ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04065971HEARTH-OFUpdated Aug 27, 2026

Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study of 2LHERP® in Orofacial Herpes Infections.

A Phase 4 interventional study of 2LHERP® and Placebo in Herpes Simplex, sponsored by Labo'Life. Recruiting at 6 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-27.

Sponsored by Labo'Life · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2020; still recruiting 6 years 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is very common, as most people will experience herpetic infection during their lifetime. The most common manifestation of HSV infection is sores which may appear at any age.

No specific antiviral therapy is available to totally cure herpetic infections and today, there is no treatment that allows the definitive eradication of the virus.

The 2LHERP® has been available for more than 20 years, and has received a marketing authorization in Belgium by the FAMHP. It is used as an immune regulator in the treatment of herpetic infections. Since 2LHERP® has been made available, clinical observational data collected on treated patients have shown the beneficial effect on the disappearance of herpetic recurrences.

The purpose of this placebo-controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of 2LHERP® on the treatment of herpetic infections in adults.

Read the detailed description

The study duration will be 36 months with 24 months of inclusion (that may be extended if the expected number of patients is not reached after this period) and 12 months of follow-up.

Patients aged between 16 and 80 years who present recurrent orofacial herpes infections (6 or more episodes within the 12-months' period prior to their study entry).

The total number of patients to include will be 140 with 70 patients per group.

Primary objective:

Evaluation of the efficacy of 2LHERP® on the reduction of the number of recurrent orofacial herpes episodes at 12 months.

Secondary objectives:

Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® vs placebo according to the following aspects:

  1. number of episodes at 6 months,
  2. time to first episode during the treatment,
  3. duration of episodes,
  4. symptomatology during the entire relapse time,
  5. use of Rescue Medication (RM),
  6. evaluation of impact on the quality of life,
  7. safety issues.

Treatment phase:

  • Group n°1 = 2LHERP® (6 months of treatment)
  • Group n°2 = Placebo (6 months of treatment) Post-treatment follow-up phase: 6 months. Treatment will be considered successful if the number of herpetic episodes is reduced.
02

Conditions studied

  • Herpes Simplex

Browse trials for

03

In context

Herpes Simplex

166 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Simplex; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 66 across 113 interventional studies indexed under Herpes Simplex.

Browse Herpes Simplex studies →

Lead sponsor

Labo'Life is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Man or woman aged 16-80 years,
  • Patient presenting 6 or more episodes of orofacial herpes infections during the preceding 12-months' period (prior to the study entry),
  • Woman of childbearing age under effective ,
  • Patient reporting a current stable sexual relationship (steady sexual partner during study duration),
  • Patient having faculties to understand and respect the constraints of the study,
  • Signature of the Form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman,
  • Patient under immunotherapy (including treatment) or micro-immunotherapy received during last previous 6 months,
  • Patient who had a suppressive antiviral therapy during last month,
  • Patient who wishes to continue his/her suppressive antiviral therapy,
  • Patient with known lactose intolerance,
  • Patient who participated in a clinical study in the previous 3-month period,
  • Patient who is not sufficiently motivated to engage in a follow-up period of 12 months, or likely to travel or to move before the end of the study,
  • Patient with severe immunodeficiency disease requiring long term treatment (*) or under chemotherapy or radiotherapy or corticoid therapy,
  • Patient under listed homeopathic or phytotherapy treatment,
  • Patient using or addicted to recreational drugs.

(*) important renal or respiratory insufficiency, transplanted or grafted patients /AIDS, terminal cancer.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    2LHERP® arm

    Group N°1: 2LHERP® treatment (6 months of treatment)

    Drug: 2LHERP®

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo arm

    Group N°1: Placebo treatment (6 months of treatment)

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drug2LHERP®

    The treatment schema consists in taking the content of one capsule a day, 15-30 minutes before breakfast, on an empty stomach, sequentially, according to capsules' numerical order: 1 through 10. When capsule number 10 is taken, capsule 1 of the next blister should be taken on the next day to continue the treatment. The duration of treatment will be 6 months of continuous intake of the content of 1 capsule/day.

    Also known as: 2LHERP

  • DrugPlacebo

    The treatment schema consists in taking the content of one capsule a day, 15-30 minutes before breakfast, on an empty stomach, sequentially, according to capsules' numerical order: 1 through 10. When capsule number 10 is taken, capsule 1 of the next blister should be taken on the next day to continue the treatment. The duration of treatment will be 6 months of continuous intake of the content of 1 capsule/day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the efficacy of 2LHERP® on the reduction of the number of recurrent orofacial herpes episodes at 12 months.

    The primary objective of the study will be to evaluate the change from baseline within the number of episodes of herpes infections observed for 12 months, where the baseline value is the number of episodes experienced within the 12 months preceeding study enrolment.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Remaining herpes infection recurrence free 12 months after treatment initiation (yes/no)

    The objective of this outcome will be to compare the number of patients recurrence free for 12 months between the treated and the placebo group.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Remaining herpes infection recurrence free 6 months after treatment initiation (yes/no)

    The objective of this outcome will be to compare the number of patients recurrence free for 6 months after treatment initiation between the treated and the placebo group.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Number of episodes of herpes infection observed at 6 months

    The objective of this outcome will be to compare the number of herpetic episodes at 6 months and the baseline number of episodes.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Time to first recurrence of herpes infection during the treatment

    The objective of this outcome will be to compare the time to first herpetic recurrence between the treated and the placebo group.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Mean duration of episodes, the duration for a given episode being defined as the number of days between the start of the episode and the last day before all symptoms recorded as 'none' for 2 consecutive days, in the patient diary

    The objective of this outcome will be to compare the mean duration of the herpetic episodes between the treated and the placebo group.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Level of pain recorded daily as well as other associated symptomatology for orofacial pain, which will be consequently measured as area under the curve

    The objective of this outcome will be to compare the level of pain during herpetic episodes between the treated and the placebo group.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Use of daily rescue medicine (RM), expressed with the cumulative number of days for the treatment period, the follow-up period and the entire study period

    The objective of this outcome will be to compare the use of rescue medication during herpetic episodes between the treated and the placebo group.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Quality of life evaluated via a 6-items questionnaire

    The objective of this outcome will be to compare the quality of life between the treated and the placebo group.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  9. Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs), considered as related or not to the study drug

    The objective of this outcome is to evaluate the safety of the treatment

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

6 of 6 sites recruiting
  • Private Practice
    Beerzel, 1650, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Carola VIEHE, Dr · Contact
    • Carola VIEHE, Dr · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet privé
    Beuzet, 5030, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Denise Peeters, Dr · Contact
    • Denise Peeters, Dr · Principal investigator
  • Clinique Saint-Luc (Bouge)
    Bouge, 5004, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Audrey SCHILS, Dr · Contact
    • Audrey SCHILS, Dr · Principal investigator
  • Private Practice
    Linkebeek, 1630, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Isabelle JEANJOT, Dr · Contact
    • Isabelle JEANJOT, Dr · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet privé
    Noirefontaine, 6831, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Denis ROULEFF, Dr · Contact
    • Denis Rouleff, Dr · Principal investigator
  • Private Practice
    Oisquercq, 1480, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Laurence TOURNE, Dr · Contact
    • Laurence TOURNE, Dr · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 84 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 21, 2019
First posted
Aug 22, 2019
StartActual
Mar 10, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2027
Last update
Aug 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04065971
Lead sponsor
Labo'Life
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 22, 2019
Start date
Mar 10, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 27, 2026

Study contacts

Laura FERTE
Contact
laura.ferte@labolife.com
499 71 79 64 ext. +32
Charlotte BOLLE
Contact
charlotte.bolle@labolife.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion