ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03252483Updated Aug 17, 2017

Integrating HIV and Hepatitis C Screening in an Urban Emergency Department

An interventional study of Bundled HCV/HIV Screening and HIV Screening in Hepatitis C, Hiv and HIV/AIDS, sponsored by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-17.

Sponsored by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2012, registered Jul 2017).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
478
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States — 29 open to participants now, 37 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Hepatitis C · United States.

Enrollment
69th of 594
478 · median 60
Started
2012
with 46 others
No phase
140 of 725
12 open now
Registered
597th of 725
by date

Among the 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States, this one is the 69th largest by enrollment of the 594 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 47 that started in 2012, is one of 140 with no phase, and was the 597th registered.

Hepatitis C

1,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 98 are open to participants now.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Open to participants now

29 of the 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

24 more — sign in →

All 29 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 56 Hepatitis C studies recruiting now, 43 (77%) set no upper age limit and 6 (11%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 26 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial was implemented to evaluate the effect of integrating rapid Hepatitis C (HCV) testing into a pre-existing screening program for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on HIV test acceptance and diagnosis of both HCV and HIV. A sample of 478 adults in a New York City Emergency Department participated in the study. Participants were randomized to receive either an offer of bundled HIV/HCV testing or HIV testing alone. Public Health Advocates approached eligible patients in the Emergency Department, performed HIV and HCV raid testing, and delivered test results to participants with post-test counseling. The primary outcome, HIV test acceptance, was compared between the two groups to evaluate whether the addition of an HCV test adversely impacted participants' consent to test for HIV. Questionnaires were also distributed to participants to assess HCV knowledge.

Read the detailed description

The high prevalence of HIV and HCV co-infection, similarity in testing strategies, and interrelated risk factors suggest a practical overlap in integrating screening services. This integration could effectively utilize existing resources and infrastructure to address both epidemics and facilitate the linkage of HCV-infected individuals to care.

The objective of this study was to integrate rapid HCV testing into a well-established HIV testing and counseling program to evaluate the effect of rapid bundled screening on HIV test acceptance rate. Secondary outcomes include HCV test acceptance, identification of newly diagnosed HCV- and HIV-positive patients, HCV knowledge, risk assessment, and refusal reasons.

The two-armed, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Jacobi Medical Center, a Level 1 trauma and tertiary care center located in the Bronx, New York. Upon recruitment, all participants completed questionnaires that included demographic information, HCV risk assessment, and HCV knowledge questions. Participants were randomized either to the control arm or the intervention arm. The control arm was offered HIV testing only and the intervention arm was offered HIV testing concurrently with HCV testing (bundled HIV/HCV screening).

Sample size was determined using the following parameters: 1) 80% power; 2) significance level of 0.05; 3) two-sided significant test; and 4) 10% difference between groups on the acceptance of HIV testing. Using these parameters, a sample of 227 in each group was needed to test the primary outcome: acceptance of an integrated screening program for HIV and HCV infection. Groups of at least 333 were used to allow for drop-outs and protocol violations.

Patients were recruited from the adult Emergency Department (ED) at Jacobi Medical Center. Recruitment took place during a six-month period from December 2012 to May 2013, and 478 patients were enrolled in the study.

Research Assistants were trained as Public Health Advocates to perform HIV and HCV testing and counseling. The Public Health Advocates approached eligible patients in the ED and followed a script to ask patients if they were interested in participating in a study through which they would be offered free screenings recommended for their general health. Patients who refused the offer of the HIV and/or HCV tests completed a test-refusal questionnaire. All enrolled participants completed a questionnaire including demographic information, HCV risk assessment, and HCV knowledge.

After providing verbal consent, participants were randomized to either an HIV test only group (control) or a bundled HIV/HCV test group (intervention). Randomization was performed by an independent statistician who used a computer generated allocation schedule. Randomization assignments were placed in sealed opaque envelopes that were opened sequentially after verbal consent was obtained for the study.

Those randomized to the control group were offered only an HIV test, and those randomized to the intervention group were offered both HCV and HIV tests. The OraQuick® HCV Rapid Antibody Test was employed as a rapid blood fingerstick test for HCV antibodies. The OraQuick Rapid Antibody Test Advance® HIV-1/2 Antibody test was used to test for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies in oral fluid. Both point-of-care tests provide results in 20 minutes.

A Public Health Advocate delivered the test(s) results to the patient and conducted post-test counseling. In the case of a preliminary positive result on either test, the Public Health Advocate informed the patient and the patient's provider and scheduled a follow up appointment for the patient.

Data was recorded in an electronic database using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). Data obtained from subjects were entered using unique subject numbers, without specific identifiers. Acceptance rates for HIV testing in experimental and intervention arms was compared using chi square with fisher's exact derived confidence intervals. Stata statistical software was used to tabulate participant demographics and testing frequencies for HIV, HCV, or both.

03

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis C
  • Hiv
  • HIV/AIDS
  • HCV Coinfection
  • HIV/AIDS and Infections
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults 18 years of age or older
  • Speak English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to consent
  • Medically unstable as determined by healthcare provider
  • Does not speak English or Spanish
  • Known and/or positive
  • Already tested for HIV and/or HCV within past 6 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
478 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    HIV Only

    Those randomized to the control group were offered only an HIV test.

    Other: HIV Screening

  • Experimental
    Bundled HCV/HIV

    Those randomized to the intervention group were offered both HCV and HIV test.s

    Other: Bundled HCV/HIV Screening

Interventions

  • OtherBundled HCV/HIV Screening

    Participants were randomized to a bundled HIV/HCV test group (intervention) to evaluate whether integrating HIV and HCV rapid screening would adversely impact HIV test acceptance.

  • OtherHIV Screening

    Participants were randomized to an HIV-only screening group as a control comparator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HIV Test Acceptance

    Participant agreement to test for HIV with a rapid Oraquick oral swab

    Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. HCV Test Acceptance

    Participant agreement to test for HCV with a rapid Orasure fingerstick

    Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months

  2. HIV and HCV Incidence

    Diagnoses of either infection

    Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months

  3. HCV Knowledge and Risk

    As assessed from a knowledge and risk assessment questionnaire distributed to each participant

    Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months

  4. Test Refusals

    Reasons for refusal of either HIV or HCV tests

    Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jacobi Medical Center
    The Bronx, New York 10461, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data includes HIV/HCV screening information and HCV knowledge and risk assessment. Study has been completed.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2012 to primary completion in May 2013, 5 months.

Of 150 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hepatitis C, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 42. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 153 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 28, 2017
First posted
Aug 17, 2017
StartActual
Dec 2012
Primary completionActual
May 2013
CompletionActual
May 2013
Last update
Aug 17, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03252483
Lead sponsor
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
Responsible party
Jason Leider (Director of Adult HIV Services, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 17, 2017
Start date
Dec 2012
Primary completion
May 2013
Completion
May 2013
Last update
Aug 17, 2017

Study contacts

Jason Leider, MD, PhD, FACP
study chair · Jacobi Medical Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion