ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02549170Updated May 24, 2023Results posted

A Study of HyQvia and Gammagard Liquid (Kiovig) in Adults With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

A Phase 3 interventional study of HYQVIA and 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20 in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, sponsored by Baxalta now part of Shire. Completed at 83 sites in 22 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-24.

Sponsored by Baxalta now part of Shire (part of Takeda) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
138
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to learn more about the following treatment options in adults with CIDP:

  • Subcutaneous self-infusion with HyQvia.
  • Intravenous infusion with Gammagard/Kiovig. Gammagard and Kiovig are the brand names for the same immunoglobulin compound.

The study is in two parts. In Part 1, participants receive either HyQvia or a placebo subcutaneously. In Part 2 (only for participants who have a CIPD relapse during Part 1), participants will receive Gammagard Liquid/Kiovig intravenously. US participants will receive Gamunex-C.

The first SC infusion will be given in the study clinic. The remaining SC infusions may be given in the study clinic or the participant's home. This will be decided by the study doctor and whether the participant or their caregiver can do the self-infusion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Keywords

  • Autoimmune Diseases
  • Polyneuropathies
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
  • Polyradiculoneuropathy
  • Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
  • Immunoglobulins
  • Immune System Diseases
  • Demyelinating Diseases
  • Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating
  • Neuromuscular Diseases
03

In context

Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating

137 studies on the registry are indexed under Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 138 is above the median of 37 across 85 interventional studies indexed under Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating.

Browse Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating studies →

Lead sponsor

Baxalta now part of Shire is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (89%) have results posted.

First submitted before Baxalta became part of Takeda.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males or females of age greater than or equal to (>=)18 years old at the time of screening.
  2. Participant has a documented diagnosis of definite or probable Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) (focal atypical CIDP and pure sensory atypical CIDP will be excluded), as confirmed by a neurologist specializing/experienced in neuromuscular diseases to be consistent with the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) 2010 criteria (European Federation of Neurological Societies, 2010). Fulfillment of electrodiagnostic criteria must be confirmed by an independent qualified/experienced central reader.
  3. Participant has responded to IgG treatment in the past (partial or complete resolution of neurological symptoms and deficits), and must currently be on stable doses of IGIV treatment within the dose range equivalent to a cumulative monthly dose of 0.4 to 2.4 gram per kilogram (g/kg) BW (inclusive) administered intravenously for at least 12 weeks prior to screening. The dosing interval of IGIV treatment must be between 2 and 6 weeks (inclusive). Variations in the dosing interval of up to ± 7 days or monthly dose amount of up to ± 20% between participant's pre-study Immunoglobulin G (IgG) infusions are within acceptable limits.
  4. INCAT disability score between 0 and 7 (inclusive). Participants with INCAT scores of 0, 1 (whether from upper or lower extremities), or 2 (if at least 1 point is from an upper extremity) at screening and/or baseline will be required to have a history of significant disability as defined by an INCAT disability score of 2 (must be exclusively from the lower extremities) or greater documented in the medical record. Participants will be eligible if one of the below eligibility criteria are met:

    Screening and Baseline INCAT disability score of between 3 and 7 inclusive.

    1. Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 2 (both points are from lower extremities).
    2. Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 2 (both points are not from lower extremities) AND has at least a score of 2 or greater documented in the medical record prior to screening. If a score was greater than 2 documented in the medical record prior to screening at least 2 points must be from lower extremities.
    3. Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 0 or 1 AND has at least a score of 2 or greater (both from lower extremities) documented in the medical record prior to screening, at least 2 points must be from lower extremities.
  5. If female of , the participant must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and agree to employ a highly effective measure throughout the course of the study and for at least 30 days after the last administration of product (IP).
  6. Participant is willing and able to sign an Form (ICF).
  7. Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with Focal atypical CIDP or pure sensory atypical CIDP.
  2. Any neuropathy of other causes, including:

    1. Hereditary demyelinating neuropathies, such as hereditary sensory and motor neuropathy (HSMN) (Charcot-Marie-Tooth [CMT] disease), and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies (HSANs).
    2. Neuropathies secondary to infections, disorders, or systemic diseases such as Borrelia burgdorferi infection (Lyme disease), diphtheria, systemic lupus erythematosus, POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, and skin changes) syndrome, osteosclerotic myeloma, diabetic and non-diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy, lymphoma, and amyloidosis.
    3. Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM).
    4. Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN).
    5. Drug-, biologic-, chemotherapy-, or toxin-induced peripheral neuropathy.
  3. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraproteinemia, including IgM monoclonal gammopathy with high titer antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein.
  4. Prominent sphincter disturbance.
  5. Central demyelinating disorders (eg, multiple sclerosis).
  6. Any chronic or debilitating disease, or central nervous disorder that causes neurological symptoms or may interfere with assessment of CIDP or outcome measures (eg, arthritis, stroke, Parkinson's disease, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy) (Participants with clinically diagnosed diabetes mellitus who do not have diabetic peripheral neuropathy, who have adequate glycemic control with ; also known as glycosylated or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) of less than (\<) 7.5% at screening, and who agree to maintain adequate glycemic control during the study are allowed).
  7. Congestive heart failure ( [NYHA] Class III/IV), unstable angina, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, or uncontrolled hypertension (ie, diastolic blood pressure greater than (>) 100 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and/or systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg).
  8. History of deep vein thrombosis or thromboembolic events (eg, cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism) in the past 12 months.
  9. Condition(s) which could alter protein catabolism and/or IgG utilization (eg, protein-losing enteropathies, nephrotic syndrome).
  10. Known history of chronic kidney disease, or (GFR) of \<60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m\^2) estimated based on CKD-EPI equation (Levey et al., 2009) at the time of screening.
  11. Participant with active requiring chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, or history of malignancy with less than 2 years of complete remission prior to screening. Exceptions are: adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, and stable prostate cancer not requiring treatment.
  12. anemia or (Hgb) level of less than (\<) 10.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) at screening.
  13. or adverse reactions (AR's) (eg, urticaria, breathing difficulty, severe hypotension, or anaphylaxis) to human blood products such as human IgG, albumin, or other blood components.
  14. Known allergy to hyaluronidase of human (including recombinant human hyaluronidase) or animal origin (such as bee or wasp venom).
  15. Known history of or immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency (\<8 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]) at screening.
  16. Abnormal laboratory values at screening:

    1. Serum (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5* (ULN)
    2. count \<100,000 cells per microliter (cells/mcL).
    3. (ANC) \<1000 cells/mcL.
  17. Ongoing/active infection with hepatitis A virus (HAV), virus (HBV), virus (HCV), or (HIV) Type 1/2 infection.
  18. The participant has received or is currently receiving treatment with immunomodulatory/ agents within 6 months prior to screening.
  19. Participant has received or is currently receiving treatment with dose within 8 weeks prior to screening, regardless of indication.
  20. Participant has undergone plasma exchange (PE) within 3 months prior to screening.
  21. The participant has any disorder or condition that in the investigator's judgment may impede the participant's participation in the study, pose increased risk to the participant, or confound the results of the study.
  22. The participant is nursing or intends to begin nursing during the course of the study.
  23. Participant has participated in another clinical study involving an IP or device within 30 days prior to enrollment, or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study (with the exception of the HYQVIA/HyQvia extension study in CIDP) involving an IP or investigational device during the course of this study.
  24. The participant is a family member or employee of the investigator.
  25. Participants with acquired or inherited thrombophilic disorders. These will include the specific types of acquired or inherited thrombophilic disorders that could put participants at risk of develop thrombotic events. Examples include:

    a. Hereditary Thrombophilias i. Factor V Leiden mutation. ii. Prothrombin 20210A mutation. iii. Protein C deficiency. iv. Protein S deficiency. v. Antithrombin deficiency. b. Acquired thrombophilias i. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. ii. Activated protein C Resistance acquired. iii. Homocystinemia.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(20)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
138 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia

    Participants received HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) 80 U/g IG, following by SC injection of immunoglobulin (IGI) 10% at the same monthly equivalent IG dose as the individual participant's pre-randomized IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 30.28 weeks or until relapse.

    Biological: HYQVIA

  • Placebo comparator
    Epoch 1: Placebo with rHuPH20

    Participants received rHuPH20 80 U/I0 mL placebo solution, followed by SC placebo infusion at matching infusion volume as the participant's pre-randomization monthly equivalent IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 31.54 weeks or until relapse.

    Biological: 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20

  • Experimental
    Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG

    Participants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg bi-weekly (BW), followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 25.63 weeks or until relapse.

    Biological: IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG

  • Experimental
    Epoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG

    Participants who were enrolled to receive HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 28.67 weeks or until relapse.

    Biological: IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG

  • Experimental
    Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C

    Participants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GAMMUNEX-C 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 24.33 weeks or until relapse.

    Biological: IGIV GAMUNEX®-C

Interventions

  • BiologicalHYQVIA

    Drug pages: Immunoglobulin G · Hyaluronoglucosaminidase

    Participants will receive HYQVIA/HyQvia SC which contains both Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) (IGI, 10%) and recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20).

    Also known as: 10%) with recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) (IGI, IGI, 10% with rHuPH20

  • Biological0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20

    Participants will receive placebo solution (0.25% human albumin in Lactated Ringer's solution) and rHuPH20.

  • BiologicalIGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG

    Drug page: Immunoglobulins

    Participants will receive GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG

    Also known as: Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), Intravenous immunoglobulin G, 10% (GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG), GAMMAGARD LIQUID

  • Participants will receive GAMUNEX®-C

    Also known as: Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), Intravenous immunoglobulin G, Approved IGIV product for US sites

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Epoch 1: Relapse Rate

    Relapse rate is defined as the percentage of participants who experience a worsening of functional disability. Worsening of functional disability defined as an increase of \>=1 point relative to the pre- subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. The INCAT disability score is an effective and responsive tool to assess clinical response to treatment in CIDP. The disability score ranges from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is normal (eg, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and 10 is severely incapacitated (eg, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help).

    Time frame: Week 32 End of Epoch 1 Treatment (EOET1)/Unscheduled relapse visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination (ET)

  2. Epoch 2: Responder Rate

    Responder rate is defined as clinically meaningful improvement in functional ability defined as a decrease of \>=1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period \[6 months\] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.

    Time frame: Up to 6 Months post-Epoch 1 (End of Epoch 2 Treatment [EOE2T])/Unscheduled visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination

Secondary outcomes

  1. Epoch 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience a Worsening of Functional Disability

    Defined as one or more of the following: an increase of \>=1 point relative to the pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT) scores; who experience CIDP worsening (defined as a \>=8 kilo Pascal (kPa) decrease in the hand grip strength in the more affected hand); \>=4 points decrease in raw Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) relative to the pre-SC treatment baseline score (at the time of withdrawal from the SC treatment period). Participants are rounded off to nearest single decimal point.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  2. Time to Relapse

    Time to relapse is defined as time from the date of the first SC administration of HYQVIA/HyQvia or placebo with rHuPH20 to the date of relapse. Participants who did not relapse were censored at their end of study.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  3. Epoch 1: Change From Pre-Subcutaneous (SC) Treatment Baseline in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)

    The Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) is a participant self-reported, linearly-weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture activity and social participation limitations in participant with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. The R-ODS is comprised of 24 items for which participants are asked to rate their functioning (i.e, no difficulty, some difficulty, or could not do) related to a variety of everyday tasks at the moment of completion. The centile metric R-ODS score range is 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better condition. The centile metric R-ODS score was used in the ANCOVA analysis. ANCOVA was used for the analysis.

    Time frame: Pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline, end of Epoch 1 treatment (approximately 7.3 months)

  4. Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-Emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an Investigational Product (IP) that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  5. Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-Serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)

    AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g.,abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g.,rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g.,peritonitis,bacteremia,etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP,considered causally related to the IP. SAE=untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. Non-SAE=AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  6. Epoch 1: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  7. Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  8. Epoch 1: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  9. Epoch 1: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions

    AEs occurring during an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an Investigational Product (IP) that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Participants can have more than one temporally associated with infusion adverse event.

    Time frame: During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)

  10. Epoch 1: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions

    AR plus suspected AR: any AE that meets any of the criteria: AE considered by either investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. Nonserious AE is AE that does not meet the criteria. Infusion per event = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in analysis set. Participants can have more than one AR/suspected AR associated with infusion.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  11. Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. Participants can have more than one TEAE associated with infusion.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  12. Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions

    AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. Infusion site adverse events and injection site adverse events refer to the same type of adverse events.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  13. Epoch 1: Number of Infusions in Participants for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced And/Or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability And/Or Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  14. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  15. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  16. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  17. Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  18. Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Participant

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  19. Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-year

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  20. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  21. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  22. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  23. Epoch 1: Number of Participants Who Develop Binding and/or Neutralizing Antibodies to Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)

    Number of participants who developed binding and/or neutralizing antibodies to rHuPH20 in Epoch 1 were reported. High-binding antibodies is defined as number of participants who had at least one anti-rHuPH20 antibody titer ≥1:160 during treatment.

    Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  24. Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality

    Number of participants experiencing any treatment-emergent serious and/or non-serious adverse events regardless of causality in Epoch 2 was reported.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  25. Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  26. Epoch 2: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs

    An adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction is defined as an Adverse Event that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  27. Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality

    A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  28. Epoch 2: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  29. Epoch 2: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions

    AEs occurring during an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

    Time frame: During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)

  30. Epoch 2: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions

    A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Participants can have more than one AR/SAR.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  31. Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. Participants can have more than one treatment-emergent systemic AEs.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  32. Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions

    AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. TEAEs are defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. Infusion site adverse events and injection site adverse events refer to the same type of adverse events.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  33. Epoch 2: Number of Infusions for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced and/or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability and/or Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  34. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  35. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  36. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  37. Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  38. Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  39. Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-Year

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  40. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected Ars, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  41. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  42. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  43. Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Functional Ability

    Defined as one or more of the following: a decrease of \>=1 point in the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT) score at 2 consecutive time points; who experience CIDP improvement (defined as ≥8 kilo Pascal (kPa) increase in hand grip strength in the more affected hand; \>=4 points increase in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)) at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period \[6 months\] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.

    Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

07

Results

Posted May 24, 2023

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at 54 investigative sites from December 15, 2015 to February 23, 2022. Participants with a diagnosis of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) were enrolled in this study.

Epoch 1: Day 1 to Approximately 32 Weeks
Participant flow — Epoch 1: Day 1 to Approximately 32 Weeks
MilestoneEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Started7062000
Completed4648000
Not completed2414000
Withdrew: Relapsed and entered epoch 2 (e2)174000
Withdrew: Relapsed and did not enter e252000
Withdrew: Did not relapse;ended treatment (et) from epoch128000
Epoch 2: Up to Approximately Week 61
Participant flow — Epoch 2: Up to Approximately Week 61
MilestoneEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Started001641
Completed001641
Not completed00000

Outcome measures

PrimaryEpoch 1: Relapse Rate

Relapse rate is defined as the percentage of participants who experience a worsening of functional disability. Worsening of functional disability defined as an increase of \>=1 point relative to the pre- subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. The INCAT disability score is an effective and responsive tool to assess clinical response to treatment in CIDP. The disability score ranges from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is normal (eg, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and 10 is severely incapacitated (eg, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help).

Time frame:
Week 32 End of Epoch 1 Treatment (EOET1)/Unscheduled relapse visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination (ET)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Epoch 1: Relapse Rate
percentage of participantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Epoch 1: Relapse Rate31.4 (21.76 to 43.03)9.7 (4.51 to 19.55)
Statistical analysis
  • Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20 vs Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia · Chi-squared · p = =0.0045 · Newcombe confidence interval: -21.8 · 95% CI -34.45 to -7.94
PrimaryEpoch 2: Responder Rate

Responder rate is defined as clinically meaningful improvement in functional ability defined as a decrease of \>=1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period \[6 months\] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.

Time frame:
Up to 6 Months post-Epoch 1 (End of Epoch 2 Treatment [EOE2T])/Unscheduled visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Epoch 2: Responder Rate
percentage of participantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG
Epoch 2: Responder Rate100 (80.64 to 100.00)
SecondaryEpoch 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience a Worsening of Functional Disability

Defined as one or more of the following: an increase of \>=1 point relative to the pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT) scores; who experience CIDP worsening (defined as a \>=8 kilo Pascal (kPa) decrease in the hand grip strength in the more affected hand); \>=4 points decrease in raw Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) relative to the pre-SC treatment baseline score (at the time of withdrawal from the SC treatment period). Participants are rounded off to nearest single decimal point.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Epoch 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience a Worsening of Functional Disability
percentage of participantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Epoch 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience a Worsening of Functional Disability54.4 (42.66 to 65.70)37.5 (26.01 to 50.59)
Statistical analysis
  • Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20 vs Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia · Chi-squared, Corrected · p = =0.0896 (The treatment groups were compared using a continuity-corrected chi-square test.) · Newcombe confidence interval: -16.9 · 95% CI -33.02 to 0.69
SecondaryTime to Relapse

Time to relapse is defined as time from the date of the first SC administration of HYQVIA/HyQvia or placebo with rHuPH20 to the date of relapse. Participants who did not relapse were censored at their end of study.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Relapse
daysEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Time to RelapseNA (20 to 221)NA (7 to 217)
Statistical analysis
  • Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20 vs Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia · Wilcoxon Survival Test · p = =0.002
SecondaryEpoch 1: Change From Pre-Subcutaneous (SC) Treatment Baseline in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)

The Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) is a participant self-reported, linearly-weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture activity and social participation limitations in participant with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. The R-ODS is comprised of 24 items for which participants are asked to rate their functioning (i.e, no difficulty, some difficulty, or could not do) related to a variety of everyday tasks at the moment of completion. The centile metric R-ODS score range is 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better condition. The centile metric R-ODS score was used in the ANCOVA analysis. ANCOVA was used for the analysis.

Time frame:
Pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline, end of Epoch 1 treatment (approximately 7.3 months)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Epoch 1: Change From Pre-Subcutaneous (SC) Treatment Baseline in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)
score on a scaleEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Epoch 1: Change From Pre-Subcutaneous (SC) Treatment Baseline in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)-6.1 ± 1.64-0.9 ± 1.69
Statistical analysis
  • Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20 vs Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia · ANCOVA · p = =0.030 · Least square mean: 5.2 · 95% CI 0.5 to 9.9
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-Emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an Investigational Product (IP) that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-Emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality
ParticipantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Any TEAE4049
Any Serious TEAE52
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-Serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)

AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g.,abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g.,rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g.,peritonitis,bacteremia,etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP,considered causally related to the IP. SAE=untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. Non-SAE=AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-Serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)
ParticipantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Any IP-related TEAE1938
Any Serious IP-related TEAE51
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs

An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Epoch 1: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs
ParticipantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
All AR/SAR2741
Serious AR/SAR51
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality
events in participantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Non-serious AEs144340
Serious AEs52
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · causally related events in participants
Epoch 1: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions
causally related events in participantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Casually Related Non-serious Adverse Events53223
Casually Related Serious Adverse Events51
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions

AEs occurring during an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an Investigational Product (IP) that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Participants can have more than one temporally associated with infusion adverse event.

Time frame:
During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 1: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Epoch 1: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions61251
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions

AR plus suspected AR: any AE that meets any of the criteria: AE considered by either investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. Nonserious AE is AE that does not meet the criteria. Infusion per event = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in analysis set. Participants can have more than one AR/suspected AR associated with infusion.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 1: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Non-Serious AR/Suspected AR76261
Serious AR/Suspected AR51
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. Participants can have more than one TEAE associated with infusion.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions149342
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions

AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. Infusion site adverse events and injection site adverse events refer to the same type of adverse events.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions20141
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Infusions in Participants for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced And/Or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability And/Or Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of infusions
Epoch 1: Number of Infusions in Participants for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced And/Or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability And/Or Adverse Events (AEs)
number of infusionsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Epoch 1: Number of Infusions in Participants for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced And/Or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability And/Or Adverse Events (AEs)13
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/infusion
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
number of AEs/infusionEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Systemic Adverse Events0.200.34
Local Adverse Events0.030.24
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/participant
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
number of AEs/participantEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Systemic AEs1.843.24
Local AEs0.292.27
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/1000 participant-year
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year
number of AEs/1000 participant-yearEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Systemic AEs4689.227341.52
Local AEs727.015150.02
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/infusion
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion
number of AEs/infusionEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
IP-Related Systemic TEAE0.060.17
IP-Related Local TEAE0.020.21
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Participant

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/participant
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Participant
number of AEs/participantEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
IP-related Systemic TEAE0.541.6
IP-related Local TEAE0.212
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-year

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/1000 participant-year
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-year
number of AEs/1000 participant-yearEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
IP-related Systemic TEAE1381.323615.98
IP-related Local TEAE545.264529.1
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of ARs/infusion
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
number of ARs/infusionEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Systemic Plus Suspected ARs0.090.20
Local Plus Suspected ARs0.030.24
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of ARs/participant
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
number of ARs/participantEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Systemic Plus Suspected ARs0.801.94
Local Plus Suspected ARs0.292.27
SecondaryEpoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year

An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Number · number of ARs/1000 Participant year
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year
number of ARs/1000 Participant yearEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Systemic Plus Suspected ARs2035.634383.00
Local Plus Suspected ARs727.015150.02
SecondaryEpoch 1: Number of Participants Who Develop Binding and/or Neutralizing Antibodies to Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)

Number of participants who developed binding and/or neutralizing antibodies to rHuPH20 in Epoch 1 were reported. High-binding antibodies is defined as number of participants who had at least one anti-rHuPH20 antibody titer ≥1:160 during treatment.

Time frame:
Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Who Develop Binding and/or Neutralizing Antibodies to Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)
ParticipantsEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Who Develop Binding and/or Neutralizing Antibodies to Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)71
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality

Number of participants experiencing any treatment-emergent serious and/or non-serious adverse events regardless of causality in Epoch 2 was reported.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality
ParticipantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Any IP related TEAE1131
Any IP related serious TEAE000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)
ParticipantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Causally related AEs830
Causally related SAEs000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs

An adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction is defined as an Adverse Event that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Epoch 2: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs
ParticipantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Any AR/SAR1030
Any Serious AR/SAR000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality

A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality
events in participantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Serious AEs000
Non-serious AEs35251
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 2: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Any TEAE2300
Any serious TEAE000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions

AEs occurring during an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

Time frame:
During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 2: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Epoch 2: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions25110
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions

A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Participants can have more than one AR/SAR.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 2: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
AR/SAR28110
Serious AR/SAR000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. Participants can have more than one treatment-emergent systemic AEs.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions35251
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions

AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. TEAEs are defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. Infusion site adverse events and injection site adverse events refer to the same type of adverse events.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · events in participants
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions
events in participantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Number of Infusions for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced and/or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability and/or Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of infusions
Epoch 2: Number of Infusions for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced and/or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability and/or Adverse Events (AEs)
number of infusionsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG
Epoch 2: Number of Infusions for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced and/or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability and/or Adverse Events (AEs)11
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/infusion
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
number of AEs/infusionEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Systemic AEs0.110.410.06
Local AEs000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/participant
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
number of AEs/participantEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Systemic AEs2.196.251.00
Local AEs000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/1000 participant-year
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year
number of AEs/1000 participant-yearEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Systemic AEs4645.2612806.802135.96
Local AEs000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/infusion
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion
number of AEs/infusionEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
IP-related Systemic Adverse Events0.070.130
IP-related Local Adverse Events000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/participant
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
number of AEs/participantEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
IP-related Systemic Adverse Events1.4420
IP-related Local Adverse Events000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-Year

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of AEs/1000 participant-year
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-Year
number of AEs/1000 participant-yearEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
IP-related Systemic Adverse Events3052.64098.180
IP-related Local Adverse Events000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected Ars, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of ARs/infusion
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected Ars, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
number of ARs/infusionEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Systemic plus Suspected ARs0.090.180
Local plus Suspected ARs000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of ARs/participant
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
number of ARs/participantEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Systemic plus Suspected ARs1.752.750
Local plus Suspected ARs000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year

An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · number of ARs/1000 participant-year
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year
number of ARs/1000 participant-yearEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Systemic plus Suspected ARs3716.215634.990
Local plus Suspected ARs000
SecondaryEpoch 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Functional Ability

Defined as one or more of the following: a decrease of \>=1 point in the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT) score at 2 consecutive time points; who experience CIDP improvement (defined as ≥8 kilo Pascal (kPa) increase in hand grip strength in the more affected hand; \>=4 points increase in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)) at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period \[6 months\] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.

Time frame:
Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Functional Ability
percentage of participantsEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: IGIVEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: IGIV
Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Functional Ability100 (80.64 to 100)100 (NA to NA)

Adverse events

Collected over From the date of signing of the informed consent form up to the end of the study, approximately 74 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH200/70 (0%)5/70 (7.1%)19/70 (27.1%)
Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia0/62 (0%)2/62 (3.2%)42/62 (67.7%)
Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)11/16 (68.8%)
Epoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)3/4 (75%)
Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathyNervous system disorders4/700/620/160/40/1
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/701/620/160/40/1
Otitis media chronicInfections and infestations0/701/620/160/40/1
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders1/700/620/160/40/1
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 34
Most frequent other events
EventEpoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEpoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C
Benign prostatic hyperplasiaReproductive system and breast disorders1/700/620/160/41/1
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/708/626/162/40/1
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders0/700/620/161/40/1
ChillsGeneral disorders0/701/620/161/40/1
Ear painEar and labyrinth disorders0/700/620/161/40/1
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/701/620/161/40/1
PainGeneral disorders0/700/620/161/40/1
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/703/620/161/40/1
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/707/621/161/40/1
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders4/701/620/161/40/1

Baseline characteristics

Epoch 1 safety analysis set included all participants who received any study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaTotal
Mean53.9 ± 13.4255.0 ± 14.2654.4 ± 13.78
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaTotal
Female322658
Male383674
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaTotal
Hispanic or Latino14923
Not Hispanic or Latino464793
Unknown or Not Reported10616
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Epoch 1: Placebo With rHuPH20Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native213
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White6458122
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported437
08

Study locations

83 sites
  • Barrow Neurological Institute
    Phoenix, Arizona 85013, United States
  • Arizona Neuromuscular Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85028, United States
  • HonorHealth Neurology
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85251, United States
  • University of California-Irvine
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Forbes Norris Mda/als Ctr
    San Francisco, California 94109, United States
  • Regents of the University of colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Immunoe Research Centers
    Centennial, Colorado 80112, United States
  • University of South Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute, Inc.
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073-6769, United States
  • Neurology Center of Las Vegas
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
    Newark, New Jersey 07103, United States
  • Hospital for Special Surgery
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Wake Forest University
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0525, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Austin Neuromuscular Center
    Austin, Texas 78756, United States
  • The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University Texas Physicians CAR
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Hospital Italiano
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina
  • Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, 1280, Argentina
  • Complejo Medico de la Policia Federal Argentina Churruca Visca
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, 1416, Argentina
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Neurologicas Raul Carrea, FLENI
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1428AQK, Argentina
  • Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba - Hospital Ecoville
    Curitiba, Paraná 81210-310, Brazil
  • HUAP - UFF - Hospital Universitario Antonio Pedro - Universidade Federal Fluminense
    Niterói, Rio Do Janeiro 24033-900, Brazil
  • Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da UNICAMP
    Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-887, Brazil
  • Hospital das Clínicas FMRP-USP
    Ribeirão Preto, Sao Paulo 14048-900, Brazil
  • Hospital Sao Paulo
    São Paulo, Sao Paulo 04039-032, Brazil
  • University of Alberta Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada
  • LHSC - University Hospital
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
  • Institucion Prestadora de Servicios de Salud de la Universidad de Antioquia "IPS UNIVERSITARIA"
    Medellin, 00000, Colombia
  • Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka
    Rijeka, 51000, Croatia
  • Clinical Hospital Centar Zagreb
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • University Hospital Centre "Sestre Milosrdnice"
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Fakultni nemocnice Brno
    Brno, 625 00, Czechia
  • Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava
    Ostrava - Poruba, 708 52, Czechia
  • Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
    Praha 5, 150 06, Czechia
  • Århus Universitetshospital
    Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
  • CHU de Nice Hôpital Pasteur 2
    Nice Cedex 1, Alpes Maritimes 06001, France
  • Hôpital de la Timone
    Marseille cedex 5, Bouches-du-Rhône 13385, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin - Hôpital Pellegrin
    Bordeaux Cedex, Gironde 33076, France
  • Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer
    Bron cedex, Rhone 69677, France
  • Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen
    Göttingen, Niedersachsen 37075, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Essen
    Essen, Nordrhein Westfalen 45147, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04103, Germany
  • University Hospital of Patra
    Patras, 26504, Greece
  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center
    Ramat Gan, 5265601, Israel
  • IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
    San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia 71013, Italy
  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas
    Rozzano, Milano 20089, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Tor Vergata
    Rome, Roma 00133, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino
    Genova, 16132, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino
    Messina, 98122, Italy
  • Casa di Cura del Policlinico
    Milano, 20144, Italy
  • Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Casimiro Mondino
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
    Pisa, 56126, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I - Università di Roma La Sapienza
    Roma, 00161, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
    Torino, 10126, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia
    Udine, 33100, Italy
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricion Dr. Salvador Zubiran
    Mexico, Distrito Federal 14080, Mexico
  • Oslo Universitetssykehus HF, Ullevål
    Oslo, 0407, Norway
  • COPERNICUS Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o. o.,
    Gdansk, 80-803, Poland
  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
    Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie
    Lublin, 20-090, Poland
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. Norberta Barlickiego
    Łódź, 90-153, Poland
  • Clinical Center of Serbia
    Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
  • Military Medical Academy
    Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
  • Clinical Center Nis
    Nis, 18000, Serbia
  • Univerzitna nemocnica Bratislava Nemocnica ak. L. Derera, II. Neurologicka klinika
    Bratislava, 83101, Slovakia
  • Fakultna nemocnica Nitra
    Nitra, 95001, Slovakia
  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08907, Spain
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
    Barcelona, 08025, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
    Sevilla, 41013, Spain
  • Hallands sjukhus
    Halmstad, 302 33, Sweden
  • Pamukkale Uni. Med. Fac.
    Denizli, 20070, Turkey
  • Istanbul University Cerrahpasa - Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty
    Istanbul, 34098, Turkey
  • Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine
    Izmir, 35340, Turkey
  • Selcuk Universitesi Selcuklu Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
    Konya, 42075, Turkey
  • Celal Bayar University Medical Faculty
    Manisa, 45040, Turkey
  • Southmead Hospital
    Bristol, Avon BS10 5NB, United Kingdom
  • King's College Hospital
    London, Greater London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
  • The Walton Centre
    Liverpool, Merseyside L9 7LJ, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Access criteria: IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2015 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 74 months.

Results were first posted in May 2023, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 11, 2015
First posted
Sep 15, 2015
StartActual
Dec 15, 2015
Primary completionActual
Feb 23, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 23, 2022
Results first posted
May 24, 2023
Last update
May 24, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02549170
Collaborators
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2015
Start date
Dec 15, 2015
Primary completion
Feb 23, 2022
Completion
Feb 23, 2022
Results posted
May 24, 2023
Last update
May 24, 2023

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Shire

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Immunoglobulin G · Hyaluronoglucosaminidase · Immunoglobulins

Start the discussion