ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02424851OPTIMALUpdated Jan 27, 2022Results posted

Optimising Renal Outcome in Myeloma Renal Failure

A Phase 2 interventional study of Bortezomib and Thalidomide in Multiple Myeloma and Chronic Kidney Disease, sponsored by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust. Completed at 9 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-27.

Sponsored by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of bortezomib versus thalidomide in reducing free light chains in the blood of myeloma patients. In addition participants will receive bendamustine (chemotherapy) and dexamethasone (steroids), which increase the effectiveness of both bortezomib and thalidomide. The trial will also study whether an earlier reduction of free light chains increases the chances of the kidneys recovering.

Read the detailed description

Renal impairment is a life threatening condition of myeloma. 20-25% of patients will present at diagnosis with renal dysfunction. Outcome is poor due to high early mortality, with 28% of newly diagnosed myeloma patients in myeloma trials with renal failure not surviving beyond 100 days, compared with 10% overall.

This study aims to establish:

  1. Whether proteosomal inhibition (bortezomib) or immunomodulatory (thalidomide) based therapy achieves threshold reduction of serum free light chains (sFLCs) in a significant majority of patients.
  2. Whether sFLC response to the first 2 cycles (early responder) predicts haematological and renal response to the next 2 cycles of therapy.
  3. An early time point for assessment of sFLC reduction as a biomarker for response.

Participants will be stratified by age and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage to receive either bortezomib, bendamustine and dexamethasone (BBD) or thalidomide, bendamustine and dexamethasone (BTD).

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Chronic Kidney Disease

Keywords

  • myeloma
  • multiple myeloma
  • chronic kidney disease
  • renal failure
  • bortezomib
  • Velcade
  • thalidomide
  • bendamustine
  • dexamethasone
  • serum free light chains
  • proteosomal inhibition
  • immunomodulatory
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,712 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 752 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 41 across 2,965 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
  • Patients attending NHS (National Health Service) Haemato-oncology centres.
  • Patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma.
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \<30 mls/min.
  • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) staging is based on estimated or measured GFR. CKD stage 4 (15-29 ml/min) and CKD stage 5 (\<15 ml/min) are eligible to enter the study. It is expected centres will consider use of fluid resuscitation and pulsed dose of steroid therapy in this group of patients to salvage renal function prior to trial screening.
  • A number of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma and renal failure will have a pre-existing medical condition (hypertension, diabetes etc.) causing renal damage. Where there is a medical condition (e.g. hypertension, diabetes) which may cause renal damage, there must have been a further decline (≥15 mls/min GFR) between previous steady state and the study screening.
  • Female participants of childbearing potential and male patients whose partner is a woman of childbearing potential must be prepared to use contraception in accordance with (and consent to) the Celgene-approved process for thalidomide and lenalidomide Risk Management and Pregnancy Prevention Programme.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed by a healthcare professional in accordance with the Celgene-approved process for thalidomide and lenalidomide Risk Management and Pregnancy Prevention.
  • Free of prior malignancies for ≥ 2 years with exception of currently treated basal cell, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, localised prostate cancer or carcinoma "in-situ" of the cervix or breast.
  • In the Investigator's opinion, is able and willing to comply with all trial requirements.
  • Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the trial or the female partner of a male participant planning a pregnancy during the course of the trial.
  • Known allergy to investigational drugs.
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.
  • Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1.0 x10\^9/L
  • Platelet count \<75 x 10\^9/L
  • Serum SGOT/AST or SGPT/ALT (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase or serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase) >3 x upper limit of normal.
  • Use of any standard/experimental anti-myeloma drug therapy excluding dexamethasone 14 days prior to trial entry.
  • CKD stages \< 4.
  • Intention to use a physical method of serum free light chain removal such as plasma exchange or high cut off dialysis.
  • Grade 2 neuropathy or more (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v 4.0) will preclude use of thalidomide and bortezomib.
  • Participants who have participated in another research trial involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks.
  • Contraindicated to receive either one of the study drugs, thalidomide, bortezomib, bendamustine based on the respective summary of product characteristics.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A (BBD)

    Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone

    Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Bendamustine · Drug: Dexamethasone

  • Active comparator
    Arm B (BTD)

    Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone

    Drug: Thalidomide · Drug: Bendamustine · Drug: Dexamethasone

Interventions

  • 1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously\* days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of each cycle. Number of cycles: Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT (autologous stem cell transplant) will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised). \*intravenous infusion available in case of patient intolerance to subcutaneous bortezomib

    Also known as: Velcade

  • 100 mg daily orally, preferably at night, days 1-21 of each cycle. Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised)

  • 60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 of each cycle. Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised)

  • 40mg orally days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9 and 11-12 of each cycle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain

    Time frame: End of week 6 (after receiving two cycles of therapy)

  2. Number of Participants With Different Renal Responses to Treatment

    Time frame: End of week 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms

    Time frame: End of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy), 30 days after final treatment and 12 months after randomisation

  2. Overall Survival

    Time frame: 1 month post end of treatment and 1 year post randomisation

  3. Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment

    Time frame: End of 2nd treatment cycle, week 6

  4. Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up

    The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a scale of 1 to 3: 1 (no problems), 2 (some problems), and 3 (extreme problems). Higher score equates to a worse outcome. As stated in the official EQ-5D user guide, patient responses to the 5 questions were converted into a single index value as per Dolan P (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095-108. These index values, with country specific value sets, facilitate the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) that are used to inform economic evaluations of health care interventions. In the UK, the values range from -0.594 to +1.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month follow up

07

Results

Posted Jan 27, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
Started1615
Completed1412
Not completed23

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain
Time frame:
End of week 6 (after receiving two cycles of therapy)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain
ParticipantsArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain133
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A (BBD) vs Arm B (BTD) · Fisher Exact · p = 0.006
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Different Renal Responses to Treatment
Time frame:
End of week 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Different Renal Responses to Treatment
ParticipantsArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
Complete/partial response51
Minor response37
No response31
Not evaluable56
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A (BBD) vs Arm B (BTD) · Fisher Exact · p = 0.02
SecondaryHaematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms
Time frame:
End of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy), 30 days after final treatment and 12 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Number · Events
Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms
EventsArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
Serious adverse events20
Adverse events36
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A (BBD) vs Arm B (BTD) · Fisher Exact · p = =0.48
  • Arm A (BBD) vs Arm B (BTD) · Fisher Exact · p = =0.25
SecondaryOverall Survival
Time frame:
1 month post end of treatment and 1 year post randomisation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Survival
ParticipantsArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
Overall Survival913
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A (BBD) vs Arm B (BTD) · Log Rank · p = = 0.31
SecondaryRenal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment
Time frame:
End of 2nd treatment cycle, week 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment
ParticipantsArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
Partial response20
Minor response97
No repsonse46
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A (BBD) vs Arm B (BTD) · Fisher Exact · p = =0.45
SecondaryQuality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up

The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a scale of 1 to 3: 1 (no problems), 2 (some problems), and 3 (extreme problems). Higher score equates to a worse outcome. As stated in the official EQ-5D user guide, patient responses to the 5 questions were converted into a single index value as per Dolan P (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095-108. These index values, with country specific value sets, facilitate the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) that are used to inform economic evaluations of health care interventions. In the UK, the values range from -0.594 to +1.

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 month follow up
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up
Units on a scaleArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
Baseline0.72 ± 0.150.69 ± 0.35
1 month FU0.69 ± 0.190.80 ± 0.28
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A (BBD) vs Arm B (BTD) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.33

Adverse events

Collected over 4 years, 2 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm A (BBD)7/16 (43.8%)11/16 (68.8%)15/16 (93.8%)
Arm B (BTD)2/15 (13.3%)9/15 (60%)11/15 (73.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent serious events
EventArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
Lung infectionInfections and infestations1/163/15
Chronic kidney diseaseRenal and urinary disorders0/162/15
FeverGeneral disorders0/162/15
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/160/15
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders2/160/15
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/161/15
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/160/15
SepsisInfections and infestations2/160/15
Upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations2/160/15
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/161/15
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 74
Most frequent other events
EventArm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)
FatigueGeneral disorders4/165/15
Edema limbsGeneral disorders4/163/15
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/161/15
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders4/163/15
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/163/15
TremorNervous system disorders1/163/15
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/163/15
ParesthesiaNervous system disorders2/163/15
Lung infectionInfections and infestations2/163/15
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/161/15

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Arm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)Total
≤70 years8816
>70 years8715
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)Total
Female8614
Male8917
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Arm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)Total
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm A (BBD)Arm B (BTD)Total
United Kingdom161531
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital
    Basingstoke, United Kingdom
  • Heartlands Hospitals
    Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Kent & Canterbury Hospital
    Canterbury, CT1 3NG, United Kingdom
  • St Helier Hospital
    Epsom, United Kingdom
  • Royal Liverpool Hospital
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Kings College Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Churchill Hospital
    Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
  • Queen Alexandra Hospital
    Portsmouth, United Kingdom
  • Great Western Hospital
    Swindon, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Zeldenrust SR, Dingli D, Russell SJ, Lust JA, Greipp PR, Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2516-20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129. Epub 2007 Nov 1. PubMed 17975015 ↗
  • Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Expected long-term survival of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2006-2010. Haematologica. 2009 Feb;94(2):270-5. doi: 10.3324/haematol.13782. Epub 2009 Jan 14. PubMed 19144659 ↗
  • Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Katzmann JA, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, Clark RJ, Baris D, Hoover R, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009 May 28;113(22):5412-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241. Epub 2009 Jan 29. PubMed 19179464 ↗
  • Knudsen LM, Hippe E, Hjorth M, Holmberg E, Westin J. Renal function in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma--a demographic study of 1353 patients. The Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 1994 Oct;53(4):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1994.tb00190.x. PubMed 7957804 ↗
  • Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D, Simeonidis A, Pouli A, Anagnostopoulos A, Michali E, Economopoulos T, Zervas K, Dimopoulos MA; Greek Myeloma Study Group. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007 Feb;48(2):337-41. doi: 10.1080/10428190601126602. PubMed 17325894 ↗
  • Clark AD, Shetty A, Soutar R. Renal failure and multiple myeloma: pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure and management of underlying myeloma. Blood Rev. 1999 Jun;13(2):79-90. doi: 10.1016/s0268-960x(99)90014-0. PubMed 10414944 ↗
  • Drayson M, Begum G, Basu S, Makkuni S, Dunn J, Barth N, Child JA. Effects of paraprotein heavy and light chain types and free light chain load on survival in myeloma: an analysis of patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy in Medical Research Council UK multiple myeloma trials. Blood. 2006 Sep 15;108(6):2013-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-008953. Epub 2006 May 25. PubMed 16728700 ↗
  • Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Cook G, Feyler S, Johnson PR, Rudin C, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Ross FM, Russell NH, Jackson GH, Child JA; National Cancer Research Institute Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: MRC Myeloma IX randomized trial results. Haematologica. 2012 Mar;97(3):442-50. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043372. Epub 2011 Nov 4. PubMed 22058209 ↗
  • Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA, Barth NJ, Davies F, Morgan G, Behrens J, Smith A, Child JA, Drayson MT. Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma: analysis of patients entered onto the United kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002--Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9219-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2086. Epub 2005 Nov 7. PubMed 16275935 ↗
  • Torra R, Blade J, Cases A, Lopez-Pedret J, Montserrat E, Rozman C, Revert L. Patients with multiple myeloma requiring long-term dialysis: presenting features, response to therapy, and outcome in a series of 20 cases. Br J Haematol. 1995 Dec;91(4):854-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb05400.x. PubMed 8547129 ↗
  • Kastritis E, Anagnostopoulos A, Roussou M, Gika D, Matsouka C, Barmparousi D, Grapsa I, Psimenou E, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA. Reversibility of renal failure in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with high dose dexamethasone-containing regimens and the impact of novel agents. Haematologica. 2007 Apr;92(4):546-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10759. PubMed 17488666 ↗
  • Knudsen LM, Hjorth M, Hippe E. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: reversibility and impact on the prognosis. Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 2000 Sep;65(3):175-81. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.90221.x. PubMed 11007053 ↗
  • Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Dixon D. Renal failure in multiple myeloma. Pathogenesis and prognostic implications. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Aug;150(8):1693-5. PubMed 2383164 ↗
  • Gandhi V. Metabolism and mechanisms of action of bendamustine: rationales for combination therapies. Semin Oncol. 2002 Aug;29(4 Suppl 13):4-11. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.34872. PubMed 12170425 ↗
  • Gaul L, Mandl-Weber S, Baumann P, Emmerich B, Schmidmaier R. Bendamustine induces G2 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in myeloma cells: the role of ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A and ATM-p53-p21-pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb;134(2):245-53. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0278-x. Epub 2007 Jul 25. PubMed 17653574 ↗
  • Ponisch W, Mitrou PS, Merkle K, Herold M, Assmann M, Wilhelm G, Dachselt K, Richter P, Schirmer V, Schulze A, Subert R, Harksel B, Grobe N, Stelzer E, Schulze M, Bittrich A, Freund M, Pasold R, Friedrich T, Helbig W, Niederwieser D; East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). Treatment of bendamustine and prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma results in superior complete response rate, prolonged time to treatment failure and improved quality of life compared to treatment with melphalan and prednisone--a randomized phase III study of the East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr;132(4):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00432-005-0074-4. Epub 2006 Jan 10. PubMed 16402269 ↗
  • Knop S, Straka C, Haen M, Schwedes R, Hebart H, Einsele H. The efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine in recurrent multiple myeloma after high-dose chemotherapy. Haematologica. 2005 Sep;90(9):1287-8. PubMed 16154860 ↗
  • Haubitz M, Bohnenstengel F, Brunkhorst R, Schwab M, Hofmann U, Busse D. Cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and dose requirements in patients with renal insufficiency. Kidney Int. 2002 Apr;61(4):1495-501. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00279.x. PubMed 11918757 ↗
  • Eriksson T, Hoglund P, Turesson I, Waage A, Don BR, Vu J, Scheffler M, Kaysen GA. Pharmacokinetics of thalidomide in patients with impaired renal function and while on and off dialysis. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;55(12):1701-6. doi: 10.1211/0022357022241. PubMed 14738599 ↗
  • Tosi P, Zamagni E, Cellini C, Cangini D, Tacchetti P, Tura S, Baccarani M, Cavo M. Thalidomide alone or in combination with dexamethasone in patients with advanced, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and renal failure. Eur J Haematol. 2004 Aug;73(2):98-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00272.x. PubMed 15245508 ↗
  • Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Russell NH, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Cook G, Feyler S, Byrne JL, Roddie H, Rudin C, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Ross FM, Jackson GH, Child JA; NCRI Haematological Oncology Study Group. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) as initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011 Aug 4;118(5):1231-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-338665. Epub 2011 Jun 7. PubMed 21652683 ↗
  • Ramasamy K, Hazel B, Mahmood S, Corderoy S, Schey S. Bendamustine in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective therapy for myeloma patients with end stage renal disease. Br J Haematol. 2011 Dec;155(5):632-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08754.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21. No abstract available. PubMed 21689088 ↗
  • Jagannath S, Barlogie B, Berenson JR, Singhal S, Alexanian R, Srkalovic G, Orlowski RZ, Richardson PG, Anderson J, Nix D, Esseltine DL, Anderson KC; SUMMIT/CREST Investigators. Bortezomib in recurrent and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Initial clinical experience in patients with impared renal function. Cancer. 2005 Mar 15;103(6):1195-200. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20888. PubMed 15690325 ↗
  • Chanan-Khan AA, Kaufman JL, Mehta J, Richardson PG, Miller KC, Lonial S, Munshi NC, Schlossman R, Tariman J, Singhal S. Activity and safety of bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients with advanced renal failure: a multicenter retrospective study. Blood. 2007 Mar 15;109(6):2604-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-046409. Epub 2006 Nov 30. PubMed 17138816 ↗
  • San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, Dimopoulos MA, Shpilberg O, Kropff M, Spicka I, Petrucci MT, Palumbo A, Samoilova OS, Dmoszynska A, Abdulkadyrov KM, Schots R, Jiang B, Mateos MV, Anderson KC, Esseltine DL, Liu K, Cakana A, van de Velde H, Richardson PG; VISTA Trial Investigators. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 28;359(9):906-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801479. PubMed 18753647 ↗
  • Fenk R, Michael M, Zohren F, Graef T, Czibere A, Bruns I, Neumann F, Fenk B, Haas R, Kobbe G. Escalation therapy with bortezomib, dexamethasone and bendamustine for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007 Dec;48(12):2345-51. doi: 10.1080/10428190701694194. PubMed 18067009 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 1, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2014, a primary completion of Apr 2020 and a completion of Apr 2020. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jan 2022, 1 year 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 10, 2015
First posted
Apr 23, 2015
Start
Nov 2014
Primary completionActual
Apr 20, 2020
CompletionActual
Apr 20, 2020
Results first posted
Jan 27, 2022
Last update
Jan 27, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02424851
Lead sponsor
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Collaborators
Janssen-Cilag Ltd., Bloodwise, University of Warwick, University of Birmingham
Responsible party
Karthik Ramasamy (Dr., Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 23, 2015
Start date
Nov 2014
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2020
Completion
Apr 20, 2020
Results posted
Jan 27, 2022
Last update
Jan 27, 2022

Study contacts

Karthik Ramasamy
principal investigator · National Health Service, United Kingdom

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Bortezomib · Thalidomide

Start the discussion