ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02743585RABbITUpdated Sep 10, 2019

Impact of Rapid Pathogen Identification From Blood Cultures (RABbIT)

An interventional study of Filmarray Blood Culture ID (BCID) panel and Rosco Diagnostica ESBL/carbapenemase screen kit in Bacteremia, Sepsis and Fungemia, sponsored by Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 103 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-10.

Sponsored by Tan Tock Seng Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2019), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
832
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 103 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Septic shock carries high mortality, which may be exacerbated by inappropriate initial therapy. Inappropriate therapy may result from unanticipated antimicrobial resistance. Conversely, positive blood cultures may result from contamination, leading to unnecessary therapy and procedures and possibly prolonged hospitalization. Clinicians may also resort to broad spectrum antimicrobials and be hesitant to de-escalate while awaiting susceptibility results.

The investigators hypothesize that rapid identification of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance will ameliorate the above problems and improve time to optimal therapy, avoid unnecessary therapy and ultimately improve patient outcomes. While there are a number of in-vitro and uncontrolled clinical studies, there is a paucity of well-designed clinical trials objectively examining the real-world clinical and health-economic impact of such technology. To date only one randomised trial has been performed in the US (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01898208), at a setting with low endemic rates of antimicrobial resistance. This is a companion study to NCT01898208. The investigators aim to study the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of a strategy for rapid pathogen and resistance detection in a setting with a moderate to high levels of antimicrobial resistance.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis:

  1. Rapid pathogen identification from blood cultures, including early identification of resistance (via specific genetic markers or phenotypic tests), will allow timelier initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy and improved patient outcomes
  2. Rapid organism identification from blood cultures will allow timelier initiation of effective and optimal antibiotic therapy; minimizing the use of unnecessary antibiotics, including combination therapy

Devices to be studied for this proposed study:

  1. BCID panel (Biofire Diagnostics Inc., bioMerieux) : The BCID panel is an FDA-approved nucleic acid amplification test (based on nested polymerase chain reaction) which detects Gram positive, Gram negative, the major Candida species and antimicrobial resistance markers (mecA for methicillin resistance, van A/B for vancomycin resistance, blaKPC for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)) directly from positive blood cultures in \< 1 - 1.5 hours
  2. Rosco Diagnostica extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase screen kit (Rosco Diagnostica): These kits are CE-marked (Approved in the European Union) rapid chromogenic tests for ESBL/ carbapenemase detection from both blood cultures and cultured bacterial colonies.
02

Conditions studied

  • Bacteremia
  • Sepsis
  • Fungemia
  • Blood Stream Infection
03

In context

Bacteremia

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteremia; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 832 is above the median of 156 across 156 interventional studies indexed under Bacteremia.

Browse Bacteremia studies →

Lead sponsor

Tan Tock Seng Hospital is the lead sponsor of 108 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 103 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age > 21 years and above to 103 years
  2. Blood culture flagged positive on automated instrument, with Gram positive, Gram negative bacteria or Yeast on Gram staining (including polymicrobial blood cultures)
  3. Ability to provide or ability to obtain informed consent from legal guardian/representative (verbal and written)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients whose blood cultures turn positive, but have no organism seen on Gram stain.
  2. Patients who have been previously enrolled.
  3. Patients who withdraw their consent (verbal or written).
  4. Patients with any positive blood culture in the preceding 7 days.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
832 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rapid diagnostic arm

    Standard Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) practices (bacterial culture and susceptibility testing) AND FilmArray Blood Culture ID (BCID) Panel test AND Rosco Diagnostica ESBL and carbapenemase screen will be performed. The Interventions to be administered are the rapid diagnostic tests: FilmArray Blood Culture ID (BCID) Panel test AND Rosco Diagnostica ESBL and carbapenemase screen. Subjects will be recruited 8am-3pm daily, weekdays only. Results of the BCID and Rosco test will be communicated to the managing physicians by phone in real-time.

    Device: Filmarray Blood Culture ID (BCID) panel · Device: Rosco Diagnostica ESBL/carbapenemase screen kit

  • No intervention
    Standard of care (control)

    Standard Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) practices (bacterial culture and susceptibility testing) will be used. FilmArray BCID and Rosco Diagnostica ESBL and carbapenemase screen will NOT be performed. Subjects will be recruited 8am-3pm daily, weekdays only.

Interventions

  • DeviceFilmarray Blood Culture ID (BCID) panel

    The BCID panel is an FDA-approved nucleic acid amplification test (based on nested polymerase chain reaction) which detects Gram positive, Gram negative, the major Candida species and antimicrobial resistance markers (mecA for methicillin resistance, van A/B for vancomycin resistance, blaKPC for KPC carbapenemase) directly from positive blood cultures in \< 1 - 1.5 hours

    Also known as: BCID

  • DeviceRosco Diagnostica ESBL/carbapenemase screen kit

    These kits are CE-marked (Approved in the European Union) rapid chromogenic tests for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase / carbapenemase detection from both blood cultures and cultured bacterial colonies.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time from positive blood culture result to effective/optimal antibiotics

    An effective antibiotic is defined as an antibiotic regimen to which the bacterial/fungal isolate is susceptible (or predicted to be susceptible for Candida, per speciation).An optimal antibiotic is defined as an antibiotic regimen to which the bacterial/fungal isolate is susceptible/predicted to be susceptible, which is the most narrow spectrum and targeted, as recommended by institutional guidelines. This will be considered as the time from the positive Gram stain to first effective and the first optimal antibiotic.

    Time frame: Approximately 14 days after positive blood culture

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical outcome (Infection related mortality)

    Infection-related at 30-day, 90-days and 1-year

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Clinical outcome (All-cause related mortality)

    All cause mortality at 30-day, 90-days and 1-year mortality

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Clinical outcome (Quality of life)

    Quality of life at enrolment, 90-days and at 1 year, as measured by the tools EQ-5D-5L QoL/SF-12

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Time from positive blood culture result to bacterial identification

    Time frame: Approximately 3 days

  5. Duration of hospitalization (days)

    Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, approximately 28 days

  6. Duration of bacteremia/fungemia (days)

    Time frame: Patient-dependent variable, estimated up to 7 days

  7. Time to isolation precautions

    Time taken for implementation of appropriate infection control measures (isolation precautions) as appropriate for pathogen detected

    Time frame: Estimated up to 5 days

  8. Antibiotic-associated adverse events

    This included all adverse events that occurred within 2 weeks following enrollment and were documented in the medical record.

    Time frame: Approximately 14 days after positive blood culture

  9. Antimicrobial utilization (hours/days of therapy)

    Difference between the date and time of the antibiotic start order (or Gram stain-positive blood culture, if antibiotics were started prior to the positive culture result) and the date and time of the antibiotic stop order. Shorter duration of broad spectrum antibiotics and longer duration of narrow-spectrum antibiotics were considered favorable outcomes.

    Time frame: Approximately 4 days after enrollment

  10. Mean Total Hospitalization Costs Per Subject

    These will be calculated based on actual billable patient costs (without government subventions/subsidies) following 7 days after the positive blood culture episode and for the duration of hospitalization, up to an estimated 24 weeks.

    Time frame: Approximately 7 days after positive blood culture for up to an estimated 24 weeks

  11. Mean Laboratory Costs Per Subject

    These will be calculated based on actual billable laboratory costs (without government subventions/subsidies) following 7 days after the positive blood culture episode and for the duration of hospitalization, up to an estimated 24 weeks.

    Time frame: Approximately 7 days after positive blood culture for up to an estimated 24 week

  12. Mean Antimicrobials Costs Per Subject

    These will be calculated based on actual billable antimicrobial costs (without government subventions/subsidies) following 7 days after the positive blood culture episode and for the duration of hospitalization, up to an estimated 24 weeks.

    Time frame: Approximately 7 days after positive blood culture and for duration of entire hospitalization

  13. Cost-effectiveness analysis

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be determined by dividing the difference between the average costs of treating a patient in the after phase (C1) and the average cost in the before phase (C0) by the difference between average health outcomes (QALYs) gained in the after phase (O1) and those gained in the before phase (O0). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is calculated by the following equation: (C1 - C0)/(O1 - O0). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using quality adjusted/sepsis adjusted life years gained as the health outcome of interest will then be determined, based on the method of Jones et al Crit Care Med. 2011 June ; 39(6): 1306-1312.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year after enrolment and using a 'modeled horizon' based on sepsis-adjusted life expectancies

  14. Time on effective/optimal antibiotics within first 96 hours of positive blood culture

    An effective antibiotic is defined as an antibiotic regimen to which the bacterial/fungal isolate is susceptible (or predicted to be susceptible for Candida, per speciation).An optimal antibiotic is defined as an antibiotic regimen to which the bacterial/fungal isolate is susceptible/predicted to be susceptible, which is the most narrow spectrum and targeted, as recommended by institutional guidelines. This will be considered in the 96-hour time frame from the positive Gram stain.

    Time frame: First 96 hours after blood culture turns positive

Other outcomes

  1. Time to First Appropriate De-escalation or First Appropriate Escalation of Antibiotics

    De-escalation included discontinuation of 1 or more antibiotics and/or switching from a broad- to a narrow spectrum antibiotic. Escalation included initiation of 1 or more antibiotics and/or switching from a narrow- to a broad-spectrum antibiotic

    Time frame: Positive Gram stain, 96 hours after enrollment

  2. Percent of Contaminated Blood Cultures Not Treated or Treated for Less Than 24 Hours

    Contaminated blood cultures were defined as growth of organisms such as coagulase-negative staphylococci from a single blood culture set when greater than or equal to 2 blood culture sets were collected, except among subjects suspected to have true bacteremia associated with central venous catheters or devices.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after positive blood culture

  3. Length of Entire Hospitalization (Days)

    Time frame: Participants are followed for the duration of hospital stay, approximately 15 days

  4. Percentage of Subjects With Infectious Disease Consultation Within 72 Hours of Enrollment

    Time frame: Approximately within 72 hours of positive blood culture

  5. Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay (days)

    Time frame: Within 14 days of positive blood culture until ICU discharge, up to an estimated 24 weeks.

  6. Percentage of Patients Who Acquired Clostridium Difficile Within 30 Days After Enrollment

    Time frame: Approximately 30 days after positive blood culture

  7. Percentage of Patients Who Acquired Multidrug-resistant organisms Within 30 Days After Enrollment

    Multidrug-resistant organisms included vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species resistant to greater than or equal to 3 antibiotic classes.

    Time frame: Approximately 30 days after positive blood culture

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
    Singapore, Singapore
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ong SWX, Hon PY, Wee SSH, Chia JWZ, Mendis S, Izharuddin E, Lin RJ, Chia PY, Sim RCS, Chen MI, Chow A, Yoong J, Lye DC, Teng CB, Tambyah PA, Banerjee R, Patel R, De PP, Vasoo S. Accuracy of a Rapid Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Plus a Chromogenic Phenotypic Test Algorithm for Detection of Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase and Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacilli in Positive Blood Culture Bottles. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 May 30;74(10):1850-1854. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab848. PubMed 34554228 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 27 months.

Of 34 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bacteremia, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 64. This study's 27 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 35 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 64.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 29, 2016
First posted
Apr 19, 2016
StartActual
Mar 20, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jul 2, 2019
CompletionEst.
Jul 2, 2020
Last update
Sep 10, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02743585
Collaborators
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Shawn Vasoo (Consultant, Tan Tock Seng Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2016
Start date
Mar 20, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2019
Completion
Jul 2, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2019

Study contacts

Shawn Vasoo, MD
principal investigator · Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Partha P De, MD
principal investigator · Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Christine B Teng, MSc
principal investigator · National University of Singapore/Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion