CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02121158I-70Updated Jul 31, 2024Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Implantation in the Elderly

An interventional study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and Optimal Medical Therapy in Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Artery Disease and Congestive Heart Failure, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Terminated at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-31.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Results of the pilot were not enough to justify the extension of the pilot. Results presented are from pilot.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
167
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall aim of this trial is to study the safety and efficacy of ICD implantation as a primary prevention strategy of sudden cardiac death in patients 70 years and older. This study will assess the many competing factors involved with ICD implantation including 1) the impact on mortality, especially in the context of a declining rate of sudden death with advanced age, 2) the tolerability of the powerful therapeutic action of the device, and 3) the impact on quality of life.

Read the detailed description

The overall aim of this trial is to study the safety and efficacy of ICD implantation as a primary prevention strategy of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients 70 years and older. In particular, this study is designed to determine the comparative effectiveness of ICD, in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT), in reducing all-cause mortality, versus OMT alone; OMT includes standard intervention for chronic heart failure patients, i.e. lifestyle modification, disease management, adoption of healthy diet and exercise practices, etcetera. One particularly important secondary objective is to assess treatment efficacy under the conditions of high versus low co-morbidity burden.

Participants will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to ICD + OMT or OMT alone, and stratified by participating site and co-morbidity level (Charlson score \<3 versus 3+). Acute treatment visits will occur as clinically indicated and per local convention; follow-up will occur 1-4 months post-randomization (all participants), and not sooner than 30 days - and not later than 120 days post-implantation (ICD arm); regular follow-up will occur at 6 month intervals post-randomization until study close (all participants). All follow-up will be conducted centrally. Neither the participant nor treating clinician will be masked to treatment.

Primary Objective:

The primary objective of this study is to determine if a primary prevention strategy with ICD implantation in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT) is effective in reducing all-cause mortality compared to OMT alone in patients 70 years of age and older who are eligible for ICD therapy according to current Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services (CMS) criteria.

Primary Hypothesis:

The primary hypothesis of this study is that implantation of an ICD plus optimal medical therapy will reduce all-cause mortality in patients 70 years of age and older versus optimal medical therapy alone.

Secondary Objectives:

  1. One secondary objective of this study is to ascertain whether age, co-morbidity burden, or age and burden together, are determinants in mortality outcomes in the OMT versus ICD + OMT group.
  2. An additional secondary objective of the study is to determine the effect of ICD implantation plus optimal medical therapy on quality of life among elderly patients compared with optimal medical therapy alone.
02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • CSP 592
  • ICD
  • cardiovascular
  • heart
  • aging
  • chronic diseases
  • multi-site trial
  • investigational device
  • cardiomyopathy
  • coronary artery disease
  • congestive heart failure
  • myocardial infarction
  • I-70
  • I70
  • elderly
  • defibrillator
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 167 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. 70 years of age or older
  2. Eligible for ICD implementation according to the CMS criteria for primary prevention by one of the following conditions:

    1. Documented prior MI and a measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<=30% (includes New York Heart Association [NYHA] class I, II, or III)
    2. Coronary artery disease with a documented prior MI, a measured left ventricular ejection fraction \<=35%, and inducible, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) at electrophysiology (EP) study
    3. Ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM), documented prior MI, NYHA class II and III heart failure, and measured LVEF \<=35%
    4. Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) > 3 months, NYHA Class II and III heart failure, and measured LVEF \<=35%
  3. Stable condition on Optimal Medical Therapy
  4. Able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Enrolled in or planning to enroll in a conflicting trial
  2. Receiving a bi-ventricular ICD device
  3. New York Heart Association class IV heart failure
  4. Cardiogenic shock or symptomatic hypotension while in stable baseline rhythm,
  5. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) within the past 3 months
  6. An MI within the past 40 days
  7. Clinical symptoms or findings that would make them a candidate for coronary revascularization
  8. Irreversible brain damage from pre-existing cerebral disease
  9. Any disease other than cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, uremia, liver failure), associated with a likelihood of survival less than 1 year
  10. Circumstance that would prevent completion of the trial and follow-up activities, including medical condition
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
167 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    1

    ICD implantation in addition to Optimal Medical Therapy

    Device: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

  • Active comparator
    2

    Optimal Medical Therapy

    Other: Optimal Medical Therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

    The ICD and lead(s) will be FDA-approved.

  • OtherOptimal Medical Therapy

    Guidance on lifestyle modification, exercise training, and disease management including review of American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    All-cause mortality

    Time frame: Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire

    Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. MLHF scoring: 0 points = Best QOL, 105 points = Worst QOL.

    Time frame: Measured at 12-months post-randomization

  2. Sudden Cardiac Death

    Sudden Cardiac Death

    Time frame: Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.

  3. All-cause Hospitalization

    Number of participants hospitalized during study follow-up

    Time frame: Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.

07

Results

Posted Jan 20, 2022

Participant flow

Recruitment at six Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). Recruitment start: 8/6/2015 (4) 9/25/2015 (1) and 10/29/2015 (1). Recruitment terminated: 12/6/2016 (1) and 12/5/2019 (5).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOptimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)
Started8582
Completed8582
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMortality

All-cause mortality

Time frame:
Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mortality
ParticipantsOptimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)
Mortality2320
SecondaryQuality of Life - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire

Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. MLHF scoring: 0 points = Best QOL, 105 points = Worst QOL.

Time frame:
Measured at 12-months post-randomization
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Quality of Life - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire
score on a scaleOptimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)
Quality of Life - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire11 (6.0 to 26.5)13 (5.0 to 37.0)
SecondarySudden Cardiac Death

Sudden Cardiac Death

Time frame:
Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sudden Cardiac Death
ParticipantsOptimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)
Sudden Cardiac Death53
SecondaryAll-cause Hospitalization

Number of participants hospitalized during study follow-up

Time frame:
Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All-cause Hospitalization
ParticipantsOptimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)
All-cause Hospitalization6160
Statistical analysis
  • Optimal Medical Therapy vs Optimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD) · Cox Proportional Hazards · p = 0.7457 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.915 · 95% CI 0.534 to 1.568

Adverse events

Collected over Serious Adverse Events were monitored from consent/baseline through 30 days after study exit, an average of 31 months. Non-Serious Adverse Events were monitored from consent/baseline through 30 days (30 days only, i.e. 30 days past consent [OMT arm] or 30 days past implantation [ICD arm]), i.e. 30 days for all participants.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Optimal Medical Therapy23/85 (27.1%)67/85 (78.8%)1/85 (1.2%)
Optimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)20/82 (24.4%)62/82 (75.6%)6/82 (7.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOptimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)
HF ComplicationCardiac disorders57/8554/82
Infection (other)Infections and infestations26/8532/82
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders12/858/82
Atrial fibrillation / Atrial flutterCardiac disorders9/852/82
StrokeNervous system disorders2/853/82
BleedingMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/851/82
PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/851/82
Infection (ICD)Infections and infestations1/850/82
Lead AlterationProduct Issues1/850/82
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOptimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)
Painful implant siteGeneral disorders0/856/82
New dizzinessNervous system disorders1/850/82

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Optimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years8582167
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Optimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)Total
Female112
Male8481165
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Optimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American121527
White7367140
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Optimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)Total
United States8582167
New York Heart Association Class: I
New York Heart Association Class: I(Participants)Optimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)Total
Count of participants246
New York Heart Association Class: II
New York Heart Association Class: II(Participants)Optimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)Total
Count of participants6258120
New York Heart Association Class: III
New York Heart Association Class: III(Participants)Optimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)Total
Count of participants212041
New York Heart Association Class: IV
New York Heart Association Class: IV(Participants)Optimal Medical TherapyOptimal Medical Therapy + Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (OMT + ICD)Total
Count of participants000
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC
    Washington, District of Columbia 20422-0001, United States
  • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417, United States
  • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN
    Nashville, Tennessee 37212-2637, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Singh SN, Wininger M, Raitt M, Adabag S, Moore H, Rottman JN, Scrymgeour A, Zhang J, Zheng K, Guarino P, Kyriakides TC; I-70 Study Group; Johnson G, Williams A, Beed A, MacMurdy K, Saavedra P. Efficacy and safety of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the elderly-The I-70 Study: A randomized clinical trial. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Apr 27;5(6):365-373. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.04.010. eCollection 2024 Jun. PubMed 38984364 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Jun 17, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02121158
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2014
Start date
Aug 7, 2015
Primary completion
Nov 6, 2020
Completion
Nov 6, 2020
Results posted
Jan 20, 2022
Last update
Jul 31, 2024

Study contacts

Steve Singh, MD
study chair · Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion