ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02317003PEPPERUpdated Aug 2, 2022

Physical Exercise Prescription With PEdometeR in General Practice for Patients With Cardiovascular Risk Factors - PEPPER

An interventional study of Intervention PPIL and Control OR in Sedentary Lifestyle, Cardiovascular Diseases and Hypertension, sponsored by University Hospital, Angers. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-02.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Angers · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the efficacy, in terms of energy expenditure, physical activity level, quality of life, blood pressure, waist circumference and weight, of a general practice based intervention involving a personalised physical exercise medical prescription, the structured delivery of information on the benefits of physical activity, a pedometer, and a pedometer log book, in 35 to 74 year old patients with cardiovascular risks factors.

Read the detailed description

Background: Health benefits of physical activity have been shown to be at least as important as drug therapies in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with hypertension, hyperlipidaemia or diabetes. However, few strategies have demonstrated efficacy and practicality in the promotion of physical exercise among these high risk patients in general practice.

The PEPPER clinical study is a pragmatic randomised trial over a period of 12 months to evaluate the efficacy, in terms of physical activity level, of an intervention based on structured information delivery according to cognitive and behavioural theories, a personalised written physical activity prescription in number of steps per day, a pedometer, and a pedometer logbook similar to diabetes logbooks, in 35 to 74 year old patients with cardiovascular risks factors. This strategy will be compared to the commonly used oral recommendation of physical activity. The primary outcome is the change in total energy expenditure measured by accelerometry over a 7-day period. Secondary outcomes include changes in physical activity levels (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), quality of life (SF-36), blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, perceived obstacles to physical activity, and patient and doctors compliance with the suggested strategy. 140 patients will be recruited and followed up in 15 GP practices. Measures will be assessed at baseline, at 3 months and at 12 months (end of intervention).

The results of the PEPPER study are expected at the end of 2016. If the intervention proves effective in increasing durably the level of physical activity, this relatively simple and cheap strategy could help decrease the occurrence of cardiovascular events in a large high-risk population seen in general practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sedentary Lifestyle
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Hypertension
  • Hypercholesterolemia
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • physical exercise
  • sedentarity
  • general practice
  • family medicine
  • pedometer
03

In context

Sedentary Behavior

367 studies on the registry are indexed under Sedentary Behavior; 165 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 126 is above the median of 70 across 314 interventional studies indexed under Sedentary Behavior.

Browse Sedentary Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Angers is the lead sponsor of 477 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients consulting their general practitioner for a non-urgent matter
  • with regular follow-up every 3 months for hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia or non insulin dependent type 2 diabetes.
  • judged insufficiently active by their general practitioner based on negative answers to the questions : "Do you practice a physical activity or cycling more than an hour per week?" and "Does your occupation involve physical exertion?"

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication to moderate physical activity,
  • non autonomous for walking,
  • with cognitive or psychiatric impairment limiting the full understanding of the study,
  • suffering from another limiting disease (coronary insufficiency, chronic cardiac failure, etc),
  • who don't speak French,
  • refusing to participate.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
126 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention PPIL

    Intervention delivered by the family doctor and based on structured information delivery according to cognitive and behavioural theories, a personalised written physical activity prescription in number of steps per day, a pedometer, and a pedometer logbook similar to diabetes logbooks.

    Behavioral: Intervention PPIL

  • Active comparator
    Control OR

    Oral recommendation of physical exercise delivered by the family doctor.

    Behavioral: Control OR

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntervention PPIL

    Also known as: Prescription, Pedometer, Information, Logbook

  • BehavioralControl OR

    Also known as: Oral recommendation of physical exercise

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in total energy expenditure by accelerometry at 3 months compared to baseline

    The total energy expenditure is measured with a wGT3x-BT Actigraph accelerometer worn at the belt during 7 consecutive days from morning to evening. It is measured in Metabolic Equivalent Task-Minutes per Week.

    Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in total energy expenditure by accelerometry at 12 months compared to baseline

    The total energy expenditure is measured with a wGT3x-BT Actigraph accelerometer worn at the belt during 7 consecutive days from morning to evening. It is measured in Metabolic Equivalent Task-Minutes per Week.

    Time frame: baseline and 52 weeks

  2. Change in total energy expenditure by questionnaire at 3 months compared to baseline

    The total energy expenditure is calculated with the self-administered International Physical Activity Questionaire (IPAQ) short version covering the past 7 days. It is expressed in Metabolic Equivalent Task-Minutes per Week.

    Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

  3. Change in total energy expenditure by questionnaire at 12 months compared to baseline

    The total energy expenditure is calculated with the self-administered International Physical Activity Questionaire (IPAQ) short version covering the past 7 days. It is expressed in Metabolic Equivalent Task-Minutes per Week.

    Time frame: baseline and 52 weeks

  4. Change in quality of life at 3 months compared to baseline

    Change in quality of life as measured by the self-administered Short Form 36 questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

  5. Change in quality of life at 12 months compared to baseline

    Change in quality of life as measured by the self-administered Short Form 36 questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline and 52 weeks

  6. Change in waist circumference at 3 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

  7. Change in waist circumference at 12 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: baseline and 52 weeks

  8. Change in weight at 3 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

  9. Change in weight at 12 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: baseline and 52 weeks

  10. Change in arterial blood pressure at 3 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

  11. Change in arterial blood pressure at 12 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: baseline and 52 weeks

  12. Perceived obstacles to physical exercise

    Perceived obstacles to physical exercise as measured by the Determinant of Physical Activity Questionnaire (DPAQ)

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  13. Adherence of doctors and patients to the suggested strategy

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  14. Adherence of doctors and patients to the suggested strategy

    Time frame: 52 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Angers University Hospital
    Angers, 49933, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bellanger W, Peurois M, Connan L, Navasiolava N, Missud D, Py T, Begue C. Comparing physical activity prescription with verbal advice for general practice patients with cardiovascular risk factors: results from the PEPPER randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):1402. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16302-6. PubMed 37475036 ↗
  • Missud DC, Parot-Schinkel E, Connan L, Vielle B, Huez JF. Physical activity prescription for general practice patients with cardiovascular risk factors-the PEPPER randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7048-y. PubMed 31159805 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2015 to primary completion in Aug 2018, 40 months.

Of 243 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sedentary Behavior, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43. This study's 40 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 246 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 10, 2014
First posted
Dec 15, 2014
StartActual
Mar 16, 2015
Primary completionActual
Aug 1, 2018
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2018
Last update
Aug 2, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 2, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02317003
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 15, 2014
Start date
Mar 16, 2015
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2018
Completion
Aug 1, 2018
Last update
Aug 2, 2022

Study contacts

Denise Jolivot, MD
study chair · University Hospital, Angers
Laurent Connan, MD
principal investigator · Medical School, Angers

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion