CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01878383Updated Sep 9, 2020Results posted

Identification of Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Shedding in the Female Genital Tract of Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women by GeneXpert PCR, Routine PCR, and Culture

An observational study in Herpes Simplex Virus, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Completed at 15 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-09.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12,550
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

PCR detection of HSV DNA shedding in the female genital tract using the GeneXpert system (Cepheid, Sunnyvale CA) will be compared with traditional (routine) PCR (pregnant and nonpregnant women) and with HSV culture (nonpregnant women). The GeneXpert system performs all sample-processing steps and real-time PCR in a single integrated cartridge. The standard cartridge is an inexpensive disposable plastic cartridge with filtration and ultrasonic lysis capabilities. It consists chiefly of several combined molded plastic components: a cartridge body containing eleven fluid reservoirs or chambers along with an attached PCR tube, a specialized valve body with an ultrasonic interface containing a sub-micron filter and glass lysis beads, and a rotary valve with an axial syringe barrel. The operation of the cartridge is simple. The rotary valve contains an inlet and an outlet port. Fluid such as a sample buffer can be drawn up into a syringe drive through the inlet port of the rotary valve and then dispensed into any other chamber within the cartridge by rotating the valve and expelling the fluid through the outlet port. The fluid can either be passed through a filter contained within the valve assembly or it can be passed directly into the next chamber without filtration, depending on the path that is chosen. The cartridge fluidics and subsequent real-time PCR all are performed within the GeneXpert instrument. The GeneXpert contains multiple modules (ICORE units) that can be independently programmed to drive the syringe/rotary valve, and to perform four-color real-time PCR. Each cartridge fits inside one module, and all processing, PCR, and analysis steps are performed automatically. Each ICORE module can be run and analyzed independently, so batching of samples is unnecessary.

Read the detailed description

The GeneXpert HSV PCR test will be validated against HSV viral cultures and routine quantitative PCR. Validation will occur in two populations: 1) nonpregnant women in STI clinics with clinically-apparent HSV lesions (Group 1, n=300), and 2) pregnant women in active labor with no visible evidence of HSV infection (Group 2, n=12,500). All testing of samples on the GeneXpert platform, routine quantitative PCR, and viral culture will be done at the UAB Central Laboratory. Women in each group will have specimens obtained from genital lesions (Group 1) or vaginal swabs (Group 2). Specimens from all women in Group 1 will be evaluated by HSV culture, routine HSV PCR, and GeneXpert HSV PCR. Approximately half of the women in Group 2 will be tested by routine HSV PCR and GeneXpert HSV PCR; specimens from the rest of the women in Group 2 will be stored for possible testing in the future by routine HSV PCR and GeneXpert HSV PCR. In this manner, we will maximize the data from which to compare GeneXpert PCR results with routine PCR, while maintaining flexibility to ensure an adequate number of specimens are positive for HSV DNA by routine PCR.

Swabs from pregnant women in labor will be placed in viral transport media, frozen at -20°C, and batch-shipped to the UAB Central Laboratory for analysis on the GeneXpert instrument and by routine HSV quantitative PCR. Swabs from nonpregnant women in STI clinics will be placed in viral transport media, refrigerated at 4°C, and shipped to the UAB Central Laboratory for real time analysis on the GeneXpert instrument and by HSV culture and routine quantitative HSV PCR. Specimens from the first 300 women enrolled in Group 2 will be run as individual routine PCRs and in batches of 5 samples per PCR run. In this manner, we will validate that the level of detection from batching of samples for routine PCR is acceptable. Once this validation occurs, specimens from the approximately half of remaining Group 2 women will be batched for real-time routine PCR analysis. If a batch run of 5 specimens is negative, no further testing will be performed. If a batch run of 5 specimens is positive, all of the specimens will be separated out for re-running as individual PCRs. All specimens evaluated by routine PCR will also be evaluated by GeneXpert PCR; in this manner, we will have individual routine PCR results results for comparison against GeneXpert PCR results.

A blood specimen will be obtained from each nonpregnant (Group 1) and pregnant (Group 2) woman at the time of enrollment, and if she is determined to be shedding HSV by routine PCR, GeneXpert PCR, or culture then type-specific serologic testing will be performed. Correlation of viral typing from the virologic sampling with HSV-1 and HSV-2 serostatus will allow for categorization of infection (first-episode primary, first-episode nonprimary, or recurrent infection).

Those women in Group 1 who have a positive HSV culture will be contacted directly when the result is known. Women in Group 2 with a positive HSV PCR result will not be contacted because routine HSV PCR and GeneXpert PCR are not FDA-cleared tests in this population; thus, we will not know the test performance characteristics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, etc.) until completion of the trial. All pregnant women in Group 2 will receive written materials at the time of enrollment educating them on signs and symptoms of neonatal HSV disease. All postpartum women will be contacted by telephone 60-90 days post-delivery and an inquiry will be made to determine if their babies developed neonatal HSV disease.

Data on the incidence of neonatal HSV disease among babies delivered to women in Group 2 will be compared with the incidence data from Brown et al.1 In their study of almost 60,000 women conducted over a 20 year period, this group of researchers has reported an incidence rate for neonatal HSV disease of 1 in 3,200 live births.

02

Conditions studied

  • Herpes Simplex Virus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • (HSV)
03

In context

Herpes Simplex

305 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Simplex; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12,550 is above the median of 180 across 55 observational studies indexed under Herpes Simplex.

Browse Herpes Simplex studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,397 studies on the registry; 285 are open to participants now.

Of its 156 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 124 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Pregnant and non-pregnant women

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:•Signed Informed Consent from woman

•≥ 19 years of age

  • Female gender
  • In active labor with a viable fetus, OR non-pregnant and being evaluated in STI clinics for herpetic genital lesions

Exclusion Criteria:•For women in active labor, active herpetic lesions in the genital region

  • Receipt of acyclovir, valacyclovir, or famciclovir within the previous 14 days
  • Known HIV infection
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12,550 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Non-pregnant women/active HSV lesions

    Women presenting to local health department

    Device: Genexpert assay

  • Pregnant women/no active HSV lesions

    Women presenting in active labor

    Device: Genexpert assay

Interventions

  • DeviceGenexpert assay
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From the Genital Tract of Non-pregnant Women in STI Clinics, as Compared With HSV Culture

    Assessing the vaginal specimen collected via a swab of non-pregnant women presenting to their provider at the time of active HSV outbreak with standard HSV culture compared to the assay of new device called a GeneXpert. Percent of GeneXpert assessment in agreement with standard HSV culture, for subjects who were positive for HSV according to culture.

    Time frame: on day of enrollment

  2. Positive Percent Agreement of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From Genital Tract of Pregnant Women, as Compared With Routine PCR Detection of Viral DNA

    Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR compared to routine PCR detection by viral DNA. Percent of GeneXpert assessment in agreement with routine PCR detection, for subjects who are positive for HSV according to routine PCR.

    Time frame: DAY OF ENROLLMENT

  3. Negative Percent Agreement of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From Genital Tract of Pregnant Women, as Compared With Routine PCR Detection of Viral DNA

    Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR compared to routine PCR detection by viral DNA. Percent of GeneXpert assessments in agreement with routine PCR detection, for subjects who were negative for HSV according to routine PCR.

    Time frame: DAY OF ENROLLMENT

07

Results

Posted Sep 9, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNon-pregnant Women/Active HSV LesionsPregnant Women/no Active HSV Lesions
Started5012500
Completed5011001
Not completed01499
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01499

Outcome measures

PrimarySensitivity of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From the Genital Tract of Non-pregnant Women in STI Clinics, as Compared With HSV Culture

Assessing the vaginal specimen collected via a swab of non-pregnant women presenting to their provider at the time of active HSV outbreak with standard HSV culture compared to the assay of new device called a GeneXpert. Percent of GeneXpert assessment in agreement with standard HSV culture, for subjects who were positive for HSV according to culture.

Time frame:
on day of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · Sensitivity (percent positive)
Sensitivity of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From the Genital Tract of Non-pregnant Women in STI Clinics, as Compared With HSV Culture
Sensitivity (percent positive)Non-pregnant Women/Active HSV Lesions
Sensitivity of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From the Genital Tract of Non-pregnant Women in STI Clinics, as Compared With HSV Culture100 (90.8 to 100)
Statistical analysis
  • Non-pregnant Women/Active HSV Lesions · Sensitivity: 100 · 95% CI 90.8 to 10095% Clopper-Pearson Exact Confidence Interval
PrimaryPositive Percent Agreement of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From Genital Tract of Pregnant Women, as Compared With Routine PCR Detection of Viral DNA

Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR compared to routine PCR detection by viral DNA. Percent of GeneXpert assessment in agreement with routine PCR detection, for subjects who are positive for HSV according to routine PCR.

Time frame:
DAY OF ENROLLMENT
Reported as:
Number · Positive percent agreement
Positive Percent Agreement of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From Genital Tract of Pregnant Women, as Compared With Routine PCR Detection of Viral DNA
Positive percent agreementPregnant Women/no Active HSV Lesions
Positive Percent Agreement of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From Genital Tract of Pregnant Women, as Compared With Routine PCR Detection of Viral DNA80 (73.7 to 86.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Pregnant Women/no Active HSV Lesions · Positive percent agreement: 80 · 95% CI 73.7 to 86.395% large sample confidence interval
PrimaryNegative Percent Agreement of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From Genital Tract of Pregnant Women, as Compared With Routine PCR Detection of Viral DNA

Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR compared to routine PCR detection by viral DNA. Percent of GeneXpert assessments in agreement with routine PCR detection, for subjects who were negative for HSV according to routine PCR.

Time frame:
DAY OF ENROLLMENT
Reported as:
Number · Negative percent agreement
Negative Percent Agreement of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From Genital Tract of Pregnant Women, as Compared With Routine PCR Detection of Viral DNA
Negative percent agreementPregnant Women/no Active HSV Lesions
Negative Percent Agreement of Detection of HSV DNA by GeneXpert PCR From Specimens Obtained From Genital Tract of Pregnant Women, as Compared With Routine PCR Detection of Viral DNA99.2 (99 to 99.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Pregnant Women/no Active HSV Lesions · Negative percent agreement: 99.2 · 95% CI 99 to 99.595% large sample confidence interval

Adverse events

Collected over 1 day for group 1 (non-pregnant); 30-90 for group 2 (pregnant). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Non-pregnant Women/Active HSV Lesions0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
Pregnant Women/no Active HSV Lesions0/12,500 (0%)0/12,500 (0%)0/12,500 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Non-pregnant Women/Active HSV LesionsPregnant Women/no Active HSV LesionsTotal
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Non-pregnant Women/Active HSV LesionsPregnant Women/no Active HSV LesionsTotal
Female501250012550
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Non-pregnant Women/Active HSV LesionsPregnant Women/no Active HSV LesionsTotal
Hispanic or Latino110901091
Not Hispanic or Latino491112411173
Unknown or Not Reported0284284
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Non-pregnant Women/Active HSV LesionsPregnant Women/no Active HSV LesionsTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native03939
Asian0335335
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander02323
Black or African American4346314674
White768596866
More than one race0225225
Unknown or Not Reported0386386
08

Study locations

15 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • University of Colorado at Denver Health Sciences Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Children's National Medical Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Emory Children's Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Louisiana State University Health Science Center-Shreveport
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Dartmouth Medical School
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Steven & Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York (CCMC)
    Manhasset, New York 11030, United States
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Carolinas Medical Center - Charlotte
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
  • MetroHealth Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44109, United States
  • Nationwide Children Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205-2664, United States
  • McGee Women's Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 3, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01878383
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Responsible party
David Kimberlin, MD (Principal Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 14, 2013
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019
Completion
Dec 31, 2019
Results posted
Sep 9, 2020
Last update
Sep 9, 2020

Study contacts

David W Kimberlin, MD
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham
Richard Whitley, MD
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion