An interventional study of Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) in Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, Intracranial Atherosclerosis and Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-10.
Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Stroke due to intracranial arterial atherosclerosis is a significant medical problem, carrying one of the highest rates of recurrent stroke despite best medical therapy, with annual recurrence rates as elevated as 25% in high risk groups.
The goal of this investigation is to advance a promising surgical treatment for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis - encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS). The investigation will test in a phase II futility trial the potential of EDAS for further development before proceeding with the design of a definitive clinical trial of EDAS Revascularization in patients with Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (ERSIAS).
The investigation is a 4-year futility trial to test the hypothesis that EDAS revascularization combined with aggressive medical therapy warrants further evaluation in a subsequent pivotal trial as an alternative to aggressive medical management alone for preventing the primary endpoint of stroke or death in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (Specific Aim 1). During the investigation the time course of collateralogenesis and perfusion improvement following EDAS will also be evaluated (Specific Aim 2.
Intracranial arterial atherosclerosis is a significant medical problem, with elevated rates of recurrent stroke despite medical therapy, with annual recurrence rates for ischemic stroke reported in the SAMMPRIS Trial as high as 12.2% in the intensive medical therapy arm. The incidence of recurrence stroke can be even higher in some high-risk groups, as high as 25% in African-Americans and females. The ultimate goal of this project is to advance a promising surgical treatment for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis - encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS). Compared with direct revascularization operations (bypass), EDAS has the advantages of being less technically demanding, avoiding temporary occlusion of cerebral vessels, and allowing gradual development of collateral circulation where the brain demands it, deterring early hyperperfusion and hemorrhage. There has been no systematic trial exploring the use of EDAS in cases of symptomatic, non-moyamoya intracranial arterial stenosis. Based on preliminary positive results, the investigators propose the long-term objective of demonstrating that EDAS improves the outcome in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis compared with aggressive medical therapy. This will require future phase III clinical trials. The present proposal has the purpose of testing in a phase II futility-design trial the potential of EDAS for further development before proceeding with the design of a definitive clinical trial of EDAS Revascularization in patients with Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (ERSIAS). The present project will be 4-year futility-design trial to determine if EDAS revascularization combined with aggressive medical therapy warrants further evaluation in a subsequent pivotal trial as an alternative to aggressive medical management alone for preventing the primary endpoint of stroke or death at two years in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (Specific Aim 1). During the investigation the investigators will systematically evaluate the time course of collateralogenesis and perfusion improvement following EDAS by using quantitative and semiquantitative perfusion MRI studies (Specific Aim 2). The new knowledge generated by this study on understanding the role of collateral circulation in stroke pathophysiology, patient selection, and use of non-invasive imaging will be useful not only for EDAS evaluation but potentially next generation stents and future novel medical therapies, such as use of angiogenic growth factors and/or endothelial stem cells.
97 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Arteriosclerosis; 43 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 180 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Intracranial Arteriosclerosis.
Browse Intracranial Arteriosclerosis studies →Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 455 studies on the registry; 108 are open to participants now.
Of its 65 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
TIA or non-severe stroke within 30 days of enrollment attributed to 70% to 99% stenosis* of a major intracranial artery (carotid artery or MCA)
*May be diagnosed by TCD, MRA, or CTA to qualify, but must be confirmed by catheter angiography as per usual clinical practice.
Age ≥30 years and ≤80 years
* Patients 30 to 49 years of age are required to meet at least 1 additional criteria (i-vi) provided below to qualify for the study. This additional requirement is to increase the likelihood that the symptomatic intracranial stenosis in patients 30 to 49 years is atherosclerotic: i. Insulin-dependent diabetes for at least 15 years ii. At least 2 of the following atherosclerotic risk factors: hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive therapy); dyslipidemia (LDL ≥130 mg/dL or HDL ≤40 mg/dL or fasting triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL or on lipid lowering therapy); smoking; non-insulin-dependent diabetes or insulin-dependent diabetes of \<15 years duration; family history of any of the following: myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass, coronary angioplasty or stenting, stroke, carotid endarterectomy or stenting, and peripheral vascular surgery in parent or sibling who was \< 55 years of age for men or \< 65 for women at the time of the event.
iii. History of any of the following: myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass, coronary angioplasty or stenting, carotid endarterectomy or stenting, or peripheral vascular surgery for atherosclerotic disease iv. Any stenosis of an extracranial carotid or vertebral artery, another intracranial artery, subclavian artery, coronary artery, iliac or femoral artery, other lower or upper extremity artery, mesenteric artery, or renal artery that was documented by noninvasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography and is considered atherosclerotic v. Aortic arch atheroma documented by noninvasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography vi. Any aortic aneurysm documented by noninvasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography that is considered atherosclerotic
Exclusion Criteria:
Surgical Specific Exclusion Criteria:
In addition to those enumerated above, given the surgical nature of the intervention for patients failing best medical therapy, the following are additional exclusion criteria:
EDAS surgery is an established form of indirect revascularization. The study arm in this study will receive EDAS surgery
Procedure: Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS)
The operation is a form of indirect revascularization or EC-IC bypass, performed under general endotracheal anesthesia, with intraoperative electroencephalographic monitoring. The surgery consists in the dissection and relocation of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and middle meningeal artery (MMA) branches, which are separated from their surrounding tissues under microscopic visualization and re-routed through a craniotomy to be placed intracranially in close proximity to the branches of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The MCA branches are dissected in the arachnoid space and the STA and MMA are kept in position with microsutures to the arachnoid or MMA dural cuffs, maintaining close contact between the EC and MCA branches.
Also known as: Indirect revascularization, Indirect bypass, EC-IC revascularization, EC-IC indirect bypass, EC-IC indirect revascularization
Stroke or Death in the Territory of Qualifying Artery
The primary study endpoint is the number of participants with any stroke or death within 30 days after enrollment, or any ischemic stroke or death attributable to ischemia in the territory of the qualifying artery at one year. Ischemic stroke is defined as a new focal neurological deficit of sudden onset, lasting at least 24 hours and not associated with CT or MRI findings of hemorrhage.
Time frame: 1 year
Myocardial Infarction
Number of participants with heart attack within 30 days of surgery
Time frame: 30 days
Major Non-stroke Hemorrhage
Number of participants with systemic hemorrhage, subdural or epidural hemorrhages
Time frame: 2 years
Functional Outcome
Proportion of participants with good functional outcome at the end of follow-up measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). That is with mRS scores between 0 and 2. Modified Rankin Scale Score and Description: 0 - No symptoms at all 1. \- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2. \- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3. \- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4. \- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5. \- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention 6. \- Dead
Time frame: 2 years
Cognitive Outcome
Mean cognitive outcome at the end of follow-up measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Scores on the MoCA scale range between 0 and 30. Higher values represent a better outcome. A normal score on the MoCA scale is 26 or higher.
Time frame: 2 years
Improved Collaterals
Number of participants with an increase by at least one grade on the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) Collateral Flow Grading System The ASITN/SIR Collateral Flow Grading System has 4 grades: 0=no collaterals visible to the ischemic site. 1. slow collaterals to the periphery of the ischemic site with persistence of some of the defect 2. rapid collaterals to periphery of ischemic site with persistence of some of the defect and to only a portion of the ischemic territory 3. collaterals with slow but complete angiographic blood flow of the ischemic bed by the late venous phase 4. complete and rapid collateral blood flow to the vascular bed in the entire ischemic territory by retrograde perfusion. Grade 4 represents the best outcome. Grade 0 represents the worst outcome.
Time frame: 1 year
Asymptomatic Cerebral Hemorrhage
Asymptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, defined as parenchymal or intraventricular bleeding detected in any imaging modality that is not associated with neurological deficits.
Time frame: 1 year
Patients were recruited at UCLA Medical Center and Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.
| Milestone | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Started | 52 |
| Completed | 52 |
| Not completed | 0 |
The primary study endpoint is the number of participants with any stroke or death within 30 days after enrollment, or any ischemic stroke or death attributable to ischemia in the territory of the qualifying artery at one year. Ischemic stroke is defined as a new focal neurological deficit of sudden onset, lasting at least 24 hours and not associated with CT or MRI findings of hemorrhage.
| Participants | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Stroke or Death in the Territory of Qualifying Artery | 5 |
Number of participants with heart attack within 30 days of surgery
| Participants | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Myocardial Infarction | 1 |
Number of participants with systemic hemorrhage, subdural or epidural hemorrhages
| Participants | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Major Non-stroke Hemorrhage | 0 |
Proportion of participants with good functional outcome at the end of follow-up measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). That is with mRS scores between 0 and 2. Modified Rankin Scale Score and Description: 0 - No symptoms at all 1. \- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2. \- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3. \- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4. \- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5. \- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention 6. \- Dead
| Participants | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Functional Outcome | 45 |
Mean cognitive outcome at the end of follow-up measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Scores on the MoCA scale range between 0 and 30. Higher values represent a better outcome. A normal score on the MoCA scale is 26 or higher.
| MoCA Score | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Cognitive Outcome | 25.5 ± 4.1 |
Number of participants with an increase by at least one grade on the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) Collateral Flow Grading System The ASITN/SIR Collateral Flow Grading System has 4 grades: 0=no collaterals visible to the ischemic site. 1. slow collaterals to the periphery of the ischemic site with persistence of some of the defect 2. rapid collaterals to periphery of ischemic site with persistence of some of the defect and to only a portion of the ischemic territory 3. collaterals with slow but complete angiographic blood flow of the ischemic bed by the late venous phase 4. complete and rapid collateral blood flow to the vascular bed in the entire ischemic territory by retrograde perfusion. Grade 4 represents the best outcome. Grade 0 represents the worst outcome.
| Participants | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Improved Collaterals | 41 |
Asymptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, defined as parenchymal or intraventricular bleeding detected in any imaging modality that is not associated with neurological deficits.
| Participants | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Asymptomatic Cerebral Hemorrhage | 0 |
Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDAS Surgery | 2/52 (3.8%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | 2/52 (3.8%) |
| Event | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Death with 30 days of surgeryCardiac disorders | 1/52 |
| Event | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Wound dehisceneceMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 2/52 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 39 |
| >=65 years | 13 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Mean | 52.2 ± 15.5 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| Female | 32 |
| Male | 20 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 |
| Asian | 18 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 8 |
| White | 25 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | EDAS Surgery |
|---|---|
| United States | 52 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
The record gives a start of Mar 2013, a primary completion of Jun 2018 and a completion of Jun 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in May 2019, 11 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis →