ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01988168CSCARUpdated May 12, 2017

Closure of Skin in ChorioAmnionitis Research Pilot Study

An interventional study of Suture closure and Staples closure in Chorioamnionitis, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious and Complications; Cesarean Section, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-12.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of the CSCAR pilot study is to improve the design of a full-scale trial by determining the patient recruitment rate and participation rate. The objective of the full-scale trial is to determine the optimal method of skin closure after Caesarean delivery in women with chorioamnionitis, which is an acute inflammation of the membranes and chorion of the placenta, seen typically after rupture of membranes with ascending polymicrobial bacterial infection. Women in labour with chorioamnionitis will be randomized at the time of Caesarean delivery to skin closure with either staples or sutures. The women will be followed at 6 weeks and 6 months post-partum in order to establish the occurrence of surgical site infection and wound disruption, as well as evaluation of the scar and other secondary questions.

The investigators hypothesis is that closure of skin with sutures will have a rate of wound infection that is no higher than the rate of wound infection when closing skin with staples. The investigators also hypothesize that closure with sutures will have a decreased rate of wound disruption, increased patient satisfaction and decreased length of hospital stay compared to skin closure with staples.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chorioamnionitis
  • Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
  • Complications; Cesarean Section
  • Postoperative Complications

Keywords

  • Suture Techniques
  • Sutures
  • Surgical Staplers
03

In context

Chorioamnionitis

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Chorioamnionitis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 157 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Chorioamnionitis.

Browse Chorioamnionitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,339 studies on the registry; 259 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of chorioamnionitis (Fever ≥ 38.0°C AND at least TWO of: Maternal tachycardia: Heart rate > 100bpm, Fetal tachycardia: Baseline heart rate > 160bpm, Uterine tenderness, Foul smelling / purulent vaginal discharge, White Blood Cell count > 15,000 cells/mm3)
  • Caesarean delivery with Pfannenstiel incision
  • Pregnancies >24 weeks
  • Scheduled or non-elective procedures
  • Primary or repeat Caesarean delivery
  • No restrictions based on
  • No exclusions due to DM (GDM or non GDM)
  • No exclusions due to multiple gestation pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-Pfannenstiel incision
  • Immune compromising disease
  • History of keloid formation
  • Chronic use
  • Allergy to staples
  • Planned postpartum care at another facility
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Suture closure

    Closure of skin with a running subcuticular, absorbable monofilament suture.

    Procedure: Suture closure

  • Active comparator
    Staples closure

    Closure of skin with stainless-steel surgical staples.

    Procedure: Staples closure

Interventions

  • ProcedureSuture closure

    A running subcuticular suture is placed by taking horizontal bites through the papillary dermis on alternating sides of the wound. An absorbable suture is used and left in place until degraded and absorbed by the patient's tissues.

    Also known as: 3-0 Monocryl suture (from Ethicon)

  • ProcedureStaples closure

    Surgical stapling devices re-appose skin edges with stainless steel or titanium staples. A second operator everts the wound skin edges while the operator applies staples along the incision. Staples can be removed on post-operative day 2 or 3, or delayed further according the surgeon preference based on patient characteristics.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient recruitment rate

    The patient recruitment rate will be calculated as the total number of women successfully recruited to the trial divided by the total duration of the trial.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Follow-up rates

    Number of women successfully contacted at 6 weeks and at 6 months post-partum divided by the total number of women randomized in the trial

    Time frame: 6 months post-operative

  2. Wound infection

    Number of women who experience a wound infection divided by the total number of eligible women who participate in the trial.

    Time frame: 6 months post-operative

  3. Wound disruption

    Number of women who experience a wound disruption divided by the total number of eligible women who participate in the trial.

    Time frame: 6 months post-operative

  4. Wound cosmesis

    Wound cosmesis will be assessed using the POSAS Observer scale, which is directed at physicians, and the POSAS Patient scale, which is directed at patients

    Time frame: 6 months post-operative

  5. Patient satisfaction

    Using the POSAS Patient Scale, patient satisfaction will be assessed.

    Time frame: 6 months post-operative

  6. Participation rate

    The trial participation rate will be calculated as the percentage of eligible women who agreed to participate in the trial divided by the total number of eligible women approached to participate in the trial.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Ellen M Giesbrecht, MD · Contactegiesbrecht@cw.bc.ca · 604-875-2424
    • Ellen M Giesbrecht, MD · Principal investigator
    • Jennifer A Hutcheon, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Julie E van Schalkwyk, MD · Sub investigator
    • Michael WH Suen, MD · Sub investigator
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01988168
Collaborators
BC Children's Hospital Research Institute
Responsible party
Ellen Giesbrecht (Principle Investigator, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2013
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Last update
May 12, 2017

Study contacts

Ellen M Giesbrecht, MD
Contact
egiesbrecht@cw.bc.ca
604-872-5484
Ellen M Giesbrecht, MD
principal investigator · Clinical Assistant Professor, Division of General Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia; Site Head, Department of Obstetrics, BC Women's Hospital
Jennifer A Hutcheon, PhD
study director · Assistant Professor, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia
Julie E van Schalkwyk, MD
study director · Clinical Assistant Professor, Division of General Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia
Michael WH Suen, MD
study director · Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion