CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02291484CRESCENT2Updated Aug 4, 2016

Comprehensive Cardiac CT Versus Exercise Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (2)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cardiac CT scan in Stable Angina Pectoris and Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Completed at 4 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-04.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Phase 3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multi-center, randomized-controlled trial comparing a comprehensive cardiac CT protocol with standard stress testing in patients with stable chest pain complaints.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: CT calcium and coronary lumen imaging allow efficient exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD), but cannot assess the hemodynamic significance of obstructive findings. Addition of stress myocardial perfusion imaging, which assesses the functional relevance of coronary narrowing, completes the non-invasive cardiac evaluation.

Hypothesis: A comprehensive cardiac CT examination will allow fast, accurate and complete evaluation of suspected CAD.

Objective: evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of comprehensive cardiac CT workup of suspected CAD.

Study design: Open-labelled, randomized-controlled, clinical efficiency trial, with an intention-to-diagnose approach, between CT-guided management and the current standard of care (based on functional testing of provocable myocardial ischemia) in patients with suspected CAD.

Study population: 250 patients (>18 yrs) with stable chest complaints, a >10% pre-test probability of CAD, and referred for evaluation of possible CAD.

Intervention: Instead of the usual diagnostic approach, patients in the intervention group will undergo in sequence the following CT examinations: coronary calcium scan, coronary CT angiography and CT myocardial perfusion imaging, with completion dependent on results. Findings on CT will direct further management.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary: Rate of negative invasive angiograms (as percentage of total population) Secondary: Diagnostic yield, chest complaints, quality of life, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, overall costs and adverse events at 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stable Angina Pectoris
  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Coronary angiography
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Perfusion imaging
  • Comparative effectiveness
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Cost-effectiveness
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 250 is above the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women aged >18 years.
  • Chest pain symptoms suspicious of coronary heart disease.
  • Pre-test probability of coronary artery disease >10%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of CAD: prior myocardial infarction or revascularization procedure
  • Contra-indication to radiation exposure (CT/SPECT): pregnancy
  • Contra-indication to iodine contrast media: renal failure, iodine allergy
  • Contra-indications to adenosine
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Comprehensive cardiac CT

    Tiered cardiac CT protocol: 1. CT calcium scan 2. CT angiography (if calcium scan positive or high pre-test probability) 3. CT perfusion (if \>50% stenosis on CTA, or cannot be ruled out)

    Device: Cardiac CT scan

  • No intervention
    Standard care

    Standard diagnostic management of suspected CAD, using stress testing

Interventions

  • DeviceCardiac CT scan

    CT-guided management

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of negative invasive angiograms (as percentage of total population)

    Number of performed invasive angiograms with no CAD requiring intervention

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Chest pain complaints

    Proportion of patients experiencing symptoms of chest pain

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Quality of life

    Questionnaire based quality of life score

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Major adverse event rate

    Death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, urgent revascularizations, CVA

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Radiation exposure

    Cumulative radiation dose from diagnostic and therapeutic interventions

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures

    Number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Medical expenses

    All medical expenses related to the diagnosis and treatment of suspected CAD

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Albert Schweizerzieknhuis
    Dordrecht, 3318 AT, Netherlands
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
    Maastricht, 6229 HX, Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC
    Rotterdam, 3015CE, Netherlands
  • Maasstadziekenhuis
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lubbers M, Coenen A, Kofflard M, Bruning T, Kietselaer B, Galema T, Kock M, Niezen A, Das M, van Gent M, van den Bos EJ, van Woerkens L, Musters P, Kooij S, Nous F, Budde R, Hunink M, Nieman K. Comprehensive Cardiac CT With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Functional Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The Multicenter, Randomized CRESCENT-II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1625-1636. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Dec 13. PubMed 29248657 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02291484
Lead sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
Responsible party
Koen Nieman (Dr K Nieman, Erasmus Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2014
Start date
Aug 2013
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Last update
Aug 4, 2016

Study contacts

Koen Nieman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion