ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07808424Updated Sep 8, 2026

To Evaluate and Compare the Effect of Orthograde and Retrograde MTA Root End Filling After Periapical Surgery in Posteriors

An interventional study of Endodontic Micro-Surgery and Endodontic Micro-Surgery in Non Vital Teeth and Persistent Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis, sponsored by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak. Recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2026, registered Aug 2026).
  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate and compare the effect of orthograde and retrograde MTA root end filling on clinical, 2D and 3D radiographic success and quality of life after periapical surgery in posteriors- A Randomised Control Trial

Read the detailed description

RATIONALE:

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) has long been established as a reliable material in retrograde filling techniques, with extensive evidence supporting its biocompatibility and sealing ability. However, the use of MTA as orthograde root end filling has not been explored, leaving a gap in clinical evidence. Retrograde placement allows direct visualization whereas orthograde filling offers a less invasive approach that could potentially reduce patient morbidity and improve comfort. Comparing these two techniques is essential to determine whether orthograde MTA filling can achieve comparable or superior healing outcomes while enhancing patient quality of life. This study aims to systematically assess both approaches, providing evidence-based insights that may guide clinicians toward more effective and patient-friendly treatment strategies.

Aim: To evaluate and compare the effect of orthograde and retrograde MTA root end filling on clinical, 2D and 3D radiographic success and quality of life after periapical surgery in posteriors- A Randomised Control Trial

Primary objective: To evaluate and compare the effect of orthograde root end filling and retrograde root end filling on 2D and 3D radiographic and clinical healing at 1 year follow up

Secondary objective: To evaluate the quality of life after orthograde and retrograde root end filling

Setting: Study will be conducted in Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak in the department of Conservative Dentistry \& Endodontics.

Study design: A randomized controlled trial

Time frame: 12Months

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Vital Teeth
  • Persistent Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis

Keywords

  • persistant symptomatic apical periodontitis
03

In context

Periapical Periodontitis

280 studies on the registry are indexed under Periapical Periodontitis; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 60 across 245 interventional studies indexed under Periapical Periodontitis.

Browse Periapical Periodontitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak is the lead sponsor of 213 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients in which non-surgical retreatment is unfeasible (anatomical complexity, iatrogenic errors) or previously failed treatment in cases of persistent symptomatic apical periodontitis involving posteriors.
  • Tooth with a peri-radicular lesion of endodontic origin (chronic apical periodontitis) or endo-perio origin with the size of lesion ≥5mm.
  • Teeth with less than 10 degree root curvature.
  • Patients between 18-55 years of age.
  • No general medical for oral surgical procedures (ASA-1 according to the classification of the )
  • Tooth with adequate final restoration without clinical evidence of coronal leakage.
  • Good periodontal health condition at tooth level.
  • Able to completely understand and sign an form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients with systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension grade III, hepatic/renal disease, or systemic bleeding disorders) (Bharathi et al 2021).

      • Patients on anticoagulant/ antiplatelet drugs.
      • Fractured/perforated teeth.
      • Presence of vertical root fracture.
      • Pregnancy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    patients with persistant symptomatic apical periodontitis with orthograde MTA plug

    Procedure/Surgery: Endodontic Micro-Surgery Patients with non vital teeth with persistant symptomatic apical periodontitis with lesion size \>5 mm not responding to conventional endodontic treatment \& planned for apical surgery using orthograde plug of 6-7 mm.

    Procedure: Endodontic Micro-Surgery

  • Active comparator
    patients with persistant symptomatic apical periodontitis with conventional retrograde surgery

    Procedure/Surgery: Endodontic Micro-Surgery Patients with non vital teeth with persistant symptomatic apical periodontitis with lesion size \>5 mm not responding to conventional endodontic treatment \& planned for apical surgery using conventional retrograde root end filling technique.

    Procedure: Endodontic Micro-Surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndodontic Micro-Surgery

    Procedure/Surgery: Endodontic Micro-Surgery Patients with non vital teeth with persistant symptomatic apical periodontitis with lesion size \>5 mm not responding to conventional endodontic treatment \& planned for apical surgery using conventional retrograde root end filling technique.

  • ProcedureEndodontic Micro-Surgery

    Patients with non vital teeth with persistant symptomatic apical periodontitis with lesion size \>5 mm not responding to conventional endodontic treatment \& planned for apical surgery using orthograde plug of 6-7 mm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Periapical healing assessment

    Periapical healing comparison in 2 groups with 2d healing using Rud and Molven et al. (1987) score 1 is for Complete healing, score 2 for Incomplete healing (scar tissue), score3: Uncertain healing and score 4: Unsatisfactory healing (failure) 3d healing outcome will be measured by modified PENN 3D criteria which has score 1 for Complete healing, score 2:Limited healing, score 3:Uncertain healing and score4:Unsatisfactory healing.

    Time frame: Base line to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post operative pain

    To assess incidence and intensity of pain postoperatively at every 12 hours till 7 days using Visual analogue scale of 0-100mm line. Score 0 means no pain and Score 100 means maximum pain.

    Time frame: Base line to 12 months

  2. OHRQoL assessment

    OHIP-14 questionnaire will be used to assess the quality of life. It consists of questionnaire in seven dimensions: functional limitations, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. It will be scored using Lickert scale: never=0, hardly ever=1, occasionally=2, fairly often=3 and very often=4. Total score will be calculated ranging from 0-56 with higher score denoting the worst OHRQoL.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 24 hours, Day1, Day2, Day3, Day4, Day5, Day6 and Day7 after the treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wong J, Cheung GSP, Lee AHC, McGrath C, Neelakantan P. PROMs Following Root Canal Treatment and Surgical Endodontic Treatment. Int Dent J. 2023 Feb;73(1):28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.015. Epub 2022 Jul 21. PubMed 35871899 ↗
  • Shugars DA, Benson K, White RP Jr, Simpson KN, Bader JD. Developing a measure of patient perceptions of short-term outcomes of third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Dec;54(12):1402-8. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90253-0. PubMed 8957118 ↗
  • Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x. PubMed 9332805 ↗
  • Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Weinstein R. Quality of life after microscopic periradicular surgery using two different incision techniques: a randomized clinical study. Int Endod J. 2009 Apr;42(4):360-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01534.x. Epub 2009 Feb 7. PubMed 19220513 ↗
  • Moradi S, Disfani R, Lomee M, Naghavi N. Effect of root resection on sealing ability of orthograde apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium enriched mixture. J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jul;11(4):447-54. Epub 2014 Jul 31. PubMed 25584057 ↗
  • Stundzia L, Veberiene R, Graunaite I, Domeika A, Skucaite N. Retrograde Versus Orthograde Obturation in Relation to Root Resection: Evaluation of Microhardness of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate In Vitro. Int J Dent. 2025 Dec 2;2025:6647418. doi: 10.1155/ijod/6647418. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41377171 ↗
  • Zheng C, Wu W, Zhang Y, Tang Z, Xie Z, Chen Z. A novel simplified approach for endodontic retrograde surgery in short single-rooted teeth. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 31;24(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03879-6. PubMed 38297251 ↗
  • Harinkhere C, Patni PM, Jain P, Raghuwanshi S, Pandey SH, Bilaiya S. Comparison of the sealing ability amongst orthograde apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate plus, mineral trioxide aggregate repair HP, and Biodentine after root resection: a bacterial leakage study. Odontology. 2024 Apr;112(2):364-371. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00847-4. Epub 2023 Aug 26. PubMed 37632561 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07808424
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
Start date
Apr 29, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Dr. SHWETA MITTAL, MDS
Contact
shwetagoelendo@gmail.com
9255596960
Vinita Vinita, PG student
Contact
vinitabibyan51@yahoo.com
8708666510

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion