ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05968573Updated Oct 13, 2026

Persuasive Health Communication Intervention for HIV/HCV

An interventional study of Video Format with Captions and Video Format without Captions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C (HCV), sponsored by University of South Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Primary conditionHepatitis CRegistry: Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Hepatitis C
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Hepatitis C.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of South Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Oct 13, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States — 29 open to participants now, 37 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Hepatitis C · United States.

Enrollment
10th of 594
2,000 · median 60
Started
2023
with 9 others
No phase
140 of 725
12 open now
Registered
705th of 725
by date

Among the 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States, this one is the 10th largest by enrollment of the 594 interventional ones, is one of 10 that started in 2023, is one of 140 with no phase, and was the 705th registered.

By phase

725 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 2157 · 1 open
No phasethis study140 · 12 open
Observational128 · 12 open
Phase 199 · 0 open
Phase 387 · 0 open
Phase 485 · 2 open
Phase 1/216 · 1 open
Phase 2/313 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 1981; this study’s year is marked. 10 started in 2023.

Size and results

Median enrollment 60 across the 594 interventional studies, 113 across the 127 observational. Of the 633 that completed or were terminated, 286 (45%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 725 studies in Hepatitis C with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

A major impediment to emergency department (ED)-based HIV/HCV screening success is that often ED patients at risk for, or later diagnosed with, HIV and HCV decline testing. In this R01 project, the research team will assess how well a promising, easy-to-use, one-time, minimal-training-needed, very brief persuasive health communication intervention (PHCI) increases acceptance of testing among adult ED patients who either currently, formerly or never injected drugs and initially declined HIV/HCV screening. The research team will conduct a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) at EDs within the Mount Sinai Health System to compare the efficacy of the PHCI when delivered by a video vs. an HIV/HCV counselor. Patients who initially declined HIV/HCV screening will be stratified by injection-drug use (IDU) history cohorts: (1) current/former PWIDs, (2) never/non-PWIDs. Within each IDU history cohort, the research team will randomly assign participants (1:1:1) to a PHCI delivered by: (1) a video with captions, (2) a video without captions, (3) an HIV/HCV counselor. This R01 project will be conducted at Mount Sinai affiliate hospitals EDs. For Aim 2, the research team will determine if screening acceptance is similar across IDU history cohorts. For Aim 3, the research team will further compare the two delivery forms of the PHCI through a health economics assessment, both independent of IDU history and within each IDU history cohort.

Read the detailed description

As part of routine practice at Mount Sinai Health System EDs, the ED Nurses initiate HIV/HCV screening for all patients able to provide consent. ED patients eligible for recruitment into the RCT portion of the study are those who declined HIV/HCV screening. RCs will review the electronic health records (EHRs) of patients present in the ED during data collection periods and determine which patients are potentially eligible.

Participation in the RCT involves a one-time encounter. All research-related activities will occur in the ED. As such, drop-out during this brief RCT (\<30 minutes from recruitment through final study questionnaires) is expected to be minimal (\<5%). RCs will coordinate with participants and ED staff to facilitate participant involvement while they are receiving medical care. If necessary, participants can continue participating in designated areas of the ED (e.g., waiting room, family room) after they are discharged and there are study-related tasks remaining. There are no research related follow-ups needed.

The research team will enroll a total of 2,000 adult ED patients who meet all study criteria and agree to participate in the RCT, stratified by IDU history. Assuming 0.6 participants completing the study/hour (1 study completion/75 minutes of recruitment, enrollment, and data collection), the research team could recruit up to ≈5,184 participants (720 collection days x 12 hours/data collection/day x 0.6 participants/hour) over 3 years.

The research team will be collecting data using the QDS™ (NOVA Research Company) program installed on a tablet computer. The program has the ability to encrypt collected data, to which only the researcher has ability to de-crypt data sets (NOVA Research cannot recover lost passwords for the researcher). The program also has a data management system, allowing data export for use in analytical packages like SPSS, Stata. Internet access is not necessary for this program to function. The data can be stored on the tablet computer for the meantime, then synced once internet is available.

03

Conditions studied

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
  • Hepatitis C (HCV)

Browse trials for

04

In context

Hepatitis C Reclassified

1,743 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 97 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 72 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

University of South Florida is the lead sponsor of 340 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (24%) have results posted.

Compared within Hepatitis C, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years-old
  • Speak English or Spanish, and able to provide for study participation
  • Not AND infected/Antibody+ (per EHR review and patient report)
  • Not already participating in a HIV or HCV study (e.g., HIV PrEP, HIV vaccine)
  • Not tested for HIV OR HCV within the past 12 months (per EHR review and patient report)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<18 years old
  • Unable to speak Spanish or English
  • or positive
  • Currently enrolled in another HIV or HCV research study
  • Has tested for HIV or HCV in the past 12 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

06

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,000 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Persuasive Health Communication Intervention delivered in video format with captions

    A video with captions created by the research team will be played to persuade patients to participate in HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) screening.

    Other: Video Format with Captions

  • Active comparator
    Persuasive Health Communication Intervention delivered in video format without captions

    A video with captions created by the research team will be played to persuade patients to participate in HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) screening.

    Other: Video Format without Captions

  • Active comparator
    Persuasive Health Communication Intervention delivered by Health Educator

    Healthcare provider educator getting patients screened for HIV/HCV.

    Other: Health Educator

Interventions

  • OtherVideo Format with Captions

    A video with captions created by the research team will be played to persuade patients to participate in HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) screening.

  • OtherVideo Format without Captions

    A video without captions created by the research team will be played to persuade patients to participate in HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) screening.

  • OtherHealth Educator

    The video created by the research will be compared to a healthcare provider in terms of effectiveness in getting patients screened for HIV/HCV.

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after watching the video with captions

    The number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after watching the video with captions

    Time frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention

  2. Number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after watching the video without captions

    The number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after watching the video captions

    Time frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention

  3. Number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after speaking with a health educator

    The number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after speaking with a health educator.

    Time frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by no prior injection-drug use

    The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by no prior injection-drug use

    Time frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention

  2. The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by former injection-drug use

    The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by former injection-drug use

    Time frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention

  3. The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by current injection-drug use

    The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by current injection-drug use

    Time frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention

  4. Health economics assessment of PHCI

    The research team will further compare the two delivery forms of the PHCI through a health economics assessment, both independent of IDU history and within each IDU history cohort. This will measure cost-benefit analysis in terms of cost of each intervention in relation to how effective it is on persuading real world populations to test for HIV and HCV.

    Time frame: End of study, at 5 years

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10128, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Merchant RC, Harrington N, Clark MA, Liu T, Morgan J, Cowan E, Solnick R, Wyler B. Testing a persuasive health communication intervention (PHCI) for emergency department patients who declined rapid HIV/HCV screening: a randomised controlled trial study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 12;14(8):e089265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089265. PubMed 39134444 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Specify Other Time FrameAfter last patient enrolled up to a year from that time point.

Access criteria: Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ('learned intermediary') identified for this purpose. To achieve aims in the approved proposal. Specify Other Mechanism Secured excel file sent through email.

10

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2023 to primary completion in Jul 2026, 31 months.

Of 150 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hepatitis C, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 42. This study's 31 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 153 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 42.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 13, 2026: primary completion Aug 2026 → Jul 2026 and completion Aug 2026 → Jul 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2023
First posted
Aug 1, 2023
StartActual
Dec 4, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jul 31, 2026was Aug 2026
CompletionActual
Jul 31, 2026was Aug 2026
Last update
Oct 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 13, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2026→Jul 31, 2026 (actual)
Oct 13, 2026
Study completion
Aug 1, 2026→Jul 31, 2026 (actual)
Oct 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 13, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Aug 1, 2026→Jul 31, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Aug 1, 2026→Jul 31, 2026 (now actual)
    + 2 other changes: contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05968573
Responsible party
Roland Merchant (Professor, University of South Florida) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 1, 2023
Start date
Dec 4, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026
Completion
Jul 31, 2026
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Study contacts

Roland C Merchant, MD
principal investigator · University of South Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion