CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03284697Updated Jan 12, 2018

Direct Pulp Capping With MTA and Calcium Hydroxide.

An interventional study of Direct Pulp Capping with Ca(OH)2 and Direct Pulp Capping With MTA in Reversible Pulpitis, sponsored by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak. Completed. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-12.

Sponsored by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim of the study was to evaluate and compare clinical and radiographic success with MTA and calcium hydroxide as direct pulp capping materials in cariously exposed mandibular molars.

Study was conducted in Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak in department of Conservative Dentistry \& Endodontics. Mature permanent mandibular molars with reversible pulpitis exhibiting occlusal pulp exposure from primary dental caries were included in the study. After excavation of caries and obtaining pulpal hemostasis, patients were randomly allocated into two groups- MTA and Calcium Hydroxide. Pulp was capped with respective allocated material and then tooth in both groups were restored according to standard protocol.

Read the detailed description

AIM AND OBJECTIVES The present study aims to

  1. Evaluate the success of direct pulp capping in mandibular molar teeth.
  2. Evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic success with MTA and calcium hydroxide as direct pulp capping materials.
  3. To assess the pain intensity before and after the direct pulp capping with visual analog scale (VAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS Study subjects were recruited from the patients visiting the Department of conservative dentistry and endodontics, PGIDS, Rohtak.

METHODOLOGY Prior to treatment, a thorough clinical and radiological examination was carried out.

A thorough history will be taken from each patient. Prior informed consent was obtained either from the patient or guardians after explaining the procedure, risks and benefits.

Clinical procedure:

Mature mandibular permanent molars exhibiting deep caries approaching pulp were chosen for the study.

The teeth were evaluated by periapical radiographs, periodontal probing, percussion test, and vitality assessment with thermal test and electric pulp test; the teeth determined to have reversible pulpitis were included.

All periapical radiographs were exposed by using constant kVP, mA, and exposure time (70 KVP, 8 mA, and 0.8 sec.) with a Rinn paralleling device and processed manually.

After administration of local anesthesia, rubber dam isolation of the involved tooth was done.

The tooth was disinfected by scrubbing with 2% chlorhexidine and 75% isopropyl alcohol.

Initially caries was removed with round bur under sterile water spray. Then, the remaining caries was removed carefully with a spoon excavator. After complete caries excavation, disinfection of exposed pulp with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite irrigation and a soaked cotton pellet was done.

Then sodium hypochlorite dressing was placed for 10 minutes to achieve adequate pulpal hemostasis.

Patients were randomly allocated into two groups (Group I - MTA and Group II -Calcium hydroxide) using a computer program This study was a double blinded trial i.e. both the patient and the investigator were not aware of the group to which the participant belongs.

GROUP I- CALCIUM HYDROXIDE GROUP Calcium hydroxide powder was mixed according to manufacturer's instructions and applied directly onto the exposed pulps.

The cavities were then restored with resin modified GIC liner followed by composite restoration.

GROUP II - MTA GROUP MTA was mixed according to manufacturer's instructions i.e. 1:3 water/ powder ratio and applied to exposure site with a sterile carrier.

Then cotton pellets soaked in normal saline was placed over MTA and cavity was sealed temporarily with intermediate restoration material.

After 24 hours, the patient was recalled and the setting of MTA was confirmed and the cavity was restored with resin modified GIC liner followed by composite restoration.

FOLLOW UP The patients were recalled periodically at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the direct pulp capping procedure for clinical (post operative sensitivity, pain, tenderness, vitality) and radiographic (widening of periodontal ligament space and periapical radiolucency) evaluation.

CRITERIA FOR SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME A positive vitality test. No pain on percussion. No widening of periodontal ligament on periapical radiograph. No clinical or radiographic signs and/or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis and pulp necrosis.

CRITERIA FOR FAILURE No response to pulp vitality test. Teeth exhibiting clinical or radiographic signs and/or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis and pulp necrosis.

Postoperative pain assessment:

This was done using Horizontal VAS scale preoperatively, 6, 12, 18 hours, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days after the procedure.

The pain VAS was completed by the patients themselves. The patients were asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity.

Patients were also asked to take analgesic (ibuprofen 400 mg/6-8h) according to the intensity of pain experienced by them and note down the details of analgesic intake on the proforma regarding the number of doses required and timing of the dose.

02

Conditions studied

  • Reversible Pulpitis

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient willing to participate in the study.
  • Age group- 15-40 years.
  • Mature permanent mandibular molars with reversible pulpitis.
  • Teeth exhibiting occlusal pulp exposure from primary dental caries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary teeth.
  • Teeth with irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain) or pulp necrosis, chronic periodontitis, cracked tooth, internal or external resorption, calcified canals, associated with sinus tract, and furcation or apical radiolucency.
  • Immuno-compromised, diabetic, pregnant and hypertensive patients.
  • Positive history of antibiotic and analgesic use within past one month of the treatment.
  • Failure to obtain authorization from patients.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    DPC with Ca(OH)2

    Direct pulp capping with Ca(OH)2.

    Procedure: Direct Pulp Capping with Ca(OH)2

  • Active comparator
    DPC with MTA

    Direct pulp capping with MTA

    Procedure: Direct Pulp Capping With MTA

Interventions

  • ProcedureDirect Pulp Capping with Ca(OH)2

    Calcium hydroxide powder was mixed with saline and placed over the exposed pulp tissue. The cavities were then restored with resin modified GIC liner followed by composite restoration.

    Also known as: Vital Pulp Therapy

  • ProcedureDirect Pulp Capping With MTA

    MTA was mixed using1:3 water/ powder ratio and applied to exposure site. Then cotton pellets soaked in normal saline was placed over MTA and cavity was sealed provisionally with IRM. After 24 hours, the patient was recalled and the cavity was restored with resin modified GIC liner followed by composite restoration.

    Also known as: Vital pulp therapy

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic success with MTA and calcium hydroxide as direct pulp capping materials.

    CRITERIA FOR SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME * A positive vitality test. * No pain on percussion. * No widening of periodontal ligament on periapical radiograph. * No clinical or radiographic signs and/or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis and pulp necrosis. CRITERIA FOR FAILURE * No response to pulp vitality test. * Teeth exhibiting clinical or radiographic signs and/or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis and pulp necrosis.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess the pain intensity before and after the direct pulp capping with visual analog scale (VAS).

    Patients were instructed to score the pain experienced by them using VAS scale. Pain was recorded preoperatively, 6, 12, 18 hours, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days following the procedure. Pain intensity was categorized as: no pain (0 - 4 mm), mild pain (5- 44), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75- 100 mm). Patients were also asked to take analgesic (ibuprofen 400 mg/6-8h) according to the intensity of pain experienced by them and note down the details of analgesic intake on the proforma regarding the number of doses required and timing of the dose.

    Time frame: Baseline to 7 days

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03284697
Lead sponsor
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
Responsible party
Sanjay Tewari (Principal, Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2017
Start date
Oct 14, 2016
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2017
Completion
Nov 30, 2017
Last update
Jan 12, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion