An interventional study of Bundled HCV/HIV Screening and HIV Screening in Hepatitis C, Hiv and HIV/AIDS, sponsored by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-17.
Sponsored by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States — 29 open to participants now, 37 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Hepatitis C · United States.
Among the 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States, this one is the 69th largest by enrollment of the 594 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 47 that started in 2012, is one of 140 with no phase, and was the 597th registered.
1,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 98 are open to participants now.
Browse Hepatitis C studies →29 of the 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Sites in United States
Ages 16–45 · Women only
University of Washington · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
West Virginia University · Sites in United States
Ages 18+ · Healthy volunteers
University of California, Los Angeles · Sites in United States
Ages 18–59 · Men only · Healthy volunteers
University of Southern California · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 56 Hepatitis C studies recruiting now, 43 (77%) set no upper age limit and 6 (11%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 26 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
725 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 115 · Phase 2 186 · Phase 3 100 · Phase 4 85
First in 1981; this study’s year is marked. 47 started in 2012.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's enrollment of 478 is above the median of 73 across 1,224 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.
Median enrollment 60 across the 594 interventional studies, 113 across the 127 observational. Of the 633 that completed or were terminated, 286 (45%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
286 of 725 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation has 1 study filed under Hepatitis C — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
13 of the studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT06367465Washington University School of MedicineFeasibility and Acceptability of HCV Treatment in Pregnancy | 2026-12-28 |
| NCT06870019University of Southern CaliforniaHepatitis C Tracker Study | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT06953479LifespanImplementing Low-Barrier HCV Treatment in a Jail Setting | 2027-01 |
| NCT07631559University of California, San FranciscoPilot Study of an Adapted Partner Navigation Intervention Booster Session for Sustained Healthcare Engagement Among People Who Inject Drugs | 2027-03-01 |
| NCT06179498University of California, San FranciscoPartner Navigation Intervention for Hepatitis C Treatment Among Young People Who Inject Drugs | 2027-03-01 |
Add all 13 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
This randomized controlled trial was implemented to evaluate the effect of integrating rapid Hepatitis C (HCV) testing into a pre-existing screening program for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on HIV test acceptance and diagnosis of both HCV and HIV. A sample of 478 adults in a New York City Emergency Department participated in the study. Participants were randomized to receive either an offer of bundled HIV/HCV testing or HIV testing alone. Public Health Advocates approached eligible patients in the Emergency Department, performed HIV and HCV raid testing, and delivered test results to participants with post-test counseling. The primary outcome, HIV test acceptance, was compared between the two groups to evaluate whether the addition of an HCV test adversely impacted participants' consent to test for HIV. Questionnaires were also distributed to participants to assess HCV knowledge.
The high prevalence of HIV and HCV co-infection, similarity in testing strategies, and interrelated risk factors suggest a practical overlap in integrating screening services. This integration could effectively utilize existing resources and infrastructure to address both epidemics and facilitate the linkage of HCV-infected individuals to care.
The objective of this study was to integrate rapid HCV testing into a well-established HIV testing and counseling program to evaluate the effect of rapid bundled screening on HIV test acceptance rate. Secondary outcomes include HCV test acceptance, identification of newly diagnosed HCV- and HIV-positive patients, HCV knowledge, risk assessment, and refusal reasons.
The two-armed, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Jacobi Medical Center, a Level 1 trauma and tertiary care center located in the Bronx, New York. Upon recruitment, all participants completed questionnaires that included demographic information, HCV risk assessment, and HCV knowledge questions. Participants were randomized either to the control arm or the intervention arm. The control arm was offered HIV testing only and the intervention arm was offered HIV testing concurrently with HCV testing (bundled HIV/HCV screening).
Sample size was determined using the following parameters: 1) 80% power; 2) significance level of 0.05; 3) two-sided significant test; and 4) 10% difference between groups on the acceptance of HIV testing. Using these parameters, a sample of 227 in each group was needed to test the primary outcome: acceptance of an integrated screening program for HIV and HCV infection. Groups of at least 333 were used to allow for drop-outs and protocol violations.
Patients were recruited from the adult Emergency Department (ED) at Jacobi Medical Center. Recruitment took place during a six-month period from December 2012 to May 2013, and 478 patients were enrolled in the study.
Research Assistants were trained as Public Health Advocates to perform HIV and HCV testing and counseling. The Public Health Advocates approached eligible patients in the ED and followed a script to ask patients if they were interested in participating in a study through which they would be offered free screenings recommended for their general health. Patients who refused the offer of the HIV and/or HCV tests completed a test-refusal questionnaire. All enrolled participants completed a questionnaire including demographic information, HCV risk assessment, and HCV knowledge.
After providing verbal consent, participants were randomized to either an HIV test only group (control) or a bundled HIV/HCV test group (intervention). Randomization was performed by an independent statistician who used a computer generated allocation schedule. Randomization assignments were placed in sealed opaque envelopes that were opened sequentially after verbal consent was obtained for the study.
Those randomized to the control group were offered only an HIV test, and those randomized to the intervention group were offered both HCV and HIV tests. The OraQuick® HCV Rapid Antibody Test was employed as a rapid blood fingerstick test for HCV antibodies. The OraQuick Rapid Antibody Test Advance® HIV-1/2 Antibody test was used to test for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies in oral fluid. Both point-of-care tests provide results in 20 minutes.
A Public Health Advocate delivered the test(s) results to the patient and conducted post-test counseling. In the case of a preliminary positive result on either test, the Public Health Advocate informed the patient and the patient's provider and scheduled a follow up appointment for the patient.
Data was recorded in an electronic database using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). Data obtained from subjects were entered using unique subject numbers, without specific identifiers. Acceptance rates for HIV testing in experimental and intervention arms was compared using chi square with fisher's exact derived confidence intervals. Stata statistical software was used to tabulate participant demographics and testing frequencies for HIV, HCV, or both.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.
After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hepatitis C tests
Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.
After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Those randomized to the control group were offered only an HIV test.
Other: HIV Screening
Those randomized to the intervention group were offered both HCV and HIV test.s
Other: Bundled HCV/HIV Screening
Participants were randomized to a bundled HIV/HCV test group (intervention) to evaluate whether integrating HIV and HCV rapid screening would adversely impact HIV test acceptance.
Participants were randomized to an HIV-only screening group as a control comparator.
HIV Test Acceptance
Participant agreement to test for HIV with a rapid Oraquick oral swab
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
HCV Test Acceptance
Participant agreement to test for HCV with a rapid Orasure fingerstick
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
HIV and HCV Incidence
Diagnoses of either infection
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
HCV Knowledge and Risk
As assessed from a knowledge and risk assessment questionnaire distributed to each participant
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
Test Refusals
Reasons for refusal of either HIV or HCV tests
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data includes HIV/HCV screening information and HCV knowledge and risk assessment. Study has been completed.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Dec 2012 to primary completion in May 2013, 5 months.
Of 150 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hepatitis C, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 42. This study's 5 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 153 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 42.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation