ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07667101HepP3Updated Jun 24, 2026

Hepatitis C Pharmacist, Physician, Patient Navigator Collaborative Care Model in Permanent Supportive Housing

An interventional study of PPP-CCM in HEPATITIS C (HCV), sponsored by University of Washington. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
444
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to extend our prior research by conducting a pragmatic implementation trial using a parallel-group, cluster randomized design to evaluate the PPP-CCM's ability to improve access to DAAs for HCV within a network of permanent supportive housing (PSH) buildings in Seattle and King County. The study will implement PPP-CCM to 16 housing buildings, randomizing half to receive PPP-CCM (intervention) versus usual care (UC) for 12-months, after which all buildings will have access to PPP-CCM. All buildings will have access to point-of-care HCV screening for the first 6 months of the study. Study outcome data will be collected through a longitudinal cohort-study of persons who screened positive for HCV which will conduct surveys and review of medical records at baseline, 12- and 24-months.

02

Conditions studied

  • HEPATITIS C (HCV)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hepatitis C

1,743 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 97 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 444 is above the median of 72 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,433 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult ≥18 years of age
  • Currently a resident at one of DESC's PSH buildings at the time of study enrollment
  • Positive test documented (screening antibody test or viral load test)
  • Provides release of information (ROI) to access community pharmacy electronic medical records (EHR) and/or other HCV treatment providers for information on HCV care during the study period between baseline visit and 24-month visit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking medications to treat at the start of the study
  • Cognitive impairment (acute or chronic) resulting in inability to provide
  • Currently or impending incarceration
  • People who plan to leave the Seattle area within 24 months
  • Not English speaking
  • Behavioral risk posing safety concerns per discretion of research staff
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
444 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Treatment-as-usual (TAU)

    TAU will be usual care provided by the permanent supportive housing buildings.

  • Experimental
    PPP-CCM

    The intervention is a "Pharmacist, Physician, Patient Navigator Collaborative Care Model" (PPP-CCM) approach for expanding access to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV. This task-shifting, collaborative care model leverages pharmacists to deliver medications-namely DAAs for HCV, as well as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV and naloxone for overdose prevention-to PWUD through "Collaborative Practice Agreements" (CPAs) with physicians in conjunction with support from patient navigators.

    Other: PPP-CCM

Interventions

  • OtherPPP-CCM

    The intervention is a "Pharmacist, Physician, Patient Navigator Collaborative Care Model" (PPP-CCM) approach for expanding access to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV. This task-shifting, collaborative care model leverages pharmacists to deliver medications-namely DAAs for HCV, as well as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV and naloxone for overdose prevention-to PWUD through "Collaborative Practice Agreements" (CPAs) with physicians in conjunction with support from patient navigators.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HCV Evaluation

    The primary outcome of interest is whether a participant received an evaluation for hepatitis C ("yes" versus "no").

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. HCV Pre-Treatment Work-Up Completion ("Adoption")

    This secondary outcome measures completion of work-up needed prior to initiation of treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. DAA Initiation

    This secondary outcome is defined as the act of being prescribed and taking at least one dose of a DAA medication for HCV ("yes" versus "no").

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. DAA completion

    This secondary outcome is defined as being prescribed and having received a full course of DAA treatment with no interruption \>14 days ("yes" versus "no").

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Sustained Virologic Response

    This secondary outcome is defined as having documentation in the EHR of an undetectable HCV viral load ≥ 4 weeks after the completion of DAA treatment ("yes" versus "no").

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Injection Drug Use

    This secondary outcome is defined as self-reported number of days of injecting drugs (a major risk factor for HIV and HCV infection/reinfection) in the past 30 days.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2028, 24 months after the start.

Of 150 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hepatitis C, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 24 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 153 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 18, 2026
First posted
Jun 24, 2026
StartActual
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 2029
Last update
Jun 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07667101
Responsible party
Judith I. Tsui (Study Principal Investigator, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 24, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Devin N Kennedy
Contact
kennedev@uw.edu
206-744-1838
Alex Gojic
Contact
agojic@uw.edu
Judith Tsui, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Washington
Sara Glick, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion