ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07620522RHINOSEDALUpdated Jun 2, 2026

Observational Study of RHINOSEDAL in Acute Nasal Obstruction

An observational study in Nasal Obstruction, Common Cold and Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by Laboratoires Elerte. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 8 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by Laboratoires Elerte · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
126
Ages
8 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, multicenter, national, observational, non-interventional post-market clinical follow-up study evaluates the performance and safety of RHINOSEDAL in children and adults presenting with acute nasal obstruction associated with common cold, allergic or non-allergic rhinitis, or rhinosinusitis. Patients prescribed RHINOSEDAL in routine care will be followed for 6 ±1 days using patient-reported outcome measures including the NOSE score.

Read the detailed description

RHINOSEDAL is a CE-marked class IIa medical device indicated in adults and children older than 2 years to relieve nasal congestion through an osmotic mechanism in cases of common cold, allergic or non-allergic rhinitis, and sinusitis. This prospective observational study is conducted in real-life conditions of use in French general practice. The decision to prescribe RHINOSEDAL is made before and independently from study participation. Patients aged 8 years and older with acute nasal obstruction evolving for less than 48 hours and baseline NOSE score >40/100 will be included. Patients will complete a self-assessment diary from Day 1 to Day 6 ±1. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving a decrease greater than 24 mm in the NOSE score between baseline Day 0 and the Day 3 evening assessment. Secondary endpoints include additional NOSE responder analyses, daily NOSE evolution, individual NOSE item evolution, social activity impairment, patient global assessment of effectiveness, associated signs, safety, device deficiencies, and compliance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nasal Obstruction
  • Common Cold
  • Allergic Rhinitis
  • Non-allergic Rhinitis
  • Rhinosinusitis

Keywords

  • nasal obstruction
  • NOSE score
  • rhinitis
  • rhinosinusitis
  • common cold
  • nasal congestion
  • saline irrigation
  • medical device
  • PMCF
  • real-world evidence
03

In context

Nasal Obstruction

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Nasal Obstruction; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 126 is above the median of 80 across 25 observational studies indexed under Nasal Obstruction.

Browse Nasal Obstruction studies →

Lead sponsor

Laboratoires Elerte is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children and adults aged 8 years or older presenting with acute nasal obstruction associated with common cold, allergic or non-allergic rhinitis, or rhinosinusitis and treated in French general practice.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 8 years or older.
  • Acute nasal obstruction evolving for less than 48 hours associated with common cold, allergic or non-allergic rhinitis, or rhinosinusitis.
  • Baseline NOSE score >40/100.
  • No warning signs such as pus, unilateral obstruction, bleeding, or pain.
  • RHINOSEDAL prescribed by the investigator.
  • Written signed.
  • Affiliated with a health insurance system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known anatomical cause of chronic nasal congestion.
  • use within the previous 2 days.
  • NSAID use within the previous 2 days.
  • Sympathomimetic use within the previous 2 days.
  • Nasal decongestant or nasal irrigation within the previous 2 days.
  • Antihistamines unless stable for more than 48 hours and maintained.
  • listed in the RHINOSEDAL instructions for use.
  • Patient under legal protection.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients treated with RHINOSEDAL

    Children and adults aged 8 years or older consulting a general practitioner for acute nasal obstruction associated with common cold, rhinitis, or rhinosinusitis and prescribed RHINOSEDAL in routine care.

    Device: RHINOSEDAL

Interventions

  • DeviceRHINOSEDAL

    RHINOSEDAL is a ready-to-use hypertonic nasal spray containing natural sea water, tamarind extract and mallow extract. It acts mechanically through osmotic decongestion and cleansing of the upper airways. It is used according to the instructions for use and physician prescription.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NOSE responder rate at Day 3

    Percentage of patients with a reduction greater than 24 mm in the NOSE (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation) score between baseline Day 0 and the Day 3 evening assessment. The NOSE questionnaire includes 5 items rated from 0 to 4 and normalized to a 0-100 score, where higher scores indicate more severe nasal obstruction symptoms. For this study, the recall period was adapted from one month to the previous 24 hours.

    Time frame: Day 3 evening

Secondary outcomes

  1. NOSE responder rate at Day 6 or end of study

    Percentage of patients with a reduction greater than 24 mm in the NOSE score between baseline Day 0 and Day 6 ±1 day or early termination.

    Time frame: Day 6 ±1 day or early termination

  2. Daily evolution of total NOSE score

    Evolution of the total normalized NOSE score (0-100) assessed daily from inclusion through the patient diary until the final visit.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 6 ±1 day or early termination

  3. Daily evolution of each NOSE questionnaire item

    Daily evolution of the five individual NOSE questionnaire items assessing nasal congestion severity, nasal blockage, trouble breathing through the nose, trouble sleeping, and inability to get enough air during exertion. Each item is scored from 0 to 4.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 6 ±1 day or early termination

  4. Daily evolution of social activity impairment

    Evolution of the intensity of discomfort in social activities measured on a 5-point numerical scale from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate greater impairment.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 6 ±1 day or early termination

  5. Patient global assessment of effectiveness

    Patient-rated overall effectiveness using a 5-point numerical scale: 0 = not effective at all; 1 = very slightly effective; 2 = slightly effective; 3 = fairly effective; 4 = very effective.

    Time frame: End of study visit at Day 6 ±1 day or early termination

  6. Evolution of associated signs

    Change in associated clinical signs including nasal discharge, sneezing, fever, and other symptoms associated with upper respiratory tract conditions.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 6 ±1 day or early termination

  7. Adverse events, serious adverse events, incidents and device deficiencies

    Number and description of adverse events, serious adverse events, incidents and device deficiencies reported during the study.

    Time frame: Inclusion to Day 6 ±1 day or early termination

  8. Compliance / RHINOSEDAL use

    Compliance assessed using the patient diary, including number of daily instillations of RHINOSEDAL.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 6 ±1 day or early termination

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 27, 2026
First posted
Jun 2, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Jun 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07620522
Collaborators
Clin-Experts
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 2, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Renaud URBINELLI
Contact
etudes@clin-experts.fr
+33756882093
Pascal DEMOLY, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University hospital of Montpellier, FRANCE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion