ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03277677Updated Mar 9, 2021

The Effect of Fluid Resuscitation With 0.9% Sodium Chloride Versus Balanced Crystalloid Solution on Renal Function of Sepsis Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Normal saline and Ringer's Acetate in Sepsis, Septic Shock and Acute Kidney Injury, sponsored by Chulalongkorn University. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-09.

Primary conditionShock, SepticRegistry: SepsisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sepsis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Shock, Septic
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Shock, Septic, a narrower term within Sepsis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Chulalongkorn University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
116
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The high chloride content of 0.9%sodium chloride (0.9%NaCl) leads to adverse pathophysiological effects in both animals and healthy human volunteers. Small randomized trials confirm that the hyperchloremic acidosis induced by 0.9%NaCl also occurs in patients. A strong signal is emerging from recent large propensity-matched and cohort studies for the adverse effects that 0.9% NaCl has on the clinical outcome in surgical and critically ill patients when compared with balanced crystalloids. Major complications are the increased incidences of acute kidney injury and the need for renal replacement therapy, and that pathological hyperchloremia may increase postoperative mortality.

Fluid resuscitation with 0.9% NaCl in animals with sepsis resulted in hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, worsened AKI, and increased mortality when compared with resuscitation with a balanced crystalloid solution.

Furthermore, hyperchloremic acidosis also resulted in increased concentrations of circulating inflammatory mediators in an experimental model of severe sepsis in rats, with a dose-dependent increase in circulating interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-a, and interleukin-10 concentrations with increasing acidosis.

Thus, in this study, investigators compared the effects of a balanced crystalloid solution with 0.9% NaCl on the renal function in severe sepsis/septic shock patients. Investigators hypothesized that balanced crystalloid solution resuscitation would decrease AKI incidence and severity and would improve immunomodulatory effect when compared with 0.9% NaCl resuscitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Septic Shock
  • Acute Kidney Injury

Browse trials for

03

In context

Shock, Septic Reclassified

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 116 is above the median of 79 across 636 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Chulalongkorn University is the lead sponsor of 322 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Compared within Shock, Septic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Who need fluid resuscitation in the Emergency Room (ER).
  • Who have fulfilled the criteria for sepsis/septic shock within the previous 24 hours according to sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection.

    o Patients with infection and resulted from a host's systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to infection are defined as sepsis if meet the criteria 2 or more of

    • Temperature >38°C or \<36°C
    • Heart rate >90/min
    • Respiratory rate >20/min or PaCo2 \<32 mm Hg (4.3 kPa)
    • White blood cell count >12000/mm3 or \<4000/mm3 or >10% immature bands.
  • Patient who have Septic shock is a subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory and cellular/metabolic abnormalities are profound enough to substantially increase mortality.

    o Patients with septic shock can be identified with a clinical construct of sepsis with persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain MAP ≥65 mm Hg and having a serum lactate level >2 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) despite adequate volume resuscitation.

  • AND where is obtainable either from the patient or by proxy (first degree relative, spouse) if patients aren't in fully conscious status (eg.comatose, drowsiness, irritable).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined by baseline serum creatinine > 2.0 in male and 1.5 in female.
  • Patients with End stage renal disease (ESRD) with or without renal replacement therapy.
  • Patients with active cardiac disease : severe valvular heart, cardiomyopathy, decompensated heart failure II-IV, severe pulmonary hypertension.
  • /AIDs Patients.
  • Allergy towards 0.9% NaCl or Ringer's Acetate.
  • Any form of renal replacement therapy.
  • Intracranial bleeding within current hospitalization.
  • Therapy with or non steroidal anti-inflammatory substance.
  • Patients who predicted not to survive more than 24 hours.
  • Pregnant and lactating patients.
  • Withdrawal of active therapy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
116 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    normal saline

    Drug: Normal saline

  • Active comparator
    balanced solution

    Drug: Ringer's Acetate

Interventions

  • DrugNormal saline

    for resuscitation in sepsis patients

  • for resuscitation in sepsis patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of acute kidney injury for any stage and severity

    Time frame: at day 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. The neutrophil function (chemotaxis, CD11b ) between two randomized groups at

    Time frame: 0, 24, and 72 hours after resuscitation.

  2. The monocyte function (HLA-DR) between two randomized groupsafter resuscitation.

    Time frame: at 0, 24, and 72 hours after resuscitation.

  3. The inflammatory marker (IL-6, IL-10) between two randomized groups at

    Time frame: 0, 24, and 72 hours after resuscitation.

  4. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) after randomization and after resuscitation with trial fluid

    Time frame: at 0,24 and 72 hours after resuscitation.

  5. Urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP)

    Time frame: at 0,24 and 72 hours after resuscitation.

  6. Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score. (excluding Glasgow Coma Score) at 72 hours after randomization.

    Time frame: at 72 hours after randomization.

  7. Need of renal replacement therapy within 72 hours after randomization

    Time frame: within 72 hours after randomization

  8. Days alive without renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: in 28 days after randomization

  9. Hospital length of stay for survivors sanctioned

    Time frame: at 28 days after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chulalongkorn university
    Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03277677
Responsible party
Nattachai Srisawat ,M.D. (Associated professor, Chulalongkorn University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 11, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2018
Completion
Mar 1, 2021
Last update
Mar 9, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ringer's acetate

Start the discussion