ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03029897VigiP-SEPUpdated Jul 2, 2019

E-reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions by Patients in Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis

An interventional study of My eReport France in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-02.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
161
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Adverse drug reactions are collected exhaustively during the experimental development phase of the drug, but the trial population is not representative. In post-marketing authorization, the use in the real life of medicines requires to specify the profile of adverse effects through pharmacovigilance. However, in clinical practice, under-reporting of adverse drug reactions prevents a satisfactory knowledge of the risks. For example, in the multiple sclerosis (MS) patients population in 2015, only 1 case of congestive flushing was reported by physicians, none by patients, for approximately 7,800 patients treated with Tecfidera® dimethyl-fumarate, while trials reported 39% of flush.

The investigators propose a study measuring the impact of the deployment of e-reporting to patients in a population suffering from multiple sclerosis in initiation of first line drug therapy. The study design will be a randomized controlled trial. Twenty-four direct or indirect partner centers of the OFSEP will be randomized in 2 arms (1 standard arm without intervention, and one interventional arm), Each arm including 6 CHU, 3 CHG and 3 liberal neurologists. CHUs will include 10 patients in 6 months, and CHGs and liberal neurologists 5 patients, a total of 180 patients will be included. The expected duration of this study is 12 months, 6 months of inclusion of patients, and one 6-month follow-up period for each patient. At 1 month (+/- 15 days) of the follow-up period of each patient, a questionnaire will be made by telephone call to each patient.

The study is part of the pharmacovigilance system in place in France and aims to improve its efficiency by increasing declarations and therefore earlier detection of signals in order to prevent and minimize risks.

The comparison of the two arms should make it possible to decide on the usefulness of national support for e-reporting, while respecting a good integration with the French pharmacovigilance system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,524 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 668 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 161 is above the median of 50 across 2,386 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 510 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patient (> 18 years) with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Initiation of treatment of 1st line: interferon β, peginterferon β, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl-fumarate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient with progressively progressive secondary or multiple sclerosis. Patient suffering from multiple sclerosis not treated with a first line treatment.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
161 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    experimental

    Patients are educated on the use of a mobile application to report adverse drug reactions

    Other: My eReport France

  • No intervention
    control

    Patients are not educated on the use of a mobile application to report adverse drug reactions

Interventions

  • OtherMy eReport France

    patients are educated to the use of "My eReport France" application

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of reports of adverse drug reactions

    number of reports of adverse drug reactions per patient in the intervention arm using mobile versus standard arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Caen
    Caen, 14000, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Defer G, Fedrizzi S, Chevanne D, Montastruc F, Briant AR, Parienti JJ, Peyro-Saint-Paul L; French VigipSEP Study Group; Societe Francophone de la Sclerose en Plaques (SFSEP). Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Using a Mobile Device Application by Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Saf. 2021 Feb;44(2):223-233. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01009-z. Epub 2020 Oct 13. PubMed 33048319 ↗
  • Defer G, Le Caignec F, Fedrizzi S, Montastruc F, Chevanne D, Parienti JJ, Peyro-Saint-Paul L. Dedicated mobile application for drug adverse reaction reporting by patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (Vigip-SEP study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Mar 9;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2560-4. PubMed 29523169 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2017 to primary completion in Apr 2019, 23 months.

Of 868 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43. This study's 23 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 889 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 20, 2017
First posted
Jan 24, 2017
StartActual
May 5, 2017
Primary completionActual
Apr 24, 2019
CompletionActual
Apr 24, 2019
Last update
Jul 2, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03029897
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 24, 2017
Start date
May 5, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 24, 2019
Completion
Apr 24, 2019
Last update
Jul 2, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion