ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03273114Updated Sep 9, 2020

Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Cognitive Functional Therapy and Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy in Low Back Pain, Back Pain and Pain, sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-09.

Sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
148
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 125 studies in Low Back Pain with a site in Brazil — 10 open to participants now, 12 under way, none of them phase 3. Low Back Pain · Brazil.

Enrollment
20th of 122
148 · median 66
Started
2017
with 18 others
No phase
101 of 125
9 open now
Registered
77th of 125
by date
Lead sponsor
5 of 125
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Among the 125 studies in Low Back Pain with a site in Brazil, this one is the 20th largest by enrollment of the 122 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 19 that started in 2017, is one of 101 with no phase, and was the 77th registered.

Low Back Pain

2,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 579 are open to participants now.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Open to participants now

10 of the 125 studies in Low Back Pain with a site in Brazil are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

5 more — sign in →

All 10 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Brazil have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Brazil →

Who these studies take

Of the 332 Low Back Pain studies recruiting now, 92 (28%) set no upper age limit and 210 (63%) stop at 75 or younger; 8 take children under 18; 46 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 125 studies in Low Back Pain with a site in Brazil, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

There is evidence, of a single randomized controlled trial, that CFT is better than combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for chronic low back pain. However, this study had significant methodological shortcomings regarding the failure to carry out the intention to treat analysis and a considerable loss of follow-up of patients. As it is, it is important to carry out more studies involving CFT compared to other interventions already used in clinical practice and to correct these methodological shortcomings. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of Cognitive Functional Therapy in patients with chronic non specific low back pain.

Read the detailed description

Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE-MT group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.

03

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain
  • Back Pain
  • Pain
  • Signs and Symptoms
  • Neuromuscular Manifestations

Keywords

  • back pain
  • physiotherapy
  • exercise therapy
  • cognitive functional therapy
  • low back pain
  • backache
  • lower back pain
  • lumbago
  • multidimensional
  • biopsychosocial
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Low back pain for more than 3 months
  • Disability score of 14% or more on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
  • Being able to walk independently with or without support
  • Understand Portuguese well enough to be able to fill in the questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Main pain area is not the lumbar spine (from T12 to buttocks)
  • Main pain as leg pain (eg: nerve root compression or herniated disc with radicular pain / radiculopathy, lateral and central stenosis)
  • Less than 6 months after lumbar spine, lower limb or abdomen surgery
  • Invasive procedures for pain relief (ex: epidural injection, rhizotomy) in the last 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammatory/rheumatological diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Scheuermann's disease)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
148 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT)

    Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a behavioral intervention that addresses multiple aspects of low back pain. This approach focuses on changing the patient's beliefs, confronting their fears, educating them about pain mechanisms, increasing mental strength, and control of their body. This is done with functional tasks performed by individuals training them to reduce excessive muscle activity in the trunk and generate behavioral changes related to pain, from postures and provocative movements.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Functional Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT)

    The active comparator will be the combination of Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT).

    Other: Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Functional Therapy

    There will be four main components in the intervention, following the protocol used by O'Keefe et al. (2015): 1. The cognitive component will focus on on the multidimensional nature of persistent pain about individual beliefs, and how emotions and behaviors (movement and lifestyle) can reinforce a vicious cycle of pain and disability. 2. Specific Functional training is designed to normalize maladaptive or provocative movement and posture. 3. Functional integration directed to activities of daily life that are avoided by the patient (rolling in bed, sitting, sitting to standing, walking, bending and lifting) 4. Patients will be advised to gradually increase physical activity based on their preference, also focusing on sleep hygiene, stress, and management strategies

  • OtherCore Training Exercise and Manual Therapy

    According to the pragmatic clinical decision of the physiotherapist responsible for this intervention arm, participants allocated to the comparison group will be treated with active exercises will involve contractions of abdominal and back muscles in different functional positions, as well as joint mobilization or manipulation techniques applied to the lower back or pélvis, when necessary. Most patients in this group will receive exercises to perform at home, but not related to CFT.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END). The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Disability associated to low back pain

    It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global impression of recovery

    It will be evaluated based on the Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) which is an 11-point scale ranging from -5 ('vastly worse'), through 0 (no change) to +5 (completely recovered).

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization

  2. Pain intensity

    It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END) 13. The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

  3. Disability associated to low back pain

    It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

  4. Patient Satisfaction (mediator of outcome)

    This is a simple questionnaire from 1 to 5 asking the patients how satisfied they were with their treatment: 1 = satisfied, 2 = just a little satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = just a little dissatisfied, 5 = dissatisfied

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization

  5. Catastrophization (mediator of outcome)

    It will be evaluated by the question "When I feel pain, it's terrible and I feel it's never going to get any better."with the response options ranging from "Never do that" = 0 to "Always do that" = 10.

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization

  6. Depression (mediator of outcome)

    It will be evaluated by the question "During the past month have you often been bothered by feeling down, depressed or hopeless?" with the response options ranging from "Never" = 0 to "All the time" = 10.

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization

  7. Fear of movement (mediator of outcome)

    It will be assessed by the question "Physical activity might harm my back" and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree).

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization

  8. Stress (mediator of outcome)

    It will be evaluated by the question "Do you feel stressed? and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree)

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization

  9. Sleep (mediator of outcome)

    It will be evaluated by the question "Did you have sleep problems last month?" based on Subjective Health Complaints Inventory19. The response options will be "Not at all"=0, "A little"=1, "Some"=2, and "Serious"=3

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Instituto da Coluna
    Campinas, São Paulo 13084-759, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Meziat Filho N. Changing beliefs for changing movement and pain: Classification-based cognitive functional therapy (CB-CFT) for chronic non-specific low back pain. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:303-6. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 16. PubMed 25920336 ↗
  • Meziat Filho N, Mendonca R, Nogueira LA. Lack of confidence in the lower limb: Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) for a unilateral loading impairment in chronic non-specific low back pain. Case report. Man Ther. 2016 Sep;25:104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 12. PubMed 27052627 ↗
  • Vibe Fersum K, O'Sullivan P, Skouen JS, Smith A, Kvale A. Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2013 Jul;17(6):916-28. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00252.x. Epub 2012 Dec 4. PubMed 23208945 ↗
  • O'Keeffe M, Purtill H, Kennedy N, O'Sullivan P, Dankaerts W, Tighe A, Allworthy L, Dolan L, Bargary N, O'Sullivan K. Individualised cognitive functional therapy compared with a combined exercise and pain education class for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 1;5(6):e007156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007156. PubMed 26033941 ↗
  • Caneiro JP, Smith A, Rabey M, Moseley GL, O'Sullivan P. Process of Change in Pain-Related Fear: Clinical Insights From a Single Case Report of Persistent Back Pain Managed With Cognitive Functional Therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Sep;47(9):637-651. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7371. Epub 2017 Jul 13. PubMed 28704623 ↗
  • Bunzli S, McEvoy S, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan P, O'Sullivan K. Patient Perspectives on Participation in Cognitive Functional Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain. Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;96(9):1397-407. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140570. Epub 2016 Mar 24. PubMed 27013577 ↗
  • Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11. PubMed 27745712 ↗
  • O'Sullivan P. It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(4):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081638. Epub 2011 Aug 4. No abstract available. PubMed 21821612 ↗
  • Goyal M, Haythornthwaite JA. Is It Time to Make Mind-Body Approaches Available for Chronic Low Back Pain? JAMA. 2016 Mar 22-29;315(12):1236-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2437. No abstract available. PubMed 27002443 ↗
  • Menke JM. Do manual therapies help low back pain? A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1;39(7):E463-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000230. PubMed 24480940 ↗
  • Kent P, Mirkhil S, Keating J, Buchbinder R, Manniche C, Albert HB. The concurrent validity of brief screening questions for anxiety, depression, social isolation, catastrophization, and fear of movement in people with low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2014 Jun;30(6):479-89. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000010. PubMed 24281277 ↗
  • Paungmali A, Joseph LH, Sitilertpisan P, Pirunsan U, Uthaikhup S. Lumbopelvic Core Stabilization Exercise and Pain Modulation Among Individuals with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Pain Pract. 2017 Nov;17(8):1008-1014. doi: 10.1111/papr.12552. Epub 2017 Feb 25. PubMed 28042685 ↗
  • Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD000335. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000335.pub2. PubMed 16034851 ↗
  • Castro J, Correia L, Donato BS, Arruda B, Agulhari F, Pellegrini MJ, Belache FTC, de Souza CP, Fernandez J, Nogueira LAC, Reis FJJ, Ferreira AS, Meziat-Filho N. Cognitive functional therapy compared with core exercise and manual therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2022 Dec 1;163(12):2430-2437. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002644. Epub 2022 Apr 4. PubMed 35384931 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 33 months.

Of 1,231 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 26. This study's 33 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,286 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2017
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
StartActual
Sep 6, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 28, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 28, 2020
Last update
Sep 9, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03273114
Lead sponsor
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Responsible party
Ney Armando Meziat Filho (Assistant Professor, Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
Start date
Sep 6, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 28, 2020
Completion
Jun 28, 2020
Last update
Sep 9, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion