CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02176291IRLGREY-BUpdated Aug 29, 2018Results posted

Incomplete Response in Late-Life Depression: Getting to Remission With Buprenorphine

A Phase 2 interventional study of Buprenorphine and Placebo in Depression and Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Jordan F. Karp. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-29.

Sponsored by Jordan F. Karp · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purposes of this project are to examine the feasibility, safety, tolerability and clinical effect of low-dose buprenorphine as a novel treatment for late-life treatment-resistant depression and to develop preliminary data about mechanism of action.

Read the detailed description

Up to one half of older patients with major depression develop Late-Life Treatment Resistant Depression (LL-TRD). Consequences of LL-TRD include suicide, worsened medical conditions, increased caregiver burden, and higher all-cause mortality. The development and testing of novel-mechanism pharmacotherapies is a public health priority embraced by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Among the neuropeptidergic transmitters, opioids are known to modulate mood, and this system is often altered in patients with major depression. Targeting the opiate system in LL-TRD may positively modulate a system in which there is age-associated imbalance between circulating opiates and the density and binding affinity of mu and kappa opiate receptors. Buprenorphine (BPN) is an antagonist at the kappa opiate receptor and a partial agonist at the mu opiate receptor. Either, or both, of these pharmacodynamic actions may underlie its putative antidepressant effects. Our research group has open pilot data from 15 older adults with prospectively demonstrated treatment resistance to venlafaxine who were exposed to low-dose BPN, suggesting a clinically meaningful antidepressant effect. In addition, since BPN: 1) is available in sublingual formulation and 2) has a favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profile, it is an attractive candidate to re-purpose as a molecule for LL-TRD. Thus, the overarching aims of this project are to examine the feasibility, safety, tolerability and clinical effect of low-dose BPN as a novel treatment for LL-TRD and to develop preliminary data about mechanism of action (MOA).

The overarching aims are to examine the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of buprenorphine (BPN) as a novel treatment for late-life treatment resistant depression (LL-TRD). This also involves using translational tools of modern neurobiology (fMRI) to rapidly obtain proof-of-concept support for further clinical development. Formal dosing schedules in the use of buprenorphine have yet to be thoroughly established. This study hopes to determine optimal dosing strategies to improve acceptability.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • Buprenorphine
  • Receptors, opioid
  • Receptors, opioid kappa and mu
03

In context

Depression

8,055 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,643 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 84 across 6,718 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Jordan F. Karp is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age >/= to 50 years.
  2. Major depressive disorder (MDD), single or recurrent, as diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM IV (SCID-IV).
  3. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) >/= to 15.
  4. Has or agrees to establish a clinical relationship with primary care physician (PCP).
  5. Availability of an informant (e.g., emergency contact).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent.
  2. Depressive symptoms not severe enough i.e.,Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ( MADRS) \< 15 at the baseline assessments.
  3. Dementia, as defined by The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination \< 84 and clinical evidence of dementia (e.g., memory impairment, executive dysfunction, agnosia, apraxia, aphasia, with functional impairment).
  4. Lifetime diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder, or current psychotic symptoms, as diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID).
  5. Abuse of or dependence on alcohol or other substances within the past 3 months as determined by SCID, and confirmed by study physician interview.
  6. Alcohol use amounting to 15 or more drinks per week or drinking 5 or more drinks on one occasion during any given week.
  7. High risk for suicide (e.g., active suicidal ideation (SI) and/or current/recent intent or plan) AND unable to be managed safely in the clinical trial (e.g., unwilling to be hospitalized). Urgent psychiatric referral will be made in these cases.
  8. Contraindication to venlafaxine extended release (XR) or BPN as determined by study physician including history of intolerance of either venlafaxine XR or BPN in the study target dosage range (venlafaxine XR at up to 300 mg/day; BPN at up to 2 mg/day).
  9. Inability to communicate in English (i.e., interview cannot be conducted without an interpreter; subject largely unable to understand questions and cannot respond in English).
  10. Non-correctable clinically significant sensory impairment (i.e., cannot hear well enough to cooperate with interview).
  11. Unstable medical illness, including delirium, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or cerebrovascular or cardiovascular risk factors that are not under medical management. This will be determined based on information from the patient's personal physician and study physician's clinical judgment. Referral to the patient's personal physician or to a general practitioner will be made in these cases. Sodium and glucose levels done in the past 6 months are also reviewed before a subject begins study medication to determine if an illness is stable or uncontrolled. Individual lab parameters may deviate from normal without any associated pathophysiology or negative clinical affect; therefore we will follow the guide below before beginning starting any study medication.

    Sodium value of 135 but asymptomatic= consider to be normal and proceed without further testing.

    Sodium value of 134= repeat sodium. If value continues to be at 134 or higher and subject is asymptomatic, continue study participation but recheck sodium level after one week of exposure to study medication to confirm it has stayed stable.

    Sodium value of 133 or less= will evaluate subject's medication list to suggest possibly removing other medications which may be contributing to low sodium (in collaboration with their PCP), suggest fluid restriction and require repeat sodium that is normal range prior to commencing study.

    Glucose \< 275 and asymptomatic= stable to proceed but will communicate value to PCP with participants permission.

    (see exclusion #17 for information on hepatic function lab parameters)

  12. Subjects taking psychotropic medications that cannot be safely tapered and discontinued prior to study initiation. The following exceptions are allowed if they have been taken at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to study entry and there is not a plan to change the dose during the next 28 weeks: benzodiazepines up to 2 mg/d lorazepam equivalent; other sedative-hypnotics (e.g., zolpidem, zaleplon, eszopiclone); gabapentin if prescribed for non-psychiatric indication (e.g., neuropathy).
  13. History of opiate abuse or dependence.
  14. Severe pain, defined as >/= 7 on 0-10 numeric rating scale for pain.
  15. Concomitant use of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, clarithromycin, itraconazole, ketonazole, nefazodone, saquinovir, telithromycin, aprepitant, erythromycin, fluconazole, grapefruit juice, verapamil, diltiazem)
  16. Refusal to stop all opioids (to avoid precipitating opioid withdrawal).
  17. Hepatic impairment- aspartate aminotransferase (AST) /alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.5 times upper normal. If AST and ALT are within 1.5 times the upper limit, and subjects are asymptomatic, they will be considered medically stable to participate
  18. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \< 20 ml/min.
  19. Inability/refusal to identify a person as an emergency contact.
  20. Pregnancy
  21. Contraindications to MRI
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Buprenorphine

    Buprenorphine

    Drug: Buprenorphine

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBuprenorphine

    low-dose buprenorphine (range 0.2 mg/day -- 2.0 mg/day)

    Also known as: suboxone, buprenex, temgesic, subutex

  • DrugPlacebo

    matched placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    Measure of depression severity, range of 0-60 We calculated the mean change in depression severity for both groups using baseline MADRS and week 8 MADRS scores. Greater mean change represents better outcome.

    Time frame: baseline and 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brief Symptom Inventory--Anxiety Subscale (BSI)

    Measure of Anxiety Theoretical Range 0-2.4 with lower numbers indicating a better outcome. We calculated the mean change in anxiety for both groups using Phase 1 week 12 time point (baseline) and Phase 2 week 8 time point (final time point).

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 2, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBuprenorphinePlacebo
Started2011
Completed1511
Not completed50
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Non compliance with protocol20
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20

Outcome measures

PrimaryMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

Measure of depression severity, range of 0-60 We calculated the mean change in depression severity for both groups using baseline MADRS and week 8 MADRS scores. Greater mean change represents better outcome.

Time frame:
baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
units on a scaleBuprenorphinePlacebo
Change in MADRS3.47 ± 8.944.09 ± 8.06
Final MADRS score16.93 ± 8.6814.64 ± 9.41
SecondaryBrief Symptom Inventory--Anxiety Subscale (BSI)

Measure of Anxiety Theoretical Range 0-2.4 with lower numbers indicating a better outcome. We calculated the mean change in anxiety for both groups using Phase 1 week 12 time point (baseline) and Phase 2 week 8 time point (final time point).

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Brief Symptom Inventory--Anxiety Subscale (BSI)
units on a scaleBuprenorphinePlacebo
Change in BSI0.07 ± 1.390.06 ± 0.80
Final BSI Score0.74 ± 0.940.64 ± 0.48

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected over a period of 1 year and six months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Buprenorphine1/20 (5%)2/20 (10%)12/20 (60%)
Placebo0/11 (0%)2/11 (18.2%)8/11 (72.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBuprenorphinePlacebo
severe abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/201/11
pneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/201/11
deathCardiac disorders1/200/11
nausea and hypertensionGeneral disorders1/200/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventBuprenorphinePlacebo
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/202/11
LightheadednessGeneral disorders4/191/11
DrowsinessGeneral disorders4/200/11
Dry MouthGeneral disorders4/200/11
InsomniaGeneral disorders3/202/11
Increased Blood PressureCardiac disorders2/202/11
CoughingGeneral disorders0/202/11
urinary frequencyRenal and urinary disorders2/200/11
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/201/11
Increased pulseGeneral disorders1/201/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BuprenorphinePlaceboTotal
Mean64.7 ± 9.765.6 ± 7.565.0 ± 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BuprenorphinePlaceboTotal
Female8311
Male12820
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BuprenorphinePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American404
White161127
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)BuprenorphinePlaceboTotal
United States201131
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 20, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 20, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02176291
Lead sponsor
Jordan F. Karp
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Jordan F. Karp (Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2014
Start date
Aug 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2017
Completion
Feb 2018
Results posted
Jul 2, 2018
Last update
Aug 29, 2018

Study contacts

Jordan F. Karp, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion