CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03082924Updated Mar 13, 2024

Surface EMGdi Evaluate the Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With COPD: a Multi Center Prospective Study

An interventional study of Control group and Calibrated cycle ergometer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), sponsored by Zhujiang Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-13.

Sponsored by Zhujiang Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary rehabilitation is recognized as a core component of the management of individuals with chronic obstructive respiratory disease, which has become first-line treatment besides drug therapy. However, in the current clinical evaluation system of pulmonary rehabilitation, there is still a lack of simple, objective index,which can be monitored at any time.Neural respiratory drive , as an important physiological index, is closely related to the symptoms and the severity of the disease. It may be a sensitive indicator to evaluate the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation. Surface EMGdi can accurately evaluate neural respiratory drive , its detection is non-invasive, simple and safety . In recent years, with the development of signal detection and analysis technology, EMG recording is more stable, but as the related research samples were low, surface diaphragm EMG has not yet the establishment of standardization. Therefore, based on the previous work, the project was carried out in a multicenter randomized controlled study,in which the stable stage of COPD patients were included in different ways of pulmonary rehabilitation training, a comprehensive clinical assessment will be conducted before and after training. Compared with the traditional evaluation methods and standard esophageal diaphragmatic electromyography, surface EMGdi detect the changes of neural respiratory drive in patients with COPD,that can help to explore the application value of surface EMGdi in the assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with pulmonary rehabilitation, to provide a basis for the promotion of the diaphragm and the optimization of pulmonary rehabilitation program.

Read the detailed description

The patients with COPD will participate in a rehabilitation program for 52 weeks.

Participants in the proposed study will be randomly programmed into one of four intervention groups:

  1. Neither cycle training nor inspiratory muscle training.
  2. Cycle training program alone (performing on calibrated stationary cycle ergometer).
  3. Inspiratory muscle training alone (performing on threshold loading device).
  4. Combined cycle training and inspiratory muscle training(performing on calibrated stationary cycle ergometer and threshold loading device).
02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Keywords

  • surface EMGdi
  • pulmonary rehabilitation
  • inspiratory muscle training
  • exercise training
03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 500 is above the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Zhujiang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 199 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged over 40 years old.
  • Patients with pulmonary function test of forced expiratory volume at one second(FEV1)/forced vital capacity(FVC) \< 70%.
  • Patients in a clinically stable state
  • Patients who signed informed consent.
  • No participation in other pulmonary rehabilitation program within the previous 2 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with signs of an airway infection.
  • Patients with metabolic disease and serious cardiovascular disease.
  • Patients with Multiple pulmonary bulla.
  • Patients with poor compliance.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
500 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Control group

    Neither cycle training nor inspiratory muscle training.

    Device: Control group

  • Experimental
    Cycle training group

    A calibrated cycle ergometer is used to do 30-minute cycling training session 3 days a week.

    Device: Calibrated cycle ergometer

  • Experimental
    Inspiratory training group

    A threshold loading device is used to perform 21-minute inspiratory muscle training 3 days a week.

    Device: Threshold loading device

  • Experimental
    Combined group

    Calibrated cycle ergometer and threshold loading device are applied.A 30-minute cycle training is performed using calibrated cycle ergometer and a 21-minute inspiratory muscle training using threshold loading device 3 days a week.

    Device: Calibrated cycle ergometer and threshold loading device

Interventions

  • DeviceControl group

    Neither cycle training nor inspiratory muscle training.

  • DeviceCalibrated cycle ergometer

    The most common device to perform cycle training is calibrated cycle ergometer.

  • DeviceThreshold loading device

    Threshold loading device is used to perform inspiratory muscle training.

  • DeviceCalibrated cycle ergometer and threshold loading device

    Combined cycle training and inspiratory muscle training.The threshold loading device is composed of a mouth -piece attached to a small plastic cylinder that contains a spring-loaded poppet value. The valve opens to permit inspiratory flow only once the person has generated adequate negative intrathoracic pressure to condense the spring.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diaphragmatic function(composite outcome measure)

    Diaphragmatic function can be assessed by diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi), which reflect the physiological activity of the diaphragm and indicate functional status of the central drive.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in diaphragm electromyogram.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inspiratory muscle function(composite outcome measure)

    Currently, the maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximal expiratory pressures(PEmax) are measured by a digital manometer (AZ-8205, AZ Instrument, Taichung City, Taiwan)and combined to evaluate inspiratory muscle function.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in inspiratory muscle function.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

  2. Pulmonary Function(composite outcome measure)

    Pulmonary function is measured using a spirometer(PonyFX 229, Cosmed, Rome, Italy) that is calibrated daily.The FEV1 and percent-of-predicted FEV1, FVC and percent-of-predicted FVC which are presented in one report are used to evaluate Pulmonary Function.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in pulmonary function.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

  3. Cardiopulmonary exercise test(composite outcome measure)

    Cardiopulmonary exercise test can help to reflect the variables,like maximaloxygen uptake(VO2max), anaerobic threshold (AT).

    Time frame: Change from baseline in cardiopulmonary exercise test.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

  4. Degree of dyspnea(composite outcome measure)

    Difference in the degree of dyspnea can be measured by Borg index.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in degree of dyspnea.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

  5. Exercise capacity(composite outcome measure)

    Exercise capacity is evaluated using the 6-min walking distance (6MWD) according to American Thoracic Society guidelines.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in exercise performance.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

Other outcomes

  1. Body Composition Monitor(composite outcome measure)

    Body composition abnormalities are prevalent in COPD.Human body composition analyzer can detect various elements of human body and analyze human health status.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in body composition.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

  2. Health-related quality(composite outcome measure)

    Health-related quality is a component of the broader concept of quality of life and is defined as satisfaction with health.The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ);and its self-reported version are the most widely used disease-specific questionnaires.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in Health-related quality.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

  3. Symptom Evaluation(composite outcome measure)

    Individuals with chronic respiratory disease often have symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, cough, weakness,sleeplessness,and psychological distress.Instruments for assessment of multiple symptoms include COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Modified Medical British Research Council Scale(mMRC).

    Time frame: Change from baseline in symptom evaluation.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

  4. Depression and anxiety evaluation(composite outcome measure)

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was found to perform well in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients and in the general population.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in depression and anxiety evaluatione.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical Universtiy
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510282, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03082924
Lead sponsor
Zhujiang Hospital
Collaborators
Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 17, 2017
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2020
Completion
Jun 2021
Last update
Mar 13, 2024

Study contacts

Xin Chen, Doctor
principal investigator · Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical Unversity

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion