A Phase 4 interventional study of Xalatan and Apo-Latanoprost in POAG, Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension, sponsored by Dr. David Yan. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-26.
Sponsored by Dr. David Yan · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of the study is to provide evidence that the efficacy of Xalatan will be superior to Apo-latanoprost and Co-latanoprost in the reduction of intraocular pressure in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. The study will also aim to prove the tolerability of Xalatan in terms of ocular hyperemia will be equivalent to its generic counterparts.
Since the introduction of Xalatan generic versions of latanoprost have entered the Canadian marketplace such as Apo-latanoprost (Apotex Inc.), Co-latanoprost (Cobalt Pharmaceuticals Co.) and Sandoz latanoprost (Sandoz Canada Inc.). The exact formulation of the different preparations of latanoprost may differ between manufacturers, although the active ingredient itself is not supposed to vary within a 15% tolerance. In a topical ocular medication in a multi-dose dispenser, the stability of the drug and its ability to penetrate the cornea into the eye may affect the efficacy of the drug.
There are no clinical trials to compare the efficacy of generic versions of latanoprost to Xalatan, nor are there any clinical trials comparing efficacy between the different generic versions. Empirical evidence based on clinical experience suggests that at least some of the generic versions of latanoprost may not be as effective as the branded version (Xalatan). Intraocular pressure is often observed to increase when switching from a branded to generic version of latanoprost, but the opposite is rarely if ever observed. The purpose of this study will be to compare the efficacy of Xalatan to two of the most popular generic versions of latanoprost available in Canada (Apo-latanoprost and Co-latanoprost).
1,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 231 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 65 across 1,272 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.
Browse Glaucoma studies →This is the only study on the registry with Dr. David Yan as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients in this arm will be prescribed Xalatan for the first four week period of the study and one of the generics, Apo- or Co-Latanoprost, for the second four week period. Patients will take one drop of the assigned drops in the affected eye every evening at 2100 hrs (+- 1 hr)
Drug: Xalatan · Drug: Apo-Latanoprost · Drug: Co-Latanoprost
Patients in this arm will be prescribed one of the generics, Apo- or Co-Latanoprost, for the first four week period of the study and Xalatan for the second four week period. Patients will take one drop of the assigned drops in the affected eye every evening at 2100 hrs (+- 1 hr)
Drug: Xalatan · Drug: Apo-Latanoprost · Drug: Co-Latanoprost
A prostaglandin analogue used to reduce intraocular pressure in patients diagnosed with glaucoma.
Also known as: 02231493, Latanoprost
A prostaglandin analogue used to reduce intraocular pressure in patients diagnosed with glaucoma.
Also known as: 02296527
A prostaglandin analogue used to reduce intraocular pressure in patients diagnosed with glaucoma.
Also known as: 02254786
Intraocular Pressure
Pressure within the eye will be measured at each study visit.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Ocular Hyperemia
Redness of the cornea will be quantified at each study visit using the Efron scale. The scale reads 0-5, 5 being the highest level of ocular hyperemia.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.