ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07645443FEEL-GOODUpdated Sep 22, 2026

FEEL-GOOD: A Multicenter Trial of a Mindfulness-Based Group Therapy in Young Adults With Early Psychosis

An interventional study of FEEL GOOD and Treatment as Usual (TAU) in Delusional Disorder, Brief Psychotic Disorder and Schizophreniform Disorder, sponsored by Stephanie Mehl. Recruiting at 8 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Stephanie Mehl · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
252
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 72 studies in Psychotic Disorders with a site in Germany — 20 open to participants now, 22 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Psychotic Disorders · Germany.

Planned enrollment
18th of 65
252 · median 85
Started
2026
with 5 others
No phase
33 of 72
14 open now
Primary completion
2028-09
later than 18 of 21 live
Registered
71st of 72
by date

Among the 72 studies in Psychotic Disorders with a site in Germany, this one is the 18th largest by planned enrollment of the 65 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 6 that started in 2026, is one of 33 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 18 of the 21 other live ones, and was the 71st registered.

Psychotic Disorders

1,587 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychotic Disorders; 281 are open to participants now.

Browse Psychotic Disorders studies →

Open to participants now

20 of the 72 studies in Psychotic Disorders with a site in Germany are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

14 more — sign in →

All 20 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Germany have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Germany →

Who these studies take

Of the 205 Psychotic Disorders studies recruiting now, 53 (26%) set no upper age limit and 143 (70%) stop at 75 or younger; 51 take children under 18; 41 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 16 Years to 35 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 72 studies in Psychotic Disorders with a site in Germany, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

FEEL-GOOD is a prospective multi-site single-blinded randomized controlled trial in young inpatients with acute early psychosis. Participants are randomized 1:1 to FEEL-GOOD plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. The intervention consists of one individual preparatory session and eight modularized group sessions delivered over four weeks involving four to eight participants at each session and including practice and homework tasks. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 4 weeks post-intervention, and 6 months follow-up, with the primary outcome being observer-rated total psychopathology as measured with the assessed by the total score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) post-treatment (4 weeks post baseline).

Read the detailed description

After providing written informed consent, participants diagnoses will be confirmed with SCID-5-RV interview. The investigator will complete astandardized screening checklist to verify that all inclusion and exclusion criteria are (not) met prior to enrollment in the study. If patients they meet the required inclusion criteria and the exclusion criteria participants will complete baseline data assessment before randomization which will be performed adaptively fromwithin the data management system SecuTrial. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation for each study site and will be balanced adaptively for gender and symptom severity as meas-ured by the PANSS total score (3 strata: mild with \<54 points, moderate with 54-74 points, and high with >74 points). Participants will further complete two assessments at 4-week and6-month post-intervention. The final assessment for each participant (t3) constitutes the individual end of study participation. As participation is voluntary, participants may withdraw from the study prematurely at any time. Any withdrawal, and the reason for withdrawal will be documented. Reasons for withdrawal may include: 1) withdrawal of consent by participant defined as drop-out (without the need to provide justification), or 2) incorrect inclusion (e.g., subsequent determination of ineligibility).

The FEEL-GOOD trial aims to evaluate a mindfulness-based group therapy for young inpatients with acute early psychosis in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) in comparison to TAU at post-intervention (t2 after 4 weeks) regarding total psychopathology, positive and negative symptoms, and general psychopathology measured with the Positive and Negative Symp-tom Scale (PANSS), as well as acceptance of symptoms, mind- fulness-related and emotion regulation skills in inpatients with EP in comparison to the control group only receiving TAU. The rationale is that early psychosis is a critical treatment window, while current psychological interventions show limited efficacy and low adherence in younger patients; mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) may improve emotional awareness, acceptance, and emotion regulation.

Participants aged 16 to 35 years with early psychosis are recruited across eight German study sites (inpatient hospitals).

FEEL-GOOD is delivered by trained clinical psychologists or psychiatrists and consists of one individual preparatory session and eight modularized 50-minute group sessions over four weeks. Clinical psychologists or psychiatrists will conduct the intervention based on a detailed manual. It will follow the principals of MBI adapted for patients with psychosis. The patients will join the group therapy sessions (open-enrolling group) at any time and then participate at 8 consecutive sessions. Prior to the first group session, there will be an individual session with the study therapist, in which the participants will discuss and write down individual treatment goals related to mindfulness, emotional awareness and emotion regulation.

The core of the intervention will be to provide insights into and to practice the essential elements of mindfulness and emotion regulation: attention to the present moment, as well as non-judgmental awareness and acceptance, and application of emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills. The following modules will be provided: (1) Information on emotions (2 sessions); (2) How to use mindfulness to better cope with distressing emotions and symptoms. (2 sessions); (3) How to reduce vulnerability towards negative emotions (1 session) and (4) Regulation of specific distressing emotions (anger, guild and shame: 2 sessions) and (5) a last session on crisis planning. The intervention was developed in cooperation with Peer Coworkers.

An earlier version of the FEEL-GOOD group intervention was piloted in a feasibility study at Vivantes Hospital Berlin.

Primary Outcome: The primary outcome will be observer-rated (blinded) total psychopathology as measured by the total score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) [post-treatment (4 weeks post baseline).

03

Conditions studied

  • Delusional Disorder
  • Brief Psychotic Disorder
  • Schizophreniform Disorder
  • Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder
  • Other Psychotic Disorder Not Due to A Substance or Known Physiological Condition

Keywords

  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Emotion regulation
  • Ecological momentary assessment
  • Early psychosis
  • First-episode psychosis
  • EMA
  • Schizophrenia spectrum disorder
  • Psychosis
  • Mindfulness
  • Mindfulness-based Interventions
  • Schizophrenia
  • Schizoaffective disorder
  • Delusional disorder
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 16 to 35 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of early psychosis, defined as first psychotic episode within the last 5 years as assessed with the Structural Clinical Interview for Research Version (SCID-5-RV)
  • DSM-5 schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorder confirmed with SCID-5-RV (DSM-5: 297.1, 298.8, 295.4, 295.9, 295.7, 298.8, 298.9) Currently receiving inpatient/day clinic treatment with a planned stay of at least 4 weeks
  • Interested in and willing to participate in FEEL-GOOD and/or TAU.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient German language abilities
  • Acute suicidality or acute threat to others
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
252 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FEEL-GOOD + TAU

    FEEL-GOOD + TAU. FEEL-GOOD consists of one individual preparatory session and eight modularized group sessions delivered over four weeks involving four to eight participants at each session and including practice and homework tasks. The core of the intervention will be to provide insights into and to practice the essential elements of mindfulness and emotion regulation: attention to the present moment, as well as non-judgmental awareness and acceptance, and application of emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills. The following modules will be provided: (1) Information on emotions (2 sessions); (2) How to use mindfulness to better cope with distressing emotions and symptoms. (2 sessions); (3) How to reduce vulnerability towards negative emotions (1 session) and (4) Regulation of specific distressing emotions (anger, guild and shame: 2 sessions) and (5) a last session on crisis planning. Patients additionally receive Treatment as Usual (TAU) as described below.

    Behavioral: FEEL GOOD

  • Active comparator
    TAU

    Participants receive treatment as usual (TAU), consisting of standard inpatient psychiatric care for early psychosis, including pharmacotherapy, supportive counselling, psychotherapeutic group interventions, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and social work as clinically indicated.

    Other: Treatment as Usual (TAU)

Interventions

  • BehavioralFEEL GOOD

    FEEL-GOOD consists of one individual preparatory session and eight modularized group sessions delivered over four weeks involving four to eight participants at each session and including practice and homework tasks. The core of the intervention will be to provide insights into and to practice the essential elements of mindfulness and emotion regulation: attention to the present moment, as well as non-judgmental awareness and acceptance, and application of emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills. The following modules will be provided: (1) Information on emotions (2 sessions); (2) How to use mindfulness to better cope with distressing emotions and symptoms. (2 sessions); (3) How to reduce vulnerability towards negative emotions (1 session) and (4) Regulation of specific distressing emotions (anger, guild and shame: 2 sessions) and (5) a last session on crisis planning.

  • OtherTreatment as Usual (TAU)

    Standard inpatient psychiatric treatment for early psychosis including pharmacotherapy, supportive counselling, psychotherapeutic group interventions, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and social work as clinically indicated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative Symptom Scale Total Score (PANSS; Blinded assessment)

    The primary outcome is observer-rated (blinded) total psychopathology as measured by the total score of PANSS after 4 weeks (t2). PANSS is widely used and the gold standard for psychopathological outcomes in people with psychotic disorders. It integrates positive, negative, and general psychopathological symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2); additional assessment at 6-months follow-up (t3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positive and negative symptoms, general psychopathology as measured by PANSS Positive, Negative and General Psychopathology subscales (Blinded assessment)

    The PANSS is a semi-structured interview to assess positive symptoms (PANSS Positive Scale), negative symptoms (PANSS Negative Scale) and general pathology (PANSS General Psychopathology Scale) of Psychosis.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  2. Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFFM-D) (Self Report, putative mediator)

    The FFMQ-D consists of 39 items forming the 5 subscales non-reactivity to inner experience, observing, acting with awareness, describing/labelling with words, and nonjudging of inner experience. Items are self-rated on a 5-point Likert-scale.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  3. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale total score (RSES) (Self Report, putative mediator)

    Global self-esteem will be assessed with the RSES that consists of 10 items self-rated on a 4-point Likert-scale.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  4. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) (Self Report, putative mediator)

    Participants will complete EMA via the m-Path mobile application starting after giving informed consent and randomisation into the trial and will end seven days post-intervention. There will be one prompt per day. Each prompt will include approximately 39-46 items, depending on conditional branching. The questions will cover several domains, such as current emotional state, psychopathological symptoms, mindfulness, emotional (in-)stability, and emotion regulation skills.

    Time frame: Starting at t1, EMA is assessed once a day during the intervention period including 7 days post t2-assessment at four weeks.

  5. Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-26) (Self Report, putative mediator)

    The TAS-26 is the German version of the TASand consists of 26 items with the 3 subscales: Difficulties Identifying Feelings, Difficulties Describing Feelings, and Externally Oriented Thinking self-rated on a 5-point Likert-scale.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  6. Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) (Self Report, putative mediator)

    The CERQ measures cognitive coping strategies, i.e., thoughts after negative events or situations on 9 subscales (self-blame, blaming others, acceptance, refocusing on planning, positive refocusing, rumination, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective, and catastrophizing), each consisting of 4 items that are self-rated on 5-point Likert-scales.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  7. Emotion regulation skills (ERSQ) (Self Report, putative mediator)

    The ERSQ consists of 27 items with 9 subscales assessing competencies that are considered essential for successful emotion regulation (i.e., attention, clarity, bodily awareness, understanding, acceptance, resilience, self-support, willingness to confront, and regulation). Self-reports are rated on a 5-point Likert-scale.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  8. Patient satisfaction questionnaire (ZUF) (Self Report, putative mediator)

    The ZUF-8 is the German version adapted for inpatients based on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). It consists of 8 items self-rated on a 4-point Likert-scale and assesses patients' overall satisfaction with the clinical treatment received.

    Time frame: 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  9. World Health Organization Quality of Life - 100 item version (WHOQOL-BREF) (Self Report, putative mediator)

    The WHOQOL-BREF assesses quality of life as a subjective evaluation, embedded within the individual's cultural, social, and environmental context using 26 items divided into 4 domains: physical health, psychological well-being, social relationships, and environment. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-scale.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  10. Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales to assess delusions (PSYRATS-D) and hallucinations (PSYRATS-H) (Blinded assessment)

    The PSYRATS is a semi-structured interview to assess delusions and hallucinations. It consist of 17 items assessing specific dimensions of hallucinations and delusions. Each item is observer-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (= absent) to 4 (=severe). The PSYRATS include two subscales: hallucinations with 11 items (PSYRATS-H) and delusions with 6 items (PSYRATS-D).

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  11. Depressive symptoms using the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) (Blinded asessment)

    The CDSS is considered as the gold standard to assess depression specifically in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The 9 items are observer-rated on a scale ranging from 0 (=absent) to 3 (=severe). It distinguishes between depressive symptoms, positive, negative, and extrapyramidal symptoms in adolescents and adults

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  12. Role Functioning Scale (RFS) (Blinded assessment)

    The RFS is a semi-structured interview that measures performance on 4 single rating scales: working productivity, independent living, immediate social network relationships (friends and family), and extended social network relationships (other social contacts) with observer ratings from 0 (= minimal functioning) to 12 (= optimal functioning).

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  13. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), (Blinded assessment)

    In the GAF scale, clinicians rate a patient's overall level of psychological, social, and occupational functioning using a single score ranging from 1 to 100. A score of 100 represents superior functioning, whereas a score of 1 indicates a persistent risk of serious harm to oneself or others, severe impairment in basic self-care, or a suicidal act with clear expectation of death. Changes of approximately 4, 10, or 12 points have been suggested to represent clinically meaningful differences \[15\].

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2), 6 months follow-up (t3)

  14. Serious adverse events (SAEs) (Blinded Assessment)

    Serious adverse events are assessed and consist of suicidality, suicide attempts, death, life-threatening events or hospitalization (if patients were previously in outpatient treatment).

    Time frame: Continuously during intervention and follow-up

Other outcomes

  1. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) (Self Report)

    The self-rating questionnaire Child Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) consists of five subscales: emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and physical neglect, each comprising five items, and an additional minimization/denial scale consisting of 3 items. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-Scale.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1)

  2. Cognitive Therapy Scale Revised for Psychosis (CTS-R-P)

    The Cognitive Therapy Scale Revised for Psychosis (CTS-R-P) is used as an adapted version to assess video or audio recordings of the group intervention and the preparatory session to evaluate adherence to cognitive therapy principles and the overall competence of therapists delivering the intervention. A random selection of 25% of all recordings are assessed.

    Time frame: During the intervention period (4 weeks)

  3. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Adherence Scale (MBCT-AS)

    Recordings of the group sessions are rated using the MBCT-AS in order to to assess how closely therapists adhere to the core principles and procedures of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy. A random selection of 25% of all recordings are assessed.

    Time frame: During the intervention period (4 weeks).

  4. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (Research Version)

    Diagnoses are confirmed using the structured interview SCID-5-RV. The SCID is an interview designed to systematically assess DSM-5 mental disorders for research purposes.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1)

  5. Assessment of Sociodemographic and Clinical Variables

    Socio-demographic data will be collected by raters at baseline to describe the study population. Core variables include age, gender, education, migration background, residential status and employment status. Clinical variables include the number of previous hospitalisations and outpatient treatments, medication and duration of illness. Medication, hospitalisations and additional treatments will be assessed additionally post-intervention and at 6-months follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline (t1), 4 weeks (t2) and 6-months follow-up (t3)

  6. Assessment of withdrawal and reasons for withdrawal

    Any withdrawal, and the reason for withdrawal will be documented. Reasons for withdrawal may include: 1) withdrawal of consent by participant defined as drop-out (without the need to provide justification), or 2) incorrect inclusion (e.g., subsequent determination of ineligibility).

    Time frame: During the intervention and at 6-months follow-up (T3)

07

Study locations

7 of 8 sites recruiting
  • University of Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, J5, 68169 Mannheim
    Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg 68159, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Lana Wölfl · ContactLana.Woelfl@zi-mannheim.de · 0049 (0) 621 1703 0
    • Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, Prof. Dr. · Principal investigator
    • Dusan Hirjak, Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
  • University of Augsburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Geschwister-Schoenert-Str. 1, 86156 Augsburg
    Augsburg, Bavaria 86156, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Nussbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich
    München, Bavaria 80336, Germany
    Recruiting
  • University of Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
    Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg 20246, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Schirin Gellert · ContactS.Gellert@uke.de · +49 (0) 40 7410 53210
    • Jürgen Gallinat, Prof. Dr. · Principal investigator
    • Martin Lambert, Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
  • Marburg University, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35039 Marburg, Germany
    Marburg, Hesse 35039, Germany
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • University of Cologne, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne
    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia 50937, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (CCM), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, , Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
    Berlin, State of Berlin 10117, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Kerem Böge, Prof. Dr. Dr · Contactkerem.boege@charite.de · +49 (0) 30 450 517 319
    • Malek Bajbouj, Prof. Dr. · Principal investigator
    • Kerem Böge, Prof. Dr. Dr. · Sub investigator
  • Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Hospital for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy und Psychosomatics, Dieffenbachstr. 1, 10967 Berlin
    Berlin, State of Berlin 10967, Germany
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Patients will not be asked whether they consent to individual data sharing. It might be possible to share some individual anonymized data based on agreement of the Data Protection Official of each individual study site.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 27 months after the start.

Of 455 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Psychotic Disorders, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 27 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 457 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 16, 2026
First posted
Jun 12, 2026
StartActual
May 27, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Sep 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07645443
Lead sponsor
Stephanie Mehl
Collaborators
German Research Foundation, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich, Charite University, Berlin, Germany, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Philipps University Marburg, University of Cologne, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Hospital Augsburg
Responsible party
Stephanie Mehl (Co-Principal Investigator, Berlin Institute of Health @ Charité) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 12, 2026
Start date
May 27, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Mara Bach
Contact
Mara.bach@charite.de
+49 (0) 130 226095
Isabella Zimmermann
Contact
isabella.zimmermann@vivantes.de
+49 (0) 30 450 676 368
Andreas Bechdolf, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, CCM, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
Stephanie Mehl, Prof. Dr.
study chair · Marburg University, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rudolf-Bultmann-Strasse 8,35039 Marburg, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion