ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07073118STREAMUpdated Jul 18, 2025

Safety and EffecTiveness of the Silk Vista Flow DiverteR in the TrEatment of Unruptured IntracrAnial AneurysMs

An observational study in Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intracranial aneurysms (IA) are abnormal outpouchings of cerebral arteries' walls that occur mostly in arteries found in the Circle of Willis and the middle cerebral artery bifurcation with a risk of rupture leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and potentially death. If IA is treated before rupture, survival rates improve dramatically. The IA can be treated with endovascular technique (coiling or stenting). Specifically, the parent artery reconstruction with a flow-diverter stent allows the treatment of a wide range of aneuryms with high rate of aneurysm occlusion. However, during follow-up, up to 15% of FD present deformities, associated with increased morbidity secondary to implant. This phenomenon is not predictable and its mechanism remains unexplained. The objective of this STREAM study is to generate longitudinal clinical and imaging data on the Silk Vista to further evaluate its efficacy and safety in the treatment of unruptured IA, and in particular, to assess and understand the impact of morphological changes over time associated with this device

Read the detailed description

Intracranial aneurysms (IA) are abnormal outpouchings of cerebral arteries' walls. IA prevalence ranges between 1.8% and 8% in adults, with an approximately equal male/female distribution and a mean age of 50 years at first detection. They predominantly occur in arteries found in the Circle of Willis and the middle cerebral artery bifurcation (85%). The primary concern after discovery of an unruptured IA (UIA) is the risk of rupture leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and potentially death. The aneurysmal SAH has been associated with up to 50% mortality, whereas approximately 30% of survivors are left with severe neurological and/or neurocognitive deficits, resulting in a significant public health burden. Given the evidence that when an IA is treated before rupture, survival rates improve dramatically, identification of aneurysms, specifically those at risk of rupture, and availability of effective treatment strategies, are essential for improving the clinical outcomes of these patients. The IA treatment management includes surgery (neurosurgical clipping has been the gold standard) or endovascular methods. However, over the past decade, the endovascular options to manage IA, ruptured or not, have rapidly evolved, making the treatment of IA less invasive and increasingly more successful. In endovascular technique, a parent artery reconstruction is realized with a flow-diverter stent. Following their specific characteristics, flow diverters (FD) were initially designed to treat giant and large. When comparing FD to the other endovascular techniques (coiling or stenting), FD have been shown to have a higher rate of occlusion for large aneurysms. However, during follow-up, up to 15% of FD present a stenosis that may affect their extremities (known as " fishmouth " stenosis) or their mid-segment (" stent collapse "). The deformities are associated with increased morbidity secondary to implant. This phenomena is not predictable and its mechanism remains unexplained. The DFT (drawn-filled tubing with platinum) technology used for braiding the latest generation of FD stents, including the SILK VISTA stent, may potentially contribute to this phenomenon. Data from an independent and comprehensive evaluation are needed to confirm safety and efficacy in this context. The Silk Vista SDF (BALT, Montmorency, France) is intended for the treatment of IA. The objective of this STREAM study is to generate longitudinal clinical and imaging data on the Silk Vista to further evaluate its efficacy and safety in the treatment of UIA, and in particular to assess and understand the impact of morphological changes over time associated with this device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Intracranial aneurism
  • flow-diverter stent
03

In context

Rupture

78 studies on the registry are indexed under Rupture; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 31 observational studies indexed under Rupture.

Browse Rupture studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 806 studies on the registry; 197 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old, with at least one unruptured intracranial aneurysm intended to be treated with Silk Vista

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old,
  • Patient has at least one unruptured intracranial aneurysm intended to be treated with Silk Vista
  • Has an untreated or recanalized, unruptured or previously ruptured aneurysm whose rupture occurred >30 days prior to the index procedure
  • Able and willing to comply with study procedures including returning to the study site for imaging exams
  • Able and willing to give oral

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any criteria for non- or to endovascular treatment and/or flow-diverting stent placement (e.g., suspected mycotic aneurysm, including those caused by a left atrial myxoma, systemic bacterial infection, contraindication to antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel/Plavix, ticagrelor, and heparin), local or general anesthesia, allergy to the contrast agent required for treatment by the diversion technique, known severe allergy or to nickel, titanium, tungsten, or platinum; cost of treatment for an intracranial aneurysm within the last 6 months; and for women, pregnant, or currently breastfeeding)
  • Has a true bifurcation aneurysm, defined as an aneurysm (saccular or non-saccular) located at a point of vessel bifurcation
  • Has vessel characteristics, such as severe tortuosity, stenosis, or morphology that would preclude safe endovascular access to the target aneurysm necessary for treatment with the study device.
  • Presence of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.
  • Received previous treatment of the target aneurysm or parent artery where it would interfere with the placement or proper apposition of the device
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage unrelated to a ruptured target aneurysm which occurred within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Intracranial parenchymal hemorrhage occurred within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Major surgery (including previous intracranial implant) occurred within previous 30 days or is planned in the next 6 months after enrollment date
  • Has more than one known IA that is anticipated to require treatment within 6 months of the index procedure
  • Chronic anticoagulation therapy is ongoing or known coagulopathy exists
  • Patient has a serious or life-threatening comorbidity that could confound study results
  • Presence of intracranial mass (tumor, except meningioma, abscess, or other infection), non-treated arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the territory of the target aneurysm
  • Participation in any other study which may interfere with collection of valid data under this study or may influence study endpoints Unable to complete study follow up (12 months) due to geographical distance
  • Unable to understanding study
  • Under legal protection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm

    Patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old, with at least one unruptured intracranial aneurysm intended to be treated with Silk Vista

    Device: Endovascular treatment with placement of a flow-diverting stent

Interventions

  • DeviceEndovascular treatment with placement of a flow-diverting stent

    Flow diverter stents (FDS) are braided stents with specific porosity that promotes the flow redirection within the parent vessel and outside the aneurysm sac, and the endothelialization. The FDS placed in the parent artery and covering the aneurysm sac will promote the intra-aneurysmal blood stagnation and parent vessel wall healing. All of these promoting, the aneurysm's thrombosis and ist regression

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation between stent modification with the geometry of the parent artery and the aneurysm and the dimensions of the stent.

    Correlation between stent modification (shortening and/or degree and location of stenosis) with the geometry of the parent artery and the aneurysm and the dimensions of the stent (diameter and length).

    Time frame: Month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complete occlusion rate

    Complete occlusion rate of the intracranial aneurysm. Intracranial aneurysm occlusion is measured using three scales : * Cekirge-Saatci : 5 levels from Class 1 (Complete occlusion of the aneurysm sac) to class 5 (Stable remodeling with flow modification) * O'Kelly-Marotta : including Aneurysm filling (from A-total filling (\>95%) to D-no filling (0%)) and Stasis phase (from 1-no stasis (arterial phase clearance, before capillary phase) to 3-significant stasis (persistent contrast at venous phase)) * Modified Raymond-Roy : from class I (complete obliteration) to class III (residual aneurysm)

    Time frame: Month 12

  2. Occlusion level

    Occlusion level of the treated aneurysm (acceptable (90-100%); without stenosis of the parent artery (\>50%). Intracranial aneurysm occlusion is measured using three scales : * Cekirge-Saatci : 5 levels from Class 1 (Complete occlusion of the aneurysm sac) to class 5 (Stable remodeling with flow modification) * O'Kelly-Marotta : including Aneurysm filling (from A-total filling (\>95%) to D-no filling (0%)) and Stasis phase (from 1-no stasis (arterial phase clearance, before capillary phase) to 3-significant stasis (persistent contrast at venous phase)) * Modified Raymond-Roy : from class I (complete obliteration) to class III (residual aneurysm)

    Time frame: Month 12

  3. Successful stent deployment

    Successful stent deployment at the target site, defined as the absence of implantation of a new device at the target aneurysm, endovascular treatment, additional stenting, or stent stenosis

    Time frame: Month 12

  4. disabling stroke

    Absence of disabling stroke or death (assessed by a Clinical Events Committee).

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 6

  5. Major stroke

    Occurrence of a major stroke within 7 days post-procedure (NIHSS +4 compared to baseline

    Time frame: Day 7

  6. Minor stroke

    Occurrence of a minor stroke within 7 days post-procedure (complete resolution or increase of less than 3 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS

    Time frame: Day 7

  7. Neurological events

    Any neurological event (regardless of relationship) leading to clinical deterioration, based on the change in the mRS (modified Rankin Scale) score : If the baseline mRS score is between 0 and 2, a deterioration is considered if it changes between 3 and 5; If the baseline mRS score is between 3 and 5, a deterioration is considered if it increases by one point from the baseline score.

    Time frame: Month 12

  8. Morphological changes

    Incidence of morphological changes over the stent period (stent stenosis ≥50%).

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 6, Mont 12

  9. Parent artery occlusion

    Incidence of parent artery occlusion

    Time frame: Month 12

  10. Intracranial hemorrhage

    Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (aneurysm-related)

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 6, Mont 12

  11. Adverse events

    Incidence of adverse events (other)

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 6, Mont 12

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07073118
Collaborators
Balt Extrusion
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 18, 2025
Start date
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 18, 2025

Study contacts

Omer Eker, MD, PhD
Contact
omer.eker@chu-bordeaux.fr
+33 (0)5 56 79 56 79

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion