CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02304783ONSAIP-RCUpdated Apr 5, 2024

Oral NSAI Versus Paracetamol or Placebo as a Second Line Treatment for Renal Colics

A Phase 3 interventional study of Piroxicam and Placebo in Renal Colic, sponsored by University of Monastir. Completed at 1 site in Tunisia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-05.

Sponsored by University of Monastir · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Outpatients treatment with NSAI in renal colics has not been well investigated and there is no clear recommendations regarding this matter.

The aim of this study is to determine if an oral NSAI treatment is beneficial in patients discharged for the emergency departement after the first line treatment of a renal colic investigating the recurrence of pain, the reconsultation rates and the admissions.

Read the detailed description

Renal colic (RC)are a frequent cause of consultation in the emergency departement (ED).

They count for approximatively 20% of patients presenting to the ED with severe acute onset abdominal pain.

The first line treatment of renal colics is based on NSAI drugs associated with antalgics and is further investigated in the NSAI vs Morphine study (NCT02156596).

But there is no clear recommendations regarding the outpatient treatment of renal colics.

Oral NSAI are still widely used as a second line medicine for this condition and variety of molecules were tried with no solid scientific arguments.

Piroxicam, a non-selective COX inhibitor drug appared to the Oxicam class of NSAI, is widely used to treat rheumatoid conditions and other inflammatory conditions and often prescribed in Tunisia as a second line treatment of RC.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficiency and safety of the use of oral NSAI drugs (Piroxicam) compared to paracetamol or placebo as a second line treatment of renal colics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Colic

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Renal colic, Piroxicam
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years old
  • Consenting to participate in the study
  • Patients treated in the ED for RC
  • No contraindications of NSAI treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients excluded from the first phase of the study
  • Contraindication of NSAI treatment
  • Patients non reachable by telephone call
  • Patients that did not receive or use the treatment
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
1,400 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Oral Piroxicam

    Piroxicam : 20 mg per pill; one pill per day for five days associated with placebo (1pill) (taken separately)

    Drug: Piroxicam

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo: two pills per day for five days (taken separately)

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    paracetamol

    paracetamol: 2000mg per day for five days two pills taken separately)

    Drug: paracetamol

Interventions

  • DrugPiroxicam

    Patients allocated to this arm received, as a second line treatment of renal colics, a five days treatment with 20 mg piroxicam associated with placebo per day and were contacted at the seventh day by telephone call to investigate the efficacity and the side effects of the treatment.

    Also known as: Piroxen

  • DrugPlacebo

    Patients allocated to this arm received a five days treatment with Placebo and were contacted at the seventh day by telephone call to investigate the efficacity and the side effects of the treatment.

  • Drugparacetamol

    Patients allocated to this arm received a five days treatment with Paracetamol and were contacted at the seventh day by telephone call to investigate the efficacity and the side effects of the treatment.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacity of oral NSAI (telephone call, asking for the recurrence of pain, the reconsultation rates and intervals and the need for other treatments)

    The efficacity of the oral NSAI treatment was evaluated at the seventh day by a telephone call, asking for the recurrence of painand the readmission rates)

    Time frame: seven days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety of NSAI (telephone call, asking for mean time to recurrence and the occurence of NSAI side effects such as abdominal pain, vomiting, rush, bleeding and ect)

    The efficacity of the oral NSAI treatment was evaluated at the seventh day by a telephone call, asking for the occurence of NSAI side effects such as abdominal pain, vomiting, rush, bleeding and ect

    Time frame: seven days

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Emergency Department of University Hospital of Monastir
    Monastir, 5050, Tunisia
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02304783
Lead sponsor
University of Monastir
Responsible party
Pr. Semir Nouira (Professor, University of Monastir) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 2, 2014
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2021
Completion
Dec 2021
Last update
Apr 5, 2024

Study contacts

Semir Nouira, MD
principal investigator · University of Monastir

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion