CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03287362Updated May 13, 2025

Effects of Schema Therapy vs. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs. Individual Supportive Therapy

An interventional study of schema therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-13.

Sponsored by Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The OPTIMA-Study: Optimized Treatment Identification at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry: An outline

Depressive disorders represent one of the most frequent diseases worldwide. Schema therapy, which was originally developed for patients with personality disorders and focuses on emotion activating techniques, became popular in the field of psychotherapy in the recent years and was also applied on axis-I-disorders such as depression.

The current study aims to close the gap of increasing popularity of ST and missing empirical evidence of its effectiveness. This aim breaks down into three main research questions dealing with (1) general effectiveness of ST measured by multiple operationalizations (i.e. depressive symptoms, biological markers, relapse prevention, or need for medication), (2) specific effectiveness of ST (i.e. interpersonal problems and emotion regulation), and (3) the identification of parameters in the sense of an individualized psychotherapy approach in order to fit patient needs with certain psychotherapy offers.

After participants have given informed consent, they undergo a comprehensive baseline measurement which covers psychometric measures (such as questionnaires and clinical ratings), biological parameters (blood samples, endocrine activity), neuropsychological testing (such as word fluency), and actimetry measures (circadian rhythms).

After finishing the diagnostic procedure, participants will be randomized to three different experimental conditions: (1) a schema therapy condition, (2) a cognitive behavioral therapy condition, and (3) an individualized supportive therapy condition. After undergoing a comprehensive baseline measurement process in study week one, patients participate in an intensive seven-week-treatment-program, in addition to the regular pharmacological treatment, which is not object of the study. The measures are repeated during the fourth and seventh week of psychotherapeutical treatment and on the occasion of a follow-up visit six months after discharge from the clinic.

Additionally, the investigators test among sub-samples the effects of psychotherapeutical interventions on psychophysiological outcomes, sleep-patterns, and neuronal substrates in the context of emotional regulation and social interaction.

Thus, the study will give valuables insights in the effectiveness of an innovative psychotherapy approach and breaks new ground in the field of individualized psychotherapy and its biological implications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • major depressive disorder
  • cognitive behavioral therapy
  • supportive therapy
  • schema therapy
  • biomarkers
  • neuropsychology
  • circadian rhythm
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Main diagnosis of major depressive disorder, single episode or recurrent, moderate or severe without psychotic symptoms according to DSM-5 criteria (F32.1, F32.2, F33.1, F33.2 according to ICD-10)
  2. age between 18 and 75 years
  3. informed consent to the study procedures and assessments (in written form)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Major depressive disorder, single episode or recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms (F32.3, F33.3 according to ICD-10)
  2. Severe mutism or stupor
  3. lifetime history of any psychotic or bipolar disorder
  4. severe neurological or internal concomitant diseases
  5. IQ \< 80; severe learning disability, brain damage or pervasive developmental disorder
  6. current alcohol or any illicit drug withdrawal syndrome according to DSM-5
  7. mental disorders secondary to a medical conditions or substance use disorders
  8. acute suicidality
  9. pregnancy and lactation period
  10. Missing eligibility for psychotherapy because of missing language skills
  11. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in preparation
  12. Participation in further scientific studies
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ST-arm

    one-third of the patients is randomized to schema therapy

    Behavioral: schema therapy

  • Active comparator
    CBT-arm

    one-third of the patients is randomized to cognitive behavioral therapy

    Behavioral: cognitive behavioral therapy

  • Placebo comparator
    IST-arm

    one-third of the patients is randomized to individualized supportive therapy

    Behavioral: individualized supportive therapy

Interventions

  • Behavioralschema therapy

    The intervention consists of a seven-week program of schema therapy, which is a further development of cognitive behavioral therapy, designed in a three-phase combined group and single session concept

  • Behavioralcognitive behavioral therapy

    The intervention consists of a seven-week program of cognitive behavioral therapy, which is the current gold standard of treatment

  • Behavioralindividualized supportive therapy

    The intervention consists of a seven-week program of individualized supportive therapy, including different therapeutic offers from the clinic and a high frequency of physician contacts.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. BDI-II (Beck-Depression-Inventory-II)

    Decrease in depression symptoms, measured by "benefit" changes in scores of BDI-II (Beck-Depression-Inventory-II) questionnaire (self rating) from baseline over the course of seven weeks of treatment up to six months after discharge from the clinic

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, and on a weekly base over the course of seven weeks of treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

Secondary outcomes

  1. MADRS (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale)

    Decrease in depression symptoms, "benefit" changes from baseline to week 4 and 7 of treatment up to six months after discharge from the clinic, clinical rating

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, in week 4 and 7 of the treatment.Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  2. CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview)

    Decrease in symptoms or recovery from DSM-5 diagnosis of depression, "benefit" changes from baseline to week 7 of treatment and up to six months after discharge from the clinic

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, in week 7 of the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  3. BSI (Brief Symptom Inventory)

    Decrease in general psychopathology, "benefit" changes from baseline over the course of seven weeks of treatment up to six months after discharge from the clinic

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, and on a weekly base over the course of seven weeks of treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  4. WHOQOL (WHO - Quality of Life)

    Increase in quality of life, "benefit" changes from baseline to week 4 and 7 of treatment and up to six months after discharge from the clinic

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, in week 4 and 7 of the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  5. Neuropsychological testing (including sections on episodic memory, working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, word fluency, sensitivity to interference, and attention)

    Increase of cognitive functioning, "benefit" changes from baseline to week 4 and 7 of treatment and up to six months after discharge from the clinic

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, in week 4 and 7 of the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  6. Decreased need for psychopharmacological medication

    Time frame: Comparison between baseline measurement before treatment start and end of therapy treatment of seven weeks

  7. Dropout rate from therapeutic treatment

    Time frame: Assessed after all participants were recruited, enrolled, treated and finished their final measurements (approx. after eight years)

  8. WHODAS (WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule)

    Decrease in symptoms or recovery from DSM-5 diagnosis of depression, "benefit" changes from baseline to week 7 of treatment and up to six months after discharge from the clinic

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, in week 7 of the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

Other outcomes

  1. PID-5

    The Personality Inventory for DSM-5

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given and in week 7 after finishing the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  2. YSQ-S2

    Young Schema Questionnaire

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given and in week 7 after finishing the treatment.. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  3. ATQ

    Automatic Thought questionnaire

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given and in week 7 after finishing the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  4. DAS

    Dysfunctional Attitude Scale

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given and in week 7 after finishing the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  5. NAQ

    Need for Affect Questionnaire

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given and in week 7 after finishing the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  6. IE-4

    a short scale to assess internal and external control beliefs

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given and in week 7 after finishing the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  7. ERQ

    Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given and in week 7 after finishing the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  8. RSQ-D

    Response Styles Questionnaire

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given and in week 7 after finishing the treatment. Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  9. MCTQ

    Munich ChronoType Questionnaire

    Time frame: Assessed in week 4.

  10. blood samples

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, in week 4 and 7 of the treatment.Additionally in a follow-up assessment six months after discharge from the clinic.

  11. endocrine parameters

    Time frame: Assessed as baseline measure after informed consent was given, in week 4 and 7 of the treatment.

  12. ECG

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and in week 7.

  13. circadian rhythms

    Time frame: continuous measurement using a wearable actimeter during the whole therapy program of seven weeks

  14. imaging (MRT)

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and in week 7.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry
    Munich, 80804, Germany
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Renner F, van Goor M, Huibers M, Arntz A, Butz B, Bernstein D. Short-term group schema cognitive-behavioral therapy for young adults with personality disorders and personality disorder features: associations with changes in symptomatic distress, schemas, schema modes and coping styles. Behav Res Ther. 2013 Aug;51(8):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 May 31. PubMed 23778056 ↗
  • Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, Patten SB, Freedman G, Murray CJ, Vos T, Whiteford HA. Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):e1001547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547. Epub 2013 Nov 5. PubMed 24223526 ↗
  • Kopf-Beck J, Zimmermann P, Egli S, Rein M, Kappelmann N, Fietz J, Tamm J, Rek K, Lucae S, Brem AK, Samann P, Schilbach L, Keck ME. Schema therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy versus individual supportive therapy for depression in an inpatient and day clinic setting: study protocol of the OPTIMA-RCT. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02880-x. PubMed 33054737 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03287362
Lead sponsor
Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry
Collaborators
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2017
Start date
Sep 13, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
May 13, 2025

Study contacts

Johannes M. Kopf-Beck, PhD
principal investigator · Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion