ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04012905CORTODOSEUpdated Jun 26, 2026

Giant Cell Arteritis: Comparison Between Two Standardized Corticosteroids Tapering

A Phase 3 interventional study of Corticosteroids for Systemic Use in Giant Cell Arteritis, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-26.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2021; still recruiting 5 years 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Corticosteroid therapy has always been the standard treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA), with very good initial clinical efficacy but a high relapse rate when it declines.

The target population of this condition, often elderly, is particularly exposed to the numerous undesirable effects of corticosteroid therapy, and this especially as its duration lengthens with the re-increases of doses according to relapses: metabolic complications, osteo-muscular , infectious or neuropsychiatric.

Investigators propose to compare prospectively the results of a "conventional" corticosteroid regimen as recommended by European societies, to those of a "lighter and / or shorter" scheme, inspired by recent North American trials. , including the largest prospective global study in the field. Investigators hypothesize non-inferiority of the lightened regimen for relapse rate without relapse at S52, but with a decrease in treatment-related adverse events whose cumulative doses should be lower.

Investigators therefore plan to include prospectively over 3 years 150 patients, 75 for each of the two arms, with a newly diagnosed ACG. A randomization of the treatment arm will be performed and a predefined pattern of cortisone adapted to body weight will be given to the patient. Relapse rates, maintenance of remission, cumulative doses of cortisone and adverse effects of treatment will be analyzed at the 52nd week of the introduction of corticosteroid therapy. An interim analysis is planned at S28.

Read the detailed description

Treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) relies on the use of glucocorticoids (GC), with a very good clinical response at treatment initiation. However, relapses at GC tapering are frequent. GCA population is elderly, frequently over 80 years, and is especially affected by GC-related side effects, that increase proportionally with treatment duration. Thus, metabolic, musculo-skeletal, infectious or neuro-psychiatric complications are frequent during prolonged GC use.

After GC introduction, gradual tapering is scheduled, provided the disease remains clinically and biologically controlled. In France, guidelines recommend tapering GC on an 18-24 months timeframe, while other countries, such as the USA, usually taper GC over a shorter period, often 6-8 months. Few comparative data exist on the relapse rates or the GC-related side effects in both settings. In this prospective multicenter study, two GC-tapering schedules are planned: patients in one arm (short treatment) will be treated for 28 weeks, while patients in the second arm will be treated for 52 weeks. Each starting dose of GC and tapering doses will be adapted to body weight. The primary endpoint is to compare the remission rate without relapse at W52 between the two groups and the secondary endpoints are: 1) cumulative GC doses at W52; 2) GC-related side effects and 3) number of relapses (minor and severe) in both arms at W52.

The results of this study might considerably modify future French clinical practice if investigators confirm that a shorter GC treatment does not significantly impact the disease course while reducing GC-related side effects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Giant Cell Arteritis

Keywords

  • Giant Cell Arteritis
  • Horton disease
  • Corticosteroids treatment
  • Prednisone
  • Relapse
  • Side effect
  • Cumulative doses
03

In context

Giant Cell Arteritis

147 studies on the registry are indexed under Giant Cell Arteritis; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 64 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Giant Cell Arteritis.

Browse Giant Cell Arteritis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 50 years
  • Patient with temporal arteritis giant cell match 2 of the 4 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) that given :

    • a temporal artery compatible with a diagnosis of CAG or
    • an abdominal thoracic aortitis diagnosed by Angio CT, MR angiography or PET scanner or
    • Echo Doppler compatible with a diagnosis of CAG
  • Oral treatment started up to 14 days, the initial dose is less or equal to 1 mg / Kg
  • Patient wo has given its written consent Patient affiliated with a social security

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects checking one of the criteria for non-inclusion may be eligible to participate in the research. These criteria may include:

  • Early treatment of CAG disease with a dose> 1 mg / kg whatever the duration
  • already started over 14 days
  • Giant arteritis cell on relapse
  • dementia syndrome
  • No compliant patient
  • Patients who live more than 150 km from the investigation center
  • Person under judicial protection, guardianship
  • to prednisone or any of its
  • Infection requiring an systemic treatment
  • Evolutive viroses (Hepatitis, Herpes, varicella-zoster virus)
  • Immunization with / mitigated during the 8 weeks preceding inclusion
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding women or women of not using
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Short tapering corticosteroids

    Corticosteroid taper over 28 weeks

    Drug: Corticosteroids for Systemic Use

  • Active comparator
    Long tapering corticosteroids

    Corticosteroid taper over 52 weeks

    Drug: Corticosteroids for Systemic Use

Interventions

  • DrugCorticosteroids for Systemic Use

    Corticosteroids tapering over 28 weeks: J0 = 0,7 mg/kg S2 = 0,6 mg/kg S4 = 0,5 mg/kg S6 = 0,4 mg/kg S8 = 0,3 mg/kg S10 = 0,25 mg/kg S12 = 0,2 mg/kg S14 = 0,15 mg/kg S16 = 0,15 mg/kg S20 = 0,1 mg/kg S24 = 0,05 mg/kg S28 = 0 mg/kg Corticosteroids tapering over 52 weeks: J0 = 0,7 mg/kg S2 = 0,6 mg/kg S4 = 0,6 mg/kg S6 = 0,5 mg/kg S8 = 0,4 mg/kg S10 = 0,3 mg/kg S12 = 0,25 mg/kg S14 = 0,2 mg/kg S16 = 0,175 mg/kg S20 = 0,15 mg/kg S24 = 0,125 mg/kg S28 = 0,01 mg/kg S32 to S52: - 1mg per month

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient in complete remission over a follow up of 52 weeks, without relapse

    Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. First relapses rate at S28 and S52

    Time frame: Weeks 28 and 52

  2. Second relapses rate at S28 and S52

    Time frame: Weeks 28 and 52

  3. Delay between first and second relapses

    Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

  4. Cumulative and the average dose of prednisone used

    Time frame: Weeks 28 and 52

  5. Number of patient with corticosteroids dependence at week 52

    Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

  6. Safety according CTCAE v5.0

    Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bienvenu B, Ly KH, Lambert M, Agard C, Andre M, Benhamou Y, Bonnotte B, de Boysson H, Espitia O, Fau G, Fauchais AL, Galateau-Salle F, Haroche J, Heron E, Lapebie FX, Liozon E, Luong Nguyen LB, Magnant J, Manrique A, Matt M, de Menthon M, Mouthon L, Puechal X, Pugnet G, Quemeneur T, Regent A, Saadoun D, Samson M, Sene D, Smets P, Yelnik C, Sailler L, Mahr A; Groupe d'Etude Francais des Arterites des gros Vaisseaux, under the Aegis of the Filiere des Maladies Auto-Immunes et Auto-Inflammatoires Rares. Management of giant cell arteritis: Recommendations of the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis (GEFA). Rev Med Interne. 2016 Mar;37(3):154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Jan 29. PubMed 26833145 ↗
  • de Boysson H, Aouba A. Abatacept as Adjunctive Therapy for the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis: Comment on the Article by Langford et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;69(7):1504. doi: 10.1002/art.40105. Epub 2017 May 10. No abstract available. PubMed 28324917 ↗
  • van der Goes MC, Jacobs JW, Boers M, Andrews T, Blom-Bakkers MA, Buttgereit F, Caeyers N, Cutolo M, Da Silva JA, Guillevin L, Kirwan JR, Rovensky J, Severijns G, Webber S, Westhovens R, Bijlsma JW. Monitoring adverse events of low-dose glucocorticoid therapy: EULAR recommendations for clinical trials and daily practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Nov;69(11):1913-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.124958. Epub 2010 Aug 6. PubMed 20693273 ↗
  • Proven A, Gabriel SE, Orces C, O'Fallon WM, Hunder GG. Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Oct 15;49(5):703-8. doi: 10.1002/art.11388. PubMed 14558057 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All individual data will be analyzed in University Hospital, Caen

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04012905
Collaborators
University Hospital, Lille, Amiens University Hospital, University Hospital, Rouen, University Hospital, Limoges, Central Hospital Saint Quentin, Central Hospital, Valenciennes, Central Hospital, Lisieux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 9, 2019
Start date
Mar 3, 2021
Primary completion
May 3, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 3, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 26, 2026

Study contacts

Hubert De BOYSSON, MD
Contact
deboysson-h@chu-caen.fr
02 31 06 57 32 ext. +33
Audrey SULTAN, PhD
Contact
sultan-a@chu-caen.fr
02 31 06 33 58 ext. +33
Hubert De BOYSSON, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Caen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion