ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07520578SUIVICOLOUpdated Sep 18, 2026

EFFECTIVENESS OF EARLY INFORMATION AND ENDORSMENT BY GP TO INCREASE COLONOSCOPY FOLLOW-UP AND REDUCE DELAYS IN PEOPLE WITH A POSITIVE COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING TEST. (SUIVICOLO)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Usual care follow-up by CRCDC and Information leaflet about colonoscopy follow-up in Colorectal Cancer Screening, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To be effective, organized colorectal cancer screening requires good adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy in the event of a positive test. In France, the rate of diagnostic colonoscopy following a positive colorectal cancer screening test is less than 85%, and the median delay is close to 90 days. After receiving their positive result from the laboratory, individuals with no known follow-up are contacted only six months later by the Regional Cancer Screening Coordination Centers (CRCDC) responsible for following up with individuals who have tested positive. To optimize follow-up with colonoscopy, earlier contact and information about colonoscopy appear to be necessary. The contribution of the general practitioner identified on the test could be an additional lever.

The SUIVICOLO study aims to evaluate the effectiveness on the rate of colonoscopies performed at 6 months of two strategies for optimizing the follow-up of positive results in comparison with control group C (current procedures of the CRCDC Centre Val de Loire without early letter).

The two strategies evaluated will be:

  • Group B1: Sending an early letter signed by the CRCDC accompanied by information leaflet about colonoscopy
  • Group B2: Sending an early letter co-signed by the CRCDC and the general practitioner (identified or provided by the patient on the test identification form) accompanied by information leaflet about colonoscopy.

These strategies will be compared to the current follow-up strategy in a three arm randomized controlled arm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Fecal immunochemical test
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 50 and 75 at the time of the positive colorectal cancer screening test

    • Residing in one of the departments of the Centre Val de Loire region
    • Date on which the positive CRC screening test result was sent to the beneficiary recorded
    • Colorectal cancer screening test results sent to the beneficiary within 30 days of the test being read
    • Affiliated with a health insurance fund

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have notified their refusal to allow their data to be used for research purposes will be excluded from the analyses.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control group (usual care)

    Other: Usual care follow-up by CRCDC

  • Experimental
    Early letter with information leaflet about colonoscopy

    B1

    Other: Usual care follow-up by CRCDC · Other: Information leaflet about colonoscopy follow-up

  • Experimental
    Early letter endorsed by the GP with information leaflet about colonoscopy

    B2

    Other: Usual care follow-up by CRCDC · Other: Information leaflet about colonoscopy follow-up · Other: Endorsement of CRCDC letters from the GP

Interventions

  • OtherUsual care follow-up by CRCDC

    1. 6 months after positive test result: 1st reminder letter from the CRCDC if it has no information about a colonoscopy being performed 2. 12 months after positive test result: 2nd reminder letter from the CRCDC if it has no information about a colonoscopy being performed 3. 18 months after positive test result: 3rd reminder letter from the CRCDC if it has no information about a colonoscopy being performed

  • OtherInformation leaflet about colonoscopy follow-up

    An information leaflet about colonoscopy follow-up will be sent in an early letter 7 days after positive test result, and though QR-codes in subsequent reminders.

  • OtherEndorsement of CRCDC letters from the GP

    Explicit mention of their general practitioner in letters and reminders sent by the CRCDC to individuals who have tested positive for colorectal cancer, including the information leaflet about colonoscopy or a link to this document (QR code).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Colonoscopy rate at 6 months after a positive test

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of general practitioners who agreed to participate in the project

    Time frame: At baseline

  2. Colonoscopy rates at 12 months after a positive test

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Colonoscopy rates at 18 months after a positive test

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Colonoscopy rates at 24 months after a positive test

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Number of reminders in each group by type of reminder

    Time frame: 24 months

  6. Number of people with contraindications to colonoscopy

    Time frame: 24 months

  7. Number of people with a CT colonography

    Time frame: 24 months

  8. Time to perform colonoscopy

    Time frame: 24 months

  9. Colorectal cancer at colonoscopy

    Time frame: 24 months

  10. Advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy

    Time frame: 24 months

  11. Number of people who refused colonoscopy

    Time frame: 24 months

  12. Number of lost to follow-up

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Crcdc-Cvl
    Tours, France 37000, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 106 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 65 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 42 and three quarters within 116. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 175 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 79.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2026
First posted
Apr 9, 2026
StartActual
Mar 24, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 24, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 24, 2028
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07520578
Collaborators
Centre Regional de Coordination des Depistages des Cancer - Pays de la Loire, INSERM U1086 ANTICIPE - Université Caen Normandie, URPS Centre Val de Loire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2026
Start date
Mar 24, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 24, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 24, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Lydia GUITTET, MD,PhD
Contact
lydia.guittet@unicaen.fr
231065781 ext. +33
Arnaud ALVES, MD,PhD
Contact
alves-a@chu-caen.fr
231065781 ext. +33
Lydia GUITTET, MD,PhD
study director · Caen Normandy University - INSERM U1086 ANTICIPE - Caen University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion