ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01819597ERSIASUpdated May 10, 2019Results posted

Surgical Indirect Revascularization For Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

An interventional study of Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) in Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, Intracranial Atherosclerosis and Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-10.

Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Stroke due to intracranial arterial atherosclerosis is a significant medical problem, carrying one of the highest rates of recurrent stroke despite best medical therapy, with annual recurrence rates as elevated as 25% in high risk groups.

The goal of this investigation is to advance a promising surgical treatment for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis - encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS). The investigation will test in a phase II futility trial the potential of EDAS for further development before proceeding with the design of a definitive clinical trial of EDAS Revascularization in patients with Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (ERSIAS).

The investigation is a 4-year futility trial to test the hypothesis that EDAS revascularization combined with aggressive medical therapy warrants further evaluation in a subsequent pivotal trial as an alternative to aggressive medical management alone for preventing the primary endpoint of stroke or death in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (Specific Aim 1). During the investigation the time course of collateralogenesis and perfusion improvement following EDAS will also be evaluated (Specific Aim 2.

Read the detailed description

Intracranial arterial atherosclerosis is a significant medical problem, with elevated rates of recurrent stroke despite medical therapy, with annual recurrence rates for ischemic stroke reported in the SAMMPRIS Trial as high as 12.2% in the intensive medical therapy arm. The incidence of recurrence stroke can be even higher in some high-risk groups, as high as 25% in African-Americans and females. The ultimate goal of this project is to advance a promising surgical treatment for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis - encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS). Compared with direct revascularization operations (bypass), EDAS has the advantages of being less technically demanding, avoiding temporary occlusion of cerebral vessels, and allowing gradual development of collateral circulation where the brain demands it, deterring early hyperperfusion and hemorrhage. There has been no systematic trial exploring the use of EDAS in cases of symptomatic, non-moyamoya intracranial arterial stenosis. Based on preliminary positive results, the investigators propose the long-term objective of demonstrating that EDAS improves the outcome in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis compared with aggressive medical therapy. This will require future phase III clinical trials. The present proposal has the purpose of testing in a phase II futility-design trial the potential of EDAS for further development before proceeding with the design of a definitive clinical trial of EDAS Revascularization in patients with Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (ERSIAS). The present project will be 4-year futility-design trial to determine if EDAS revascularization combined with aggressive medical therapy warrants further evaluation in a subsequent pivotal trial as an alternative to aggressive medical management alone for preventing the primary endpoint of stroke or death at two years in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (Specific Aim 1). During the investigation the investigators will systematically evaluate the time course of collateralogenesis and perfusion improvement following EDAS by using quantitative and semiquantitative perfusion MRI studies (Specific Aim 2). The new knowledge generated by this study on understanding the role of collateral circulation in stroke pathophysiology, patient selection, and use of non-invasive imaging will be useful not only for EDAS evaluation but potentially next generation stents and future novel medical therapies, such as use of angiogenic growth factors and/or endothelial stem cells.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
  • Intracranial Atherosclerosis
  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Cerebral Angiogenesis

Keywords

  • Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Stroke
  • EDAS
  • Angiogenesis
03

In context

Intracranial Arteriosclerosis

97 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Arteriosclerosis; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 180 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Intracranial Arteriosclerosis.

Browse Intracranial Arteriosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 455 studies on the registry; 108 are open to participants now.

Of its 65 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. TIA or non-severe stroke within 30 days of enrollment attributed to 70% to 99% stenosis* of a major intracranial artery (carotid artery or MCA)

    *May be diagnosed by TCD, MRA, or CTA to qualify, but must be confirmed by catheter angiography as per usual clinical practice.

  2. Modified Rankin scale score of ≤3
  3. Target area of stenosis in an intracranial artery that has a normal diameter of 2.00 mm to 4.50 mm
  4. Target area of stenosis is ≤14 mm in length
  5. Age ≥30 years and ≤80 years

    * Patients 30 to 49 years of age are required to meet at least 1 additional criteria (i-vi) provided below to qualify for the study. This additional requirement is to increase the likelihood that the symptomatic intracranial stenosis in patients 30 to 49 years is atherosclerotic: i. Insulin-dependent diabetes for at least 15 years ii. At least 2 of the following atherosclerotic risk factors: hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive therapy); dyslipidemia (LDL ≥130 mg/dL or HDL ≤40 mg/dL or fasting triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL or on lipid lowering therapy); smoking; non-insulin-dependent diabetes or insulin-dependent diabetes of \<15 years duration; family history of any of the following: myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass, coronary angioplasty or stenting, stroke, carotid endarterectomy or stenting, and peripheral vascular surgery in parent or sibling who was \< 55 years of age for men or \< 65 for women at the time of the event.

    iii. History of any of the following: myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass, coronary angioplasty or stenting, carotid endarterectomy or stenting, or peripheral vascular surgery for atherosclerotic disease iv. Any stenosis of an extracranial carotid or vertebral artery, another intracranial artery, subclavian artery, coronary artery, iliac or femoral artery, other lower or upper extremity artery, mesenteric artery, or renal artery that was documented by noninvasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography and is considered atherosclerotic v. Aortic arch atheroma documented by noninvasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography vi. Any aortic aneurysm documented by noninvasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography that is considered atherosclerotic

  6. Negative pregnancy test in a female who has had any menses in the last 18 months
  7. Patient is willing and able to return for all follow-up visits required by the protocol.
  8. Patient is available by phone.
  9. Patient understands the purpose and requirements of the study, can make him/herself understood, and has provided informed consent.
  10. Demonstration of poor or no collateral flow in the territory of the qualifying stenotic vessel (ASITN/SIR Collateral Flow Grades 0-2) and hypoperfusion of the vascular territory in MRI.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tandem extracranial or intracranial stenosis (70-99%) or occlusion that is proximal or distal to the target intracranial lesion
  2. Bilateral intracranial vertebral artery stenosis of 70% to 99% and uncertainty about which artery is symptomatic (e.g., if patient has pontine, midbrain, or temporal occipital symptoms)
  3. Stenting, angioplasty, or endarterectomy of an extracranial (carotid or vertebral artery) or intracranial artery within 30 days before the expected enrollment date
  4. Previous treatment of target lesion with a stent, angioplasty, or other mechanical device, or plan to perform staged angioplasty followed by stenting of target lesion
  5. Plan to perform concomitant angioplasty or stenting of an extracranial vessel tandem to an intracranial stenosis
  6. Presence of intraluminal thrombus proximal to or at the target lesion
  7. Any aneurysm proximal to or distal to the stenotic intracranial artery
  8. Intracranial tumor (including meningioma) or any intracranial vascular malformation
  9. Computed tomographic or angiographic evidence of severe calcification at target lesion
  10. Thrombolytic therapy within 24 hours before enrollment
  11. Progressive neurologic signs within 24 hours before enrollment
  12. Brain infarct within previous 30 days of enrollment that is of sufficient size (> 5 cm) to be at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during or after surgery
  13. Any hemorrhagic infarct within 14 days before enrollment
  14. Any hemorrhagic infarct within 15 to 30 days that is associated with mass effect
  15. Any history of a primary intracerebral (parenchymal) hemorrhage
  16. Any other intracranial hemorrhage (subarachnoid, subdural, or epidural) within 30 days
  17. Any untreated chronic subdural hematoma >5 mm in thickness
  18. Intracranial arterial stenosis related to arterial dissection, Moya-Moya disease; any known vasculitic disease; herpes zoster, varicella zoster or other viral vasculopathy; neurosyphilis; any other intracranial infection; any intracranial stenosis associated with cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis; radiation-induced vasculopathy; fibromuscular dysplasia; sickle cell disease; neurofibromatosis; benign angiopathy of central nervous system; postpartum angiopathy; suspected vasospastic process, and suspected recanalized embolus
  19. Presence of any of the following unequivocal cardiac sources of embolism: chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, mitral stenosis, mechanical valve, endocarditis, intracardiac clot or vegetation, myocardial infarction within 3 months, dilated cardiomyopathy, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, ejection fraction \<30%
  20. Known allergy or contraindication to aspirin and local or general anesthesia
  21. History of life-threatening allergy to contrast dye. If not life-threatening and can be effectively pretreated, patient can be enrolled at physician's discretion
  22. Known absolute contraindication to obtaining MRI studies, such as magnetically activated implanted devices (cardiac pacemakers, insulin pumps, neuro-stimulators, and cochlear implants), MRI incompatible orthopedic implants, and free metallic fragments in the brain or eye.
  23. Active peptic ulcer disease, major systemic hemorrhage within 30 days, active bleeding diathesis, platelets \<100,000, hematocrit \<30, INR >1.5, clotting factor abnormality that increases the risk of bleeding, current alcohol or substance abuse, uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic BP>180 mm Hg or diastolic BP>115 mm Hg), severe liver impairment (AST or ALT > 3 times normal, cirrhosis), creatinine > 3.0 (unless on dialysis)
  24. Major surgery (including open femoral, aortic, or carotid surgery) within previous 30 days or planned in the next 90 days after enrollment
  25. Indication for warfarin or heparin beyond enrollment (NOTE: Exceptions allowed for use of subcutaneous heparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis while hospitalized)
  26. Severe neurologic deficit that renders the patient incapable of living independently
  27. Dementia or psychiatric problem that prevents the patient from following an outpatient program reliably
  28. Comorbid conditions that may limit survival to \< 3 years
  29. Females who are pregnant or of childbearing potential and unwilling to use contraception for the duration of this study
  30. Enrollment in another study that would conflict with the current study

Surgical Specific Exclusion Criteria:

In addition to those enumerated above, given the surgical nature of the intervention for patients failing best medical therapy, the following are additional exclusion criteria:

  1. Use of clopidogrel or extended release dipyridamole within 7 days of the date of surgery. This exclusion is based on the elevated risk of hemorrhagic complications for intracranial surgery using those agents according to the current AHA/ACC Guidelines (Fleisher et al., 2007).
  2. Evidence of active, un-treated focal or systemic infections (i.e. pneumonia, urinary tract infection, skin abscess) or history of recurrent infections despite treatment in the last 6 months.
  3. Coagulation disorders characterized by a PTT ≥ 34, or a PT ≥ 12, or an INR ≥ 1.3, or a platelet count of \<80,000.
  4. Non-controlled hyperglycemia (any pre-prandial glucose level ≥ 180 mg/dL in any single test within 30 days before enrollment) or a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥7%.
  5. A low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) ≥ 130 mg/dL.
  6. A non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-c) ≥ 100 mg/dL.
  7. Smoking history in the last 6 months.
  8. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    EDAS surgery

    EDAS surgery is an established form of indirect revascularization. The study arm in this study will receive EDAS surgery

    Procedure: Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS)

Interventions

  • ProcedureEncephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS)

    The operation is a form of indirect revascularization or EC-IC bypass, performed under general endotracheal anesthesia, with intraoperative electroencephalographic monitoring. The surgery consists in the dissection and relocation of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and middle meningeal artery (MMA) branches, which are separated from their surrounding tissues under microscopic visualization and re-routed through a craniotomy to be placed intracranially in close proximity to the branches of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The MCA branches are dissected in the arachnoid space and the STA and MMA are kept in position with microsutures to the arachnoid or MMA dural cuffs, maintaining close contact between the EC and MCA branches.

    Also known as: Indirect revascularization, Indirect bypass, EC-IC revascularization, EC-IC indirect bypass, EC-IC indirect revascularization

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stroke or Death in the Territory of Qualifying Artery

    The primary study endpoint is the number of participants with any stroke or death within 30 days after enrollment, or any ischemic stroke or death attributable to ischemia in the territory of the qualifying artery at one year. Ischemic stroke is defined as a new focal neurological deficit of sudden onset, lasting at least 24 hours and not associated with CT or MRI findings of hemorrhage.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Myocardial Infarction

    Number of participants with heart attack within 30 days of surgery

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Major Non-stroke Hemorrhage

    Number of participants with systemic hemorrhage, subdural or epidural hemorrhages

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Functional Outcome

    Proportion of participants with good functional outcome at the end of follow-up measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). That is with mRS scores between 0 and 2. Modified Rankin Scale Score and Description: 0 - No symptoms at all 1. \- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2. \- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3. \- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4. \- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5. \- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention 6. \- Dead

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Cognitive Outcome

    Mean cognitive outcome at the end of follow-up measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Scores on the MoCA scale range between 0 and 30. Higher values represent a better outcome. A normal score on the MoCA scale is 26 or higher.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Improved Collaterals

    Number of participants with an increase by at least one grade on the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) Collateral Flow Grading System The ASITN/SIR Collateral Flow Grading System has 4 grades: 0=no collaterals visible to the ischemic site. 1. slow collaterals to the periphery of the ischemic site with persistence of some of the defect 2. rapid collaterals to periphery of ischemic site with persistence of some of the defect and to only a portion of the ischemic territory 3. collaterals with slow but complete angiographic blood flow of the ischemic bed by the late venous phase 4. complete and rapid collateral blood flow to the vascular bed in the entire ischemic territory by retrograde perfusion. Grade 4 represents the best outcome. Grade 0 represents the worst outcome.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Asymptomatic Cerebral Hemorrhage

    Asymptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, defined as parenchymal or intraventricular bleeding detected in any imaging modality that is not associated with neurological deficits.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted May 10, 2019
Limitations and caveats
None. Trial was completed as planned

Participant flow

Patients were recruited at UCLA Medical Center and Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEDAS Surgery
Started52
Completed52
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryStroke or Death in the Territory of Qualifying Artery

The primary study endpoint is the number of participants with any stroke or death within 30 days after enrollment, or any ischemic stroke or death attributable to ischemia in the territory of the qualifying artery at one year. Ischemic stroke is defined as a new focal neurological deficit of sudden onset, lasting at least 24 hours and not associated with CT or MRI findings of hemorrhage.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Stroke or Death in the Territory of Qualifying Artery
ParticipantsEDAS Surgery
Stroke or Death in the Territory of Qualifying Artery5
Statistical analysis
  • EDAS Surgery · Regression, Cox · p = 0.08 (Pre-established α ≤ 0.10 for phase IIa) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.38 · 90% CI 0.14 to 0.94ERSIAS/ Controls.
SecondaryMyocardial Infarction

Number of participants with heart attack within 30 days of surgery

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Myocardial Infarction
ParticipantsEDAS Surgery
Myocardial Infarction1
SecondaryMajor Non-stroke Hemorrhage

Number of participants with systemic hemorrhage, subdural or epidural hemorrhages

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Major Non-stroke Hemorrhage
ParticipantsEDAS Surgery
Major Non-stroke Hemorrhage0
SecondaryFunctional Outcome

Proportion of participants with good functional outcome at the end of follow-up measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). That is with mRS scores between 0 and 2. Modified Rankin Scale Score and Description: 0 - No symptoms at all 1. \- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2. \- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3. \- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4. \- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5. \- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention 6. \- Dead

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Functional Outcome
ParticipantsEDAS Surgery
Functional Outcome45
SecondaryCognitive Outcome

Mean cognitive outcome at the end of follow-up measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Scores on the MoCA scale range between 0 and 30. Higher values represent a better outcome. A normal score on the MoCA scale is 26 or higher.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Mean · MoCA Score
Cognitive Outcome
MoCA ScoreEDAS Surgery
Cognitive Outcome25.5 ± 4.1
SecondaryImproved Collaterals

Number of participants with an increase by at least one grade on the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) Collateral Flow Grading System The ASITN/SIR Collateral Flow Grading System has 4 grades: 0=no collaterals visible to the ischemic site. 1. slow collaterals to the periphery of the ischemic site with persistence of some of the defect 2. rapid collaterals to periphery of ischemic site with persistence of some of the defect and to only a portion of the ischemic territory 3. collaterals with slow but complete angiographic blood flow of the ischemic bed by the late venous phase 4. complete and rapid collateral blood flow to the vascular bed in the entire ischemic territory by retrograde perfusion. Grade 4 represents the best outcome. Grade 0 represents the worst outcome.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Improved Collaterals
ParticipantsEDAS Surgery
Improved Collaterals41
SecondaryAsymptomatic Cerebral Hemorrhage

Asymptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, defined as parenchymal or intraventricular bleeding detected in any imaging modality that is not associated with neurological deficits.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Asymptomatic Cerebral Hemorrhage
ParticipantsEDAS Surgery
Asymptomatic Cerebral Hemorrhage0

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
EDAS Surgery2/52 (3.8%)1/52 (1.9%)2/52 (3.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventEDAS Surgery
Death with 30 days of surgeryCardiac disorders1/52
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventEDAS Surgery
Wound dehisceneceMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/52

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)EDAS Surgery
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years39
>=65 years13
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)EDAS Surgery
Mean52.2 ± 15.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)EDAS Surgery
Female32
Male20
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)EDAS Surgery
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian18
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American8
White25
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)EDAS Surgery
United States52
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dusick JR, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Martin NA, Gonzalez NR. Indirect revascularization for nonmoyamoya intracranial arterial stenoses: clinical and angiographic outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2012 Jul;117(1):94-102. doi: 10.3171/2012.4.JNS111103. Epub 2012 May 4. PubMed 22559848 ↗
  • Gonzalez NR, Liebeskind DS, Dusick JR, Mayor F, Saver J. Intracranial arterial stenoses: current viewpoints, novel approaches, and surgical perspectives. Neurosurg Rev. 2013 Apr;36(2):175-84; discussion 184-5. doi: 10.1007/s10143-012-0432-z. Epub 2012 Oct 25. PubMed 23097149 ↗
  • Dusick JR, Gonzalez NR, Martin NA. Clinical and angiographic outcomes from indirect revascularization surgery for Moyamoya disease in adults and children: a review of 63 procedures. Neurosurgery. 2011 Jan;68(1):34-43; discussion 43. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fc5ec2. PubMed 21150753 ↗
  • Gonzalez NR, Jiang H, Lyden P, Song S, Schlick K, Dumitrascu O, Quintero-Consuegra MD, Toscano JF, Liebeskind DS, Restrepo L, Rao N, Hinman J, Alexander MJ, Schievink W, Piantadosi S, Saver JL. Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive (ERSIAS) Phase-II objective performance criterion trial. Int J Stroke. 2021 Aug;16(6):701-709. doi: 10.1177/1747493020967256. Epub 2020 Oct 29. PubMed 33115382 ↗
  • Laiwalla AN, Ooi YC, Van De Wiele B, Ziv K, Brown A, Liou R, Saver JL, Gonzalez NR. Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 19;6(1):e009727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009727. PubMed 26787251 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 3, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2013, a primary completion of Jun 2018 and a completion of Jun 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in May 2019, 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 24, 2013
First posted
Mar 27, 2013
Start
Mar 2013
Primary completionActual
Jun 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 2018
Results first posted
May 10, 2019
Last update
May 10, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01819597
Responsible party
Nestor R. Gonzalez, MD, MSCR. (Professor of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2018
Completion
Jun 2018
Results posted
May 10, 2019
Last update
May 10, 2019

Study contacts

Nestor R Gonzalez, MD, MSCR
principal investigator · Cedars Sinai Neurosurgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion