CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06566144Updated Aug 22, 2024

Standard Treatment for Non-specific Low Back Pain Combined With Multimodal Osteopathy Treatment on Pain Intensity and Functional Capacity

An interventional study of Standard treatment and Osteopathy treatment in Low Back Pain, sponsored by University of Nove de Julho. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-22.

Sponsored by University of Nove de Julho · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Low back pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal health problem with the highest prevalence in the adult population; globally, it represents a relevant cause of medical, social and economic burden. The aim of the proposed study is to determine the effect of a standard treatment for non-specific low back (CNSLBP) combined with multimodal osteopathy treatment on pain intensity and functional capacity.

Methods: This will be a blind randomized clinical trial, with 44 patients with CNSLBP, randomly assigned into two groups: Experimental group (EG) treated with therapeutic exercises and multimodal osteopathy treatment (n=22) and Control group (CG) treated with therapeutic exercises (n=22). Participants will receive treatment twice a week (total of 16 sessions). The primary outcome is pain, measured by numeric rating scale (NRS: score 0-11 points). Secondary outcomes are: Patient-specific functional scale (scored from 0 to 30), Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), finger-to-floor distance test (FFD). Participants will be evaluated pre- and post-treatment and after 1 and 3 months (follow-up).

Results: Analysis will be by intention to treat using linear mixed models. Comparisons between groups before and after treatment will demonstrate whether osteopathy treatment exerts a supplementary effect on pain and functional capacity in patients with CNSLBP. The data will be published after the study is completed. The study will support the practice of evidence-based physical therapy for individuals with CNSLBP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nove de Julho is the lead sponsor of 239 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (13%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals within the age range of 18-70 years;
  • Chronic low back pain in the region between the 12th rib and the gluteal fold, with a minimum duration of 6 weeks with or without referral of pain in the lower limbs;
  • no specific cause detectable, such as infection, neoplasia, metastasis, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, fracture, inflammatory process or radicular syndrome.
  • baseline pain: minimum intensity score of 3 out of 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = most intense pain) considered and verified by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of spinal disorders (local trauma, cauda equina syndrome, spinal canal stenosis, congenital abnormalities tumor);
  • Inflammatory or infectious diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia and vertebral osteomyelitis);
  • Previous lumbar spine surgery;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Regular opioid analgesics (≥2 times per week) or opioid patches;
  • Receiving disability benefits for back pain or even for another health reason;
  • Previous injections for back pain, such as facet joint blocks, nerve root or epidural steroid injection in the previous year;
  • Having undergone physical therapy, massage, acupuncture or any other therapeutic intervention for back pain in the previous two weeks;
  • Osteopathy techniques that are not used as a treatment for low back pain;
  • Neuropathic pain tested with Laségue and Valsalva clinical tests.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Osteopathy treatment

    The osteopathy treatment group (OTG) will be submitted to a clinical method considered the gold standard for the treatment of non-specific low back pain together with osteopathy treatment

    Other: Osteopathy treatment

  • Active comparator
    Standard treatment

    The Standard treatment group (STG) will only receive the gold standard method for the treatment of low back pain.

    Other: Standard treatment

Interventions

  • OtherStandard treatment

    The treatment to be used in the study is in accordance with the latest guidelines for chronic LBP \[George et al., 2021; Owen, et al., 2020\]. A warm-up will be performed by walking on a treadmill for 10 minutes, followed by 3 sets of 10 to 15 repetitions of exercise: bridge, cat, abdominal, straight leg raising, and oyster, and 3 sets of 30 to 60 seconds of each isometric exercise (front plank and side plank), where the therapist will assess the optimal amount of repetitions for each individual. The rest period between sets will be 40 seconds, and the rest period between exercises will be 1 minute. The total duration of the session will be 40 minutes \[Sipaviciene et al., 2020; Kim et al, 2020\].

  • OtherOsteopathy treatment

    The osteopathy treatment group (OTG) will receive the same standard treatment for low back pain as the STG, which will be applied twice a week and osteopathy treatment every 15 days for 8 weeks, totaling 4 sessions. The duration of the osteopathy sessions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Changes in pain intensity, will be assessed using the NPRS (Numerical Pain Rating Scale). This is an 11-point scale where 0 means "no pain" and 10 means "worst possible pain". NPRS outcome measures will be evaluated pre- and post-treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and one week and 3 months (follow-up).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disability caused by low back pain

    Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) will be used to measure disability caused by low back pain. The ODQ is a 10-item scale with higher numbers indicating greater disability. The questionnaire is self-report and includes the following groups of questions: pain intensity and its effect on personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, and travelling. Each subscale contains 6 questions and to each question a score from zero to four is assigned. The levels of disability are determined according to the total score as: no disability (0 to 4), mild disability (5 to 14), moderate disability (15 to 24), severe disability (25 to 34), and complete disability (35 to 50).

    Time frame: Baseline and one week

  2. Lumbar mobility

    Finger-to-floor distance (FFD) will be used to assess lumbar mobility in flexion.

    Time frame: Baseline and one week

  3. Patient-Specific Functional Scale

    Patients were asked to identify up to three important activities they were having difficulty with or were unable to perform due to their condition (e.g., low back pain). The assessment was conducted using an 11-point scale (ranging from 0 "unable to perform activity" to 10 "able to perform activity at pre-injury level") .

    Time frame: Baseline and one week

  4. Prognostic Risk Assessment

    The risk of poor prognosis among participants with low back pain, influenced by physical and psychosocial factors, was evaluated using the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST). The SBST is a 9-item questionnaire that stratifies patients with low back pain into three risk groups (low, medium, and high) that represent their prognosis regarding disability

    Time frame: Baseline and one week

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, Schneider MJ, Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA, Gilliam JR, Hendren S, Norman KS. Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):CPG1-CPG60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304. PubMed 34719942 ↗
  • Kim B, Yim J. Core Stability and Hip Exercises Improve Physical Function and Activity in Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020 Jul;251(3):193-206. doi: 10.1620/tjem.251.193. PubMed 32669487 ↗
  • Owen PJ, Miller CT, Mundell NL, Verswijveren SJJM, Tagliaferri SD, Brisby H, Bowe SJ, Belavy DL. Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;54(21):1279-1287. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100886. Epub 2019 Oct 30. PubMed 31666220 ↗
  • Sipaviciene S, Kliziene I. Effect of different exercise programs on non-specific chronic low back pain and disability in people who perform sedentary work. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Mar;73:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 3. PubMed 31923778 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06566144
Lead sponsor
University of Nove de Julho
Responsible party
Fabiano Politti (Prof. Fabiano Politti, FT, University of Nove de Julho) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2024
Start date
Sep 10, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 22, 2024

Study contacts

Fabiano Politti, PhD
Contact
fabianopolitti@gmail.com
55 11 989418885
Caroline Razera, PT
Contact
carolinerazeraf@gmail.com
55 19 982110053

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion