CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02426086Updated Sep 14, 2021Results posted

Study to Evaluate Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Participants With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Previously Treated With Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor

A Phase 2 interventional study of Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg and Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg in Myelofibrosis, sponsored by Geron Corporation. Completed at 72 sites in 11 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-14.

Sponsored by Geron Corporation · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
107
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or is refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. Key secondary endpoint includes overall survival.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), multicenter (more than one hospital, medical school team or medical clinic work on a medical research study) study of 2 dosing regimens (treatment arms) of single-agent imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. The main study consists of 3 parts: Screening Phase (21 days before randomization); Treatment Phase (from randomization until study drug discontinuation); and Follow up Phase (until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent or study end, whichever occurs first). Participants received imetelstat 9.4 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg) intravenously (IV) for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end OR imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg IV for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. Initially, all participants were blinded to the treatment. After the first interim analysis, treatment for all participants was unblinded and participants assigned to the imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg arm could continue with their same imetelstat dose or have it increased to 9.4 mg/kg at the investigator's discretion. The percentage of spleen response and symptom response were evaluated as co-primary endpoints. Following completion of the primary analysis, participants benefiting from study treatment could continue to receive imetelstat in Extension phase for up to 2 years or until loss of benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Participants who had already stopped study treatment could enter the Extension phase to continue follow up for safety via serious adverse event collection and for survival status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelofibrosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Myelofibrosis
  • Imetelstat
  • GRN163L
  • Relapsed/refractory to JAKi
  • IMbark
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) according to the revised WHO criteria; or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF) or post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) according to the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria.
  • Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or highrisk MF.
  • Measurable splenomegaly prior to study entry as demonstrated by palpable spleen measuring ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin OR spleen volume of ≥ 450 cm\^3 measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • Active symptoms of MF as demonstrated by a symptom score of at least 5 points (on a 0 to 10 scale) on at least one of the symptoms or a score of 3 or greater on at least 2 of the symptoms.
  • Documented progressive disease during or after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral blood blast count of ≥ 10% or bone marrow blast count of ≥ 10%.
  • Prior treatment with imetelstat.
  • Any chemotherapy or MF-directed therapy, investigational drug, hydroxyurea, immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, corticosteroids or JAK inhibitor therapy ≤14 days prior to randomization.
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Active systemic hepatitis infection requiring treatment (carriers of hepatitis virus are permitted to enter the study), of any type or known acute or chronic liver disease including cirrhosis.
  • Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
107 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg

    Drug: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg

  • Experimental
    Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg

    Drug: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg

Interventions

  • DrugImetelstat 4.7 mg/kg

    Participants received imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Study drug was administered intravenously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.

  • DrugImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg

    Participants received imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response

    Spleen response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at Week 24 from baseline performed by the IRC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants With Symptom Response

    Symptom response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 from baseline as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 2.0 diary. The MFSAF assessed following symptoms due to Myelofibrosis (MF): night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, feeling of fullness, bone or muscle pain and degree of inactivity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. The total score ranges from 0-70, where 0 indicates absent/as good as it can be and 70 indicates worst imaginable/as bad as it can be.

    Time frame: Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria

    Overall Response Rate: % of participants with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) per modified IWG-MRT.CR: bone marrow: normocellular \<5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in peripheral blood (PB):\<2%;hemoglobin (Hb):10 g/dL-upper limit of normal (ULN); neutrophils:1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen:not palpable and ≤350ml volume; extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH): no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH;symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. All response categories, benefit must last \>12 weeks to qualify as response.

    Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

    CI per the modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia (Increase in severity of anemia constitutes the occurrence of new transfusion dependency or a ≥ 2.0 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from pretreatment baseline that lasts for at least 12 weeks. Increase in severity of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia is defined as a 2-grade decline, from pretreatment baseline, in platelet count or ANC, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. In addition, assignment to CI requires a minimum platelet count of ≥ 25,000\*10\^9/L and ANC of ≥ 0.5\*10\^9/L.) For all response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response.

    Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT

    Clinical response rate (CRR) was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR, or CI per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. CR: bone marrow: normocellular \<5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: not palpable and ≤350ml volume; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

    Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

    Spleen response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Spleen response: a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at 5-10 cm, below the left costal margin (LCM), becomes not palpable or a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at \>10 cm, below the LCM, decreases by ≥50%; A spleen response requires confirmation by MRI showing \>35% spleen volume reduction (SVR). For response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for spleen response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

    Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

    Symptoms response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Symptoms Response: a ≥50% reduction in the modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. For response category, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for symptom response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

    Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

    Anemia response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Anemia response is defined as participants with baseline Hb \<10 g/dL but not meeting strict criteria for transfusion dependency: a ≥ 2 g/dL increase in Hb; Transfusion dependent participants at baseline: becoming transfusion independent. Transfusion independence is defined as absence of any pRBC transfusions for at least 12 "rolling" weeks. For response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for anemia response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

    Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  7. Duration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria

    Duration of response (PR/CI/RWCI) is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a response to date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first. PR: BM: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤Grade 1 fibrosis/not meeting BM remission criteria; IMC in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL- ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI/not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia. RWCI: Participants who met criteria for response but had worsening cytopenias. PD: Splenomegaly requires MRI showing ≥25% increase in spleen volume.

    Time frame: From date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  8. Overall Survival

    Overall Survival is measured from the date of Cycle 1, Day 1 to the date of the participants death. If the participant's was alive or the vital status was unknown, OS was censored at the date that the participant is last known to be alive.

    Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days), up to the date of the participant's death (approximately up to 4.1 years)

  9. Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients. The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 items resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1= Not at all to 4= Very much); and 1 global health status scale based on 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7= Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning. Clinically meaningful improvement defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status.

    Time frame: Up to end of the treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  10. EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and VAS. EQ-5D health state profile comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L- VAS is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

    Time frame: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years

  11. Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

    The BPI rates the intensity of pain on 4 items (right now, worst, least, and average), and the interference in 7 areas (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations, sleep, enjoyment of life). Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes. Clinically meaningful improvement in BPI defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline.

    Time frame: Up to end of treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)

  12. Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    The PGIC was used to capture the participant's perspective of improvement or decline in MF symptoms over time. The PGIC had a 7-point response scale ranging from 1 to 7 where, (1=very much improved, 2= somewhat improved, 3= a little improved, 4=no change, 5= a little worse, 6= somewhat worse, 7=very much worse).

    Time frame: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years

  13. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were AEs with onset during or after the first dose of study drug, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years)

  14. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat

    Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  15. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat

    Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  16. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat

    Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  17. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat

    Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  18. Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat

    Elimination half-life (t 1/2) is associated with the terminal slope (lambda \[z\]) of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, calculated as 0.693/lambda(z).

    Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  19. Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat

    Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  20. Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat

    Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

06

Results

Posted Sep 14, 2021

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled at 55 investigative sites in Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and the United States from August 28, 2015, to 25 October 2016. Data analyses include all data through the data cut-off date February 07, 2020.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Started4859
Treated4859
Completed00
Not completed4859
Withdrew: Death3336
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up20
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor514
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject89

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Spleen Response

Spleen response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at Week 24 from baseline performed by the IRC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response0 (0 to 7.4)10.2 (3.8 to 20.8)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Symptom Response

Symptom response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 from baseline as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 2.0 diary. The MFSAF assessed following symptoms due to Myelofibrosis (MF): night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, feeling of fullness, bone or muscle pain and degree of inactivity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. The total score ranges from 0-70, where 0 indicates absent/as good as it can be and 70 indicates worst imaginable/as bad as it can be.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Symptom Response
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Percentage of Participants With Symptom Response6.3 (1.3 to 17.2)32.2 (20.6 to 45.6)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria

Overall Response Rate: % of participants with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) per modified IWG-MRT.CR: bone marrow: normocellular \<5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in peripheral blood (PB):\<2%;hemoglobin (Hb):10 g/dL-upper limit of normal (ULN); neutrophils:1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen:not palpable and ≤350ml volume; extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH): no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH;symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. All response categories, benefit must last \>12 weeks to qualify as response.

Time frame:
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria0 (NA to NA)1.7 (0.0 to 9.1)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

CI per the modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia (Increase in severity of anemia constitutes the occurrence of new transfusion dependency or a ≥ 2.0 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from pretreatment baseline that lasts for at least 12 weeks. Increase in severity of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia is defined as a 2-grade decline, from pretreatment baseline, in platelet count or ANC, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. In addition, assignment to CI requires a minimum platelet count of ≥ 25,000\*10\^9/L and ANC of ≥ 0.5\*10\^9/L.) For all response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response.

Time frame:
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria16.725.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT

Clinical response rate (CRR) was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR, or CI per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. CR: bone marrow: normocellular \<5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: not palpable and ≤350ml volume; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

Time frame:
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT16.7 (7.5 to 30.2)27.1 (16.4 to 40.3)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

Spleen response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Spleen response: a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at 5-10 cm, below the left costal margin (LCM), becomes not palpable or a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at \>10 cm, below the LCM, decreases by ≥50%; A spleen response requires confirmation by MRI showing \>35% spleen volume reduction (SVR). For response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for spleen response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

Time frame:
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Spleen response with CI03.4
Spleen response without CI2.10
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

Symptoms response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Symptoms Response: a ≥50% reduction in the modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. For response category, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for symptom response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

Time frame:
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Symptom response with CI14.622.0
Symptom response without CI4.28.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

Anemia response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Anemia response is defined as participants with baseline Hb \<10 g/dL but not meeting strict criteria for transfusion dependency: a ≥ 2 g/dL increase in Hb; Transfusion dependent participants at baseline: becoming transfusion independent. Transfusion independence is defined as absence of any pRBC transfusions for at least 12 "rolling" weeks. For response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for anemia response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

Time frame:
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Anemia response with CI4.26.8
Anemia response without CI01.7
SecondaryDuration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria

Duration of response (PR/CI/RWCI) is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a response to date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first. PR: BM: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤Grade 1 fibrosis/not meeting BM remission criteria; IMC in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL- ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI/not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia. RWCI: Participants who met criteria for response but had worsening cytopenias. PD: Splenomegaly requires MRI showing ≥25% increase in spleen volume.

Time frame:
From date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Duration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria
weeksImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Duration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria36.3 (11.9 to 60.0)38.3 (27.0 to 48.3)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall Survival is measured from the date of Cycle 1, Day 1 to the date of the participants death. If the participant's was alive or the vital status was unknown, OS was censored at the date that the participant is last known to be alive.

Time frame:
Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days), up to the date of the participant's death (approximately up to 4.1 years)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Overall Survival19.91 (17.05 to 33.87)28.09 (22.80 to 31.61)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients. The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 items resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1= Not at all to 4= Very much); and 1 global health status scale based on 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7= Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning. Clinically meaningful improvement defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status.

Time frame:
Up to end of the treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status22.236.4
SecondaryEuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and VAS. EQ-5D health state profile comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L- VAS is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

Time frame:
At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
score on a scaleImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
EQ-5D-5L: Utility Score0.498 ± 0.29990.626 ± 0.2117
EQ-5D-5L: VAS51.28 ± 21.14347.73 ± 16.398
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

The BPI rates the intensity of pain on 4 items (right now, worst, least, and average), and the interference in 7 areas (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations, sleep, enjoyment of life). Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes. Clinically meaningful improvement in BPI defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline.

Time frame:
Up to end of treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
percentage of participantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Pain at its Worst: Improvement50.075.8
Pain at its Least: Improvement44.451.5
Pain on the Average: Improvement55.666.7
Pain Right Now: Improvement61.166.7
Relief Pain Treatments Provided: Improvement50.053.1
Pain Interfered General Activity: Improvement72.268.8
Pain Interfered with Mood: Improvement50.059.4
Pain Interfered Walking Ability: Improvement38.978.1
Pain Interfered with Normal Work: Improvement61.162.5
Pain Interfered with Relations: Improvement44.453.1
Pain Interfered with Sleep: Improvement61.178.1
Pain Interfered Enjoyment of Life: Improvement61.162.5
SecondaryPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC was used to capture the participant's perspective of improvement or decline in MF symptoms over time. The PGIC had a 7-point response scale ranging from 1 to 7 where, (1=very much improved, 2= somewhat improved, 3= a little improved, 4=no change, 5= a little worse, 6= somewhat worse, 7=very much worse).

Time frame:
At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
score on a scaleImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)4.82 ± 1.2373.97 ± 1.571
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were AEs with onset during or after the first dose of study drug, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)4759
SecondaryMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat
Time frame:
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat
μg/mLPK: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPK: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat57.0 ± 72.381.9 ± 40.0
SecondaryTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat
Time frame:
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Median · hr
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat
hrPK: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPK: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat2.00 (1.93 to 2.20)2.00 (1.00 to 2.75)
SecondaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat
Time frame:
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · μg*hr/mL
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat
μg*hr/mLPK: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPK: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat171 ± 135501 ± 283
SecondaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat
Time frame:
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · μg*h/mL
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat
μg*h/mLPK: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPK: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat193 ± 156524 ± 297
SecondaryElimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat

Elimination half-life (t 1/2) is associated with the terminal slope (lambda \[z\]) of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, calculated as 0.693/lambda(z).

Time frame:
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · hr
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat
hrPK: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPK: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat4.6 ± 1.65.5 ± 1.5
SecondaryTotal Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat
Time frame:
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · L/hr/kg
Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat
L/hr/kgPK: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPK: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat0.0329 ± 0.01380.0252 ± 0.0157
SecondaryVolume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat
Time frame:
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · L/kg
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat
L/kgPK: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPK: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat0.198 ± 0.07700.190 ± 0.104

Adverse events

Collected over Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg34/48 (70.8%)24/48 (50%)47/48 (97.9%)
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg36/59 (61%)21/59 (35.6%)59/59 (100%)
Imetelstat Dose Escalated From 4.7 mg/kg to 9.4 mg/kg1/12 (8.3%)4/12 (33.3%)12/12 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 60
Most frequent serious events
EventImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgImetelstat Dose Escalated From 4.7 mg/kg to 9.4 mg/kg
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/480/591/12
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/480/591/12
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/481/591/12
Rotator cuff syndromeMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/480/591/12
MyelofibrosisNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/480/591/12
Cerebral haemorrhageNervous system disorders0/480/591/12
EncephalopathyNervous system disorders0/480/591/12
Splenic infarctionBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/480/590/12
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/480/590/12
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/481/590/12
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 97
Most frequent other events
EventImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgImetelstat Dose Escalated From 4.7 mg/kg to 9.4 mg/kg
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders11/4829/594/12
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders15/4826/595/12
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders18/4818/593/12
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/4821/593/12
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders15/4820/591/12
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders13/4810/593/12
FatigueGeneral disorders10/4815/591/12
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/4815/591/12
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders9/4814/590/12
AstheniaGeneral disorders9/4814/591/12

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set included all participants randomized into the study and classified according to their assigned treatment group.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal
Mean68.0 ± 8.9566.5 ± 9.3967.2 ± 9.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal
Female162440
Male323567
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal
Hispanic or Latino2810
Not Hispanic or Latino414485
Unknown235
Not Reported347
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal
White404888
Black/African American224
Asian235
Multiple101
Not Reported369
Region
Region(Participants)Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal
United States/Canada251843
European Union193453
Rest of World4711
Spleen Size by Palpation
Spleen Size by Palpation(centimeter (cm))Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal
Mean17.6 ± 7.6217.3 ± 7.5117.4 ± 7.53
Platelet Count
Platelet Count(Participants)Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal
<75 (10^9/L)123
75 - <150 (10^9/L)233154
≥150 (10^9/L)242650
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score(Participants)Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgImetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal
0: Asymptomatic111425
1: Symptomatic fully ambulatory263460
2: Self care111122

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

72 sites
  • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Duarte, California, United States
  • La Jolla, California, United States
  • Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Stanford, California, United States
  • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
  • Tampa, Florida, United States
  • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
  • Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Bronx, New York, United States
  • Buffalo, New York, United States
  • Lake Success, New York, United States
  • New York, New York, United States
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
  • Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
  • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  • Watertown, South Dakota, United States
  • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
  • Antwerpen, Belgium
  • Brugge, Belgium
  • Brussel, Belgium
  • Leuven, Belgium
  • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Angers, France
  • Lille, France
  • Marseille Cedex 9, France
  • Paris, France
  • Pierre Benite, France
  • Toulouse cedex 9, France
  • Aachen, Germany
  • Dresden, Germany
  • Duesseldorf, Germany
  • Frankfurt, Germany
  • Hamburg, Germany
  • Heidelberg, Germany
  • Koeln, Germany
  • Leipzig, Germany
  • Mannheim, Germany
  • Rostock, Germany
  • Haifa, Israel
  • Jerusalem, Israel
  • Kfar Saba, Israel
  • Nahariya, Israel
  • Ramat Gan, Israel
  • Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Bergamo, Italy
  • Bologna, Italy
  • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Barcelona, Spain
  • Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Spain
  • Madrid, Spain
  • Salamanca, Spain
  • Valencia, Spain
  • Chiayi City, Taiwan
  • Taipei, Taiwan
  • Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom
  • Oxford, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mascarenhas J, Komrokji RS, Palandri F, Martino B, Niederwieser D, Reiter A, Scott BL, Baer MR, Hoffman R, Odenike O, Vannucchi AM, Bussolari J, Zhu E, Rose E, Sherman L, Dougherty S, Sun L, Huang F, Wan Y, Feller FM, Rizo A, Kiladjian JJ. Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase II Study of Two Doses of Imetelstat in Relapsed or Refractory Myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;39(26):2881-2892. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02864. Epub 2021 Jun 17. PubMed 34138638 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 28, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 14, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02426086
Lead sponsor
Geron Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 24, 2015
Start date
Aug 28, 2015
Primary completion
Apr 26, 2018
Completion
Feb 7, 2020
Results posted
Sep 14, 2021
Last update
Sep 14, 2021

Study contacts

Study Clinical Team
study director · Geron Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion