ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07813169iTMMDDUpdated Sep 10, 2026

Study on iTBS Regulating the Reward Circuit Function to Improve Anhedonia in Depression

An interventional study of Left DLPFC + OFC iTBS and Left DLPFC iTBS in Major Depression, Anhedonia and Melancholic Depression, sponsored by Guo Wenbin. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Guo Wenbin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the proposed intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) protocol can effectively improve anhedonia symptoms in depressed patients. The stimulation targets in our protocol include (1) dual-target stimulation at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). (2) single-target stimulation at the left DLPFC.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Whether iTBS of dual-target stimulation (left DLPFC and OFC) can improve the symptoms of anhedonia and better than single-target stimulation at the left DLPFC?
  • Whether iTBS of the dual targets of left DLPFC and OFC can improve the symptoms of anhedonia by correcting the abnormal functional connectivity of DLPFC-NAc and OFC-sgACC, regulating the functional abnormalities of NAc and sgACC, and indirectly repairing the overall dysfunction of the reward circuit.
  • Researchers will compare dual-target stimulation to single-target stimulation and sham dual-target stimulation (a dedicated sham coil is utilized which produces an identical audible click and physical sensation) to see if the proposed iTBS protocol works to treat anhedonia.

Participants will:

  • Take 6 sessions of dual-target iTBS or single-target iTBS every day, for 5 consecutive days.
  • Visit our hospital at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 8weeks after the iTBS treatment completion, for clinical evaluation and brain image examination.
Read the detailed description

Anhedonia, defined as the diminished capacity to experience pleasure, is a core symptom of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Patients with anhedonia exhibit a pervasive loss of interest or pleasure in all or almost all previously enjoyable activities, which frequently leads to a profound reduction in the desire to engage in rewarding behaviors. Previous studies have reported that anhedonia occurs in 37% to 72% of depressed individuals. Patients with depression accompanied by anhedonia tend to respond poorly to medication and psychotherapy but show relatively better responses to conventional physical treatments such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Research has shown that improving anhedonia significantly enhances social functioning in depressed patients. Therefore, more effective treatments targeting anhedonia are needed. Achieving breakthroughs in therapeutic approaches and understanding their underlying mechanisms will contribute substantially to progress in this field.

Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) utilizes a stimulation pattern that closely mimics the natural firing frequencies of cerebral neurons. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated the clinical efficacy of intermittent TBS (iTBS) in alleviating depressive symptoms. Thus, this study aims to investigate and evaluate whether the proposed iTBS protocol can effectively improve anhedonia symptoms in depressed patients by regulating functional abnormalities.

The stimulation targets in our protocol include (1) dual-target stimulation at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). (2) single-target stimulation at the left DLPFC.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Whether iTBS of dual-target stimulation (left DLPFC and OFC) can improve the symptoms of anhedonia and better than single-target stimulation?
  2. Whether iTBS of the dual targets of left DLPFC and OFC can improve the anhedonia symptom by correcting the abnormal functional connectivity of DLPFC-NAc and OFC-sgACC, regulating the functional abnormalities of NAc and sgACC, and indirectly repairing the overall dysfunction of the reward circuit?
02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depression
  • Anhedonia
  • Melancholic Depression
  • Theta Burst Stimulation
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Major

3,041 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 588 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 79 across 2,530 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Guo Wenbin as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 18-45 years, and right-handed;
  2. Diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) by at least two qualified psychiatrists, according to the , Fifth Edition (DSM-5), with a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥ 20 or a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score ≥ 17;
  3. Evaluated by a psychiatrist as having prominent anhedonia, and meeting the cutoff criteria on two self-report anhedonia scales, including a Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, Chinese version (SHAPS-C) score ≥ 20, or a Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale, Chinese version (TEPS-C) score ≤ 76;
  4. Medication type and dosage remained unchanged for at least 4 weeks prior to treatment initiation and throughout the study period;
  5. MADRS item 10 score ≤ 4.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A history of epilepsy, seizures, stroke, or other serious organic brain diseases;
  2. Presence of severe infectious diseases, malignant tumors, or other major unstable medical conditions;
  3. Intellectual disability or developmental delay, presence of psychotic symptoms, or meeting the diagnostic criteria for other psychiatric disorders;
  4. A history of substance abuse or psychoactive substance use;
  5. Presence of intracranial implants (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes), or any other metallic objects in or near the head that cannot be safely removed (excluding dental fillings);
  6. to MRI or structural intracranial abnormalities detected on MRI;
  7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  8. Receipt of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) within the past 6 months, or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) within the past 3 months;
  9. Current daily use of lorazepam > 2 mg (or an equivalent dose), or use of antiepileptic drugs at any dose;
  10. Presence of strong suicidal ideation, or a MADRS item 10 score > 4.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Left DLPFC + OFC iTBS Group

    iTBS Parameter Specifications: 60 cycles of 10 bursts of three pulses at 50 Hz were delivered in 2-second trains (5 Hz) with an 8-second intertrain interval. The total duration of a single session is 10 minutes, comprising 60 trains and yielding a total of 1,800 pulses per session. Treatment Protocol for Left DLPFC+OFC iTBS Group: Stimulations are first delivered to the left DLPFC-NAc functional region using the specified iTBS parameters (1,800 pulses per session), performed 3 sessions daily with a 50-minute interval between sessions. Subsequently, stimulation was applied to the left OFC-sgACC functional region with the identical parameters (1,800 pulses per session), also performed 3 sessions daily with a 50-minute interval. This yields a cumulative total of 10,800 pulses over 5 consecutive days, for a total of 54,000 pulses.

    Device: Left DLPFC + OFC iTBS

  • Experimental
    Left DLPFC iTBS Group

    iTBS Parameter Specifications: 60 cycles of 10 bursts of three pulses at 50 Hz were delivered in 2-second trains (5 Hz) with an 8-second intertrain interval. The total duration of a single session is 10 minutes, comprising 60 trains and yielding a total of 1,800 pulses per session. Treatment Protocol for Left DLPFC iTBS Group: For Group B, stimulations are delivered solely to the left DLPFC-NAc functional region using the specified iTBS parameters, performed 6 sessions daily with a 50-minute interval between sessions. This yields a cumulative total of 10,800 pulses over 5 consecutive days, for a total of 54,000 pulses.

    Device: Left DLPFC iTBS

Interventions

  • DeviceLeft DLPFC + OFC iTBS

    iTBS Parameter Specifications: 60 cycles of 10 bursts of three pulses at 50 Hz were delivered in 2-second trains (5 Hz) with an 8-second intertrain interval. The total duration of a single session is 10 minutes, comprising 60 trains and yielding a total of 1,800 pulses per session. For the Left DLPFC + OFC iTBS Group, stimulation is first delivered to the left DLPFC-NAc functional region using the specified iTBS parameters (1,800 pulses per session), performed 3 sessions daily with a 50-minute interval between sessions. Subsequently, stimulation is applied to the left OFC-sgACC functional region with the identical parameters (1,800 pulses per session), also performed 3 sessions daily with a 50-minute interval. This yields a cumulative total of 10,800 pulses over 5 consecutive days, for a total of 54,000 pulses.

    Also known as: intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS)

  • DeviceLeft DLPFC iTBS

    iTBS Parameter Specifications: 60 cycles of 10 bursts of three pulses at 50 Hz were delivered in 2-second trains (5 Hz) with an 8-second intertrain interval. The total duration of a single session is 10 minutes, comprising 60 trains and yielding a total of 1,800 pulses per session. For the left DLPFC iTBS Group, stimulation is delivered solely to the left DLPFC-NAc functional region using the specified iTBS parameters, with 6 sessions performed daily, each with a 50-minute interval between sessions. This yields a cumulative total of 10,800 pulses over 5 consecutive days, for a total of 54,000 pulses.

    Also known as: intermittent theta burst stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total score of Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores will be evaluated before and after treatment. Total score: 0-60. A higher score means worse depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: *Baseline; * Day 2- Day 6 (every treatment day); *1 week post-treatment; *4 weeks post-treatment; *8 weeks post-treatment.

  2. Remission Rate of Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores

    The proportion of patients in each group achieving remission. Remission is defined as a MADRS score \< 11 points.

    Time frame: * Day 2- Day 6 (every treatment day); *1 week post-treatment; *4 weeks post-treatment; *8 weeks post-treatment.

  3. Response Rate of Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores

    The percentage change in MADRS scores from baseline, calculated as \[(MADRSpre - MADRSpost) / MADRSpre\] \* 100%.

    Time frame: * Day 2- Day 6 (every treatment day); *1 week post-treatment; *4 weeks post-treatment; *8 weeks post-treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total score of the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale - Chinese Version (TEPS-C)

    Total score: 20-120. The lower score means worse anhedonia.

    Time frame: *Baseline; *Day 6; *1 week post-treatment; *4 weeks post-treatment; *8 weeks post-treatment.

  2. Remission rate of Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale - Chinese Version (TEPS-C) score

    Remission means the TEPS-C score \> 76. The TEPS-C remission rate is the proportion of patients in each group whose TEPS-C scores increased to \>76 after treatment.

    Time frame: *Day 6; *1 week post-treatment; *4 weeks post-treatment; *8 weeks post-treatment.

Other outcomes

  1. Total score of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)

    Total score: 0-52. A higher score means worse depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: *Baseline; *Day 6; *1 week post-treatment; *4 weeks post-treatment; *8 weeks post-treatment.

  2. Total scores of the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) score

    Total score: 14-56. A higher score means worse anhedonia.

    Time frame: *Baseline; *Day 6; *1 week post-treatment; *4 weeks post-treatment; *8 weeks post-treatment.

  3. Brain MRI

    Resting-state magnetic resonance imaging scans will be conducted. Resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) changes before and after treatment will be assessed by fMRI. And its potential correlation with clinical symptom changes will be further explored.

    Time frame: *Baseline; *Day 6, up to 1day delay; *8 weeks post-treatment.

  4. Questionnaire: The Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) scores

    The Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) scores will be evaluated before and after treatment. Total score: 0-38. Higher scores indicate greater severity of suicidal ideation.

    Time frame: *Baseline; *Day 6; * 1 week post-treatment; * 4 weeks post-treatment; * 8 weeks post-treatment.

  5. Total Score of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS)

    The RBANS is an instrument used to assess cognitive functioning. The Total Scale Score will be evaluated. The standard score range is typically 40 to 160 (index score based). A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.

    Time frame: *Baseline; *Day 6; * 8 weeks post-treatment.

  6. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) Perseverative Errors scores

    The WCST is an assessment of executive function and cognitive flexibility. This measure evaluates the number of perseverative errors, which occur when a participant continues to apply a previous sorting rule after the rule has changed. For this 48-card version, the theoretical score ranges from 0 to 48. A higher score indicates worse cognitive flexibility and greater executive dysfunction.

    Time frame: *Baseline; *Day 6; *8 weeks post-treatment.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared to ensure strict confidentiality and protect participant privacy.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07813169
Lead sponsor
Guo Wenbin
Responsible party
Guo Wenbin (Professor, Central South University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
Start date
May 19, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 3, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 3, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Wenbin Guo, PhD
Contact
guowenbin76@csu.edu.cn
+86 73185360921
Wenbin Guo, PhD
principal investigator · Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion