ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07754968Updated Aug 10, 2026

Use of Bifidobacterium Bifidum in Formula-Fed Infants With Colic, With or Without Atopic Dermatitis

An interventional study of Bifidobacterium bifidum BFP19® and BFP29® (Bifipral®) and Placebo in Infant Colic and Atopic Dermatitis, sponsored by University of Roma La Sapienza. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 1 Week to 5 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by University of Roma La Sapienza · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Week to 5 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether daily probiotic supplementation with Bifidobacterium bifidum (Bifipral® drops) can reduce crying time in formula-fed infants aged 5 months or younger diagnosed with infant colic (according to Rome IV criteria), with or without concomitant atopic dermatitis.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does daily administration of B. bifidum for 8 weeks achieve at least a 50% reduction in average daily crying duration compared to placebo?
  • Does B. bifidum supplementation improve secondary outcomes, including crying frequency, sleep quality, bowel movement frequency, stool consistency, fecal microbiota composition, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels, and SCORAD score in infants with atopic dermatitis? Researchers will compare formula-fed infants receiving Bifipral® drops (containing B. bifidum strains BFP19® and BFP29®) to a comparison group receiving an indistinguishable placebo to see if the probiotic safely improves colic symptoms and gut microbiota balance.

Participants will be asked to:

  • Complete a 7-day observational run-in period to confirm eligibility and record baseline symptoms in a daily diary.
  • Administer 5 drops daily of the study product (probiotic or placebo) for 8 weeks.
  • Complete daily diaries tracking crying duration/frequency, sleep parameters, and bowel habits.
  • Attend 3 clinical visits (Baseline, Week 8, and a Safety Follow-up 2-4 weeks post-treatment).
  • Provide fecal samples at Baseline (Visit 1) and Week 8 (Visit 2) for microbiota profiling and SCFA analysis.
Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND AND SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE:

Bifidobacterium bifidum is a primary commensal of the human intestinal microbiota, exhibiting a pronounced tropism for the early stages of life. It is highly adapted to the neonatal ecosystem due to its ability to efficiently utilize both host glycans-specifically human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs)-and intestinal mucin. This capability is enabled by a rich repertoire of extracellular glycosidases and the presence of structures such as sortase-dependent pili, which promote adhesion to the epithelium, mucosal colonization, and interaction with the immune system.

The degradation of HMOs present in breast milk by B. bifidum confers a crucial role in modulating the gut microbiota: the released degradation products, such as fucose, sialic acid, and LNB (Lacto-N-Biose), serve as substrates for other beneficial species, promoting cross-feeding mechanisms and ensuring the establishment of a healthy microbial community.

While in breastfed infants the growth of B. bifidum is sustained by HMOs, non-breastfed infants exhibit a dramatic deficiency of this key species. However, the ability of B. bifidum to stably adhere to the mucosa via pili and metabolize endogenous mucin suggests that it can successfully colonize the intestine even in the absence of breastfeeding, acting as a functional surrogate to restore cross-feeding mechanisms and immune tolerance typical of healthy neonates. This positions B. bifidum among the primary intestinal colonizers capable of significantly modulating the infant's immunological trajectory.

A reduction in bifidobacteria has been associated with both infant colic, defined according to Rome IV criteria, and atopic manifestations, including atopic dermatitis. Both conditions share a background of immuno-enteric immaturity and a higher prevalence of dysbiosis characterized by a decrease in Bifidobacterium and an increase in gas-producing species. In light of this evidence, B. bifidum emerges as a key species whose decline is associated with adverse outcomes along a continuum that includes colic and atopic dermatitis.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES:

Despite the strong biological rationale, to date there are no randomized controlled trials specifically evaluating the efficacy of B. bifidum in non-breastfed infants with infant colic, nor are structured data available on its potential impact on symptoms associated with atopy.

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate whether daily administration of a probiotic blend consisting of Bifidobacterium bifidum BFP19® and Bifidobacterium bifidum BFP29® (Bifipral® drops) reduces crying duration in non-breastfed infants diagnosed with infant colic according to Rome IV criteria. Additionally, the study explores the impact of this intervention on sleep parameters, bowel habits, fecal microbiota composition (via shotgun metagenomics), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) levels, and, in subjects with concomitant atopic dermatitis, changes in the SCORAD score.

PROCEDURAL SUMMARY:

Following a 7-day observational run-in period to confirm diagnosis and collect baseline data, eligible infants are randomized (1:1 ratio, block randomization stratified by age) to receive either Bifipral® drops (5 drops/day, supplying 4 x 10\^9 CFU/day total) or an indistinguishable placebo for 8 weeks. Daily diaries are maintained by parents to record behavioral and gastrointestinal outcomes. Clinical assessments and biological sampling occur at baseline (Visit 1), end of treatment at Week 8 (Visit 2), and a final safety follow-up visit scheduled 2 to 4 weeks post-treatment. Fecal samples are processed for metagenomic profiling and SCFA analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant Colic
  • Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

  • Bifidobacterium bifidum
  • Infant colic
  • Atopic dermatitis
  • Probiotics
  • Gut microbiota
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

In context

Colic

127 studies on the registry are indexed under Colic; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is below the median of 76 across 110 interventional studies indexed under Colic.

Browse Colic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Roma La Sapienza is the lead sponsor of 398 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Week to 5 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-breastfed infants aged ≤ 5 months diagnosed with infant colic according to Rome IV criteria, with or without atopic dermatitis.
  • Written from parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 5 months.
  • Exclusive breastfeeding or mixed feeding.
  • Absence of infant colic diagnosis.
  • Presence of chronic diseases, neoplasms, immunodeficiencies, chronic infections, diseases, IBD, celiac disease, genetic-metabolic disorders, cystic fibrosis or other chronic pulmonary diseases, cardiovascular/respiratory/GI malformations, neuropsychiatric disorders, neurological conditions, or vegetarian/vegan diet.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Probiotic Group (Bifipral®)

    Non-breastfed infants receiving oral drops containing a probiotic blend of Bifidobacterium bifidum BFP19® and Bifidobacterium bifidum BFP29® (Bifipral®) daily for 8 weeks.

    Dietary Supplement: Bifidobacterium bifidum BFP19® and BFP29® (Bifipral®)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Control Group

    Non-breastfed infants receiving oral drops of an indistinguishable placebo daily for 8 weeks.

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementBifidobacterium bifidum BFP19® and BFP29® (Bifipral®)

    Oral drops containing a combination of Bifidobacterium bifidum BFP19® and Bifidobacterium bifidum BFP29®. Administered at a dose of 5 drops once daily (providing a total of 4 x 10⁹ CFU/day, 2 x 10⁹ CFU per strain), preferably in the morning before feeding, for 8 weeks.

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo

    Matching placebo oral drops, indistinguishable from the active intervention in packaging, color, odor, taste, consistency, and labeling. Administered at a dose of 5 drops once daily, preferably in the morning before feeding, for 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment Response Rate Based on Daily Crying Duration

    Proportion of infants achieving a clinical response, defined as a \>/=50% reduction in the mean daily crying duration compared to baseline. Crying duration is recorded by parents in a structured daily diary. Baseline crying duration is calculated as the average of the values recorded during the 3 consecutive days preceding the baseline visit., in accordance with methodological standards of probiotic studies and Rome IV recommendations.

    Time frame: Baseline (3-day run-in average) to Week 8 (end of treatment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Daily Crying Episode Frequency

    Change in the average number of crying episodes per 24-hour period, as recorded by parents in the structured daily behavioral diary.

    Time frame: Baseline (3-day run-in average) to Week 8 (end of treatment)

  2. Change from Baseline in Total 24-Hour Sleep Duration

    Change in total sleep duration over a 24-hour period (expressed in hours per day), calculated as the average of 3 consecutive days recorded by parents in the daily diary.

    Time frame: Baseline (3-day run-in average) to Week 8 (end of treatment)

  3. Change from Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings

    Change in the mean number of nocturnal awakenings per night, calculated as the average of 3 consecutive nights recorded by parents in the daily diary.

    Time frame: Baseline (3-day run-in average) to Week 8 (end of treatment)

  4. Change from Baseline in Longest Uninterrupted Nighttime Sleep Episode

    Change in the duration (expressed in hours) of the longest continuous nighttime sleep episode per night, calculated as the average of 3 consecutive nights recorded by parents in the daily diary.

    Time frame: Baseline (3-day run-in average) to Week 8 (end of treatment)

  5. Change from Baseline in Daily Bowel Movement Frequency

    Change in the mean number of bowel movements per day, as recorded by parents in the daily diary.

    Time frame: Baseline (3-day run-in average) to Week 8 (end of treatment)

  6. Change from Baseline in Stool Consistency Score

    Change in stool consistency assessed using the modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for infants. The scale ranges from Type 1 (hard lumps) to Type 7 (watery/liquid). Minimum score is 1, maximum score is 7; lower scores indicate harder stool consistency and higher scores indicate looser/more liquid stool consistency.

    Time frame: Baseline (3-day run-in average) to Week 8 (end of treatment)

  7. Change from Baseline in Fecal Microbiota Composition (Alpha Diversity)

    Change in gut microbial community alpha diversity (Shannon Diversity Index) determined by shotgun metagenomic sequencing of collected fecal samples.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Week 8 (Visit 2)

  8. Change from Baseline in Fecal Short-Chain Fatty Acid (SCFA) Concentrations

    Change in absolute concentrations (expressed in micromoles per gram of dry stool) of key fecal short-chain fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate) measured via gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Week 8 (Visit 2)

  9. Change from Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Index Total Score

    Change in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index total score evaluated in the subgroup of participants with concomitant atopic dermatitis. The SCORAD total score evaluates disease extent, clinical severity of 6 parameters, and subjective symptoms (pruritus and sleep loss). The total score ranges from 0 to 103, where 0 indicates absence of disease and higher scores represent greater disease severity (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Week 8 (Visit 2)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nocerino R, De Filippis F, Cecere G, Marino A, Micillo M, Di Scala C, de Caro C, Calignano A, Bruno C, Paparo L, Iannicelli AM, Cosenza L, Maddalena Y, Della Gatta G, Coppola S, Carucci L, Ercolini D, Berni Canani R. The therapeutic efficacy of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12(R) in infant colic: A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;51(1):110-120. doi: 10.1111/apt.15561. Epub 2019 Dec 3. PubMed 31797399 ↗
  • Samarra A, Renwick S, Arzamasov AA, Rodionov DA, Spann K, Cabrera-Rubio R, Acuna-Gonzalez A, Martinez-Costa C, Hall L, Segata N, Osterman AL, Bode L, Collado M. Human milk oligosaccharide metabolism and antibiotic resistance in early gut colonizers: insights from bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the maternal-infant microbiome. Gut Microbes. 2025 Dec;17(1):2501192. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2501192. Epub 2025 May 9. PubMed 40340669 ↗
  • Hoskinson C, Medeleanu MV, Reyna ME, Dai DLY, Chowdhury B, Moraes TJ, Mandhane PJ, Simons E, Kozyrskyj AL, Azad MB, Petersen C, Turvey SE, Subbarao P. Antibiotics taken within the first year of life are linked to infant gut microbiome disruption and elevated atopic dermatitis risk. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Jul;154(1):131-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.03.025. Epub 2024 Apr 24. PubMed 38670232 ↗
  • Rahman T, Sarwar PF, Potter C, Comstock SS, Klepac-Ceraj V. Role of human milk oligosaccharide metabolizing bacteria in the development of atopic dermatitis/eczema. Front Pediatr. 2023 Mar 20;11:1090048. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1090048. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37020647 ↗
  • Ouwehand AC, Isolauri E, He F, Hashimoto H, Benno Y, Salminen S. Differences in Bifidobacterium flora composition in allergic and healthy infants. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jul;108(1):144-5. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.115754. No abstract available. PubMed 11447399 ↗
  • Partty A, Kalliomaki M, Endo A, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Compositional development of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus microbiota is linked with crying and fussing in early infancy. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032495. Epub 2012 Mar 5. PubMed 22403665 ↗
  • Lordan C, Roche AK, Delsing D, Nauta A, Groeneveld A, MacSharry J, Cotter PD, van Sinderen D. Linking human milk oligosaccharide metabolism and early life gut microbiota: bifidobacteria and beyond. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2024 Mar 27;88(1):e0009423. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00094-23. Epub 2024 Jan 11. PubMed 38206006 ↗
  • Verma R, Lee C, Jeun EJ, Yi J, Kim KS, Ghosh A, Byun S, Lee CG, Kang HJ, Kim GC, Jun CD, Jan G, Suh CH, Jung JY, Sprent J, Rudra D, De Castro C, Molinaro A, Surh CD, Im SH. Cell surface polysaccharides of Bifidobacterium bifidum induce the generation of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Sci Immunol. 2018 Oct 19;3(28):eaat6975. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aat6975. PubMed 30341145 ↗
  • Egan M, Motherway MO, Kilcoyne M, Kane M, Joshi L, Ventura M, van Sinderen D. Cross-feeding by Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 during co-cultivation with Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 in a mucin-based medium. BMC Microbiol. 2014 Nov 25;14:282. doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0282-7. PubMed 25420416 ↗
  • Turroni F, Duranti S, Bottacini F, Guglielmetti S, Van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Bifidobacterium bifidum as an example of a specialized human gut commensal. Front Microbiol. 2014 Aug 21;5:437. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00437. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25191315 ↗
  • Turroni F, Duranti S, Milani C, Lugli GA, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Bifidobacterium bifidum: A Key Member of the Early Human Gut Microbiota. Microorganisms. 2019 Nov 9;7(11):544. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7110544. PubMed 31717486 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study involves the prospective collection of new clinical data and biological samples within the framework of a randomized controlled experimental intervention. Data will be stored in a pseudonymized form using unique identification codes and processed in compliance with current privacy regulations. Informed consent will be obtained by the investigators or designated staff

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 26 months after the start.

Of 32 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colic, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 26 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 28, 2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2028
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07754968
Responsible party
Prof. Giovanni Di Nardo (Professor, University of Roma La Sapienza) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Giovanni Di Nardo, Professor
Contact
giovanni.dinardo@uniroma1.it
0633775870
Maurizio Mennini, MD
Contact
dott.mauriziomennini@gmail.com
+39 0633775780
Giovanni Di Nardo, Professor
principal investigator · UOC Pediatrics, AOU Sant'Andrea, Rome / Sapienza University of Rome

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion