ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03243279Updated Jul 21, 2022

BRS and Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery

An observational study in Pain, Postoperative, Atrial Fibrillation and Cognitive Dysfunction, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-21.

Sponsored by Duke University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
72
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether baroreceptor sensitivity (the ability of your body to change your heart rate and/or blood pressure in response to a situation) has any effect on how likely you are to suffer certain events after heart or lung surgery. The postoperative events that the investigators will be studying are pain after surgery, atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm), and cognitive dysfunction (a decline in mental abilities).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine if preoperative baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) correlates with major outcomes after cardiac and thoracic surgery, including acute and chronic pain, atrial arrhythmias, and cognitive function. To test this hypothesis, approximately 95 patients will be enrolled, and spontaneous baroreceptor sensitivity will be measured prior to surgery as well as immediately postoperatively. Outcomes will include acute pain using the numeric rating scale, Brief Pain Inventory, and Gracely Box Scale administered preoperatively, on postoperative days 1 and 2 and by phone at 6-weeks postoperatively. Chronic pain will be assessed at 6-month follow-up visit via hyperalgesia testing using Von Frey filaments. Postoperative atrial arrhythmias will be assessed by review of postoperative telemetry, the electronic medical record, and ECG performed prior to discharge. Finally, cognitive function will be assess via Mini-Mental State examination administered preoperative and at the 6-month follow-up visit. Association between BRS and the outcomes of interest will be tested with regression models adjusted for appropriate covariates. Significance threshold alpha will be adjusted for the number of statistical tests using the Bonferroni correction. Our hypothesis is that patients with impaired preoperative BRS will have an increased incidence of acute and chronic postoperative pain, atrial fibrillation, and cognitive decline after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Cognitive Dysfunction
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,224 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,154 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is below the median of 100 across 622 observational studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,058 studies on the registry; 274 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 165 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients presenting for cardiac and thoracic surgery at Duke University Hospital, a quaternary referral center

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • >= 18 years of age
  • Undergoing cardiac (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], CABG + valve, or valve only) or thoracic (video-assisted thoracoscopic [VATS] approach to lobectomy) surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any preexisting pain condition (defined as pain of >=3 months duration prior to enrollment)
  • Pain at the time of enrollment interview
  • Need for preoperative analgesics
  • Preexisting chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
  • Preexisting atrial or ventricular arrhythmia
  • Need for preoperative anti-arrhythmic medication
  • History of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease (e.g., prior stroke) with residual deficits
  • Alcoholism (>2 drinks/day)
  • Psychiatric illness (any clinical diagnosis requiring therapy)
  • Drug abuse (any illicit drug use in the preceding 3 months before surgery)
  • Hepatic insufficiency (liver function tests > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal)
  • Severe pulmonary insufficiency (home oxygen)
  • Renal failure (serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL)
  • Non-English speaking
  • Unable to read
  • Participants who score \<24 on baseline Mini Mental State examination
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Surgical

    No interventions. Patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery will be assessed for baroreflex sensitivity and the outcomes of interest.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Baseline baroreflex sensitivity

    Non-invasive BRS testing with BIOPAC MP160

    Time frame: 30 min

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative day (POD) 1 baroreflex sensitivity

    Non-invasive BRS testing with BIOPAC MP160

    Time frame: 30 min

  2. POD 2 baroreflex sensitivity

    Non-invasive BRS testing with BIOPAC MP160

    Time frame: 30 min

  3. 6 month baroreflex sensitivity

    Non-invasive BRS testing with BIOPAC MP160

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Acute postoperative pain as assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS) - 24h

    Median NRS pain score in the first 24h after surgery

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. Acute postoperative pain as assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS) - 48h

    Median NRS pain score in the second 24h after surgery

    Time frame: 48 hours

  6. Acute postoperative pain as assessed by the Gracely Box Scale (GBS) - POD1

    GBS survey on POD 1

    Time frame: 15 min

  7. Acute postoperative pain as assessed by the Gracely Box Scale (GBS) - POD2

    GBS survey on POD 2

    Time frame: 15 min

  8. Acute postoperative pain as assessed by the Gracely Box Scale (GBS) - 6 mo

    GBS survey at 6 month follow-up visit

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Chronic pain as assessed by the change in Brief Pain Inventory score

    Change from baseline to 6 months postoperatively

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  10. Hyperalgesia

    Nociceptive threshold as assessed by Von Frey filament testing at 6 month follow-up

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Area of hyperalgesia or allodynia

    Area surrounding operative incision as assessed by Von Frey filament testing at 6 month follow-up

    Time frame: 6 months

  12. Postoperative atrial fibrillation

    Chart review assessment of the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation during hospitalization and up to 6 weeks postoperatively

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  13. Postoperative cognitive change

    Change from baseline to 6 months in the Mini Mental Status Exam score

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  14. Baseline psychological distress

    As assessed by the Brief Symptom Inventory-18

    Time frame: 15 min

  15. 6 month psychological distress

    As assessed by the Brief Symptom Inventory-18

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Baseline frailty

    As assessed by the Modified Frailty Index

    Time frame: 10 min

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 51 months.

Of 347 non-industry observational studies under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31. This study's 51 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 352 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 2, 2017
First posted
Aug 8, 2017
StartActual
Sep 15, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 15, 2021
CompletionActual
May 31, 2022
Last update
Jul 21, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03243279
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 8, 2017
Start date
Sep 15, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2021
Completion
May 31, 2022
Last update
Jul 21, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion