic Nystagmus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • eye movements
  • electronystagmography
  • nystagmus
  • electrooculogram
  • vestibular assessment
03

In context

Nystagmus, Pathologic

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Nystagmus, Pathologic; 3 are open to participants now.

Browse Nystagmus, Pathologic studies →

Lead sponsor

Julie Dawson is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy volunteers, aged 18 or over.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 and over
  • Able to commit to 30 days of continuous wear of the trial device as per the study plan
  • Own a telephone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Potential participants who have a history of dermatological disease or damage around the forehead
  • Potential participants who have an allergy to plasters and/or medical adhesives
  • History of dizziness, vertigo, balance disorders, or syncope
  • History of hypertension or cardiac problems (uncontrolled, acute or de-compensated phase)
  • History of ear disease, or previous ear surgery
  • History of psychotic/neurotic disorders or epilepsy
  • History of eye disease, or previous eye surgery
  • Unable to follow the testing protocol
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy Volunteers

    All trial participants are within this group. All trial participants will wear the CAVA device for up to 23 hours a day, for 30 days.

    Device: CAVA

Interventions

  • DeviceCAVA

    prototype device for monitoring dizziness

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity of a Computer Algorithm to Detect Artificially Induced Nystagmus

    Dates containing nystagmus. Of the \~450 days' worth of data captured during the study, 120 will contain artificially induced nystagmus. A computer algorithm has been developed at the University of East Anglia for detecting nystagmus. The key measurements are the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm's results when applied to data captured during the trial. This measurement will be assessed post-trial.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-trial Participant Questionnaire.

    A 2-page questionnaire producing qualitative and quantitative data. Participants rate different aspects of their experiences with the device using a sliding scale and have the opportunity to write more detailed descriptions.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Compliance With the Device.

    1 - There is a minimum of 80% compliance with wearing the device for each single day of the trial for a minimum of 80% of participants. 2 There is a minimum of 80% compliance with wearing the device for the entirety of the 30-day trial for a minimum of 80% of participants.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Data Usefulness

    The device provides less than 5% non-useful data for each participant. We will report the percentage of non-useful data (corrupted or flat-line data) that is captured for each participant.

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Data Usefulness

    The device provides less than 5% non-useful data for the entirety of the 30-day trial across all participants. We will report the percentage of non-useful data (corrupted or flat-line data) that is captured over the entire trial, across all participants.

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Event Marker Functioning

    During a return visit, the event marker on each device will be pressed and the time noted. Post-trial, the data on the device will be examined to confirm that an event was recorded on the correct date. This will produce either a positive or negative outcome, depending on whether the event marker button press is present in the data or not. The percentage of identifiable button presses across all devices will be reported.

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Time Stamp Accuracy

    The difference will be calculated between the time noted by the research team and the time logged by the device when the event marker was activated. The time difference (in hh:mm:ss) will be calculated across all devices and we will report the average and standard deviation of the clock drift.

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Accelerometer Functioning

    Participants will perform a number of head movements and the device data will be examined visually to confirm that they can be identified. This will produce either a positive or negative outcome for each head movement, depending on whether the movement is visible in the data or not. The proportion of successfully identified head movements will be reported.

    Time frame: 30 days

  8. Accuracy of Nystagmus Beat Direction

    Participants will undergo caloric testing at the end of the trial, during which they will wear conventional Videonystagmography (VNG) goggles as well as the CAVA device. The beat direction (whether the fast phase of the nystagmus is towards the left or right ear) will be determined from both sources of data during the period of nystagmus captured. This will produce either a positive or negative outcome, depending on whether the beat direction matches in both data sources. The proportion of matches will be reported.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  9. Accuracy of Nystagmus Onset Time

    Also from the data captured during caloric testing, the start time of nystagmus will be identified from both the VNG data and data captured by the CAVA device. The time difference (in mm:ss) will be calculated between the two data sources and the mean time difference will be reported.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  10. Accuracy of Nystagmus Finishing Time

    Also from the data captured during caloric testing, the finishing time of nystagmus will be identified from both the VNG data and data captured by the CAVA device. The time difference (in mm:ss) will be calculated between the two data sources and the mean time difference will be reported.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  11. Accuracy of Nystagmus Peak Time

    Also from the data captured during caloric testing, the time at which the nystagmus reaches its maximum slow phase velocity will be calculated from the VNG data and the data captured by the CAVA device. The time difference (in mm:ss) will be calculated between the two data sources and the mean time difference will be reported.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  12. Accuracy of Nystagmus Frequency

    Also from the data captured during caloric testing, the number of beats will be counted during the period identified as the nystagmus peak time. This will be calculated for both the VNG data and the data captured by the CAVA device. From the number of beats and time duration examined, the frequency of the nystagmus will be determined. The difference between the two systems will be calculated and the mean difference will be reported. The Unit of Measure will be Hz (number of beats per second).

    Time frame: 1 hour

  13. Data Drop-outs

    The device provides less 5 drop-outs for each single day of the trial for each participant. We will report the maximum number of drop-outs (periods when the device stopped logging) per participant, per day.

    Time frame: 30 days

  14. Data Drop-outs

    The device provides less 60 drop-outs for the entirety of the 30-day trial across all participants. We will report the total number of drop-outs that occurred over the entire trial, across all participants.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Results

Posted Dec 10, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHealthy Volunteers
Started18
Completed10
Not completed8

Outcome measures

PrimarySensitivity and Specificity of a Computer Algorithm to Detect Artificially Induced Nystagmus

Dates containing nystagmus. Of the \~450 days' worth of data captured during the study, 120 will contain artificially induced nystagmus. A computer algorithm has been developed at the University of East Anglia for detecting nystagmus. The key measurements are the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm's results when applied to data captured during the trial. This measurement will be assessed post-trial.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · Percent
Sensitivity and Specificity of a Computer Algorithm to Detect Artificially Induced Nystagmus
PercentHealthy Volunteers
Sensitivity99.1
Specificity98.6
SecondaryPost-trial Participant Questionnaire.

A 2-page questionnaire producing qualitative and quantitative data. Participants rate different aspects of their experiences with the device using a sliding scale and have the opportunity to write more detailed descriptions.

Time frame:
30 days

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryCompliance With the Device.

1 - There is a minimum of 80% compliance with wearing the device for each single day of the trial for a minimum of 80% of participants. 2 There is a minimum of 80% compliance with wearing the device for the entirety of the 30-day trial for a minimum of 80% of participants.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Compliance With the Device.
percentage of participantsHealthy Volunteers
Daily compliance82
30-day compliance100
SecondaryData Usefulness

The device provides less than 5% non-useful data for each participant. We will report the percentage of non-useful data (corrupted or flat-line data) that is captured for each participant.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of non-useful data
Data Usefulness
Percentage of non-useful dataHealthy Volunteers
Data Usefulness0 ± 0
SecondaryData Usefulness

The device provides less than 5% non-useful data for the entirety of the 30-day trial across all participants. We will report the percentage of non-useful data (corrupted or flat-line data) that is captured over the entire trial, across all participants.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of non-useful data
Data Usefulness
percentage of non-useful dataHealthy Volunteers
Data Usefulness0
SecondaryEvent Marker Functioning

During a return visit, the event marker on each device will be pressed and the time noted. Post-trial, the data on the device will be examined to confirm that an event was recorded on the correct date. This will produce either a positive or negative outcome, depending on whether the event marker button press is present in the data or not. The percentage of identifiable button presses across all devices will be reported.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of button presses identified
Event Marker Functioning
percentage of button presses identifiedHealthy Volunteers
Event Marker Functioning100
SecondaryTime Stamp Accuracy

The difference will be calculated between the time noted by the research team and the time logged by the device when the event marker was activated. The time difference (in hh:mm:ss) will be calculated across all devices and we will report the average and standard deviation of the clock drift.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · minutes per day
Time Stamp Accuracy
minutes per dayHealthy Volunteers
Time Stamp Accuracy-17.49 ± 1.47
SecondaryAccelerometer Functioning

Participants will perform a number of head movements and the device data will be examined visually to confirm that they can be identified. This will produce either a positive or negative outcome for each head movement, depending on whether the movement is visible in the data or not. The proportion of successfully identified head movements will be reported.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of movements identified
Accelerometer Functioning
percentage of movements identifiedHealthy Volunteers
Slow head turning97
Slow head nodding100
Slow head tilting100
Fast head turning93
Fast head nodding100
Fast head tilting97
SecondaryAccuracy of Nystagmus Beat Direction

Participants will undergo caloric testing at the end of the trial, during which they will wear conventional Videonystagmography (VNG) goggles as well as the CAVA device. The beat direction (whether the fast phase of the nystagmus is towards the left or right ear) will be determined from both sources of data during the period of nystagmus captured. This will produce either a positive or negative outcome, depending on whether the beat direction matches in both data sources. The proportion of matches will be reported.

Time frame:
1 hour

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryAccuracy of Nystagmus Onset Time

Also from the data captured during caloric testing, the start time of nystagmus will be identified from both the VNG data and data captured by the CAVA device. The time difference (in mm:ss) will be calculated between the two data sources and the mean time difference will be reported.

Time frame:
1 hour

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryAccuracy of Nystagmus Finishing Time

Also from the data captured during caloric testing, the finishing time of nystagmus will be identified from both the VNG data and data captured by the CAVA device. The time difference (in mm:ss) will be calculated between the two data sources and the mean time difference will be reported.

Time frame:
1 hour

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryAccuracy of Nystagmus Peak Time

Also from the data captured during caloric testing, the time at which the nystagmus reaches its maximum slow phase velocity will be calculated from the VNG data and the data captured by the CAVA device. The time difference (in mm:ss) will be calculated between the two data sources and the mean time difference will be reported.

Time frame:
1 hour

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryAccuracy of Nystagmus Frequency

Also from the data captured during caloric testing, the number of beats will be counted during the period identified as the nystagmus peak time. This will be calculated for both the VNG data and the data captured by the CAVA device. From the number of beats and time duration examined, the frequency of the nystagmus will be determined. The difference between the two systems will be calculated and the mean difference will be reported. The Unit of Measure will be Hz (number of beats per second).

Time frame:
1 hour

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryData Drop-outs

The device provides less 5 drop-outs for each single day of the trial for each participant. We will report the maximum number of drop-outs (periods when the device stopped logging) per participant, per day.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Number of drop outs
Data Drop-outs
Number of drop outsHealthy Volunteers
Data Drop-outs0.2353 ± 0.4372
SecondaryData Drop-outs

The device provides less 60 drop-outs for the entirety of the 30-day trial across all participants. We will report the total number of drop-outs that occurred over the entire trial, across all participants.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · Total number of drop outs
Data Drop-outs
Total number of drop outsHealthy Volunteers
Data Drop-outs4

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Healthy Volunteers0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)10/18 (55.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHealthy Volunteers
Redness under electrodesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders8/18
Over rubbed under left eyeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/18
Erosion under all electrode sitesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/18
Disturbed sleepProduct Issues1/18
Sore throatRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/18
Allergic reactionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/18
Swollen lymph nodesRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Healthy Volunteers
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years18
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Healthy Volunteers
Female12
Male6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers(Participants)Healthy Volunteers
Count of participants18
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03661762
Lead sponsor
Julie Dawson
Collaborators
University of East Anglia, Medical Research Council
Responsible party
Julie Dawson (Manager Research Services, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 7, 2018
Start date
Aug 23, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 12, 2018
Completion
Apr 5, 2019
Results posted
Dec 10, 2020
Last update
Dec 10, 2020

Study contacts

John Phillips, Consultant
principal investigator · Clinical Research and Trials Unit (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion