ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04630834Updated Apr 14, 2022

Ibuprofen Plus Acetaminophen for Enhanced Pain Reduction

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen in Pain, Acute, sponsored by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 20 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-14.

Sponsored by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 20 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Combination of analgesics with different modes of action have the potential to offer enhanced pain relief with reduced dosage. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen have different modes of action. Combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen has shown enhanced analgesia in adult studies, with pediatric data limited to post-operative pain and dental pain. Our study objective is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of oral acetaminophen plus ibuprofen versus ibuprofen plus placebo for the management of acute pain in a pediatric emergency department.

Read the detailed description

In the pediatric emergency department (PED), acute traumatic and nontraumatic pain accounts for approximately 9% of ED visits. The initial drugs of choice for analgesia are typically ibuprofen or acetaminophen. Both drugs display analgesic and antipyretic effects via distinct mechanisms of action. Various meta-analyses in the literature have compared ibuprofen and acetaminophen for pain relief in adults and children. Ibuprofen has been shown to be very effective for mild to moderate pain, especially in musculoskeletal injuries, including some limb fractures.

Combination of analgesics with different modes of action have the potential to offer enhanced pain relief with reduced dosage. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen have different modes of action. Ibuprofen is an NSAID that inhibits the activity of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 enzymes and blocks the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes. The mode of action of acetaminophen for its analgesic effects is not entirely understood. It is thought that its effects are mediated through serotonergic pathways, cannabinoid and nitric oxide synthase, substance P, and N-methyl-D-aspartate. Combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen has shown enhanced analgesia in adult studies, with pediatric data limited to post-operative pain and dental pain.

The data is limited regarding the combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen for acute pain in the PED. A recent study showed similar analgesic efficacy of oral ibuprofen and acetaminophen in comparison with each analgesic alone for short-term treatment of acute pain in the PED7. In this study, pain reassessment was limited to only one time point at 60 minutes and included patients with pain scores of 1 on a 10 point scale. Since there is ample data demonstrating the effectiveness of ibuprofen for pain, we will investigate whether the combination of ibuprofen plus acetaminophen is superior for moderate to severe pain reduction compared to ibuprofen alone.

Objective To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of oral acetaminophen plus ibuprofen versus ibuprofen plus placeboalone for the management of acute pain in a pediatric emergency department.

Hypothesis: The combination of oral acetaminophen and ibuprofen is superior to ibuprofen alone for the reduction of acute traumatic and nontraumatic pain.

Study Design This will be a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, conducted in the pediatric emergency department.

Participant Recruitment Patients ages 3 years through 20 years who present to the PED with traumatic and/or nontraumatic pain will be assessed for eligibility. Pain assessment will be performed by a study investigator upon presentation at triage before medication administration. A validated numeric pain score (11-point 0-10 scale) will be used for patients 8 through 20 years. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale (11-point 0-10 scale) will be used for patients ages 3 through 7 years. If the patient is eligible for enrollment, details of the study will be discussed with parent and/or patient and consent/assent will be obtained if they agree to participate.

Female patients >12 years will be assessed for pregnancy with a point of care urine HCG test. Pregnant patients will be excluded. Patients found to be pregnant will not be enrolled in the study and will be given appropriate care as is our standard procedure.

Study Intervention Study participants will be randomized to one of two treatment groups according to predetermined block randomization. A clinical research pharmacist will prepare placebo and acetaminophen in identical 20 mL amber bottles labeled sequentially. The bottle, 5, 10 and 20 mL amber syringes, and study documents will be stored in individual sequentially numbered manilla envelopes in a locked cabinet in the PED medication room. A nurse will draw the appropriate weight-based dose of placebo or medication into the amber syringes and administer the placebo or medication to the patient. Additionally, the nurse will administer a weight based dose of ibuprofen to each study participant.

The placebo group will receive a single weight-based dose of oral ibuprofen (100mg/5mL) at 10mg/kg to a maximum of 600 mg and placebo, mirrored as acetaminophen concentration of 160mg/5mL, at 15mg/kg to a maximum of 20 mL. The intervention group will receive a weight-based dose of ibuprofen (100mg/5mL) at 10mg/kg to a maximum of 600 mg and a dose of acetaminophen (160mg/5mL) at 15mg/kg to a maximum of 20 mL (650mg). The patient will then be evaluated in a standard manner by a treating clinician. The study investigator will reassess the pain score at 1 hour and 2 hours after medication administration. At the discretion of the treating physician, patients will receive parenteral medications at any time during the two hour assessment period for increasing or unremitting pain. Patients who are ready for discharge before the two hour pain assessment will receive a final pain score by the study investigator with documentation of time of the reassessment. Adverse events during the assessment period will be documented on a data collection sheet.

Subject treatment assignments will remain blinded until the final subject has completed follow up and all data has been recorded and validated. Urgent, immediate unblinding due to medical emergency may be authorized by the Investigator. When possible, the treatment assignment will be provided to the treating physician in order to maintain the blind for the Investigator and study staff. All instances of subject unblinding will be documented in the study record

Consent Written informed consent will be obtained by a study investigator at triage before initiation of treatment. An informed consent will be obtained parent or legal guardian for all patients 17 years and younger. Patients ages 13 years and older will sign an informed consent and an assent will be obtained from patients 7 years to 12 years of age.

Patients who are in pain and are first approached at the time the protocol will be initiated must be capable of providing contemporaneous informed consent. The principal investigator or study investigator will assess the capacity of the patient to provide ethically adequate informed consent. If the patient has capacity and consents to participation these facts will be documented in the patient's research record.

Confidentiality All patient data and research records will be kept confidential. Data collection sheets will be stored in a locked cabinet in the principal investigator's locked office throughout the study period and will be accessible only to research staff. Data will be collected on paper forms then entered into a password protected computer database. After data collection is performed, identifiers will be removed from the data file. Research investigators responsible for study collection, nurses, study participants and clinicians providing care to the patient in the emergency department will be blinded to the medication received.

Benefits The potential benefit of combined acetaminophen and ibuprofen therapy may provide an increased reduction in acute pain, improved patient comfort and patient/parent satisfaction compared to ibuprofen administered as a single agent. Enhanced pain reduction may potentially obviate the need for parenteral pain medication, including opioids. An additional benefit is the opportunity to contribute to research regarding pain management in children.

Risks This study may involve slightly more than minimal risk. Risk of participation in this study may be failure of combination therapy to potentiate pain reduction. Since patients will be randomized into treatment or placebo groups, they will not have the ability to choose a treatment option. Acetaminophen can be given at any age, however, there is a risk of liver toxicity in overdose. Ibuprofen has common side effects of gastrointestinal and renal effects including gastric irritation and acute renal injury. These risks, however, are considered to be minimal the medications are given as a single weight-based dose.

Data Analysis Baseline and post-treatment pain scores at 1 and 2 hours will be documented. Categorical data will be compared using the chi-squared test. Continuous data will be compared using the Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed data and t-test for normally distributed data. For our sample size calculation, we made the following assumptions: previous studies investigating pain scores in children have reported a decrease in pain score of 1 on a 10-point scale to be clinically significant. For this study, we assumed that a decrease in pain score of 2 would be clinically relevant. We used a standard deviation of 3 for our sample size calculation. We also assumed a 20% dropout rate and increased our sample size estimate by 15% to account for nonparametric data. Based on these assumptions, for our primary outcome, we estimated 50 patients would be needed in each group to have a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.05 to detect a difference of 2 in pain score between the two groups, with a standard deviation of 3. Data analyses of the pain scores will be based on the principle of intention to treat.

Data Safety Monitoring Plan

This is a single site study involving a biochemical intervention that presents slightly more than minimal risk due potential adverse effects from medication and randomized design. Close-monitoring will be performed by the study investigator and co-investigator every other month, or every 20 patients enrolled, whichever is more frequent. The specific procedures that will be used to monitor for and report adverse events, protocol violations and deviations are:

  1. Data will be analyzed for participant recruitment
  2. Data quality and protocol adherence, as determined by completeness of forms
  3. Protocol adherence as determined by times of drug administration and pain assessments
  4. Quality of informed consent process and documentation as determined by review of all forms for valid signatures and times
  5. Analysis of adverse effects of medication determined by rates of such events as identified on data collection forms

The Data Safety Monitoring Committee Members will be:

Anthony Ciorciari, MD - Department of Emergency Medicine Michael Jones, MD - Department of Emergency Medicine Jackeline Urrutia-Monteleone, MD - Department of Pediatrics

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Acute

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • children
03

In context

Acute Pain

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 166 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 86 across 902 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 20 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a numeric pain score of greater than or equal to 5 or Wong -Baker FACES Pain Scale of greater than or equal to 6

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergy to ibuprofen
  • Known allergy to acetaminophen
  • documented or suspected pregnancy
  • inability to tolerate oral medication
  • a to oral intake
  • inability to reliably indicate a pain score
  • intake of ibuprofen or acetaminophen less than 4 hours prior to presentation
  • inability to communicate in Spanish or English
  • the need for immediate parenteral pain medication as per the treating physician.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention group

    Intervention Group: ibuprofen 10 mg/kg (maximum 600mg) plus acetaminophen 15mg/kg (maximum 650mg)

    Drug: Ibuprofen · Drug: Acetaminophen

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Group

    Placebo Group: Ibuprofen 10mg/kg (maximum 600 mg) plus placebo 15mg/kg (maximum 650mg)

    Drug: Ibuprofen · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Patients will receive both ibuprofen 10mg/kg weight based dosing with a max of 600mg

  • patients will receive acetaminophen 15 mg/kg weight based dosing with a max of 650mg

  • DrugPlacebo

    patients will receive placebo 15mg/kg weight based dosing with a max of 650mg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score

    Change in mean pain score from baseline pain score. A validated pain score for children beginning at 3 years old, the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale (0-10 scale), will be used for patients ages 3 through 7 years. A validated numeric pain score (0-10 scale) will be used for patients 8 through 20 years. The higher score indicate worse pain.

    Time frame: 1 hour and 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants requiring rescue medications.

    Documentation of the need for rescue medications (number and dose)

    Time frame: 1 hour and 2 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Jacobi Medical Center
    Bronx, New York 10461, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Poddighe D, Brambilla I, Licari A, Marseglia GL. Ibuprofen for Pain Control in Children: New Value for an Old Molecule. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jun;35(6):448-453. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001505. PubMed 29912084 ↗
  • Gaglani A, Gross T. Pediatric Pain Management. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018 May;36(2):323-334. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2017.12.002. PubMed 29622325 ↗
  • Jozwiak-Bebenista M, Nowak JZ. Paracetamol: mechanism of action, applications and safety concern. Acta Pol Pharm. 2014 Jan-Feb;71(1):11-23. PubMed 24779190 ↗
  • Ong CK, Seymour RA, Lirk P, Merry AF. Combining paracetamol (acetaminophen) with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a qualitative systematic review of analgesic efficacy for acute postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1170-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cf9281. Epub 2010 Feb 8. PubMed 20142348 ↗
  • Gazal G, Mackie IC. A comparison of paracetamol, ibuprofen or their combination for pain relief following extractions in children under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007 May;17(3):169-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00806.x. PubMed 17397460 ↗
  • Motov S, Butt M, Masoudi A, Palacios W, Fassassi C, Drapkin J, Likourezos A, Hossain R, Brady J, Rothberger N, Flom P, Zerzan J, Marshall J. Comparison of Oral Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen with Either Analgesic Alone for Pediatric Emergency Department Patients with Acute Pain. J Emerg Med. 2020 May;58(5):725-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Apr 1. PubMed 32247660 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2022, 14 months after the start.

Of 79 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Acute Pain, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 32. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 84 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 11, 2020
First posted
Nov 16, 2020
StartActual
Mar 30, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Jun 20, 2022
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2022
Last update
Apr 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04630834
Lead sponsor
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
Responsible party
Sandra Cunningham, MD (Division Director, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 16, 2020
Start date
Mar 30, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 14, 2022

Study contacts

Sandra Cunningham, MD
Contact
sandra.cunningham@nychhc.org
718-918-5875
Jackeline Urrutia-Monteleone, MD
Contact
urrutiaj@nychhc.org
718-918-5875
Sandra Cunningham, MD
principal investigator · NYCHHC - Jacobi Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Acetaminophen

Start the discussion