ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07358000AIMSIUpdated Sep 9, 2026

Double-blind, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial in Atopic Dermatitis: Comparison of Lipikar Balm and Relipid+ Balm in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adults

An interventional study of Baume Relipid+ in Atopic Dermatitis and Emollients, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The therapeutic cornerstone for mild to moderate forms of atopic dermatitis (AD) relies on the combination of topical corticosteroids and emollients. However, the daily application of emollients can be burdensome, leading to poor adherence, treatment fatigue, and therapeutic failure, often prompting a switch in emollient products.

Emollients therefore represent a true therapeutic challenge. They also raise economic concerns, as they are not reimbursed by national health insurance, unlike topical corticosteroids. This results in an out-of-pocket expense for patients, adding a significant financial burden in the context of this chronic skin condition.

Laboratoires Gilbert have developed and patented an active ingredient derived from seawater (Active Oligo Skin), formulated and produced at their pharmaceutical site in Hérouville Saint Clair. This active compound has shown promising in vitro and preclinical results in modulating inflammatory mechanisms involved in sensitive and atopic skin.

The objective of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of Laboratoires Gilbert's patented emollient balm (Relipid+) with a reference emollient balm considered the "gold standard" and most frequently prescribed on the market (Lipikar Baume AP+M, La Roche-Posay) for atopic dermatitis. The hypothesis is that the test balm will be at least as effective as the gold standard (non-inferiority) in clinical terms, with an added benefit on microbiome diversity-an emerging and critical issue in the management of atopic dermatitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atopic Dermatitis
  • Emollients

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dermatitis, Atopic

1,591 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic; 286 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 86 is close to the median of 82 across 1,246 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic.

Browse Dermatitis, Atopic studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 6 months to 70 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (SCORAD \< 40)

Time to treatment initiation \< 72 hours between initial assessment and balm application

Affiliated with the French national health insurance system and French-speaking

Written must be obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who decline participation

Patients under legal guardianship, curatorship, legal protection, or judicial safeguard

Patients with a SCORAD indicating the need for systemic therapy

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
86 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Bras Lipikar AP+M (La Roche Posay)

    Other: Baume Relipid+

  • Experimental
    Bras baume RELIPID+ (Laboratoires Gilbert)

    Other: Baume Relipid+

Interventions

  • OtherBaume Relipid+

    Application of daily emollient

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SCORAD measurment

    SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) : from 0 up to 103

    Time frame: Day 0; Day 7; Day 28; Day 70

Secondary outcomes

  1. DLQI (Quality of life)

    DLQI questionnaire, scoring to 0 up to 30

    Time frame: Day 7 and Day 14

  2. Itch NRS scale (Itch Numeric Rating Scale)

    Itch Numeric Rating Scale from 0 to 10

    Time frame: Day 4 and Day 14

  3. Use of topical steroids

    Amount of topical steroids used

    Time frame: Day 70 at the end of the study

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07358000
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion