An interventional study of Mobi mHealth app in Psychosis and Clinical High Risk for Psychosis, sponsored by University of California, Davis. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 30 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-18.
Sponsored by University of California, Davis · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The project aims to test the utility of implementing a mobile health application ("mhealth app") in early psychosis care in the community outpatient setting and in the university medical center setting. We will enroll 60 individuals in the early stages of psychotic illness who are receiving care in two UC Davis affiliated community based early psychosis outpatient programs: the Aldea Child and Family Services SOAR Programs in Napa and Solano Counties (Napa SOAR, and Solano SOAR), as well as the UC Davis Early Psychosis Programs (EDAPT and SacEDAPT clinics). Early psychosis (EP) participants will include individuals at high risk for developing a psychotic illness (termed "clinical high risk" or CHR) and individuals within two years of their first psychotic episode (termed "first episode psychosis" or FEP). Over the course of five months, EP participants will use the app on their mobile device to complete daily surveys assessing mood, social interactions and medication adherence, and weekly surveys assessing clinical symptoms, sleep and medication adherence. EP participants will also complete clinical assessments with UC Davis research staff at the initial and final study appointments (baseline and five month timepoints). Clinicians working in the three early psychosis programs will also participate in the study. In their clinical role, they will interact with EP participants' app data via the Dashboard, a secure web-based portal, and provide feedback on the clinical utility of the data that is provided on the dashboard. EP participants and their clinicians will also provide feedback on the impact of the app on the therapeutic relationship.
Although remission of psychotic symptoms following a patient's first episode of psychosis is achievable through pharmacological and psychosocial treatment, 50% of patients relapse within two years; 80% relapse within five. Relapse, defined as a recurrence of positive psychotic symptoms, is associated with cumulative increases in levels of psychotic symptoms following recovery, decreased social and community functioning, decreased quality of life, and increased hospitalizations. Given the negative impact on patients and their families, and the increasing cost of services as a function of relapse, development of effective relapse prevention strategies is imperative. Predictors of relapse amenable to treatment include: 1) clinical factors such as an exacerbation of clinical symptoms indicative of impending relapse; 2) treatment engagement factors such as medication adherence and therapeutic alliance; and 3) functioning factors such social impairments. Using mobile health technology in a community based outpatient clinic, we propose to specifically address these three types of relapse predictor variables.
The mobile health application tested in this study provides a user interface and a provider interface. The user interface is the mobile application (i.e. the "app") that patients interact with via their smartphone. This is designed to be simple and easily accessible. The app gathers "active" data, i.e. self-report surveys, which the user is alerted to via notifications on their device. Active data are analyzed and summarized for each patient on the "Dashboard", a provider-facing web portal for accessing concise and relevant information about a patient. The Dashboard provides up-to-date information regarding a patient's survey responses. Providers then use this information to better inform treatment decisions.
Specific aims and associated hypotheses are as follows:
Aim 1: Determine the feasibility and acceptability of the mhealth app in a community based outpatient early psychosis population. Hypothesis a: EPs will show high utilization of the mhealth app and low dropout, as well as high satisfaction and endorsement of continued use of the app. Hypothesis b: Clinicians will report high satisfaction and endorsement of continued use of the app.
Aim 2: Identify mhealth data related to key patient outcomes to inform calibration of patient status alerts. Hypothesis: Reductions in phone calls/text messages and/or increases in self-reported ratings of basic symptoms will predict psychotic symptom flares, increased clinic utilization, psychiatric ER visits and hospitalizations.
Aim 3: Evaluate the effect of the mhealth app on medication adherence, therapeutic alliance, and insight. Hypothesis a: After five months of app use, patients will report improved medication adherence, therapeutic alliance with their clinicians, and insight into their illness. Hypothesis b: After five months of use, clinicians will report improved therapeutic alliance with their patients.
Exclusion Criteria:
EP participants will be individuals who are either a) at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing psychosis and/or bipolar disorder, or b) First Episode Psychosis (FEP) participants meeting criteria for schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or another psychotic, non-schizophrenia diagnosis including those with bipolar disorder.
Other: Mobi mHealth app
Clinicians/treatment team members who are providing treatment services to the EP participants at one of the three early psychosis clinics.
Other: Mobi mHealth app
Mobile application (i.e. the "app") that patients interact with via their smartphone to collect daily and weekly survey information. Data is visualized on a clinician-facing Dashboard, which can be used to inform treatment.
Feasibility
Feasibility will be measured by utilization of the application (i.e. number of enrolled and active participants versus total patient population invited).
Time frame: 18 months
Acceptability/Satisfaction
Acceptability will be measured with satisfaction survey ratings of mhealth app by patients and clinicians.
Time frame: 18 months
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
a 24-item semi-structured clinical interview rating symptom severity at ascertainment across four domains: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, agitation/mania, and depression/anxiety.
Time frame: 18 months
Critical incidents
Includes information from patient chart: increased clinic contact, psychiatric ER visits or hospitalizations, and progression from a high risk state to first episode psychosis.
Time frame: 18 months
The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (Haro et al., 2003)
is a brief 12-item scale assessing illness severity and degree of improvement over follow-up that is appropriate for use in clinical or research settings.
Time frame: 18 months
Medication adherence
The MARS (Thompson et al., 2000) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire assessing medication taking behavior, attitudes to medication, and side effects.
Time frame: 18 months
Therapeutic Alliance
Therapeutic alliance will be assessed with the STAR (Mcguire-Snieckus et al., 2007), a 12-item questionnaire with patient and clinician versions assessing positive collaboration and positive clinician input (both versions), non-supportive input (patient version), and emotional difficulties (clinician version).
Time frame: 18 months
Insight
Patient's insight into their illness will be assessed using the IS (Birchwood et al., 1994), an 8-item self-report questionnaire assessing awareness of illness, need for treatment, and attribution of symptoms.
Time frame: 18 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of California, Davis