CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02892903RIPCORD 2Updated Aug 12, 2019

In the Management of Coronary Artery Disease, Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment at the Time of Coronary Angiography Affect Management Strategy, Hospital Costs and Outcomes?

An interventional study of Routine Measurement of FFR in Chest Pain, Stable Angina and Acute Coronary Syndrome, sponsored by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust. Status unknown at 17 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2019), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomised controlled trial to compare two strategies for the investigation of coronary artery disease at the time of angiography. Patients will be randomised to conventional angiography or additional, routine pressure wire assessment - measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) - in all main vessels judged as being of sufficient vessel calibre to allow percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (experimental arm).

Read the detailed description

The study will recruit patients undergoing angiography for the investigation of stable angina or for the assessment of a recent, but stabilised, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome event. Eligible patients who provide written informed consent will be randomised to conventional angiography or additional, routine pressure wire assessment - measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) - in all main vessels judged as being of sufficient vessel calibre to allow percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (experimental arm). The study pragmatic design allows investigators to conduct all diagnostic and therapeutic management in accordance with prevailing best practice patterns. Study outcome measures will examine resource utilisation, patient reported quality of life and clinical events at 1 year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chest Pain
  • Stable Angina
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Non ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

  • Fractional flow reserve (FFR)
  • Pressure wire (PW)
  • Coronary angiography
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,100 is above the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 147 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  • Inclusion criteria

o Outline Initial Inclusion Criteria (before entry to cath lab):

Patient scheduled for coronary angiography for the:

  • Elective investigation of known or suspected coronary artery disease OR
  • Urgent investigation of a recent but stabilised, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome event

    o Outline Angiographic Inclusion Criterion (after angiography):

  • Presence of significant coronary disease defined as:

Any stenosis >30% reduction in luminal diameter, by visual estimate, in at least one vessel (main or branch) of sufficient calibre to permit the potential performance of PCI - approximately 2.25 mm diameter.

  • Key Exclusion Criteria

    • Screening phase exclusion criteria:

      • ≤ 18 years of age
      • Previous enrolment in this trial
      • Currently enrolled into another study unless co-enrolment approved by Chief Investigator (CI) and the clinical trials unit (CTU)
      • Inability to provide informed consent
      • Residence outside the United Kingdom (UK) or other issues limiting the ability to secure clinical follow-up data to one year
      • Non-cardiac pathology that may limit survival in the next year
      • Clear contraindication to potential future management with CABG or PCI (patients should be a potential candidate for medical therapy or revascularisation with either PCI or surgery)
      • Heart valve disease of sufficient import to consider valve replacement or other intervention as part of an index management strategy
      • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
      • Previous coronary artery surgery of any type
      • Known chronic renal impairment with a current estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of \< 45
      • Anaemia with a current measured haemoglobin of \< 100
      • Angiography performed in the context of an ST elevation myocardial infarction event
      • Any patient who at the time of planned angiography manifests haemodynamic instability, or recurrent sustained ventricular arrhythmia, or Mobitz type II or complete heart block
      • Any patient who at the time of planned angiography manifests unstable chest pain symptoms at rest or has required the continuing use of intravenous nitrates or regular opioid analgesia to control symptoms
      • Continuing use of intravenous glycoprotein 2b/3a (GP2b3a) agents before entry to the catheterisation laboratory
      • Known intolerance, hypersensitivity or contraindication to adenosine - including significant reversible airways disease
      • Additional investigations planned (or deemed likely to be required) for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia or viability. Examples of proposed tests that would constitute an exclusion criterion would include, but are not limited to, exercise tolerance testing, stress echocardiography, cardiac MRI viability or perfusion scanning or nuclear myocardial perfusion scanning.
      • Active bleeding at the time of planned index angiography
      • Pregnant women
    • Angiographic phase exclusion criteria:

      • Single vessel occlusive coronary disease (TIMI flow \<3) as sole disease
      • Patient not suitable for the immediate performance of a pressure wire assessment of all major vessels for any reason, for example:

        • Patient discomfort
        • Change in the clinical condition or complication of angiography requiring termination of the procedure or immediate intervention
        • Significant use of radiographic contrast or X-Ray exposure during the initial angiography
        • Inadequate angiographic images or failure to intubate any of the coronary vessels
        • Aorto-ostial disease that would preclude accurate assessment of FFR
        • Insufficient laboratory time
        • Uncertain availability of key clinical and trial staff
        • PW use in coronaries declared unsafe (e.g. tight or long disease)
        • PW use in coronaries declared unsuitable (e.g. distal disease or complete cross-filling)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Conventional angiography

    Routine angiography will be performed according to local best practice

  • Experimental
    Routine Measurement of FFR

    Additional investigation with the measurement of FFR in all major vessels

    Device: Routine Measurement of FFR

Interventions

  • DeviceRoutine Measurement of FFR

    FFR measurement will be performed in all major vessels with normal (TIMI 3) flow. Occluded vessels and vessels with TIMI flow \<3 will not be examined but will be 'awarded' an FFR value of 0.5

    Also known as: Pressure wire assessment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Economic Outcome Measure

    Resource utilisation as determined by hospital care costs at one year; All hospital admissions will be tracked using national hospital episode statistics; the cost of each episode will be derived from a cost model using standard UK tariffs. This analysis will compare the mean (or median) of the total hospital costs recorded for each patient over the 12 month follow-up period.

    Time frame: One year

  2. Primary Quality of Life Outcome Measure

    Patient reported quality of life at one year using the EQ-5D health questionnaire.

    Time frame: One year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Management strategy information

    · Proportion of vessels deemed to demonstrate flow-limiting disease and targeted for revascularisation in the declared initial management strategy.

    Time frame: Reported once: Single declaration at index procedure after randomisation

  2. Management strategy information

    · Proportion of patients scheduled for management with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in the declared initial management strategy.

    Time frame: Reported once: Single declaration at index procedure after randomisation

  3. Angina symptoms

    • Angina symptoms as reported by the research team after the 12 month contact, described by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grade.

    Time frame: One year

  4. Angina symptoms

    • Angina symptoms as reported by the patient with private completion of a screening form at 12 months, described by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grade.

    Time frame: One year

  5. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: One year

  6. Number of hospitalisation events

    Time frame: One year

  7. Total hospital days

    Time frame: One year

  8. Hospitalisation events

    Hospitalisation events coded as cerebro-vascular accident (CVA).

    Time frame: One year

  9. Hospitalisation events

    Hospitalisation events coded as myocardial infarction.

    Time frame: One year

  10. Hospitalisation events

    Hospitalisation events coded as Coronary revascularisation. This analysis will involve a pre-specified subgroup analysis of: * Planned revascularisation - if declared as the index strategy. * All additional revascularisation events.

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

17 sites
  • Royal Bournemouth Hospital - The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Bournemouth, Dorset BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
    Brighton, East Sussex BN2 5BE, United Kingdom
  • Queen Alexandra Hospital - Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
    Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3LY, United Kingdom
  • Southampton General Hospital - University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
    Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
  • Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital - East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
    Blackburn, Lancashire BB2 3HH, United Kingdom
  • Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Liverpool, Merseyside L14 3PE, United Kingdom
  • Freeman Hospital - Newcastle Hospitals
    Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumberland NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
  • King's Mill Hospital - Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Mansfield, Nottinghamshire NG17 4JL, United Kingdom
  • City Hospital - Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
  • Golden Jubilee National Hospital
    Glasgow, Scotland G81 4DY, United Kingdom
  • Northern General Hospital - Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
    Sheffield, South Yorkshire S5 7AU, United Kingdom
  • Royal Stoke University Hospital - University Hospitals of North Midlands
    Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 6QG, United Kingdom
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital - University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Birmingham, West Midlands B15 2TH, United Kingdom
  • Pinderfields Hospital - The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire WF1 4DG, United Kingdom
  • Castle Hill Hospital - Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
    Hull, Yorkshire HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
  • Leeds General Infirmary - Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
    Leeds, Yorkshire LS1 3EX, United Kingdom
  • Bristol Heart Institute - University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
    Bristol, BS2 8HW, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976 Apr;53(4):627-32. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.53.4.627. PubMed 1253383 ↗
  • White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med. 1984 Mar 29;310(13):819-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198403293101304. PubMed 6700670 ↗
  • De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1013-22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1013. PubMed 8124786 ↗
  • Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J Koolen JJ, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 27;334(26):1703-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606273342604. PubMed 8637515 ↗
  • Berger A, Botman KJ, MacCarthy PA, Wijns W, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.041. PubMed 16053955 ↗
  • Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611. PubMed 19144937 ↗
  • Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17. PubMed 17531660 ↗
  • Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, van't Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, De Bruyne B; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28. PubMed 20537493 ↗
  • De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov;367(18):1768. Mobius-Winckler, Sven [corrected to Mobius-Winkler, Sven]. PubMed 22924638 ↗
  • Longman K, Curzen N. Should ischemia be the main target in selecting a percutaneous coronary intervention strategy? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Aug;11(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2013.814856. PubMed 23984928 ↗
  • Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, Mangiacapra F, Nelis O, De Vroey F, Di Serafino L, Muller O, Van Mieghem C, Wyffels E, Heyndrickx GR, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Barbato E, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2831-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu094. Epub 2014 Mar 18. PubMed 24644308 ↗
  • Curzen N, Rana O, Nicholas Z, Golledge P, Zaman A, Oldroyd K, Hanratty C, Banning A, Wheatcroft S, Hobson A, Chitkara K, Hildick-Smith D, McKenzie D, Calver A, Dimitrov BD, Corbett S. Does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain?: the RIPCORD study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(2):248-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000978. Epub 2014 Mar 18. PubMed 24642999 ↗
  • Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Writing Group on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Glob Heart. 2012 Dec;7(4):275-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 26. No abstract available. PubMed 25689940 ↗
  • Weintraub WS, Mahoney EM, Zhang Z, Chu H, Hutton J, Buxton M, Booth J, Nugara F, Stables RH, Dooley P, Collinson J, Stuteville M, Delahunty N, Wright A, Flather MD, De Cock E. One year comparison of costs of coronary surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent or surgery trial. Heart. 2004 Jul;90(7):782-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.015057. PubMed 15201249 ↗
  • Zhang Z, Mahoney EM, Stables RH, Booth J, Nugara F, Spertus JA, Weintraub WS. Disease-specific health status after stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year results from the Stent or Surgery trial. Circulation. 2003 Oct 7;108(14):1694-700. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087600.83707.FD. Epub 2003 Sep 15. PubMed 12975252 ↗
  • SoS Investigators. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 Sep 28;360(9338):965-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11078-6. PubMed 12383664 ↗
  • Van Belle E, Rioufol G, Pouillot C, Cuisset T, Bougrini K, Teiger E, Champagne S, Belle L, Barreau D, Hanssen M, Besnard C, Dauphin R, Dallongeville J, El Hahi Y, Sideris G, Bretelle C, Lhoest N, Barnay P, Leborgne L, Dupouy P; Investigators of the Registre Francais de la FFR-R3F. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry. Circulation. 2014 Jan 14;129(2):173-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006646. Epub 2013 Nov 19. PubMed 24255062 ↗
  • Henderson R, Lee L. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Chapter 1 in The Oxford Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. Eds: Redwood, Curzen, Thomas. Oxford University Press 2010.
  • Muller O, De Bruyne B. Coronary physiology in clinical practice. Chapter 9 in in The Oxford Book of Interventional Cardiology. Eds: Redwood, Curzen, Thomas. Oxford University Press 2010.
  • Chest Pain of Recent Onset. NICE Guidance CG95, 2010. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG95
  • Elguindy M, Stables R, Nicholas Z, Kemp I, Curzen N. Design and Rationale of the RIPCORD 2 Trial (Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Influence Management Strategy at Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Chest Pain?): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Routine Pressure Wire Assessment With Conventional Angiography in the Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Feb;11(2):e004191. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004191. PubMed 29449442 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02892903
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2016
Start date
Sep 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2019

Study contacts

Nicholas Curzen, BM PhD FRCP
principal investigator · University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Rod H Stables, MA, DM, BM BCH, FRCP
principal investigator · Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion