An interventional study of Laximeter measurement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, sponsored by Versailles Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-23.
Sponsored by Versailles Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Actually, there are several laximeters for measuring anterior tibial translational in case of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. The most commonly used are telos, KT-1000, GnrB and Rolimeter. Results of these instrumented tests, which expressed in differential (millimeters values), have a bad correlation between them and so are not comparable in current literature. The aim of this study was to compare results of these tests and establish a ratio (pathologic knee laxity/ healthy knee laxity) to reduce differences between each instrumented test.
558 studies on the registry are indexed under Rupture; 98 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 72 across 335 interventional studies indexed under Rupture.
Browse Rupture studies →Versailles Hospital is the lead sponsor of 74 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Anterior laxity of patient was measure with 4 laximeters:Telos, reference laximeter and with three other instruments called, KT-1000, GnrB and Rolimeter.
Procedure: Laximeter measurement
Comparison of anterior laxity measurement between pathologic and healthy knees.
Collect and compare differential values of anterior laxity between pathologic and healthy knee obtained by four different laximeters (Telos, KT-1000, GnrB and Rolimeter)
Time frame: 18 months
Sensivity and specificity of each instrument
Determine sensivity and specificity of each instrument test to highlight a cruciate ligament rupture and find the better test. Evaluations are using the 4 following devices: Telos ©, KT-1000 ©, Rolimeter, and GnrB.
Time frame: 18 months
Correlation between the f4 laximeters results
Estimate if correlation between two results increase discriminating capacity in comparison with the reference.
Time frame: 18 months
Value of the ratio : pathologic (anterior knee laxity) versus healthy knee
Compare ratio pathologic versus healthy knee obtained with each instrument to determine a possible harmonization of measurements
Time frame: 18 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Versailles Hospital