CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03117231Updated Sep 9, 2019

Effects of tDCS in Elderly With Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis

An interventional study of Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Osteoarthritis, Knee and Chronic Pain, sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-09.

Sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if anodal tDCS stimulation over M1 may decrease chronic knee OA pain in elderly subjects with defective CPM. In addition, this trial will help to investigate the role of central sensitization in knee OA and evaluate how tDCS stimulation may affect it.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Chronic Pain

Keywords

  • osteoarthritis
  • elderly
  • musculoskeletal pain
  • transcranial direct current stimulation
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 104 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Federal University of São Paulo is the lead sponsor of 427 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals > 60 years old, of both genders.
  • Diagnosis of primary knee osteoarthritis with chronic pain self-reported.
  • Be able to sign the informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Chronic pain (over the past 6 months) of at least 4 on a 0-10 VAS scale on average.
  • Reduction on VAS (visual analogic scale) during CPM (conditioned pain modulation) \< 10%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to transcranial brain stimulation, i.e. implanted brain medical devices or implanted brain metallic devices.
  • Severe acute or chronic decompensated disease.
  • Cognitive and behavioral impairment.
  • Epilepsy.
  • History of fractures in the lower limbs and/or spine in the last 6 months.
  • Use of carbamazepine within the past 6 months as self-reported.
  • Severe depression (with a score of >30 in the Beck Depression Inventory)
  • History of syncope.
  • Traumatic brain injury with residual neurological deficits.
  • History of alcohol abuse within the past 6 months as self-reported.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
104 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active tDCS

    Subjects will undergo low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation for 20 minutes.

    Device: Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tDCS

    Subjects will undergo low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation for 20 minutes.

    Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Interventions

  • DeviceActive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

    Subjects will undergo 15 sessions of tDCS stimulation, 1x per day at 20 minutes per session, of up to 2mA. During active stimulation, the current will be active for the full 20 minutes.

  • DeviceSham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

    Subjects will undergo 15 sessions of tDCS stimulation, 1x per day at 20 minutes per session, of up to 2mA. However, during sham stimulation (placebo) the current will not be active for the full 20 minutes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Pain Scale

    Determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in reducing pain in subjects with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis, as measured by changes in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and up to 60 days after the end of stimulation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Quality of Life

    The investigators will use the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) to assess changes in quality of life.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 days after the of stimulation

  2. Changes in Physical Function as measured through Lequesne Index

    The investigators will use the Lequesne Index to assess changes in functional capacity.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30, and 60 days after the end of stimulation

  3. Changes in Patient Global Assessment

    Modifications in the patient global assessment will be evaluated by measuring changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 after the end of stimulation

  4. Changes in Physical Function as measured through Western Ontário and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

    The investigators will use the Western Ontário and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) to assess changes in functional capacity.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 days after the end of stimulation

  5. Adverse Events

    Subjects will complete a questionnaire, after each session, to assess potential adverse events of stimulation (headache, neck pain, mood alterations, and seizures) on a 5-point scale.

    Time frame: Up to 60 days after the end of stimulation

  6. Changes in Mood

    The safety of tDCS will be monitored by measuring changes in the Visual Analog Mood Scale.

    Time frame: Up to 60 days after the end of stimulation

  7. Changes in cognition

    The safety of tDCS will be monitored by measuring changes in the MMSE.

    Time frame: Up to 60 days after the end of stimulation

  8. One leg standing balance test

    The investigators will analyse how long time the subject can stay stand on one foot to analise those balance.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 days after the end of stimulation

  9. Timed Up and Go Test

    The investigators will measure the walking speed of the subjects.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 days after the end of stimulation

  10. Changes Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)

    Changes in the pain pressure threshold will be analyzed in order to determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in increasing the pain pressure threshold in subjects with osteoarthritis knee pain.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 days after the end of stimulation

  11. Changes in mechanical detection threshold as measured through Von-Frey monofilaments

    Changes in the mechanical detection threshold (MDT) will be measured through calibrated Von-Frey monofilaments in order to determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in increasing the mechanical detection threshold of subjects with osteoarthritis knee pain.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 days after the end of stimulation

  12. Changes in mechanical pain threshold as measured through Von-Frey monofilaments

    Changes in the mechanical pain threshold (MDT) will be measured through calibrated Von-Frey monofilaments in order to determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in increasing the mechanical pain threshold of subjects with osteoarthritis knee pain.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 days after the end of stimulation

  13. Descending Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC)

    The investigators will monitore the central modulation of pain.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 15, 30 and 60 days after the end of stimulation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Daniela Tavares
    São Paulo, SP, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tavares DRB, Okazaki JEF, Santana MVA, Pinto ACPN, Tutiya KK, Gazoni FM, Pinto CB, Santos FC, Fregni F, Trevisani VFM. Motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation effects on knee osteoarthritis pain in elderly subjects with dysfunctional descending pain inhibitory system: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):477-487. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Mar 5. PubMed 33684598 ↗
  • Tavares DRB, Okazaki JEF, Rocha AP, Santana MVA, Pinto ACPN, Civile VT, Santos FC, Fregni F, Trevisani VFM. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Knee Osteoarthritis Pain in Elderly Subjects With Defective Endogenous Pain-Inhibitory Systems: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Oct 29;7(10):e11660. doi: 10.2196/11660. PubMed 30373731 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03117231
Lead sponsor
Federal University of São Paulo
Collaborators
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Responsible party
Daniela Regina Brandão Tavares (Geriatrician, Federal University of São Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 17, 2017
Start date
Mar 15, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2019
Completion
Jul 1, 2019
Last update
Sep 9, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion