ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT03257423MAPPACUpdated Nov 10, 2020

Acute Appendicitis and Microbiota - Etiology of Appendicitis and Antibiotic Therapy Effects

An interventional study of Ertapenem followed by levofloxacin and metronidazole and Moxifloxacin in Acute Appendicitis, sponsored by Turku University Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-10.

Sponsored by Turku University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2022, 3 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2017, registered Aug 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Appendicectomy has been the treatment of acute appendicitis for over a hundred years. Appendicectomy, however, includes operative and postoperative risks despite being a routine procedure. Several studies have proved promising results of the safety and efficiency of antibiotics in the treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. The previous APPAC study by the investigators, published in 2015 in the Journal of American Medical Association, also proved promising results with 73% of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis treated successfully with antibiotics. None of the patients initially treated with antibiotics that later had appendectomy had major complications. The results of the APPAC trial suggest that CT proven uncomplicated acute appendicitis is not a surgical emergency and antibiotic therapy is a safe first-line treatment option. Reducing unnecessary appendectomies has also been shown to lead to significant economic savings. On the other hand, antibiotic therapies have been shown to have an effect on the normal gut microbiota and are considered an increasing global health threat underlining the importance of evaluating both short- and long-term effects of the antimicrobial treatment in old and new indications.

The aims of this randomized prospective study are:

  1. To evaluate the possible role and differences in the microbiological etiology of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.
  2. To determine the effects of both antibiotic and placebo treatment on the composition of gut microbiota, and to evaluate how it recovers after the appendicitis-related antimicrobial treatment (AMT)
  3. To evaluate the effects of the duration of the hospital stay on the AMR reservoir of the gut microbiota.
Read the detailed description

Appendectomy has been the treatment of acute appendicitis for over a hundred years. Appendicectomy, however, includes operative and postoperative risks despite being a routine procedure. Several studies have proved promising results of the safety and efficiency of antibiotics in the treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. The previous APPAC study by the investigators, published in 2015 in the Journal of American Medical Association, also proved promising results with 73% of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis treated successfully with antibiotics. None of the patients initially treated with antibiotics that later had appendectomy had major complications. The results of the APPAC trial suggest that CT proven uncomplicated acute appendicitis is not a surgical emergency and antibiotic therapy is a safe first-line treatment option. Reducing unnecessary appendectomies has also been shown to lead to significant economic savings. On the other hand, antibiotic therapies have been shown to have an effect on the normal gut microbiota.

Gut microbiota is an extremely complex ecosystem with both high bacterial density and diversity. Recent scientific evidence emphasizes that the symbiosis between the host and the balanced gut microbiota supports good health, and contributes to various biochemical and metabolic functions occurring in host's body. The possible role of the somehow distorted gut microbiota composition in addition to its metabolites in the etiopathogenesis of many diseases such as allergy, inflammatory bowel disease, type 1 diabetes and obesity related disorders, has been recently proposed. Further, detected alterations and perturbations both in the gut microbiota composition and functionality have been linked to the development of various malignancies such as colorectal cancer, gastric cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. To date, the role of the microbes and especially the members of the commensal microbiota with their structural compartments and metabolites in the pathogenesis and etiology of appendicitis have not been clarified in detail, despite the recent knowledge that uncomplicated acute appendicitis could be treated by antibiotic treatments alone. Further, there is only limited amount of evidence on the appendix microbial composition in humans.

Microbial overgrowth has been speculated to serve as a secondary consequence in appendicitis. However, recent accumulating evidence suggests that primary bacterial infection may actually be an initiating event in the pathogenesis of the disease. Interestingly, it has been postulated that the appendix could serve as a microbial reservoir for repopulating the gastrointestinal tract in times of necessity thus gut microbiota may act as a source for these pathogenic intruders. Further it has been reported that certain members of the gram negative Fusobacteria especially F. nucleatum and necrophorum are present in most appendicitis samples.

Additionally, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered an increasing global threat. According to the WHO (World Health Organisation), in 2050s more people will be killed by AMR bacteria than by all cancers.The use of antimicrobials in humans and especially in animal health care and production industry are the major causes of increasing AMR worldwide; the prudent use of antimicrobials is essential to prevent increasing AMR. Antimicrobials are known to decrease the gut microbiota diversity, richness and species variation and cause the perturbation of its overall balance and even a short-term antimicrobial treatment has a long-term impact on its composition underlining the importance of evaluating both short- and long-term effects of the antimicrobial treatment in old and new indications.

The aims of this randomized prospective study are:

  1. To evaluate the possible role and differences in the microbiological etiology of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. The bacterial composition of the complicated appendix will be compared to the gut microbiota composition determined from the fecal sample collected from the same individual. Additionally, these results will be compared to the gut microbiota composition of patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
  2. To determine the effects of both antibiotic and placebo treatment on the composition of gut microbiota, and to evaluate how it recovers after the appendicitis-related antimicrobial treatment (AMT). The bacterial composition and AMR reservoir of the gut microbiota will be evaluated both pre and post treatment in patients receiving antibiotic or placebo treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Additionally, the recovery of gut microbiota composition and disappearance of AMR will be evaluated. We will compare two variations (i.v.and p.o.) of antibiotic treatment with the placebo treatment.
  3. To evaluate the effects of the duration of the hospital stay on the AMR reservoir of the gut microbiota. According to the study protocols of the APPAC II and III trials, patients will spend either 1 or 3 days in the hospital in order to receive treatment before continuing the selected treatment at home. We will evaluate the effects of length of stay on the AMR reservoir of gut microbiota as well as evaluating if and when possible colonization occurs.
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Appendicitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Uncomplicated acute appendicitis
  • Complicated acute appendicitis
  • Antibiotic therapy
  • Microbiological etiology
03

In context

Appendicitis

419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 111 across 252 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Turku University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 287 studies on the registry; 67 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-60 years
  • CT confirmed uncomplicated or complicated acute appendicitis
  • Ability to give consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years or over 60 years
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Allergy to contrast media or iodine
  • Allergy or to antibiotic therapy
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Metformin medication
  • Severe systemic illness (for example , medical condition requiring medication)
  • Inability to co-operate and give
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    I.v. + p.o. antibiotics (APPAC II)

    Patients in this group recruited also in APPAC II trial will receive i.v. antibiotics (ertapenem 1 g twice per day) for 2 days followed by p.o. antibiotics (levofloxacin 500 mg x 1 and metronidazole 500 mg x 3) for 5 days, for a total treatment duration of 7 days. From these patients, rectal swab samples will be collected at day 0 (before treatment) and day 1 (after beginning of treatment), serum sample before treatment initiation.

    Drug: Ertapenem followed by levofloxacin and metronidazole

  • Active comparator
    P.o. moxifloxacin (APPAC II)

    Patients in this group recruited also in APPAC II trial will receive p.o. antibiotics for a total of 7 days, moxifloxacin 400 mg once per day. From these patients, rectal swab samples of faces will be collected at two time points, day 0 (before treatment) and day 1 (after beginning of treatment), serum sample before treatment initiation.

    Drug: Moxifloxacin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo treatment (APPAC III)

    Patients in this group recruited also in APPAC III trial will receive i.v. placebo 3 times per day for 3 days followed by p.o. placebo 3 times per day for 4 additional days. From these patients rectal swab samples will be collected twice during the stay at the research hospital (time points 0 and 1 or 3 d) and three times at home (follow-up at one week, six months and one year). Serum samples are taken prior to treatment initiation and at 10 days after the treatment initiation.

    Other: Placebo

  • Other
    Surgery (complicated appendicitis)

    Patients in this group will undergo appendectomy and are recruited only in the MAPPAC trial. Rectal swab samples and biopsies from the removed appendix will be collected from these patients.

    Procedure: Appendectomy

  • Other
    Surgery (uncomplicated appendicitis)

    Patients in this group will undergo appendectomy either after refusing to participate in the APPAC II or APPAC III trials or after presenting with recurrent appendicitis after antibiotic or placebo therapy. Rectal swab samples of faces and biopsies from the removed appendix will be collected from these patients.

    Procedure: Appendectomy

  • Active comparator
    I.v. + p.o. antibiotics (APPAC III)

    Patients in this group recruited also in APPAC III trial will receive i.v. antibiotics (ertapenem 1 g twice per day) for 3 days followed by p.o. antibiotics (levofloxacin 500 mg x 1 and metronidazole 500 mg x 3) for 4 days, for a total treatment duration of 7 days. From these patients rectal swab samples will be collected twice during the stay at the research hospital (time points 0 and 1 or 3 d) and three times at home (follow-up at one week, six months and one year). Serum samples are taken prior to treatment initiation and at 10 days after the treatment initiation.

    Drug: Ertapenem followed by levofloxacin and metronidazole

Interventions

  • DrugErtapenem followed by levofloxacin and metronidazole

    Drug pages: Ertapenem · Levofloxacin · Metronidazole

    Ertapenem 1 g i.v. daily for either 2 days (MAPPAC + APPAC II patients) or 3 days (MAPPAC + APPAC III) followed by p.o. levofloxacin 500 mg x 1 + metronidazole 500 mg x 3 for either 5 days (APPAC II + MAPPAC) or 4 days (APPAC III + MAPPAC)

  • Moxifloxacin 400 mg once a day for seven days (APPAC II + MAPPAC)

  • ProcedureAppendectomy

    Primarily laparoscopic appendectomy for either complicated acute appendicitis or uncomplicated acute appendicitis (refusing to participate in APPAC II or III trials or recurrent acute appendicitis).

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo i.v. once a day for three days (APPAC III + MAPPAC) followed by placebo capsules three times a day for four days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Microbiology in the etiology of acute appendicitis

    Differences in the microbiological etiology of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effects of antimicrobial treatment on gut microbiota

    Determining the effects of both antibiotic and placebo treatment on the composition of gut microbiota, and to evaluate how it recovers after the appendicitis-related antimicrobial treatment evaluated by rectal swabs pre- and post treatment

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Effects of hospital stay duration on the AMR reservoir of the gut microbiota

    The effect of length of hospital stay (days) on the AMR reservoir of gut microbiota and colonization occurrence evaluated by analysing rectal swabs microbiota pre- and post-treatment at 0, 1 and 3 days.

    Time frame: 3 days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vanhatalo S, Munukka E, Kallonen T, Sippola S, Gronroos J, Haijanen J, Hakanen AJ, Salminen P. Appendiceal microbiome in uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276007. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36240181 ↗
  • Vanhatalo S, Munukka E, Sippola S, Jalkanen S, Gronroos J, Marttila H, Eerola E, Hurme S, Hakanen AJ, Salminen P; APPAC collaborative study group. Prospective multicentre cohort trial on acute appendicitis and microbiota, aetiology and effects of antimicrobial treatment: study protocol for the MAPPAC (Microbiology APPendicitis ACuta) trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e031137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031137. PubMed 31494621 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2022, 68 months after the start.

Of 89 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Appendicitis, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 68 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 91 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 2, 2017
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
StartActual
Apr 4, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Nov 10, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03257423
Collaborators
Tampere University Hospital, Oulu University Hospital, Kuopio University Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Jyväskylä Central Hospital
Responsible party
Paulina Salminen (MD, PhD, Chief of Acute Care Surgery, Turku University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
Start date
Apr 4, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2020

Study contacts

Paulina Salminen, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Turku University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Ertapenem · Levofloxacin · Metronidazole · Moxifloxacin

Start the discussion