ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT02598661Updated Jul 17, 2026Results posted

Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Participants With International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Imetelstat Sodium and Placebo in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, sponsored by Geron Corporation. Active, not recruiting at 126 sites in 17 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.

Sponsored by Geron Corporation · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
289
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that is relapsed/refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in Phase 2 study and to compare the efficacy, in terms of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI), of imetelstat sodium to placebo in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment in Phase 3 study.

A separate Ventricular Repolarization Substudy (QTc Substudy) will evaluate the effect of imetelstat sodium on ventricular repolarization.

An Extension Phase has been included to allow continued treatment for those participants who are benefitting from imetelstat sodium and to continue to evaluate the long-term safety, overall survival (OS), and disease progression, including progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in transfusion-dependent participants with low or immediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2/3, multicenter study of imetelstat sodium in which 289 participants were enrolled.

  • Phase 2 is an open-label, single-arm design to assess the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium. A total of 57 participants were enrolled in Phase 2, including the expansion cohort.
  • Phase 3 is a double-blind, randomized design to compare the efficacy of imetelstat sodium with placebo. In the Phase 3 study, 178 participants were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo, respectively.
  • In a separate Ventricular Repolarization (VR) Substudy (QTc Substudy), 54 participants were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles in the VR substudy, a participant has no significant change to packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant may be unblinded. If the participant was on placebo treatment, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium.

The Extension Phase was initiated at the end of the Phase 3 study (24 months after the last participant was randomized in the Phase 3) and will continue until participants who entered Phase 3 study participated in the study for up to 5 years from the first dose of imetelstat sodium (including treatment and follow-up), or 3 years of post-treatment follow-up from the last dose of study treatment, whichever occurs later, or until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a participant is lost to follow-up. Participants ongoing on imetelstat sodium and considered to be benefiting from treatment per Investigator in the Phase 3 Study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, have the option to continue receiving imetelstat sodium in the Extension Phase. Participants in the follow-up phase for the Phase 3 study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy have the option to continue the follow-up in the Extension Phase.

The Phase 2, Phase 3, and VR Substudy all consist of 3 phases: a Screening phase (up to 28 days); a treatment phase; and a post-treatment follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first). The Extension Phase of the study will consist of an extended treatment phase and an extended follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first).

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Imetelstat Sodium
  • GRN163L
  • Relapsed/refractory to ESAs
  • Transfusion dependent
  • IMerge
03

In context

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

1,997 studies on the registry are indexed under Myelodysplastic Syndromes; 324 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 289 is above the median of 40 across 1,611 interventional studies indexed under Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Browse Myelodysplastic Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Geron Corporation is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Man or woman greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and within 12 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) (Phase 2) or randomization (Phase 3). In Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, diagnosis of MDS or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) according to WHO criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to C1D1
  • International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low Risk or intermediate-1 risk MDS
  • Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent, defined as requiring at least 4 RBC units transfused over an 8-week period during the 16 weeks prior to Study Entry; pre-transfusion (Hb) should be less than or equal to (≤) 9.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL) to count towards the 4 units total
  • (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has known allergies, , or intolerance to imetelstat sodium or its
  • Participant has received an drug or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Study Entry or is currently enrolled in an investigational study
  • Prior treatment with imetelstat sodium
  • Have received greater than (>) 30 milligram per day (mg/day) prednisone or equivalent, or growth factor treatment within 4 weeks prior to study entry
  • Has received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or any chemotherapy, immunomodulatory, or therapy within 4 weeks prior to study entry (8 weeks for long-acting ESAs)
  • Phase 3: a) Prior treatment with a hypomethylating agent (example [eg], azacitidine, decitabine); b) Prior treatment with lenalidomide

Additional Exclusion Criteria for the Ventricular Repolarization Substudy:

  • Concurrent therapy with medications known to prolong the and have been associated with Torsade de pointes arrhythmia (TdP)
  • Cardiac function abnormalities on screening as follows:

    • Resting heart rate outside of 50 to 100 beats per minute
    • QT interval by Fridericia's correction method (QTcF) >470 millisecond (msec) (or QTcF >490 msec in the presence of a right bundle branch block or ventricular conduction delay [QRS >119 msec]), determined by central assessment based on the average value of a triplicate set of ECGs
    • Diagnosed or suspected congenital long QT syndrome
    • Family history of sudden unexpected death from cardiac-related causes if indicative of a pathogenic mutation of cardiac ion channels
    • Family history of congenital long QT syndrome
    • History of Mobitz II second degree or third degree heart block
    • Implantable pacemaker or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator
    • Complete left bundle branch block
    • Chronic or persistent atrial arrhythmia including atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
    • History or presence of heart rhythm disturbances including atrial, junctional, re-entry, and ventricular tachycardia
    • Unusual T-wave morphology (i.e., bifid T-wave) likely to interfere with QT measurements
  • History or evidence for any of the following: severe or unstable angina, myocardial infarction, symptomatic congestive heart failure, arterial or venous thromboembolic events (example, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident including ) within 12 months prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, (NYHA) Class II to IV heart disease
  • Presence of uncontrolled hypertension (persistent systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥160 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥100 mmHg). Participants with a history of hypertension are permitted, provided that BP is controlled to within these limits by anti-hypertensive treatment
  • Any skin condition likely to interfere with electrocardiographic electrode placement or adhesion
  • History of thoracic surgery likely to cause abnormality of the electrical conduction through thoracic tissues
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
289 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium

    Imetelstat sodium administered intravenously (IV), at a starting dose of 7.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. Dose escalation to 9.4 mg/kg was allowed before Protocol Amendment 2.

    Drug: Imetelstat Sodium

  • Experimental
    Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium

    Imetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Imetelstat Sodium

  • Placebo comparator
    Phase 3: Placebo

    Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    QTc Substudy: Imetelstat Sodium

    Imetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Imetelstat Sodium

  • Placebo comparator
    QTc Substudy: Placebo

    Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles a participant has no significant change to pRBC transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Extension Phase: Imetelstat Sodium

    Participants randomized to the imetelstat sodium arm in the Phase 3 and the VR QTc Substudy, based on the response will continue to receive imetelstat sodium IV, at the dose they were receiving in the Phase 3 or VR QTc Substudy, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or up to 3 years whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Imetelstat Sodium

  • Experimental
    Extension Phase: Extended Follow-up

    Participants randomized to the placebo arm in the Phase 3 study will enter the Extended Follow-up part of the Extension Phase and continue in follow up until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or whichever occurs first up to approximately 3 years.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Imetelstat sodium IV infusion.

    Also known as: GRN163L

  • DrugPlacebo

    Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo IV infusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)

    Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

  2. Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population

    Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

  3. Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period

    Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Deaths

    TEAEs were defined as those events that 1) occurred after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug or until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if earlier; 2) any event that was considered study drug-related regardless of the start date of the event; or 3) any event that was presented at baseline but worsened in severity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the investigator. Serious TEAEs are any TEAEs that result in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, is medically important. Any clinically significant vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory values, and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings were reported as TEAEs. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.

    Time frame: Adverse events: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3; Deaths: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

  2. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period

    Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 24 weeks (168 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2 and the day of randomization for participants enrolled in Phase 3. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  3. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)

    Time to 8-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 8-week RBC TI period.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  4. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI

    Time to 24-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 24-weeks RBC TI period.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  5. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI

    Duration of RBC TI was defined as the first day of the longest RBC TI period to the date of the first RBC transfusion after the TI period started. The 95% CI was based on Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  6. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006

    As per IWG Response Criteria 2006: HI-E was defined as a hemoglobin (Hb) increase by greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusion units/8 weeks compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hb of less than or equal to (≤)9 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  7. Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Investigator

    As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood (PB): Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10\^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place. All participants in Phase 2 were evaluated by the Investigator for CR/PR/mCR regardless of bone marrow blasts at baseline.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

  8. Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

    As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; PB: Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10\^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. CR, PR and mCR were assessed by IRC in Phase 3 and participants were required to fit at least one of the following criteria (participants with \>5% baseline blasts per central pathology reviewer assessment; participants with CR, PR, mCR, or cytogenetic response as assessed by the investigator) and have at least one post-baseline assessment.

    Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  9. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to death from any cause. Survival time of living participants was censored on the last date a participant is known to be alive or lost to follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival.

    Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

  10. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Progression free survival was defined as the time interval from study Day 1 to the first date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression as per IWG criteria was defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 % decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.

    Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

  11. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

    Time to progression to AML was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the date of AML diagnosis. Participants who did not progress to AML and were still alive at the cutoff date for the analysis or who withdrew from the study (withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up), data was censored at the date of the last disease evaluation.

    Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

  12. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval

    Amount of RBC transfusions for 8-week interval was defined as the total number of RBC transfusion units in a given 8-week interval during study. The best 8-week interval is a post-baseline 8-week interval where the participant had the fewest post-Study Day 1 RBC transfusion units. A valid 8-week period must start before the date of last dose of study drug + 30 days or end of treatment (EOT) visit whichever occurs first and ends before the first transfusion in post-treatment follow-up or the first day of subsequent anti-cancer therapy whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  13. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden

    Relative percent change in RBC transfusions per 8-week = (amount of RBC transfusions per 8-week - prior RBC transfusion burden) / prior RBC transfusion burden multiplied by 100%. Prior RBC transfusion burden was defined as the maximum number of RBC units transfused over any consecutive 8 weeks prior to study entry.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  14. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors

    Percentage of participants who received any myeloid growth factors starting from Study Day 1 were reported. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  15. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration

    Duration of myeloid growth factor administered starting from Study Day 1 was reported.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  16. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

    As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for pharmacokinetic (PK) data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)

  17. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)

    As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for PK data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (Days 1 to 28) (Cycle duration= 28 days)

  18. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium

    As pre-specified in the SAP, participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for immunogenicity data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)

  19. Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters

    Outpatient medical encounters included various sites of care: a) emergency room (ER) visits, b) hospital outpatient visits, c) home care visit, d) visit to lab, e) visit to doctor's office, f) other visits. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  20. Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization

    Hospitalization included any medical encounter defined as hospice, hospital inpatient department, and intensive care unit (ICU). Hospitalizations without end dates were not counted in the calculation of length of stay. If any participant had multiple readmissions, duration was calculated as the sum of all hospital stays.

    Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  21. QTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)

    Baseline was defined as the mean of the measured ECG intervals collected at 3 time points (-1 hour, -0.5 hour, and 0 hour) prior to treatment administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length= 28 days)

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1, Day 1: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)

Other outcomes

  1. Extension Phase: Number of Participants With AEs

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. AEs included clinically significant vital signs measurements, clinical laboratory values and electrocardiograms (ECGs) changes.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

  2. Extension Phase: Overall Survival

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

  3. Extension Phase: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Survival

    Progression free survival will be assessed as the time interval from the end of the Phase 3 study until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a subject is lost to follow-up. As per IWG criteria disease progression is defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 percent (%) decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by greater than or equal to ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

07

Results

Posted Feb 14, 2025

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled in Phase 2 at 48 study sites and in the Phase 3 Study at 77 study sites. Data is reported for the Phase 2, Phase 3 and QTc substudy up to the primary completion date (PCD) of 13 October 2023. Enrolment in Extension phase started after October 2023 and analyses for the participants in extension phase is still ongoing, hence data for extension phase will be reported at study completion date in 2026.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Placebo
Started57118603519
Crossover to imetelstat000014
Target population380000
Completed1557293317
Not completed42613122
Withdrew: Death27341410
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up23200
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject13241411
Withdrew: Adverse event00100
Withdrew: Randomized, never treated00001

Outcome measures

PrimaryPhase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)

Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)
percentage of participantsPhase 2: Imetelstat Sodium
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)36.8 (24.45 to 50.66)
PrimaryPhase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population

Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population
percentage of participantsPhase 2: Imetelstat Sodium
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population42.1 (26.31 to 59.18)
PrimaryPhase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period

Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period39.8 (30.93 to 49.25)15.0 (7.10 to 26.57)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium vs Phase 3: Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The p-value was calculated based on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) controlling for prior RBC transfusion burden (≤6 versus\[vs.\]\>6 units RBC) \& international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) risk group (low vs. intermediate-1) applied to randomization.) · Percentage difference: 24.8 · 95% CI 9.90 to 36.89The 95% CI was calculated based on the Wilson Score method.
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Deaths

TEAEs were defined as those events that 1) occurred after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug or until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if earlier; 2) any event that was considered study drug-related regardless of the start date of the event; or 3) any event that was presented at baseline but worsened in severity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the investigator. Serious TEAEs are any TEAEs that result in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, is medically important. Any clinically significant vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory values, and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings were reported as TEAEs. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.

Time frame:
Adverse events: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3; Deaths: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Deaths
ParticipantsPhase 2: Imetelstat Sodium (No Dose Escalation)Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium (Escalated to 9.4 mg/kg)Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Participants with AEs50611759
Participants who died2433515
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period

Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 24 weeks (168 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2 and the day of randomization for participants enrolled in Phase 3. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period
percentage of participantsPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period24.6 (14.13 to 37.76)28.0 (20.10 to 36.98)3.3 (0.41 to 11.53)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium vs Phase 3: Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The p-value was calculated based on CMH controlling for prior RBC transfusion burden (≤6 vs. \>6 units RBC) and IPSS risk group (low vs. intermediate-1) applied to randomization.) · Percentage difference: 24.6 · 95% CI 12.64 to 34.18The 95% CI was calculated based on the Wilson Score method.
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)

Time to 8-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 8-week RBC TI period.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)
weeksPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)8.29 (0.1 to 100.6)9.29 (0.1 to 64.7)8.29 (0.1 to 46.9)
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI

Time to 24-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 24-weeks RBC TI period.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI
weeksPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI8.79 (3.3 to 100.6)8.43 (2.1 to 37.6)3.79 (0.3 to 7.3)
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI

Duration of RBC TI was defined as the first day of the longest RBC TI period to the date of the first RBC transfusion after the TI period started. The 95% CI was based on Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI
weeksPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI69.6 (17.00 to 92.43)51.6 (26.86 to 80.43)13.3 (8.00 to 24.86)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium vs Phase 3: Placebo · Log Rank · p = <0.001 (The p-value (2-sided) was calculated using the stratified log-rank test for superiority of imetelstat sodium versus placebo in hazard ratio.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.25 · 95% CI 0.105 to 0.586Hazard ratio and 95% CI were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model, stratified by prior RBC transfusion burden (≤ 6 vs. \> 6 units RBC) and IPSS risk group (low vs. intermediate-1), with treatment as the only covariate.
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006

As per IWG Response Criteria 2006: HI-E was defined as a hemoglobin (Hb) increase by greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusion units/8 weeks compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hb of less than or equal to (≤)9 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006
percentage of participantsPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 200661.4 (47.57 to 74.00)63.6 (54.20 to 72.22)51.7 (38.39 to 64.77)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium vs Phase 3: Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.112 (The p-value was calculated based on CMH controlling for prior RBC transfusion burden (≤ 6 vs. \> 6 units RBC) and IPSS risk group (low vs. intermediate-1) applied to randomization.) · Percentage difference: 11.9 · 95% CI -4.10 to 27.5695% CI was calculated based on the Wilson Score Method.
SecondaryPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Investigator

As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood (PB): Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10\^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place. All participants in Phase 2 were evaluated by the Investigator for CR/PR/mCR regardless of bone marrow blasts at baseline.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Investigator
percentage of participantsPhase 2: Imetelstat Sodium
Percentage of participants with CR8.8
Percentage of participants with PR0
Percentage of participants with mCR12.3
SecondaryPhase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; PB: Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10\^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. CR, PR and mCR were assessed by IRC in Phase 3 and participants were required to fit at least one of the following criteria (participants with \>5% baseline blasts per central pathology reviewer assessment; participants with CR, PR, mCR, or cytogenetic response as assessed by the investigator) and have at least one post-baseline assessment.

Time frame:
Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Percentage of participants with CR00
Percentage of participants with PR00
Percentage of participants with mCR00
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to death from any cause. Survival time of living participants was censored on the last date a participant is known to be alive or lost to follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival.

Time frame:
Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)
monthsPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)55.3 (39.16 to NA)40.4 (37.06 to NA)NA (32.16 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium vs Phase 3: Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.949 (P value (two-sided) for superiority of imetelstat sodium versus placebo in hazard ratio was calculated using stratified log-rank test.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.526 to 1.823Hazard ratio and 95% CI were calculated from the Cox proportional hazard model, stratified by prior RBC transfusion burden (≤6 vs. \>6 units RBC) and IPSS risk group (low vs. intermediate-1), with treatment as the only covariate.
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival was defined as the time interval from study Day 1 to the first date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression as per IWG criteria was defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 % decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.

Time frame:
Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
monthsPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)34.2 (25.10 to 39.29)NA (29.24 to NA)NA (16.72 to NA)
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Time to progression to AML was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the date of AML diagnosis. Participants who did not progress to AML and were still alive at the cutoff date for the analysis or who withdrew from the study (withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up), data was censored at the date of the last disease evaluation.

Time frame:
Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
monthsPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)NA (41.36 to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval

Amount of RBC transfusions for 8-week interval was defined as the total number of RBC transfusion units in a given 8-week interval during study. The best 8-week interval is a post-baseline 8-week interval where the participant had the fewest post-Study Day 1 RBC transfusion units. A valid 8-week period must start before the date of last dose of study drug + 30 days or end of treatment (EOT) visit whichever occurs first and ends before the first transfusion in post-treatment follow-up or the first day of subsequent anti-cancer therapy whichever occurs first.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Mean · number of RBC transfusions units
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval
number of RBC transfusions unitsPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval3.0 ± 3.483.1 ± 3.623.4 ± 2.13
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden

Relative percent change in RBC transfusions per 8-week = (amount of RBC transfusions per 8-week - prior RBC transfusion burden) / prior RBC transfusion burden multiplied by 100%. Prior RBC transfusion burden was defined as the maximum number of RBC units transfused over any consecutive 8 weeks prior to study entry.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden
percent changePhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden-62.5 ± 38.36-57.75 ± 50.220-51.01 ± 31.606
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors

Percentage of participants who received any myeloid growth factors starting from Study Day 1 were reported. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors
percentage of participantsPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors3335.65.0
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration

Duration of myeloid growth factor administered starting from Study Day 1 was reported.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration
weeksPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration1.43 (0.1 to 118.0)0.71 (0.1 to 12.9)3.14 (0.1 to 10.0)
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for pharmacokinetic (PK) data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Phase 2 and Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)89.5 ± 27.3
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)

As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for PK data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 (Days 1 to 28) (Cycle duration= 28 days)
Reported as:
Mean · hour*micrograms per milliliter(h*mcg/mL)
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)
hour*micrograms per milliliter(h*mcg/mL)Phase 2 and Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)559 ± 43.2
SecondaryPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium

As pre-specified in the SAP, participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for immunogenicity data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium
percentage of participantsPhase 2 and Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium16.9
SecondaryPhase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters

Outpatient medical encounters included various sites of care: a) emergency room (ER) visits, b) hospital outpatient visits, c) home care visit, d) visit to lab, e) visit to doctor's office, f) other visits. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters39.038.3
SecondaryPhase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization

Hospitalization included any medical encounter defined as hospice, hospital inpatient department, and intensive care unit (ICU). Hospitalizations without end dates were not counted in the calculation of length of stay. If any participant had multiple readmissions, duration was calculated as the sum of all hospital stays.

Time frame:
Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Reported as:
Median · days
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization
daysPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Placebo
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization8.0 (1 to 47)16.5 (1 to 75)
SecondaryQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)

Baseline was defined as the mean of the measured ECG intervals collected at 3 time points (-1 hour, -0.5 hour, and 0 hour) prior to treatment administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length= 28 days)

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 1, Day 1: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milliseconds (ms)
QTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)
milliseconds (ms)QTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Placebo
Change at 0.5 hr post-dose4.2 ± 1.541.9 ± 2.09
Change at 1 hr post-dose5.4 ± 1.470.4 ± 2.00
Change at 2 hr post-dose5.5 ± 1.563.7 ± 2.12
Change at 4 hr post-dose1.8 ± 2.431.1 ± 3.28
Change at 6 hr post-dose1.7 ± 2.37-1.1 ± 3.12
Change at 8 hr post-dose2.3 ± 2.53-3.4 ± 3.36
Other pre-specifiedExtension Phase: Number of Participants With AEs

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. AEs included clinically significant vital signs measurements, clinical laboratory values and electrocardiograms (ECGs) changes.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedExtension Phase: Overall Survival
Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedExtension Phase: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Survival

Progression free survival will be assessed as the time interval from the end of the Phase 3 study until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a subject is lost to follow-up. As per IWG criteria disease progression is defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 percent (%) decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by greater than or equal to ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events: Up to 5 years in Phase 2; up to 3.7 years in Phase 3; up to 1.3 years in QTc substudy; All-cause mortality: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2; up to 4 years in Phase 3; up to 1.6 years in QTc substudy. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium (No Dose Escalation)24/50 (48%)26/50 (52%)50/50 (100%)
Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium (Escalated to 9.4 mg/kg)3/7 (42.9%)1/7 (14.3%)6/7 (85.7%)
Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium35/118 (29.7%)41/118 (34.7%)117/118 (99.2%)
Phase 3: Placebo15/59 (25.4%)13/59 (22%)58/59 (98.3%)
QTc Substudy: Imetelstat Sodium1/35 (2.9%)8/35 (22.9%)33/35 (94.3%)
QTc Substudy: Crossover Imetelstat Sodium0/14 (0%)3/14 (21.4%)12/14 (85.7%)
QTc Substudy: Placebo0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)13/18 (72.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 110
Most frequent serious events
EventPhase 2: Imetelstat Sodium (No Dose Escalation)Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium (Escalated to 9.4 mg/kg)Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Crossover Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Placebo
Rectal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/501/70/1180/590/350/140/18
SepsisInfections and infestations1/500/72/1180/590/351/140/18
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/500/72/1180/590/351/140/18
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/500/73/1180/590/351/140/18
Femur fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/500/72/1181/590/350/140/18
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations1/500/72/1183/590/350/140/18
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/500/73/1181/591/350/140/18
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/500/70/1180/590/350/140/18
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders2/500/73/1180/590/350/140/18
Abscess limbInfections and infestations0/500/70/1182/590/350/140/18
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 129
Most frequent other events
EventPhase 2: Imetelstat Sodium (No Dose Escalation)Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium (Escalated to 9.4 mg/kg)Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Crossover Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Placebo
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders36/502/789/1185/5926/358/142/18
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders33/502/789/1186/5925/359/143/18
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations7/503/713/1184/596/354/141/18
FatigueGeneral disorders5/502/79/1184/595/352/141/18
AstheniaGeneral disorders4/502/721/1188/592/351/141/18
Influenza like illnessGeneral disorders2/502/70/1180/592/350/140/18
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders7/502/714/1187/596/353/141/18
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders3/502/72/1184/590/350/140/18
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations6/502/711/1184/593/353/141/18
HeadacheNervous system disorders11/502/715/1183/593/351/141/18

Baseline characteristics

Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Phase 3: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the phase 3 study. The QTc Substudy Analysis Set included all participants who participated in QTc Substudy and received at least one dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: PlaceboTotal
Mean70.1 (46 to 83)70.4 (44 to 87)71.7 (39 to 85)69.7 (43 to 84)67.8 (54 to 81)69.9 (39 to 87)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: PlaceboTotal
Female25472082102
Male3271402716186
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino1650012
Not Hispanic or Latino48100482915240
Unknown or Not Reported81276336
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000000
Asian2823015
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000000
Black or African American112116
White4695482915233
More than one race000000
Unknown or Not Reported81482234
08

Study locations

126 sites

Showing the first 100 of 126 sites across 17 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sekeres MA, Zeidan AM, Santini V, Komrokji RS, Fenaux P, Savona MR, Madanat YF, Valcarcel D, Regnault A, Creel K, Sun L, Wan Y, Navada S, Berry T, Feller F, Platzbecker U, Diez-Campelo M, Oliva EN. Imetelstat improves patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: results from the phase III IMerge study. Haematologica. 2026 Jul 1;111(7):2385-2396. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2025.288956. Epub 2026 Jan 22. PubMed 41568521 ↗
  • Kim N, Pulte ED, Ehrlich LA, Ionan AC, Haupert S, Vallejo J, Green F, Zheng N, Wang Y, Liu J, Blanco JG, Dorff SE, Booth B, Choe M, Gehrke B, Bhatnagar V, Theoret M, Pazdur R, De Claro RA, Norsworthy KJ. US Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Imetelstat for Selected Patients With Low- to Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Transfusion-Dependent Anemia. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Dec 10;43(35):3760-3768. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-01369. Epub 2025 Oct 24. PubMed 41135032 ↗
  • Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Sekeres MA, Savona MR, Madanat YF, Diez-Campelo M, Valcarcel D, Illmer T, Jonasova A, Belohlavkova P, Sherman LJ, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Ikin A, Navada S, Feller F, Komrokji RS, Zeidan AM. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024 Jan 20;403(10423):249-260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01724-5. Epub 2023 Dec 1. PubMed 38048786 ↗
  • Steensma DP, Fenaux P, Van Eygen K, Raza A, Santini V, Germing U, Font P, Diez-Campelo M, Thepot S, Vellenga E, Patnaik MM, Jang JH, Varsos H, Bussolari J, Rose E, Sherman L, Sun L, Wan Y, Dougherty S, Huang F, Feller F, Rizo A, Platzbecker U. Imetelstat Achieves Meaningful and Durable Transfusion Independence in High Transfusion-Burden Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in a Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;39(1):48-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01895. Epub 2020 Oct 27. PubMed 33108243 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02598661
Lead sponsor
Geron Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2015
Start date
Jan 12, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 13, 2023
Completion
Oct 13, 2026 (estimated)
Results posted
Feb 14, 2025
Last update
Jul 17, 2026

Study contacts

Tymara Berry, MD
study director · Geron Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Imetelstat

Start the discussion