CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT030846013-mixtatinUpdated Oct 26, 2018

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain After Using 3MIX-TATIN Versus Calcium Hydroxide Iodoform Paste In Necrotic Primary Molars Treated by Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Therapy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Calcium Hydroxide, Iodoform, paste and 3-mixtatin in Necrotic Pulp and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Mahmoud M Saadoon. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 8 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-26.

Sponsored by Mahmoud M Saadoon · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the current study is to compare a newly introduced material which is a combination of triple mix antibiotics paste and anti-hyperlipidemia drug simvastatin, the new material is named 3MIX-TATIN \& will be compared to triple antibiotic paste for management of necrotic primary molars by using lesion sterilization and tissue repair LSTR technique.

Read the detailed description

3Mix-tatin will prepared by mixing three commercially available antibiotics with simvastatin. After removing the coating materials, 3 types of antibiotics are pulverized by porcelain mortars and pestles to achieve fine powders. A total of 100 mg ciprofloxacin, 100 mg metronidazole, and 100 mg cefixime will be mixed in a ratio of 1: 1: 1. Two milligrams of simvastatin will be added to the drugs blend to form 3-Mix-tatin. Preparation of 3Mixtatin will be trained and supervised by an expert pharmacist. 3Mixtatin will be stored in a tightly capped porcelain container, adding a small amount of silica gel in a bag inside the container to maintain low humidity. This powder will be mixed with normal saline to form a creamy paste of 3Mixtatin at the time of application.

Local anesthesia using mepivicaine hydrochloride 3% (septodont, saint-maurdesFosses, France) will be administered.

Rubber dam isolation.

Access cavity will be prepared with a fissure bur in a high-speed handpiece, necrotic pulp tissue will be removed using a sterile sharp spoon excavator.

The canal orifices will be enlarged with a round bur (one mm diameter and two mm depth) to create medication receptacles.

Cotton pellet moistened with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) will be placed in the pulp chamber for 1 minute.

Bleeding, if present, will be controlled by applying sterile cotton pellet moistened with 10% sodium hypochlorite against the pulp stumps and will be maintained for 1 min.

The 3-Mix-Tatin will be mixed with saline to obtain a creamy mix and placed over the canal orifices and the pulpal floor.

The access opening will be sealed with a glass ionomer cement , and the tooth will be restored with a stainless steel crown.

02

Conditions studied

  • Necrotic Pulp
  • Postoperative Pain
03

In context

Dental Pulp Necrosis

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Pulp Necrosis; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 44 across 139 interventional studies indexed under Dental Pulp Necrosis.

Browse Dental Pulp Necrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Mahmoud M Saadoon as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Children age range from 5-8 years.
  • Children free from any systemic diseases or medical problems.
  • Primary molar with necrotic pulp, with pain, gingival abscess, fistula openings, or clinical mobility not exceeding grade two.
  • Radiographic evidence of non-perforating internal resorption, external resorption not exceeding 1\3 of the root, furcation or periapical radiolucency.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Non-restorable molars or beyond repair, for example: decay reaches to bifurcation, a hard gingival margin cannot be established or infection cannot be eradicated by other mean (Balaji, 2007).
  • Patient with known allergy to any type of antibiotics or anti-hyperlipidemia drugs.
  • Patient with facial cellulitis or lymphadenopathy
  • Lack of patient/parent compliance and cooperation.
  • Refusal of participation or failure to obtain an informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    calcium hydroxide iodoform paste

    intervention administered to control group is a combination of drugs as follow: ciprofloxacin 500mg, cefixime 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, simvastain 40mg. all are mixed, placed in pulp chamber only one time and tooth is restored

    Drug: 3-mixtatin

  • Experimental
    3-mixtatin

    intervention administered to experimental group is a ready made mixture of calcium hydroxide and iodoform, placed in pulp chamber only one time and tooth is restored

    Drug: Calcium Hydroxide, Iodoform, paste

Interventions

  • DrugCalcium Hydroxide, Iodoform, paste

    mixture of calcium hydroxide and iodoform

    Also known as: metapex

  • Drug3-mixtatin

    3-mixtatin mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, cefixime, and simvastatin

    Also known as: 3mixtatin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain

    measurment of post-operative pain by a questionnaire either present or absent

    Time frame: at 3rd months

Secondary outcomes

  1. swelling

    visual inspection either present or absent

    Time frame: at 3rd month

  2. swelling

    visual inspection either present or absent

    Time frame: at 6th month

  3. swelling

    visual inspection either present or absent

    Time frame: at 9th month

  4. mobility

    visual inspection either present or absent

    Time frame: at 3rd month

  5. mobility

    visual inspection either present or absent

    Time frame: at 6th month

  6. mobility

    visual inspection either present or absent

    Time frame: at 9th month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pedodontic Department Cairo University
    Cairo Governorate, Cairo 002, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03084601
Lead sponsor
Mahmoud M Saadoon
Responsible party
Mahmoud M Saadoon (resident dr, department of pedodontics, cairo University, Cairo University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 21, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2018
Completion
Mar 1, 2018
Last update
Oct 26, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion