ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03662178OxGRIPUpdated Jan 29, 2026

Investigating the Structured Use of Ultrasound Scanning for Fetal Growth

An observational study in Stillbirth, Fetal Death and Fetal Growth Retardation, sponsored by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 16 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-29.

Sponsored by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2017; still recruiting 9 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
56,000
Ages
16 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Fetal growth restriction during pregnancy represents one of the biggest risk factors for stillbirth (Gardosi et al, 2013), with 'about one in three term, normally formed antepartum stillbirths are related to abnormalities of fetal growth' (MBRRACE, 2015).

Therefore, antenatal detection of growth restricted babies is vital in order to be able to monitor and decide the appropriate delivery timing.

However, antenatal detection of SGA babies has been poor, varying greatly across trusts in England in those that calculate their rates (NHS England, 2016). Most trusts do not calculate their detection rates and rates are therefore unknown. It is estimated that routine NHS care detects only 1 in 4 growth restricted babies (Smith, 2015).

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, in partnership with the Oxford Academic Health Science Network (AHSN) has introduced a clinical care pathway (the Oxford Growth Restriction Pathway (OxGRIP)) designed to increase the rates of detection of these at risk babies. The pathway is intended to increase the identification of babies who are at risk of stillbirth, in order to try to prevent this outcome, whilst making best usage of resources, and restricting inequitable practice and unnecessary obstetric intervention.

It has been developed with reference to a body of research, however, the individual parts of care provided have not been put together in a pathway in this manner before. Therefore it is important to examine whether the pathway meets its goals of improving outcomes for babies in a 'real world' setting.

The principles of the pathway are

  1. A universal routine scan at 36 weeks gestation.
  2. Additional growth scans at 28 and 32 weeks gestation based on a simplified assessment of risk factors and universal uterine artery Doppler at 20 weeks gestation.
  3. Assessment of further parameters other than estimated fetal weight associated with adverse perinatal outcome (eg growth velocity, umbilical artery Doppler and CPR).

The clinical data routinely collected as a result of the introduction of the pathway offers a valuable and unique resource in identifying and analysing in the effects of the pathway on its intended outcomes and also in investigating and analysing other maternal, fetal and neonatal complications and outcomes, establishing normal / reference ranges for ultrasound values.

Read the detailed description

There is no requirement for patient participation in this study. All data collected and analysed is routinely collected clinical data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stillbirth
  • Fetal Death
  • Fetal Growth Retardation
  • Small for Gestational Age
  • Fetal Growth Restriction
  • Perinatal Death
  • Intrauterine Growth Restriction
03

In context

Stillbirth

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Stillbirth; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 56,000 is above the median of 480 across 55 observational studies indexed under Stillbirth.

Browse Stillbirth studies →

Lead sponsor

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (OUHFT) from January 2013 to 31st December 2019

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (OUHFT) from January 2013 to 31st December 2019 with no exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who have opted out of research related to pregnancy in this pregnancy whilst receiving care by the OUHFT.
  • If intrapartum care takes place outside of the OUHFT.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
56,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact of OxGRIP on Perinatal mortality according to gestation

    Mortality (stillbirth and neonatal death per 1000 pregnancies) in the period after birth) assessed in 2 years before the programme and compared with the 2 years after the programme started. Assessed for all pregnancies and for those reaching 35 weeks' gestation

    Time frame: 4 yrs

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact of the OxGRIP Pathway on service: number of scans

    Number of Ultrasound Scans (\>24 weeks gestation) performed per pregnancy

    Time frame: 6 yrs

  2. Impact of the OxGRIP Pathway on service - Consultant time

    Number of Consultant appointments

    Time frame: 6 yrs

  3. Impact of the OxGRIP Pathway on service - intrapartum interventions

    Proportion of all birth delivered as emergency and elective cesarean sections and instrumental deliveries

    Time frame: 6 yrs

  4. Risk Factors for adverse outcomes - ultrasound head circumference

    Routinely collected ultrasound fetal measurements - Head Circumference. Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  5. Risk Factors for adverse outcomes - ultrasound abdomen circumference

    Routinely collected ultrasound fetal measurements - Abdominal Circumference.Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  6. Risk Factors for adverse outcomes - ultrasound femur length

    Routinely collected ultrasound fetal measurements - Femur Length. Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  7. Risk Factors for adverse outcomes - ultrasound presentation

    Fetal presentation at last scan before birth. Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  8. Risk Factors for adverse outcomes - Doppler ultrasound

    Uterine/umbilical artery/ middle cerebral artery Doppler values. Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  9. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: hypertension

    Diagnosis of pre eclampsia and related complications. Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  10. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: diabetes

    Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes. Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  11. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: mode of birth

    Mode of Delivery

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  12. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: preterm birth

    Number of preterm births by gestation per 1000 pregnancies

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  13. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: stillbirth

    Antenatal fetal loss rate per 1000 pregnancies

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  14. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: intrapartum stillbirth

    Intrapartum fetal loss rate per 1000 pregnancies

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  15. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: neonatal death

    Neonatal death \<30 days of age: rate per 1000 livebirths

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  16. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: infant

    Neonatal/infant death \>30 days of age \<1year of age: per 1000 live births

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  17. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: neonatal admission

    Adverse neonatal outcome - planned/unplanned admission to NICU: rate per 1000 pregnancies

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  18. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: HIE

    Adverse neonatal outcome - diagnosis of HIE rate per 1000 pregnancies

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  19. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: cord gas

    Cord Blood Gases outside normal range (umbilical cord arterial pH at birth \<7.00 and \<7.05)

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  20. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: Apgar

    Apgar score at birth (continuous variable and rate of \<7 at 5 mins)

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  21. Clinical outcomes during pregnancy and postnatal/neonatal period: size

    Small for Gestational Age birthweight - by Hadlock and Intergrowth centiles. Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  22. Normal ranges of antenatal ultrasound markers.

    Development of normal range of routinely collected ultrasound measurements. Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

  23. Normal ranges of intrapartum markers.

    Cardiotocograph results ( Dawes Redman Criteria). Physiological parameter

    Time frame: 4 yrs

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chauhan SP, Magann EF. Screening for fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;49(2):284-94. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200606000-00010. PubMed 16721107 ↗
  • Gardosi J, Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;201(1):28.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.034. PubMed 19576372 ↗
  • Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D, Smith GCS. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2089-2097. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00131-2. Epub 2015 Sep 7. PubMed 26360240 ↗
  • Stacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, Zuccollo JM, Ekeroma AJ, McCowan LM. Antenatal care, identification of suboptimal fetal growth and risk of late stillbirth: findings from the Auckland Stillbirth Study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Jun;52(3):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01406.x. Epub 2012 Jan 25. PubMed 22276935 ↗
  • Papageorghiou AT, Kennedy SH, Salomon LJ, Ohuma EO, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Altman DG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Pang R, Victora CG, Bhutta ZA, Villar J; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;44(6):641-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.13448. Epub 2014 Nov 2. PubMed 25044000 ↗
  • Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ. 2013 Jan 24;346:f108. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f108. PubMed 23349424 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03662178
Lead sponsor
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Lawrence Impey (Principal Investigator, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 7, 2018
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 29, 2026

Study contacts

Lawrence Impey
Contact
lawrence.impey@ouh.nhs.uk
01865 851165
Christina Aye
Contact
christina.aye@ouh.nhs.uk
Lawrence Impey, FRCOG
study director · Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion