CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02562924Updated Oct 16, 2019Results posted

The Efficacy of MEDIHONEY® for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

An interventional study of MEDIHONEY® and Budesonide in Chronic Sinusitis and Nasal Polyposis, sponsored by University of Vermont Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-16.

Sponsored by University of Vermont Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will assess the effectiveness of MEDIHONEY® sinus rinses (alone or in combination with intranasal corticosteroids) vs. intranasal corticosteroid sinus rinses on mucosal healing and polyp recurrence in the post-operative period following functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Read the detailed description

In patients with refractory CRSwNP, functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), is intended to restore physiologic sinus ventilation and drainage, which can facilitate the gradual resolution of mucosal disease. However, because FESS does not directly treat the underlying inflammatory disorder, a successful sinus surgery must be followed by medical maintenance therapy to control inflammatory processes.

The current mainstay of treatment of CRSwNP includes antibiotics and topical and systemic steroids. There is evidence that administration of systemic steroids in the postoperative period for patients who have polyps may have a significant impact on their postoperative course. However, the chance of significant side effects increases with the dose and duration of treatment and therefore the minimum dose necessary to control the disease should be given. Antibiotics also have their limited but documented side effects and can induce resistance.

A semi-natural product like manuka honey (brand name MEDIHONEY®), with antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, might prove as a useful alternative since it has no major adverse events documented in the literature, does not induce resistance and is effective against resistant pathogens common in this patient population.

This study is a prospective, randomized, pilot clinical trial that will determine if the use of MEDIHONEY® sinus rinses (alone or in combination with intranasal steroids) in the postoperative period enhances recovery and prevents polyp recurrence in patients after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), compared with the standard regimen of topical corticosteroid sinus rinses. The study will collect and compare subjective and objective efficacy assessments of both types of rinses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Sinusitis
  • Nasal Polyposis

Keywords

  • MEDIHONEY
  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
  • Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
03

In context

Rhinosinusitis

330 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinosinusitis; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Rhinosinusitis.

Browse Rhinosinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Vermont Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 years or older;
  1. Diagnosis of CRSwNP based on the following criteria:
  • Pattern of symptoms:

    i. Symptoms present for ≥12 wk

  • Symptoms for diagnosis: Requires ≥2 of the following symptoms:

    i. Anterior and/or posterior mucopurulent drainage; ii. Nasal obstruction; iii. Facial pain/pressure/fullness;

  • Objective documentation: Requires both:

    1. Endoscopy to verify the presence of polyps in middle meatus and document presence of inflammation, such as discolored mucus or edema of middle meatus or ethmoid area; and
    2. Evidence of rhinosinusitis on imaging by CT (1 obvious polypoid tissue or sinus opacification and/or at least 2mm of mucosal thickening).
  • Failed medical management (i.e. refractory CRSwNP) and eligible for FESS.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications to oral prednisone or known hypersensitivity to any study medications;
  2. Churg Strauss disorder;
  3. abnormalities of mucociliary clearance (cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia and Young's syndrome);
  4. Diagnosed immunodeficiency;
  5. Aspirin-induced asthma (ASA) (aka Samter triad) (a triad of asthma, aspirin and NSAID sensitivity, and nasal/ethmoidal polyposis).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Budesonide rinse group

    1a. Days 0-7: 40 mg prednisone daily, saline sinus rinse 4 times daily, nasal saline spray q 1 hour while awake b. Days 7-91: 8oz saline/budesonide sinus rinse BID (twice daily) c. After day 91: i. In case endoscopy shows any polyps, edema or discharge: Decrease volume to 4 oz budesonide/saline rinse BID. Continue until day 182 ii. In case endoscopy shows no polyps, edema and discharge: Decrease volume to 4 oz budesonide/saline rinse once daily. Reevaluate at day 119: 1. In case endoscopy shows any polyps, edema or discharge: Return to the initial regimen as per 1.c.i till day 182. 2. In case endoscopy shows no polyps, edema and discharge: Continue as per 1.c.ii till day 182.

    Drug: Budesonide · Drug: Normal saline sinus rinse · Drug: Prednisone · Procedure: Endoscopic sinus surgery · Drug: nasal saline spray

  • Experimental
    MEDIHONEY® rinse alone group

    1. Days 0-7: Same as 1a; 2. Days 7-91: 8oz saline sinus rinse followed with 0.5oz of MEDIHONEY® in 50 cc of normal saline. 3. After day 91: i. In case endoscopy shows any polyps, edema or discharge: Decrease volume to 4 oz saline rinse followed with the 50cc of the MEDIHONEY®rinse BID. Continue until day 182 ii. In case endoscopy shows no polyps, edema and discharge: Decrease volume to 4 oz saline rinse followed with the 50cc of the MEDIHONEY®rinse once daily. Reevaluate at day 119: 1. In case endoscopy shows any polyps, edema or discharge: Return to the initial regimen as per 1.c.i till day 182. 2. In case endoscopy shows no polyps, edema and discharge: Continue as per 1.c.ii till day 182.

    Device: MEDIHONEY® · Drug: Normal saline sinus rinse · Drug: Prednisone · Procedure: Endoscopic sinus surgery · Drug: nasal saline spray

  • Experimental
    MEDIHONEY® and budesonide rinse group

    1. Days 0-7: Same as 1a.; 2. Days 7-91: 8oz saline/budesonide sinus rinse followed by 0.5oz of MEDIHONEY® in 50 cc of normal saline BID. 3. After day 91: i. In case endoscopy shows any polyps, edema or discharge: Decrease volume to 4 oz budesonide/saline rinse followed with 50cc of the MEDIHONEY® rinse BID. Continue with this regimen till day 182. ii. In case endoscopy shows no polyps, edema and discharge: Decrease volume to 4 oz budesonide/saline rinse followed with 50cc of the MEDIHONEY® rinse once a day. Reevaluate at day 119: 1. In case endoscopy shows any polyps, edema or discharge: Return to the initial regimen as per 3.c.i till day 182. 2. In case endoscopy shows no polyps, edema and discharge: Continue as per 3.c.ii till day 182.

    Device: MEDIHONEY® · Drug: Budesonide · Drug: Normal saline sinus rinse · Drug: Prednisone · Procedure: Endoscopic sinus surgery · Drug: nasal saline spray

Interventions

  • DeviceMEDIHONEY®

    MEDIHONEY® is a seminatural product with antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties

  • DrugBudesonide

    Topical steroid

  • DrugNormal saline sinus rinse

    8 oz or 4 oz of normal saline with NeilMed sinus rinse bottle

  • DrugPrednisone

    Post-operatively, 40 mg daily for 7 days

  • ProcedureEndoscopic sinus surgery

    Endoscopic sinus surgery to debride polyps and establish adequate sinus drainage

  • Drugnasal saline spray

    saline nasal mist every hour while awake

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Scores

    Characteristics of each sinonasal cavity are assessed endoscopically to provide a score based on polyp disease, mucosal edema/crusting/scarring and nasal secretions. A score is provided for the left and right. The scores are totaled to provide a number between 0 and 20. Polyps: 0 = absence of polyp; 1 = polyps in middle meatus only; 2 = polyps beyond middle meatus Edema: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = severe Discharge: 0 = no discharge; 1 = clear, thin discharge; 2 = thick, purulent discharge Scarring: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = severe Crusting: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = severe This scoring system has since been the instrument of choice to endoscopically evaluate outcomes of interventions in non-neoplastic sinonasal disease prospectively over time in research and clinical practice. The higher the score, the worse the outcome. Endoscopy scores from the 3 study groups are compared for the average unit change between baseline and day 119.

    Time frame: 119 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nasal Drainage Cultures

    Nasal drainage cultures from the 3 study groups will be compared for the average percent change between a patient's positive intraoperative cultures compared to the patient's cultures at day 35.

    Time frame: 35 days

  2. Change in Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Questionnaire Score

    The SNOT-22 consists of 22 questions; items 1 to 12 represent the physical problems associated with rhinosinusitis, items 13 to 18 represent the functional limitations, and items 20 to 22 represent the emotional consequences. Each question is scored by the patient from 0 (no problem) to 5 (the problem is as bad as it can be). The overall score can theoretically range from 0 to 110, with higher scores reflecting more severe quality of life impairment as subjectively reported by the patient. Overall SNOT-22 scores from the 3 study groups are compared for the average change in score from baseline to day 119.

    Time frame: 119 days

  3. Change in SNOT-22 Nasal Symptom Scores

    The SNOT-22 consists of 22 questions; items 1 to 12 represent the physical problems associated with rhinosinusitis, items 13 to 18 represent the functional limitations, and items 20 to 22 represent the emotional consequences. Each question is scored by the patient from 0 (no problem) to 5 (the problem is as bad as it can be). The first seven questions relate to nasal symptoms. The nasal symptoms score is calculated by summing the scores for these first seven questions. The range is 0 to 35. Higher scores reflect more severe quality of life impairment as subjectively reported by the patient. The nasal symptom scores from the 3 study groups are compared for the average change in score from baseline to day 119.

    Time frame: 119 days

07

Results

Posted Oct 16, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Limitations of this study include: non-blinded study, high drop-out rate in one study arm, and lack of quantitative data for sinus cultures.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBudesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse Group
Started131212
Completed1218
Not completed1114

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Scores

Characteristics of each sinonasal cavity are assessed endoscopically to provide a score based on polyp disease, mucosal edema/crusting/scarring and nasal secretions. A score is provided for the left and right. The scores are totaled to provide a number between 0 and 20. Polyps: 0 = absence of polyp; 1 = polyps in middle meatus only; 2 = polyps beyond middle meatus Edema: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = severe Discharge: 0 = no discharge; 1 = clear, thin discharge; 2 = thick, purulent discharge Scarring: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = severe Crusting: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = severe This scoring system has since been the instrument of choice to endoscopically evaluate outcomes of interventions in non-neoplastic sinonasal disease prospectively over time in research and clinical practice. The higher the score, the worse the outcome. Endoscopy scores from the 3 study groups are compared for the average unit change between baseline and day 119.

Time frame:
119 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Scores
score on a scaleBudesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse Group
Change in Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Scores-8.0 ± 3.1-1.5 ± 4.6-6.9 ± 3.9
SecondaryNasal Drainage Cultures

Nasal drainage cultures from the 3 study groups will be compared for the average percent change between a patient's positive intraoperative cultures compared to the patient's cultures at day 35.

Time frame:
35 days

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Questionnaire Score

The SNOT-22 consists of 22 questions; items 1 to 12 represent the physical problems associated with rhinosinusitis, items 13 to 18 represent the functional limitations, and items 20 to 22 represent the emotional consequences. Each question is scored by the patient from 0 (no problem) to 5 (the problem is as bad as it can be). The overall score can theoretically range from 0 to 110, with higher scores reflecting more severe quality of life impairment as subjectively reported by the patient. Overall SNOT-22 scores from the 3 study groups are compared for the average change in score from baseline to day 119.

Time frame:
119 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Questionnaire Score
score on a scaleBudesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse Group
Change in Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Questionnaire Score-22.8 ± 20.2-15.3 ± 27.4-25.6 ± 16.9
SecondaryChange in SNOT-22 Nasal Symptom Scores

The SNOT-22 consists of 22 questions; items 1 to 12 represent the physical problems associated with rhinosinusitis, items 13 to 18 represent the functional limitations, and items 20 to 22 represent the emotional consequences. Each question is scored by the patient from 0 (no problem) to 5 (the problem is as bad as it can be). The first seven questions relate to nasal symptoms. The nasal symptoms score is calculated by summing the scores for these first seven questions. The range is 0 to 35. Higher scores reflect more severe quality of life impairment as subjectively reported by the patient. The nasal symptom scores from the 3 study groups are compared for the average change in score from baseline to day 119.

Time frame:
119 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in SNOT-22 Nasal Symptom Scores
score on a scaleBudesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse Group
Change in SNOT-22 Nasal Symptom Scores-10.0 ± 7.0-5.3 ± 15.5-11.7 ± 7.9

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was recorded in the form of a modified version of the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). This was done at each visit from baseline (pre-surgery) to the 6th visit on day 182.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Budesonide Rinse Group0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)1/13 (7.7%)
MEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone Group1/12 (8.3%)0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)
MEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse Group0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBudesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse Group
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/131/120/12
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/131/120/12
Nasal PainGeneral disorders1/130/120/12
Blurred VisionEye disorders1/130/120/12
Mood alteration (anxiety)Psychiatric disorders1/130/120/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Budesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse GroupTotal
Mean53 ± 1951 ± 1458 ± 856 ± 14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Budesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse GroupTotal
Female2417
Male1181130
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Budesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0000
White13121237
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Budesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse GroupTotal
United States13121237
Current Smoker
Current Smoker(Participants)Budesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse GroupTotal
Count of participants2114
Former Smoker
Former Smoker(Participants)Budesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse GroupTotal
Count of participants54413
History of Asthma
History of Asthma(Participants)Budesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse GroupTotal
Count of participants76619
History of Diabetes
History of Diabetes(Participants)Budesonide Rinse GroupMEDIHONEY® Rinse Alone GroupMEDIHONEY® and Budesonide Rinse GroupTotal
Count of participants2002

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Vermont Medical Center
    Burlington, Vermont 05403, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 6, 2016
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 19, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02562924
Lead sponsor
University of Vermont Medical Center
Responsible party
Gary Landrigan, MD (Associate Professor of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 29, 2015
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Results posted
Oct 16, 2019
Last update
Oct 16, 2019

Study contacts

Gary P Landrigan, MD
principal investigator · University of Vermont Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion