ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07137624Updated Oct 21, 2026

Motor Imagery and Action Observation for Gait Function in MS

An interventional study of Action Observation + Motor Imagery and Nature Video in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Oct 21, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 23 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by Hacettepe University — 6 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Multiple Sclerosis · Hacettepe University.

Planned enrollment
13th of 15
20 · median 34
Started
2026
with 4 others
No phase
15 of 23
4 open now
Registered
15th of 23
by date

Among the 23 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by Hacettepe University, this one is the 13th largest by planned enrollment of the 15 interventional ones, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 15 with no phase, and was the 15th registered.

By phase

23 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study15 · 4 open
Observational8 · 2 open

By the year they started

First in 2015; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 34 across the 15 interventional studies, 56 across the 8 observational. Of the 13 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 23 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by Hacettepe University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study will investigate whether mentally simulating walking movements while watching others walk can improve walking performance in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Participants will be divided into two groups: one group will watch walking videos and imagine themselves walking, while the other group will watch nature scenes. The study will measure muscle activity and walking patterns to assess the effects. The results may help support the use of mental practice techniques to improve mobility in people with MS.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to explore the impact of mental simulation of walking movements on walking performance in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The participants will be randomly assigned to two groups: the experimental group will watch walking-related videos and engage in mental imagery exercises, imagining themselves walking, while the control group will watch nature scenes without any walking-related content.

Objectives:

To determine whether mental imagery can enhance walking ability and gait parameters in individuals with MS.

To measure the effect of mental simulation on muscle activity and walking patterns, including stride length, walking speed, and balance.

Study Procedure:

The study will consist of multiple sessions, where participants will first undergo baseline assessments of walking ability. Following this, they will engage in either the walking video and imagery task (experimental group) or the nature video viewing task (control group) for a predetermined period of time. Measurements of muscle activity using electromyography (EMG) and walking patterns will be recorded before and after the intervention.

Potential Impact:

The results from this study may provide insights into the use of mental practice techniques as a non-invasive intervention to improve mobility in individuals with MS, a population often affected by walking difficulties. Mental imagery could serve as an adjunct therapy to traditional physical rehabilitation methods.

03

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Motor imagery
  • Action Observation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A confirmed diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) by a neurologist
  • No history of relapse within the past 3 months and not currently experiencing a relapse
  • A score of 24 or higher on the standardized

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of serious health conditions affecting the muscles, heart, lungs, or metabolism that could interfere with participation
  • History of other neurological disorders, head injury, or chronic psychiatric conditions
  • Chronic pain lasting longer than six months
  • Significant muscle stiffness in the legs that may affect EMG recordings
  • Hearing difficulties
  • Vision problems as determined by the Snellen visual acuity test
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    Arm 1: Experimental Group: Action Observation + Motor Imagery

    Behavioral: Action Observation + Motor Imagery

  • Other
    Arm 2

    Arm 2: Control Group: Nature video

    Behavioral: Nature Video

Interventions

  • BehavioralAction Observation + Motor Imagery

    Participants will watch videos showing walking actions and will be instructed to mentally simulate the movement.

  • BehavioralNature Video

    Participants will watch a video of nature scenes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Tibialis Anterior and Gastrocnemius Medialis Muscle Activity Amplitude

    Change in muscle activity amplitude (microvolts, µV) of tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis during gait initiation measured by surface EMG.

    Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention

  2. Change in Tibialis Anterior and Gastrocnemius Medialis Muscle Activity Onset Latency

    Change in onset latency (milliseconds, ms) of tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis muscle activation during gait initiation measured by surface EMG.

    Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention.

  3. Change in Step Length

    Change in step length (centimeters, cm) during gait initiation measured by the GAITRite system.

    Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention

  4. Change in Step Time

    Change in step time (seconds, s) during gait initiation measured by the GAITRite system.

    Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention

  5. Change in Step Width

    Change in step width (centimeters, cm) during gait initiation measured by the GAITRite system.

    Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention

  6. Change in Double Support Period

    Change in double support period (percentage of gait cycle, %) during gait initiation measured by the GAITRite system.

    Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention

  7. Change in Gait Velocity

    Change in gait velocity (centimeters per second, cm/s) during gait initiation measured by the GAITRite system.

    Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention

  8. Change in Cadence

    Change in cadence (steps per minute, steps/min) during gait initiation measured by the GAITRite system.

    Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Motor Imagery Vividness

    Kinesthetic and visual imagery vividness will be assessed using the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-20 (KVIQ-20), which includes 10 visual and 10 kinesthetic items (20 total). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = no image/sensation, 5 = vivid image/sensation). Higher scores indicate better imagery ability.

    Time frame: Baseline only

  2. Mental Chronometry Ratio

    The ratio between imagined and actual Timed Up and Go (TUG) performance time (both measured in seconds, s) will be calculated. During imagined trials, participants will press a button to mark the start and end of the imagined movement sequence. A ratio closer to 1 indicates better temporal congruence between imagined (iTUG) and executed TUG performance.

    Time frame: Baseline only

  3. Limb Laterality Recognition Performance

    Right-left discrimination ability will be evaluated using the Recognise Foot App™ developed by the NOI Group™. Both accuracy (percentage of correct responses, %) and response time (milliseconds, ms) will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline only

  4. Cognitive Status

    General cognitive functioning will be screened using the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE). The test is scored on a 30-point scale (0-30). Scores ≥24 indicate normal cognitive functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline only

  5. Fatigue Level

    Fatigue severity specific to MS will be measured with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The FSS consists of 9 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly agree). The final score is calculated as the mean of all items (range: 1-7), with higher scores indicating greater fatigue severity.

    Time frame: Baseline only

  6. Anxiety and Depression

    Emotional state will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The scale consists of 14 items divided into two subscales: anxiety (7 items) and depression (7 items). Each item is scored from 0 to 3, yielding subscale scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater levels of anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: Baseline only

  7. Disability Level

    Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scoring will be performed using the standardized Neurostatus-EDSS format. This scale evaluates functional systems such as motor ability, balance, vision, and sensory function to quantify disability level in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Scores range from 0 to 10 in 0.5-point increments, where 0 indicates normal neurological status and 10 represents death due to MS. Higher scores reflect greater disability.

    Time frame: Baseline only

  8. Visual Acuity

    Participants' visual acuity will be assessed using the Snellen chart under standard conditions. The test will be conducted with or without corrective lenses depending on the participant's usual visual aid usage. Visual acuity will be recorded as a Snellen fraction (e.g., 20/20, 20/40), where larger denominators indicate poorer visual performance.

    Time frame: Baseline only

Other outcomes

  1. Perceived Task Load

    The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) will be used to measure mental and physical workload related to the task. The scale consists of six subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. Each subscale is rated on a 0-100 visual analog scale, and an overall workload score is obtained by averaging the six subscales. Higher scores indicate greater perceived workload.

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wright DJ, Williams J, Holmes PS. Combined action observation and imagery facilitates corticospinal excitability. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 27;8:951. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00951. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25505880 ↗
  • Rocca MA, Meani A, Fumagalli S, Pagani E, Gatti R, Martinelli-Boneschi F, Esposito F, Preziosa P, Cordani C, Comi G, Filippi M. Functional and structural plasticity following action observation training in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2019 Oct;25(11):1472-1487. doi: 10.1177/1352458518792771. Epub 2018 Aug 7. PubMed 30084706 ↗
  • Gil-Bermejo-Bernardez-Zerpa A, Moral-Munoz JA, Lucena-Anton D, Luque-Moreno C. Effectiveness of Motor Imagery on Motor Recovery in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;18(2):498. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020498. PubMed 33435410 ↗
  • Chye S, Valappil AC, Wright DJ, Frank C, Shearer DA, Tyler CJ, Diss CE, Mian OS, Tillin NA, Bruton AM. The effects of combined action observation and motor imagery on corticospinal excitability and movement outcomes: Two meta-analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Dec;143:104911. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104911. Epub 2022 Nov 5. PubMed 36349570 ↗
  • Salamci M, Salci Y, Topuz S, Yalcin AI, Acar Ozen P, Tuncer A. Gait initiation in multiple sclerosis patients with and without functional loss. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Nov;79:104990. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104990. Epub 2023 Sep 4. PubMed 37708821 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 10 months after the start.

Of 847 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 869 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 21, 2026: primary completion Sep 2026 → Nov 2026 and completion Sep 2026 → Nov 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 6, 2025
First posted
Aug 22, 2025
StartActual
Jan 3, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026was Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 2026was Sep 2026
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Sep 2026→Nov 2026
Oct 21, 2026
Study completion
Sep 2026→Nov 2026
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Primary completion Sep 2026→Nov 2026
    Study completion Sep 2026→Nov 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07137624
Responsible party
Merve Ünal (Principal Investigator, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2025
Start date
Jan 3, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Merve Ünal, Res. Asst.
Contact
merveunal.144@gmail.com
+905386582787
Yeliz Salcı, Assoc. Prof.
study chair · Hacettepe University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion